Project Management migration

Migrate from Project Risk Manager to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Project Risk Manager and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Project Risk Manager logo

Project Risk Manager

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Project Risk Manager and Asana.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Project Risk Manager to Asana is a specialization-to-generalization migration. Project Risk Manager organizes work around a dedicated risk register: Risks with probability and impact ratings, linked Mitigation Actions, parent Projects, and categorization picklists. Asana has no native risk management module but provides the custom field infrastructure to reconstruct one using Tasks as risk records, custom number fields for probability and impact, a custom dropdown for risk category, and subtasks for mitigation actions. We extract whatever manual exports the customer can generate from Project Risk Manager (no public API exists), normalize the risk taxonomy, and load everything into Asana Projects via the REST API with chunking and error retry. Workflows, automations, and any risk-triggered alerts do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana's Workflow Builder.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Project Risk Manager logo

Project Risk Manager

What's pushing teams away

  • With only six verified reviews on Capterra and minimal presence on G2, the tool has low community visibility, making it harder for teams to validate long-term viability before committing.
  • No documented public API is referenced in available documentation, which limits automation options and makes data portability a manual, error-prone process.
  • Integration with CRM, ERP, or time-tracking tools is not prominently documented, frustrating teams that need cross-system risk context.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Project Risk Manager objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Project Risk Manager object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Project Risk Manager

Risk

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Each Project Risk Manager Risk record maps to an Asana Task within the appropriate Project. The risk title becomes the task name; risk description migrates as the task description. We map probability and impact scores to custom number fields prm_probability__c and prm_impact__c on the task. Risk status (Open, Mitigated, Closed, Accepted) maps to a custom dropdown field prm_risk_status__c. The task is created in the destination Project that corresponds to the risk's parent Project in Project Risk Manager.

Project Risk Manager

Mitigation Action

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Mitigation Actions linked to a parent Risk in Project Risk Manager map to Asana Subtasks of the migrated risk Task. The action text becomes the subtask name; owner email resolves to the assignee in Asana (unmatched owners flagged for manual reassignment); due date migrates to the subtask due date field; status maps to the subtask completed flag or a custom prm_action_status__c field if the source uses custom status values beyond open and closed.

Project Risk Manager

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Project Risk Manager Project records map directly to Asana Projects. The project name and description migrate as-is. We use the project name as the Asana Project name and create the project structure before any risk Task imports so that the parent relationship is satisfied at import time. If the source project has a start or end date, we set the corresponding Asana project dates.

Project Risk Manager

Risk Category

maps to

Asana

Custom Dropdown Field

lossy
Fully supported

Project Risk Manager risk categories (e.g., Technical, Financial, Operational, Compliance) are stored as picklist values. We recreate the full category taxonomy as a global custom dropdown field prm_risk_category__c on the Task object in Asana and map the source picklist values directly. If the destination Asana workspace already has a comparable field, we map to the existing field to avoid duplication.

Project Risk Manager

Risk Owner

maps to

Asana

Assignee

1:1
Fully supported

Risk owners in Project Risk Manager are extracted by email address. We attempt to match each owner email to an Asana User in the destination workspace via the Asana Users API. Owners with no matching Asana User are flagged in a reconciliation report for the customer's admin to provision before the migration proceeds. Owner assignment is set on the migrated Task at import time.

Project Risk Manager

Risk Status

maps to

Asana

Custom Field or Section

lossy
Fully supported

Project Risk Manager status values (Open, Mitigated, Closed, Accepted) migrate as a custom dropdown field prm_risk_status__c on the Task. If the customer prefers a section-based approach, we alternatively map status to Asana Sections within the Project and move tasks between sections during migration. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping. Migrations using sections require additional section management in the import script.

Project Risk Manager

Risk Probability

maps to

Asana

Custom Number Field

lossy
Fully supported

Project Risk Manager probability scores (numeric or percentage) map to a custom number field prm_probability__c on the Task. We preserve the original scale (e.g., 1-5 or 0-100) as specified by the customer during scoping. If the source uses descriptive probability labels (Low, Medium, High), we map them to numeric equivalents agreed upon during field mapping.

