Project Management migration

Migrate from Husky to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Husky and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Husky logo

Husky

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

50%

6 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Husky and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Husky to Microsoft Project is a structural migration that requires significant manual preparation on the source side and careful schema design on the destination. Husky does not publish a REST or GraphQL API, so we rely on CSV exports from the UI and, where coordinated with your IT team, direct database access to extract record data. Microsoft Project has no native client object, so Husky Client records must route to a SharePoint list, a connected CRM, or a custom-built lookup table. Recurring Job templates carry their metadata but not their active schedules; we document the recurrence rules for your admin to rebuild. We do not migrate finalized Invoices because they are locked financial records under your accounting jurisdiction. Workflows and automations in Husky do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory of every active rule requiring rebuild in Microsoft Project Desktop or Project Online.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Husky logo

Husky

What's pushing teams away

  • GBP-denominated pricing (£300/month Fundamental up to £1,000/month Limitless) creates currency-conversion friction for non-UK customers and may exceed local-currency competitors.
  • Per-tier user caps (10 users on Fundamental, 15 on Quantum, 20 on Limitless) force tier upgrades as headcount grows, even when feature needs do not change.
  • Smaller integration ecosystem than mainstream FSM tools — Husky covers the major business systems but lacks the deep marketplace of platforms like Salesforce Field Service or ServiceTitan.
  • Reporting depth in the standard tiers lags dedicated BI tools, and customers often need to pair Husky with external reporting platforms.
  • Limited public reviewer presence on G2 and Capterra compared with established FSM leaders.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Husky objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Husky object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Husky

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Plan (MPP or XML)

1:1
Fully supported

Husky Projects map to a Microsoft Project plan file or Project Online project. We extract project name, status, start and end dates, description, and Owner assignment from Husky and write them to the project-level fields in the destination. Active versus archived status in Husky maps to IsActive in Project Online or a Project Plan flag. If the customer maintains multiple active Husky projects, each becomes a separate Project plan on the destination side.

Husky

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Husky Tasks map to Microsoft Project Tasks with task name, start date, finish date, duration, and percent complete preserved. Parent-child subtask hierarchy in Husky maps to the Outline Level and Summary Task structure in Microsoft Project. We set Summary tasks for parent records and convert them to collapsed outline groups in the destination. Task-level Owner assignments from Husky map to the Project Online Resource pool or desktop Resource names.

Husky

Client

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint List / Custom Lookup

lossy
Fully supported

Microsoft Project has no native client or account object. Husky Client records (name, contact details, billing address, tax settings) do not map directly into a standard Project field. We export Client data as a structured CSV and recommend hosting it as a SharePoint list or a Power Apps lookup table connected to the Project Online site. We document the field mapping between Husky Client columns and the SharePoint columns so the customer's admin can configure the lookup or hyperlink in the project plan.

Husky

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Assignment Work Field

1:many
Fully supported

Husky Time Entries link a user to a project or task with a duration or start/end timestamp and a billable/non-billable flag. Microsoft Project does not have a native time entry object; instead, task effort is tracked as Work and Duration at the task level with Resource assignments. We aggregate Husky time entries by task and populate the Work field in Microsoft Project, preserving the total hours and the billable flag as a custom flag field on the task. Non-billable hours are noted separately for reconciliation.

Husky

Recurring Job

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task + Custom Recurrence Field

1:1
Fully supported

Husky Recurring Jobs store a frequency, interval, and last-run date as template metadata. This data does not recreate an active recurring schedule in Microsoft Project because Project has no native recurrence engine for tasks. We export the job template name, the recurrence rule (daily, weekly, monthly, interval), the last-run timestamp, and the associated task list as a structured CSV. The customer recreates the recurrence logic manually using Power Automate or a scheduled task reminder. We document this as a post-migration step in the handoff checklist.

Husky

Custom Field (Projects)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Fields (Project-level)

lossy
Fully supported

Husky allows per-tenant custom fields on Projects with non-standard names and data types. We enumerate all custom project fields during the discovery pass, classify each by type (text, picklist, date, number), and configure matching custom fields in the Microsoft Project plan or Project Online enterprise custom fields. Text picklists map to outline codes or flag fields; dates map to deadline or baseline date fields; numbers map to number custom fields. Any custom fields added after discovery require a supplemental mapping pass.

