Project Management migration

Migrate from TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce logo

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from TeamBoard for Salesforce to Asana is a cross-platform migration that exits the Salesforce ecosystem entirely. TeamBoard stores its entire data model as Salesforce custom objects—TB_Project__c, TB_Task__c, TB_Resource__c, and TB_TimeEntry__c—which means the migration pulls from the Salesforce REST and Bulk APIs before transforming and loading into Asana via its REST API with batch chunking. The primary structural differences are that TeamBoard Work Boards (the Kanban organizing layer) have no direct Asana equivalent, so we map board columns to a custom-field taxonomy; TeamBoard's approval workflow state on timesheets resets because Asana has no native approval routing for time entries; and TeamBoard's randomly generated task IDs have no referential value in Asana, so we use Asana's own GIDs as the canonical reference post-migration. We do not migrate Salesforce report definitions tied to TeamBoard custom objects, approval workflow configurations, or vacation calendar entries as structured records. We deliver a written inventory of each for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana or its native integrations.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce logo

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

What's pushing teams away

  • Users report data inaccuracy in TeamBoard for Monday.com reviews, where task assignments and timelines diverge from what was entered.
  • Upgraded plans are perceived as expensive relative to the features provided, especially when comparing to standalone PM tools with broader functionality.
  • Random task ID generation with no sequential or relation-based structure makes it difficult to reference tasks in external reporting or exports.
  • The Freemium plan cap of 5 projects forces teams to upgrade or split data across multiple workspaces once they exceed the limit.
  • Salesforce's frequent platform updates occasionally break existing TeamBoard workflows, requiring admins to reconfigure integrations.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Project (TB_Project__c)

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

TeamBoard Projects map directly to Asana Projects. Each TB_Project__c record carries Name, StartDate, EndDate, Status, and Portfolio reference. We map Project Name to the Asana Project name, StartDate and DueDate to the Project's start and deadline dates, and Status to an Asana Project color indicator (green for On Track, yellow for At Risk, red for Off Track). Portfolio linkage migrates to Asana Portfolio membership. We use Asana's bulk project creation endpoint for batches of up to 100 projects per request.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Work Item (TB_Task__c)

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

TeamBoard Work Items map 1:1 to Asana Tasks within the corresponding Project. TB_Task__c fields (Name, Description, StartDate, DueDate, Status, Assignee) map to Asana name, notes, start_on, due_on, completion, and assignee. Sub-items (TB_SubItem__c) map to Asana Subtasks nested under the parent Task. The parent Work Board reference resolves to the containing Project during transform. Task ordering within a Section preserves the TeamBoard sequence order.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Work Board

maps to

Asana

Project + Section + Custom Field

1:many
Fully supported

TeamBoard Work Boards represent a Kanban-style organizing view with configurable columns. Asana has no Work Board equivalent, so we decompose the board into Project Sections (representing columns) and a custom-field taxonomy for column-specific metadata. Board-level configuration objects migrate as a JSON-encoded custom field on the Project for audit. If the TeamBoard org uses multiple board views per project, each board becomes a separate Section set within the same Project.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Resource Assignment (TB_Resource__c)

maps to

Asana

User + Project Membership

1:1
Fully supported

TeamBoard Resource records link a Salesforce User to a TB_Task__c with allocation percentage and date range. We resolve TB_Resource__c assignments by matching the Salesforce User email to an Asana User (by workspace member invitation), then write the allocation percentage to an Asana custom numeric field on the Task and set the Task assignee to the resolved Asana User. The date range for allocation becomes the Task start_on and due_on. If an Asana User does not yet exist, it enters a reconciliation queue for the admin to provision.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Time Entry (TB_TimeEntry__c)

maps to

Asana

Task Time Tracking

1:1
Fully supported

TeamBoard time entries linked to TB_Task__c migrate to Asana Task-level time tracking entries. Each TB_TimeEntry__c record carries Hours, LoggedDate, User reference, and Task reference. We set the Asana Task to have time tracking enabled and create a time entry with the original date and hours value. The logged User resolves via email lookup. Total hours per task aggregate in Asana's time tracking summary. Entries spanning multiple days create separate Asana time entries per day.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Timesheet (TB_Timesheet__c)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field + Tag (no approval routing)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamBoard Timesheets aggregate weekly or period-based time entries with an approval workflow (Pending, Approved, Rejected). Asana has no native timesheet approval routing. We migrate the timesheet records as tagged groupings of the underlying time entries, preserving the original period dates and the last-known approval status in a custom-field text value. We flag to the customer that approval routing must be rebuilt in Asana's native approval flows (available on Business and Enterprise) or via a third-party integration post-migration.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Portfolio (TB_Portfolio__c)

maps to

Asana

Portfolio

1:1
Fully supported

TeamBoard Portfolio records group multiple Work Boards (Projects) under a single oversight entity. Asana Portfolios at Business and Enterprise tiers serve the same function: a collection of Projects with progress, status, and workload views. We map TB_Portfolio__c Name to the Asana Portfolio name and link all migrated Projects that reference the Portfolio. Portfolio-level metadata (owner, description) migrates to Portfolio-level custom fields.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Vacation Entry (TB_Vacation__c)

maps to

Asana

Calendar Integration or Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

TeamBoard vacation approval records carry employee, start date, end date, status, and approver. Asana has no native vacation or absence management object. We extract vacation entries as date-range records attached to the relevant User's workspace as a tagged custom-field set (vacation_start, vacation_end, vacation_status). For organizations using a dedicated HR tool, we document the mapping for integration. Vacation approval workflow is not portable and must be configured in the destination HR system.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Custom Fields (TB custom fields on standard objects)

