Project Management migration

Migrate from LiquidPlanner to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between LiquidPlanner and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

LiquidPlanner logo

LiquidPlanner

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

57%

8 of 14

objects map 1:1 between LiquidPlanner and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from LiquidPlanner to Asana is a methodology shift as much as a data migration. LiquidPlanner uses a probabilistic scheduling engine that adjusts task dates when resources or scope change, while Asana uses fixed start and end dates with a drag-to-reschedule interaction model. We handle that structural difference by converting range estimates to bounded fixed dates, flagging long dependency chains that relied on automatic propagation, and preserving the member assignment ratio on tasks that had multiple owners. Time tracking data migrates as a structured export since Asana has no native billing-grade timesheet module. We do not migrate automations, baselines, or portfolio health dashboards as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for your admin to rebuild in Asana's Rules and Timeline view.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

LiquidPlanner logo

LiquidPlanner

What's pushing teams away

  • Steep learning curve and opinionated methodology: teams that do not follow LiquidPlanner's scheduling logic spend months fighting the tool instead of using it.
  • Limited third-party integrations compared to modern PM platforms — many teams outgrow what is available and migrate to Jira, Asana, or Monday.com.
  • Customer service quality has declined since the Tempo acquisition, with multiple reviewers reporting slow or nonexistent support responses.
  • Predictive scheduling can produce confusing or unexpected date shifts when dependencies chain across many tasks, making it hard to communicate committed deadlines to clients.
  • LiquidPlanner Classic sunset on December 31, 2026 forces teams off a familiar platform, and Portfolio Manager itself sunsets December 31, 2027, creating uncertainty about long-term platform viability.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How LiquidPlanner objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a LiquidPlanner object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

LiquidPlanner

Workspace

maps to

Asana

Organization

lossy
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Workspaces contain all Projects, Members, and Settings for an organization. We map Workspace-level member lists and settings to the Asana Organization workspace. Workspace-level custom field definitions must be recreated as Asana custom fields within the organization's field library; the custom field values attached to Projects and Tasks migrate as typed field data. Workspace-level configurations (notification settings, billing rates) do not have a direct Asana equivalent and are documented in the migration inventory for the customer's admin.

LiquidPlanner

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We preserve the project name, description, status, baseline dates, and start date. Project-level custom field values migrate to Asana custom fields within the project. Project health indicators from LiquidPlanner do not have a native Asana equivalent and are flagged for manual review. LiquidPlanner's project hierarchy (parent-child project relationships) maps to Asana Portfolio structure.

LiquidPlanner

Package

maps to

Asana

Section or Subproject

1:1
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Packages are grouping containers within a Project that function like high-level phases or initiative buckets. We map Packages to Asana Sections within a Project, preserving the grouping structure and any custom field values attached to the Package. If the customer prefers a hierarchical structure, we can create subprojects under the parent Project and map Packages to those subprojects instead. The customer selects the approach during scoping.

LiquidPlanner

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Tasks are the core work item type and map directly to Asana Tasks. We migrate task names, descriptions, start dates, end dates, assignees, and custom field values. Range estimates (e.g., 3-5 days) from LiquidPlanner's predictive scheduling engine are converted to fixed start and end dates using the lower bound as start and upper bound as end, then flagged for the customer's PM to verify. Tasks that are part of a dependency chain of more than three steps are flagged individually because LiquidPlanner's auto-propagation will not replicate in Asana's Timeline.

LiquidPlanner

Sub-Task

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Sub-Tasks map to Asana Subtasks nested within the parent Task. We preserve the subtask name, description, dates, assignee, and custom field values. Subtasks in LiquidPlanner that have their own Sub-Tasks are flattened to two levels maximum in Asana (Task > Subtask), with any deeper nesting converted to checklist items on the second-level subtask. The nesting depth reduction is documented in the field mapping deliverable.

LiquidPlanner

Dependency

maps to

Asana

Dependency (Timeline)

lossy
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner supports finish-to-start, start-to-start, and wait-day dependencies. Asana's Timeline view supports finish-to-start dependencies natively. Start-to-start dependencies are converted to finish-to-start by adjusting the predecessor task's end date to align with the successor's start. Wait days (gaps between dependency-trigger and successor start) are added as an offset to the successor's start date or as a separate placeholder task, depending on gap length. Complex multi-step dependency chains are flagged individually during migration.

LiquidPlanner

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Milestones are zero-duration tasks with a target date. We preserve milestone names and dates as Asana Milestones. Milestones that drive downstream dependencies via LiquidPlanner's scheduling engine are flagged because the propagation behavior will not replicate in Asana; the customer's PM reviews and manually sets successor dates after migration.

LiquidPlanner

Member

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Members (email, name, role, billing rate) map to Asana Users. We resolve Members by email match. Members without a matching Asana User go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Billing rates from LiquidPlanner do not have an Asana equivalent; we preserve them in a custom field for reference or export to a timesheet system.