Husky

Custom Field (Tasks)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom Fields (Task-level)

lossy
Fully supported

Husky task-level custom fields vary by tenant configuration and can include flags, text notes, or numeric cost fields. We map these to Microsoft Project task custom fields: text fields become Notes or flag fields; numeric fields become number custom fields; date fields become deadline or baseline fields. We do not automate the recreation of custom picklist values if the destination plan uses a fixed enterprise field definition; the customer's admin configures the enterprise custom field in Project Online PWA settings before migration.

Husky

Custom Field (Clients)

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint List Column

lossy
Fully supported

Husky Client custom fields (billing tier, account manager, contract status) are exported as additional columns in the Client CSV and mapped to SharePoint list columns on the destination client lookup list. We document the type mapping for each custom field so the SharePoint column types are configured correctly by the customer's admin during the SharePoint list setup phase.

Husky

User / Owner

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

Husky Owner records map to Microsoft Project Resources. We resolve each Husky Owner by email, extracting display name, role, and active/inactive status. In Project Online, resources must be added to the PWA Resource Center before they can be assigned to tasks. We export a resource import CSV with Name, Email, Type (User or Material), and Max Units for the customer's admin to bulk-provision before task assignment migration. Archived Husky users are flagged for deferred provisioning.

Husky

Invoice

maps to

Microsoft Project

No equivalent — Reconciliation Report

1:1
Fully supported

Husky finalized invoices are locked financial records under the customer's accounting jurisdiction and are not imported into Microsoft Project, which has no invoice object. We export invoice history as a structured reconciliation report (CSV) containing invoice number, client name, date, amount, and status. The customer routes this to their accounting team or CPA for continuity. This is documented as a manual step outside the migration scope.

Husky

Attachment (Project)

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint Document Library

lossy
Fully supported

Husky project attachments are exported from the platform and linked to the corresponding Project Online site or SharePoint document library. We identify all attachment URLs or files during the extraction pass, download them, and organize them by project into a folder structure matching the Husky hierarchy. The customer provisions the SharePoint destination library before migration; we deliver the file manifest and a folder mapping document.

Husky

Job Template

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Template

1:1
Fully supported

Husky recurring job templates with a defined task structure are exported as template metadata. They do not become live project templates in Microsoft Project automatically, but we provide a template conversion document that maps the Husky template task list to a Project plan outline. The customer's admin uses this document to build a reusable MPP or Project Online template manually, which can then be applied to new projects going forward.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Husky logo

Husky gotchas

High

No documented public API for automated extraction

High

Finalized invoices are not transferable records

Medium

Custom field schema varies by tenant and changes without notice

Medium

Recurring job recurrence rules do not migrate as live schedules

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Husky has no public API for automated extraction

    Husky does not publish a REST or GraphQL API for third-party integrations. We cannot run an automated connector and must use CSV exports from the Husky UI and, where coordinated with the customer's IT team, direct database access to extract structured record data. This extends discovery timelines compared to platform pairs with open APIs. We raise the export method in the first scoping call and agree on an approach — UI CSV versus database — before moving to the migration phase. Any delay in export access directly affects the migration timeline.

  • Microsoft Project has no native client object

    Husky Client records (name, billing address, contact details, tax settings) have no direct equivalent in Microsoft Project. Project does not maintain a contact or account object within the schedule file or Project Online by default. We export Client data as a structured CSV and recommend hosting it as a SharePoint list or Power Apps lookup table connected to the Project Online site. The customer's admin must provision the SharePoint destination and configure the lookup column. If the customer also uses Dynamics 365 or a CRM, Client records route there instead. This is a manual configuration step outside the data migration scope.

  • Recurring Job schedules do not transfer as active recurrences

    Husky Recurring Jobs store a frequency, interval, and last-run date but these rules are not exportable as re-triggerable schedules in Microsoft Project. Project has no native recurring task engine. We export the job template definition, recurrence metadata, last-run timestamp, and associated task list. The customer recreates the recurrence logic manually using Power Automate or by building a reusable Project plan template. We document every recurrence rule in the post-migration handoff checklist with enough detail for the admin to rebuild each schedule at the destination.

  • Custom field schema varies by tenant and requires manual discovery per account

    Husky allows per-account custom fields on Projects, Tasks, and Clients with names and data types that are not standardized across accounts. We run a full schema discovery pass before mapping, enumerating every custom field and its type. Any custom fields added to Husky after discovery require a supplemental mapping pass before migration resumes. We recommend scheduling the migration window to minimize post-discovery configuration changes on the source side and allocating admin time for SharePoint custom field setup on the destination side.

