Project Management migration

Migrate from Orangescrum to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Orangescrum and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

Orangescrum logo

Orangescrum

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

83%

10 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Orangescrum and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Orangescrum to Jira is a structural migration: Orangescrum's flat task hierarchy with optional agile modules becomes Jira's typed issue model (Story, Task, Bug, Epic) with configured workflows and boards. We map Orangescrum Projects to Jira Projects, Tasks to Jira Issues, and preserve Sprint associations where the source project had agile enabled. Time logs migrate as Jira worklog entries against the matching issue. Custom fields require explicit type-by-type mapping because Orangescrum's field model (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox) does not auto-translate to Jira's custom field types. Orangescrum's Invoices and Wiki pages have no native Jira equivalent; we migrate invoice metadata as Issue attachments and Wiki content as plain-text descriptions, flagging both as gaps for the customer's admin to resolve post-migration. Orangescrum's SaaS stability concerns mean we run all migrations in a single session rather than a prolonged parallel period. Workflows, custom boards, and automations do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's Jira admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Orangescrum logo

Orangescrum

What's pushing teams away

  • Users report the platform crashes or becomes unstable during heavy usage periods, disrupting active projects and causing data-entry loss.
  • The interface and feature set feel dated compared to newer tools like ClickUp and monday.com, leading teams to seek a more modern experience.
  • Setup and initial configuration require manual effort that many reviewers describe as time-consuming compared to competitors with faster onboarding.
  • The open-source edition omits critical features — agile boards, backlogs, time tracking, and role management — forcing teams toward paid tiers for basic functionality.
  • Performance on the SaaS version has been inconsistent, with multiple reviewers noting service interruptions during business hours.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How Orangescrum objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a Orangescrum object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Orangescrum

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Projects map to Jira Projects with a 1:1 correspondence. Each Project carries name, description, start/end dates, status, and budget fields. We migrate name and description directly; dates migrate as project start and end dates in Jira's project settings. Orangescrum's budget field has no direct Jira equivalent and is preserved as a custom number field budget__c on the Jira project. Project-level status (Active, on Hold, Completed) maps to Jira's project state where supported, or to a custom picklist field project_status__c.

Orangescrum

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue (Task or Story)

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Tasks are the primary work unit and map to Jira Issues. We map task title to Issue summary, description to Issue description (converted to Jira's wiki markup or plain text), priority (Low, Medium, High, Urgent) to Jira Priority, and status (New, In Progress, Completed) to Jira Status. Orangescrum's task type subtypes (if any) map to Jira Issue Type (Task, Story, Bug). Due dates and assignee resolve to Jira Due Date and Assignee fields. Custom field values on Tasks migrate to their mapped Jira custom field equivalents.

Orangescrum

Subtask

maps to

Jira

Sub-Task Issue

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Subtasks inherit parent project and task context. We map them as Jira Sub-Task issues linked to their parent Jira Issue via the Parent Link field. Subtask nesting depth is preserved up to two levels. Jira requires Sub-Task issue type to be enabled per project, which we configure during project schema setup.

Orangescrum

Sprint

maps to

Jira

Sprint

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Sprints (available on Agile-enabled projects only) map to Jira Sprints. Each Sprint carries a start date, end date, goal, and linked tasks. We preserve sprint association by mapping Orangescrum sprint_id to Jira sprint_id via the board-sprint linkage. Orangescrum sprints without a linked Jira board (e.g., if the source project was not Agile-enabled) are migrated as Jira Backlog items ranked by RICE order or by Orangescrum's backlog position index. Sprints with zero tasks are not migrated.

Orangescrum

Backlog

maps to

Jira

Backlog (ranked issues)

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum's backlog holds unassigned stories not yet placed in a sprint. We migrate these as Jira Issues in the Backlog with ranking preserved using Jira's Rank field or the backlog order index from Orangescrum. Backlog grouping by Epic or Feature (Orangescrum Premium feature) maps to Jira Epic Link on each issue where the parent Epic exists in the destination.

Orangescrum

Epic and Feature

maps to

Jira

Epic

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Epics and Features (Premium and Enterprise tiers) are hierarchical containers above Tasks. We map them to Jira Epic issues with the Epic Name and Epic Status fields populated from Orangescrum's epic name and status. Tasks under an Epic are linked via Jira's Epic Link custom field. If the destination project does not have the Epic issue type enabled, we map Epics to Jira Stories and preserve the hierarchy in a custom field epic_parent__c with an admin-rebuild note.