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

TeamBoard extends Salesforce standard and custom objects with additional fields for project metadata, task classification, and resource attributes. We perform Salesforce field-level discovery against the source org to enumerate all TB_-prefixed custom fields, their API names, data types, and picklist values. Each field maps to an equivalent Asana custom field of matching type (text, number, date, enum) created at the Project or Task level. Picklist values migrate as custom field options.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Report Definition

maps to

Asana

Not migrated (rebuild required)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamBoard reports are configured as Salesforce report types against TeamBoard custom objects. These report definitions cannot be exported as structured data. We export the underlying record data (Projects, Tasks, Time Entries, Resource allocations) in CSV and JSON formats so that equivalent Asana dashboards and reports can be configured. We deliver a written report inventory listing each TeamBoard report's metric, filter, and visualization type for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana's native reporting or a BI tool.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Approval Workflow Configuration

maps to

Asana

Not migrated (rebuild required)

lossy
Fully supported

TeamBoard's timesheet and vacation approval workflows are Salesforce Flow-based or declarative approval configurations attached to TB_Timesheet__c and TB_Vacation__c. These workflow definitions cannot be extracted as transferable automation code. We document the current approval chain (approver role, conditions, escalation path) and deliver a written recommendation for rebuilding in Asana's approval flows (Business and above) or a dedicated approval tool. The migration does not include post-migration workflow rebuild.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

WorkZone and Folder

maps to

Asana

Project Folder Structure or Tags

lossy
Fully supported

TeamBoard organizes Work Boards into Folders within a WorkZone hierarchy. Asana has no native folder concept within a workspace; projects exist as a flat list or within Teams. We map Folders to Asana Teams (for orgs that use Teams as the top-level grouping) or to a tagging convention that the customer defines during scoping. WorkZone-level metadata becomes workspace-level custom fields.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce logo

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce gotchas

High

Freemium project cap limits migration scope

High

TeamBoard custom objects require schema discovery

Medium

Salesforce API quota governs migration throughput

Medium

Approval workflow state resets on migration

Low

Report definitions are not portable

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Work Board columns have no native Asana equivalent

    TeamBoard Work Boards use configurable Kanban columns that teams customize for their workflow stages. Asana organizes Tasks within Sections, but Sections are project-level rather than a cross-project board view, and Asana has no native board visualization that persists column configuration across projects. We decompose Work Boards into Project Sections with column-specific metadata encoded as custom fields, and we document the board-to-section mapping for the customer's admin to configure any Asana Portfolio or dashboard views that replicate the board overview. Teams relying on board-level reporting across multiple projects need to adopt Asana Portfolios (Business tier) as the replacement visual layer.

  • Timesheet approval workflow state resets post-migration

    TeamBoard timesheet records carry a status field (Pending, Approved, Rejected) that reflects an active approval workflow tied to Salesforce Flow. Asana has no native timesheet approval object or routing mechanism. We export the timesheet records with their current approval status as a read-only custom field, but we flag that approval routing cannot carry forward. The destination system must replay approvals or implement a new workflow using Asana's native approval flows (Business and Enterprise) or a third-party approval tool. Teams that require historical approval audit trails should retain the TeamBoard export as a reference document.

  • TeamBoard schema discovery is required before field mapping

    TeamBoard stores its data in Salesforce custom objects with names like TB_Project__c, TB_Task__c, TB_Resource__c, and TB_TimeEntry__c that are not publicly documented in a schema reference. Before any field-level mapping begins, we run a schema discovery step against the source Salesforce org using the Tooling API to enumerate all TeamBoard custom objects, their fields, data types, and cross-object relationships. This prevents silent data loss on fields we did not know existed. The discovery output is reviewed with the customer before the migration field map is finalized.

  • Randomly generated TeamBoard task IDs carry no referential value

    TeamBoard generates task IDs without sequential or relational structure, making it difficult to reference tasks in external exports. Asana assigns its own Global ID (GID) to every task, project, and user as the canonical identifier post-migration. Any external references to TeamBoard task IDs in documents, spreadsheets, or other systems become stale after migration. We do not remap TeamBoard IDs to Asana GIDs as part of standard scope; if the customer requires ID cross-referencing for audit purposes, we document the ID mapping table separately.