  • Time entries require aggregation and loss of per-entry granularity

    Husky time entries are individual records linking a user, a task, a duration, and a billable flag. Microsoft Project aggregates effort at the task level using Work and Duration fields, not as discrete time entry rows. We aggregate Husky time entries by task to populate the Work field in the destination, but the per-entry granularity (who logged time on which day with what notes) does not preserve as individual records. We export a detailed time entry report separately so the customer can cross-reference billing in their accounting system.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Husky to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Export method agreement and Husky schema discovery

    We run a schema discovery pass against the Husky tenant to enumerate all Projects, Tasks, Clients, Time Entries, Recurring Jobs, and custom field definitions. Because Husky has no public API, we agree on an export method in the first scoping call — UI CSV exports, coordinated database access, or a hybrid approach — and document the extraction steps for the customer's IT team to execute. We flag any locked or incomplete records and establish a migration window start date when the source data export is complete.

  2. Destination environment assessment and SharePoint planning

    We assess the Microsoft Project destination environment: desktop client, Project Online, or Project for the Web. We identify whether the customer has an existing SharePoint tenant for document storage and client lookup lists, or whether SharePoint provisioning is required. We document the custom field schema needed in Project Online PWA (or the desktop custom field definitions) and the SharePoint list structure for Client records, and the customer configures these before we begin data migration.

  3. Resource and Owner mapping

    We extract every distinct Husky Owner referenced on Projects, Tasks, and Time Entries and map them to Microsoft Project Resources. We generate a resource import CSV with Name, Email, and Resource Type. The customer's admin provisions resources in Project Online PWA Resource Center or the desktop resource sheet before task assignment migration begins. Any Husky Owners without a destination account are flagged in a reconciliation queue for the admin to provision.

  4. Sandbox or pilot migration

    We run a pilot migration of two to three representative Husky projects into a Project Online site or a local MPP file. We validate that task hierarchy (subtasks and summary tasks), Owner assignments, custom field values, and time entry aggregations map correctly. The customer's project manager or PMO lead spot-checks 15-20 records against the source and signs off the mapping before production migration begins. Corrections to the field map happen here, not in production.

  5. Production migration in record order

    We run production migration in dependency order: Projects first (as plan files or Project Online project entries), then Tasks with hierarchy preserved as outline levels and summary tasks, then Time Entry aggregation into task Work fields, then custom field values applied per task and project. Client records are delivered as a structured CSV for SharePoint list population. Recurring Job metadata is delivered as a separate CSV with recurrence rule documentation. Attachment files are organized by project folder and delivered with a manifest for the customer's admin to upload to SharePoint.

  6. Cutover, validation, and documentation handoff

    We freeze Husky access to writes during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window. We deliver a reconciliation report comparing record counts and spot-checking custom field values between the final Husky export and the Microsoft Project destination. We deliver the Recurring Job inventory document with recurrence rule details, the time entry aggregation report for accounting reference, and the Client CSV for SharePoint configuration. We support a one-week hypercare window for record-level reconciliation issues.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Husky logo

Husky

Source

Strengths

  • Straightforward project and task structure with clear ownership assignment
  • Time tracking at the task level enables accurate labor reporting across projects
  • Recurring job templates reduce setup friction for repetitive work
  • Client management consolidates billing and project history in one place
  • Low administrative overhead compared to heavyweight enterprise PM platforms

Weaknesses

  • No published API documentation makes programmatic data extraction non-standard
  • Tenant-specific custom field configurations require manual discovery per account
  • Invoices are not exportable as live records, limiting financial history transfer
  • No clear bulk export mechanism, increasing manual effort during data gathering
  • Limited visibility into multi-currency or multi-entity setup without account review
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Husky and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Husky: Not publicly documented as a hard ceiling..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Husky doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Husky to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Husky to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Husky to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Husky to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 50 active projects with clean CSV exports and no complex custom field configurations. Migrations with large time entry histories (over 10,000 entries), complex multi-level task hierarchies, or incomplete Husky export methods requiring IT coordination move to six to ten weeks because of manual extraction work, schema discovery overhead, and SharePoint list setup for Client records. We define the timeline during scoping based on the export method agreed upon and the number of active projects.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Husky.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day