Project Risk Manager

Risk Impact

maps to

Asana

Custom Number Field

lossy
Fully supported

Project Risk Manager impact scores map to a custom number field prm_impact__c on the Task using the same scale logic as probability. Some customers use a combined Risk Score (Probability x Impact) in Project Risk Manager; we calculate this as a formula field prm_risk_score__c in Asana using the two migrated values if the Advanced plan is in use, or document the calculation for manual use.

Project Risk Manager

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

File attachments linked to Project Risk Manager risk records are extracted and uploaded to the corresponding Asana Task via the Asana Attachments API. Asana's API does not support attachments larger than 100 MB per the official documentation; attachments exceeding this are flagged for the customer to host externally and link as a URL instead. We re-link all successfully migrated attachments to the correct target task after upload.

Project Risk Manager

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Risk-level comments and discussion threads are exported with a timestamp and author from Project Risk Manager. We import them as Asana Task stories (comments) on the migrated Task, preserving the author name and timestamp. If the author email does not match an Asana workspace member, the comment is posted under the migration account with a note indicating the original author.

Project Risk Manager

Risk Register Metadata

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Any custom metadata fields on Risk records (e.g., Risk ID, Root Cause, Contingency Plan, Escalation Flag) are mapped to additional custom fields on the Task. We pre-create all required custom fields in Asana before migration begins and validate that the field types match (text, number, date, dropdown) to avoid API errors during insert.

Project Risk Manager

Timestamp Fields

maps to

Asana

Created At and Modified At

1:1
Fully supported

Project Risk Manager created date, modified date, and any last-assessed date on Risk records are preserved in Asana using the created_at and modified_at task properties. We set these at insert time via the Asana API to preserve the original historical record of when each risk was identified and last updated.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Project Risk Manager logo

Project Risk Manager gotchas

High

No documented public API for data export

Medium

Undocumented tier-specific field availability

Medium

No verified review base for long-term viability assessment

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Project Risk Manager has no documented public API for export

    Project Risk Manager does not publish a public REST or GraphQL API in its available documentation. All migrations from this platform therefore rely on admin-panel exports that the customer generates manually, or on screen-scraped data if no export is available. Before migration, we ask the customer to identify what exports are available in their account settings and confirm whether all risk records, mitigation actions, and linked fields are present in the output. If a full export is not available, we request manual data dumps and extend the timeline accordingly to account for data entry or normalization work.

  • Asana CSV imports can misalign custom dropdown field values

    Asana's CSV import interface has a documented bug where custom dropdown field values in the preview can differ from the imported result (e.g., a value appearing as 'Year 8' in preview but importing as 'Year 9'). We avoid CSV imports for custom field values and instead use the Asana REST API to set dropdown field values directly on each task after creation, bypassing the import UI entirely. This adds API call overhead but ensures field values match the source exactly.

  • Asana attachment API limits files to 100 MB

    Asana's Attachments API does not support files larger than 100 MB. If the Project Risk Manager export contains attachments exceeding this limit, those files are flagged in the migration report and not uploaded. We recommend the customer host oversized files externally (SharePoint, Google Drive, Dropbox) and add the external URL as a task field or link. This is an Asana platform constraint, not a migration tooling limitation.

  • Risk categories may not align with existing Asana tags or fields

    Project Risk Manager's risk category taxonomy (e.g., Technical, Financial, Operational) may not match any existing custom field or tag set in the destination Asana workspace. We create a new global custom dropdown field prm_risk_category__c during schema setup and populate it from the source. If the customer already has a risk category field in Asana with different values, we map during transformation rather than overwriting existing data. Migrations with large category taxonomies may require extended mapping time.