  • Asana's Salesforce integration deprecation affects bidirectional sync planning

    Asana's AppExchange Salesforce integration is deprecated as of February 27, 2026. Teams migrating from TeamBoard to Asana while retaining Salesforce as their CRM must use Asana's native 'Salesforce in Asana' app (available on Business and Enterprise tiers) for future bidirectional sync. This is a configuration step post-migration and not part of the data migration scope. Teams that relied on TeamBoard for Salesforce-to-PM synchronization need to re-establish sync using the native Asana app after migration is complete.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce to Asana data migration

  1. Schema discovery against source Salesforce org

    We authenticate to the source Salesforce org and run a Tooling API schema discovery scan to enumerate all TB_-prefixed custom objects, their fields, data types, and foreign-key relationships to standard Salesforce objects (User, Account, Contact). We also extract the Work Board configuration, Portfolio-to-Project junction records, and any custom fields on TeamBoard standard objects. The discovery output is a schema map reviewed with the customer before the migration plan is finalized. We assess API usage during discovery to determine the Salesforce edition's rate limit headroom for subsequent bulk extraction.

  2. Destination schema design in Asana

    We design the Asana destination structure: Projects (mapped from TeamBoard Projects), Sections (mapped from Work Board columns), custom fields (mapped from TeamBoard custom Salesforce fields), and Portfolio groupings. For each custom field we define the Asana type (text, number, enum, date) matching the discovered Salesforce data type. We use Asana's bulk custom field creation endpoint for efficiency. Teams are provisioned as Asana Workspaces or Teams based on the customer's organizational structure. Schema is validated in a pre-production Asana workspace before the production migration begins.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a staging Asana workspace using a representative subset of TeamBoard data (at least one full Project with Tasks, Sub-items, Resource assignments, and Time Entries). The customer's project manager and admin review the migrated structure for completeness, correct section mapping, assignee resolution, time entry accuracy, and portfolio grouping. We correct any mapping errors identified in sandbox before the production migration begins. Sandbox validation typically takes three to five business days depending on customer review turnaround.

  4. User resolution and workspace provisioning

    We extract all Salesforce User references from TeamBoard Resource and Time Entry records and match them by email address against the destination Asana workspace membership. Users without an existing Asana account enter a reconciliation queue, and the customer's admin provisions Asana seats for any missing team members before production migration begins. Migration cannot proceed past the User resolution step because every Task assignee and time entry must reference a valid Asana User GID.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency sequence: Projects first (no dependencies), then Sections and custom fields within Projects, then Tasks with Sub-items resolved to the correct Project and Section, then Resource assignments (assignee lookup and allocation percentage as custom fields), then Time Entries linked to Tasks, then Timesheet records with status metadata, then Portfolio membership linking Projects to Portfolios. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Asana's bulk task creation endpoint (up to 100 tasks per request) with exponential backoff on rate-limit responses. Salesforce API usage is monitored throughout to avoid throttling concurrent integrations.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff

    We freeze TeamBoard writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration run, then mark Asana as the system of record. We deliver the migration reconciliation report with record counts by object, a schema map showing Asana custom field assignments, and a written inventory of TeamBoard approval workflows and report definitions requiring rebuild. We provide a one-week hypercare window to resolve any data quality issues raised by the customer's team. Approval workflow rebuild in Asana's native approval flows or a third-party tool is outside standard scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce logo

TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce

Source

Strengths

  • SOC 2 Type II certified and hosted on Google Cloud, meeting enterprise security and compliance requirements.
  • Fully Salesforce-native, meaning no separate login and data stays inside the existing Salesforce org.
  • Drag-and-drop resource scheduling and Gantt chart visualization with a shallow learning curve for Salesforce users.
  • Integrated time tracking and timesheet approval workflows eliminate the need for separate time management tools.
  • Freemium tier lets teams trial the full feature set on up to 5 projects before committing to a per-user paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Users report data inaccuracy in task timelines and assignments, which complicates migration scoping for historical accuracy.
  • Task IDs are randomly generated with no sequential or relational structure, making it harder to match records across systems.
  • Premium pricing at $19/user/month plus Salesforce licensing creates a combined cost that rivals standalone PM platforms.
  • Salesforce platform updates can break TeamBoard workflows unexpectedly, requiring ongoing maintenance by an admin.
  • Limited to Salesforce as the host platform, with no meaningful functionality outside the Salesforce environment.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce: Salesforce edition-dependent; varies from 15,000 to 100,000 API calls per day per org.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for teams with fewer than 50 Projects, 3,000 Tasks, and no complex timesheet history. Migrations with large time entry volumes (over 100,000 time entries), multi-level Work Board hierarchies, or extensive custom field schemas move to seven to twelve weeks because of schema discovery scope, field-level transformation, and Asana bulk API chunking across a high volume of records.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TeamBoard - Work Management & Project Management for Salesforce.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day