LiquidPlanner

Virtual Member

maps to

Asana

User or Contact

lossy
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Virtual Members are lightweight references for external clients or stakeholders without a full license. Asana has no concept of a partial user. We import Virtual Members as full Asana User accounts with an explicit [Virtual Member] prefix in the display name, or as Contacts in the customer's Asana organization if the customer prefers not to create user accounts for external parties. The customer selects the approach during scoping.

LiquidPlanner

Multi-Owner Task

maps to

Asana

Multiple Tasks (1:N split)

1:many
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner allows multiple Members assigned to a single Task with individual effort allocations. Asana supports only one assignee per task. We split each multi-owner task into individual task assignments in Asana, with the effort allocation ratio preserved as a note on each resulting task. The total estimated effort is distributed proportionally. This split is documented in the pre-migration field mapping document so the customer can decide whether to consolidate owners manually or accept the split structure.

LiquidPlanner

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

External Export or Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Time tracking data (hours logged, billable vs. non-billable flags, billing rates, approval status) migrates to a structured CSV export linked to the corresponding Asana task by task name and assignee. Asana has no native billing-grade timesheet module, so time entries do not map to a native Asana object. We recommend exporting to a format compatible with Harvest, Toggl, or the customer's preferred timesheet system. Individual logged-time entries and timesheet summaries are preserved as separate export sections for maximum flexibility in downstream processing.

LiquidPlanner

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner custom fields at the Workspace and Project level migrate to Asana custom fields within the project's field set or the organization's field library. Custom field definitions (names, types, option lists) must be recreated in Asana before migration because Asana manages custom field schemas differently. We provide a custom field definition mapping document listing each LiquidPlanner custom field's name, type, and option values alongside the recommended Asana custom field configuration. Custom field values on Tasks and Projects migrate as data once the field schema is in place.

LiquidPlanner

Document and Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment or Link

1:1
Fully supported

File attachments on LiquidPlanner Tasks and Projects migrate as Asana Attachments. If the customer's organization uses Google Drive, Dropbox, or Box, we create linked references in Asana rather than duplicating files. Standalone file attachments are exported to a designated cloud storage location with a manifest linking each file to its source task. PDF and document attachments migrate as attachment references pointing to the exported location.

LiquidPlanner

Portfolio View

maps to

Asana

Portfolio

1:1
Fully supported

LiquidPlanner Portfolio-level aggregations (portfolio health, resource utilization, cost summaries) do not map directly to Asana Portfolios, which aggregate project progress and status but lack resource utilization heatmaps and cost rollup. We migrate the underlying Projects and their data. Portfolio-level health indicators and resource utilization charts are documented in the migration inventory as items requiring manual recreation in Asana Dashboards or a third-party BI tool.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

LiquidPlanner logo

LiquidPlanner gotchas

High

API access requires Ultimate plan — migrations from Essentials or Professional need an alternative extraction path

High

LiquidPlanner Classic and Portfolio Manager both have announced sunset dates

Medium

Predictive scheduling range estimates do not map to fixed-date destination systems

Medium

Multi-owner task assignments require flattening in single-assignee platforms

Low

Virtual Members import as full users in most destination platforms

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Asana has no native billing-grade time tracking

    LiquidPlanner's integrated time tracking with timesheet approval workflows and configurable billing rates has no direct Asana equivalent. Asana's native time tracking is limited to per-task hour logging without approval flows, billing rates, or timesheet consolidation. An Asana forum respondent who migrated from LiquidPlanner specifically cited time tracking as the largest holdover, noting they rely on Harvest for task-level and subtask-level tracking. We migrate LiquidPlanner time entries as a structured CSV export linked to Asana tasks by name and assignee, compatible with Harvest, Toggl, or any timesheet system the customer adopts post-migration. Customers who depend on billing-rate timesheets must plan for a separate timesheet tool.

  • Range estimates do not map to fixed-date systems

    LiquidPlanner uses range estimates (e.g., 3-5 days) as a core data type and its scheduling engine treats these probabilistically to generate most-likely completion dates. Asana uses fixed start and end dates. When we migrate a task with a range estimate, we use the lower bound as the start date and the upper bound as the end date, then flag the task in a pre-migration review document for the customer's PM to verify the resulting timeline. Tasks that are part of a dependency chain of more than three tasks are flagged individually because the chain's auto-rescheduling behavior in LiquidPlanner will not replicate in Asana's Timeline view.

  • API access requires LiquidPlanner Ultimate plan

    LiquidPlanner's Open API is only available on the Ultimate plan at $42/user/month. Organizations on Essentials ($15) or Professional ($28) have no programmatic access to their data. Before scoping a migration, we verify which plan the customer is on. If they are on a lower tier, we extract data via the built-in CSV export for Classic workspaces or via the web interface for Portfolio Manager, both of which are more brittle and require manual column mapping before processing. We flag this constraint during discovery so the customer is not surprised by a higher scoping effort or a plan upgrade recommendation.