  • Mitigation action hierarchies may flatten during migration

    If Project Risk Manager supports multi-level mitigation action hierarchies (sub-actions under actions), Asana's subtask model is limited to a single level of nesting. We flatten any multi-level action trees into top-level subtasks of the parent risk Task during migration and flag the flattening in the migration report. The customer's admin can reorganize action nesting post-migration if needed.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Project Risk Manager to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and export availability check

    We audit the source Project Risk Manager account to identify all record types present: Risks, Mitigation Actions, Projects, Risk Categories, and any custom fields. We ask the customer to generate whatever exports are available from their admin panel (CSV, Excel, or JSON) and to confirm whether all linked fields appear in the output. If no structured export is available, we request access to a sandbox or trial environment and assess the feasibility of a manual data dump. The discovery output is a written migration scope document listing every object, record count estimate, and known export gaps.

  2. Schema design in Asana

    We design the destination Asana schema: custom fields for probability (prm_probability__c), impact (prm_impact__c), risk status (prm_risk_status__c), and risk category (prm_risk_category__c). We create these as global custom fields on the Task object in the destination workspace. We also create the Project structure matching the source Project Risk Manager projects before any task import. If the customer uses Asana Advanced or Enterprise, we configure formula fields for risk score calculation. All schema setup uses the Asana API and is validated in a test workspace before the production migration.

  3. Data normalization and transformation

    We normalize the source export data: map probability and impact values to the agreed numeric scale, translate risk categories to the destination dropdown values, resolve owner email addresses to Asana User GIDs via the Asana Users API, and parse mitigation actions into a parent-child structure linked to their parent risk Task. Any malformed or incomplete records are flagged in a pre-import data quality report. We transform CSV or Excel exports into the JSON format required by the Asana Task creation API.

  4. Owner reconciliation and user provisioning

    We extract every distinct owner email from the Project Risk Manager export and query the Asana Users API to match against existing workspace members. Owners without a matching Asana User go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Asana admin provisions missing users (active or inactive depending on whether the original owner is still active) before record import begins. Migration cannot proceed past this step because assignee references must be valid Asana User GIDs at insert time.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Projects first (to establish the parent structure), then Risks as Tasks (with probability, impact, status, and category fields set via API), then Mitigation Actions as Subtasks (linked to their parent risk Task). Attachments upload after task creation with individual retry logic for files under 100 MB. Comments import last as task stories. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report showing records created, updated, skipped, and failed before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze writes in Project Risk Manager during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We validate a randomized 5-10 percent sample of migrated tasks against the source export to confirm field accuracy. We deliver a written inventory of any risk-triggered workflows or alerts that existed in Project Risk Manager with recommended Asana Workflow Builder equivalents. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild automations as part of the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Project Risk Manager logo

Project Risk Manager

Source

Strengths

  • Free tier for subscriber plus one team member eliminates upfront cost for initial adoption.
  • Structured risk workflow (identify, categorize, rank, respond) provides opinionated guidance rather than a blank slate.
  • User-friendly design cited by reviewers as reducing onboarding friction for non-specialist risk owners.
  • 24/7 live support listed as an option differentiates from tools with limited support availability.
  • Supports web, Android, and iOS deployment giving teams mobile access to risk data.

Weaknesses

  • Extremely limited third-party review presence with only six Capterra reviews, making independent validation difficult.
  • No documented public API limits automation, integration, and migration options to manual export processes.
  • Integration ecosystem is not documented, which concerns teams needing cross-tool workflows.
  • Tier-specific feature differences are not publicly disclosed, creating uncertainty about what data exists where.
  • Lacks the community resources and plugin ecosystem of established PM platforms.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Project Risk Manager and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    4 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Project Risk Manager: Not publicly documented..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Project Risk Manager doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Project Risk Manager to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Project Risk Manager to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Project Risk Manager to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Project Risk Manager to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts with clean admin-panel exports and fewer than 2,000 risk records. Migrations where Project Risk Manager requires manual data dumps, where the customer has complex mitigation action hierarchies, or where owner reconciliation requires provisioning new Asana users move to five to eight weeks because of normalization effort and lookup resolution time.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Project Risk Manager.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day