  • Multi-owner tasks require flattening to single assignee

    LiquidPlanner allows multiple Members to be assigned to a single Task with individual effort allocations. Asana supports only one assignee per task. We split multi-owner tasks into individual task assignments, preserving the effort allocation ratio as a note on each resulting task. This approach is surfaced in the pre-migration field mapping document so the customer can decide whether to consolidate owners manually before migration or accept the split structure. Customers with extensive multi-owner task usage should budget additional review time post-migration.

  • Virtual Members import as full user accounts

    LiquidPlanner's Virtual Members are lightweight references for external clients or stakeholders without a full license. Asana has no concept of a partial user, so Virtual Members become full User accounts. We flag Virtual Members during scoping and either import them as full users with an explicit [Virtual Member] prefix in the display name, or create Contact records if the customer prefers not to provision user accounts for external parties. The customer chooses the approach before migration begins. Both approaches require the customer to manage seat licensing for any Virtual Members that receive full user accounts.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful LiquidPlanner to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and plan verification

    We audit the source LiquidPlanner environment across edition (Essentials/Professional/Ultimate), Workspace count, Project count, task and subtask volume, dependency chain depth, custom field schemas, time entry volume, and member roster including Virtual Members. We verify which LiquidPlanner plan the customer is on to determine the data extraction path (API for Ultimate, CSV/web export for Essentials and Professional). We pair this with an Asana plan review to confirm custom field availability (Starter+ required) and seat count. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, a data extraction path recommendation, and a LiquidPlanner plan upgrade recommendation if API access is needed.

  2. Schema design and field mapping

    We design the destination schema in Asana. This includes recreating LiquidPlanner custom field definitions as Asana custom fields (with type-mapped field types and option lists), mapping Packages to Asana Sections or subprojects per the customer's preference, defining the multi-owner task split strategy, and mapping LiquidPlanner dependency types to Asana Timeline dependency configurations. We document every LiquidPlanner field and its Asana equivalent in a field mapping spreadsheet that the customer's project manager reviews and approves before migration begins.

  3. Data extraction and transformation

    For Ultimate plan customers, we extract data via the LiquidPlanner Open API with rate-limit handling and batch chunking. For Essentials and Professional customers, we extract via CSV export or web interface and process the output through a column-mapping pipeline. We transform range estimates to fixed date ranges, split multi-owner tasks into individual records, map dependency types, and format time entries as a structured CSV linked to task names. We flag any data that cannot be automatically mapped and escalate to the customer's PM for a manual decision before proceeding.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Asana Workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager reconciles record counts (Projects in, Tasks in, Subtasks in, Dependencies in, Members in), spot-checks 25-50 random tasks against the LiquidPlanner source, and reviews flagged dependency chains and range estimate conversions. The customer signs off the schema and mapping before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections happen in this phase, not in production.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Members and Virtual Members (provisioned or reconciled), Projects, Packages (as Sections), Milestones, Tasks with their start and end dates and converted dependencies, Subtasks, custom field values, then time entries as a structured export. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We run a delta pass after cutover to capture any records modified during the migration window.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze LiquidPlanner writes during cutover, run the final delta migration, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the automation and baseline inventory document listing every LiquidPlanner automation, baseline, and portfolio health dashboard that requires manual rebuild in Asana Rules and Dashboards. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's project team. We do not rebuild LiquidPlanner automations or baselines as Asana Rules; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

LiquidPlanner logo

LiquidPlanner

Source

Strengths

  • Automatic resource leveling identifies over-allocated team members across the full project schedule without manual calculation.
  • Predictive scheduling engine propagates delays and scope changes automatically through dependency chains.
  • Range estimates for task duration capture schedule uncertainty rather than forcing teams to commit to single-point dates.
  • Integrated time tracking with configurable billing and pay rates supports professional services billing directly within the PM tool.
  • Portfolio-level visibility across multiple projects gives managers a single dashboard for resource utilization and project health.

Weaknesses

  • Opinionated scheduling methodology requires significant process change; teams that resist the approach get poor results and high frustration.
  • API access is gated behind the Ultimate plan, limiting automation options for Essentials and Professional tier customers.
  • LiquidPlanner Classic sunset on December 31, 2026 and Portfolio Manager sunset on December 31, 2027 create migration urgency and platform viability concerns.
  • Limited third-party integrations compared to modern PM platforms; integration ecosystem has not expanded significantly since the Tempo acquisition.
  • Steep onboarding curve means project managers report 3–6 months before the tool becomes productive rather than disruptive.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across LiquidPlanner and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    LiquidPlanner: Not publicly documented in available API documentation.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    LiquidPlanner doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your LiquidPlanner to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about LiquidPlanner to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during LiquidPlanner to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your LiquidPlanner to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for organizations with fewer than 500 tasks, 20 projects, and no complex multi-owner task structures. Migrations with large dependency chains (over 1,000 dependency links), extensive time entry history, extensive multi-member task usage, or Workspace-level custom field schemas move to ten to sixteen weeks because of range estimate transformation, multi-owner task explosion, and time entry export formatting. LiquidPlanner Essentials and Professional plan customers may face longer extraction timelines due to the lack of API access.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from LiquidPlanner.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day