Orangescrum

Custom Field

maps to

Jira

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Orangescrum custom fields (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox) on tasks and projects require explicit per-field type mapping to Jira custom field types. We create Jira custom fields of the matching type during project schema setup before any issue data is loaded. Orangescrum dropdown options map to Jira custom field options. Multi-select or tag-style custom fields may need to be mapped to Jira Labels or a multi-select custom field depending on the target project configuration. Custom field values do not migrate as code; we document every custom field's source name, type, and destination equivalent in the mapping specification.

Orangescrum

Time Log

maps to

Jira

Worklog

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Time Logs (hours, date, billing notes, linked to a task and a user) map to Jira Issue Worklog entries. We map hours to Time Spent in Jira format (e.g., 2h 30m), date to Worklog Start Date, and the Orangescrum billing note to a custom Worklog comment field. Jira Worklog requires a matching Jira User for the author; we resolve by email against the Jira User table. If the original Orangescrum time logger has no Jira User, we assign the worklog to the issue's default assignee with a migration flag for admin review.

Orangescrum

Bug and Defect Record

maps to

Jira

Issue (Bug)

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Bug records are a task subtype with severity (Low, Medium, High, Critical), reproduction steps, and status fields. We map them to Jira Issues with Issue Type = Bug. Orangescrum severity maps to Jira Priority (Low, Medium, High, Highest). The reproduction steps from Orangescrum's bug description migrate to the Jira issue description. Bug status follows the same status-to-Jira-Status mapping as Tasks. If Orangescrum used a separate Bug tracking module, the same mapping applies.

Orangescrum

User and Team Member

maps to

Jira

User

1:1
Fully supported

Orangescrum Users (name, email, role, active/inactive) map to Jira Users. We resolve by email match against the Jira destination User table. Any Orangescrum user without a matching Jira account is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's Jira admin to provision before record import. Inactive Orangescrum users migrate as inactive Jira users so that historical assignment and worklog attribution is preserved. Role mapping (Orangescrum role to Jira project role) is documented during scoping; the customer's admin assigns project roles post-migration.

Orangescrum

Client

maps to

Jira

Project Role or Contact

1:many
Fully supported

Orangescrum distinguishes between internal Team Members and external Client contacts. Client records include company name, contact info, and billing details. Jira does not have a native Client object. We map Clients to Jira Project Roles (e.g., Client Viewer) and optionally to Jira user accounts if the client needs access. If the customer uses Jira Service Management, Client contacts may map to Customer records instead. The mapping approach is confirmed during scoping.

Orangescrum

Wiki

maps to

Jira

Issue Description or Attachment

1:1
Mapping required

Orangescrum Wiki pages contain rich-text content linked to Projects and organized by Categories and Sub-Categories. Jira has no native Wiki; Confluence is a separate product. We migrate Wiki page content as plain-text Issue descriptions on a designated documentation issue (Issue Type = Task, titled with the original page name) or as a text file attachment on the relevant Jira project. Category hierarchy is not preserved natively; we document it in the mapping specification for the customer to rebuild in Confluence if needed. Links between Wiki pages are not preserved as live links.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Orangescrum logo

Orangescrum gotchas

High

Open-source edition omits key paid features

High

SaaS stability issues documented in 2024

Medium

Enterprise API requires explicit access approval

Medium

Invoices do not preserve rendered PDF files

Low

Self-hosted and SaaS editions have divergent feature sets

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • Sprint-to-board mapping requires source-side agile review

    Orangescrum Sprints exist only on projects where the Agile module is enabled, and the backlog is a flat list without native ranking. Jira Sprints are always scoped to a specific board. We review the Orangescrum source for each project's agile status before migration. Projects without an active agile board have their backlog items migrated as ranked Backlog issues rather than Sprint issues. Sprints that contain zero tasks are not migrated. This review adds a discovery step to the migration plan; skipping it results in orphaned sprints in Jira with no linked issues.

  • Custom fields must be explicitly typed and created in Jira before import

    Orangescrum's custom field types (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox) do not auto-translate to Jira's custom field model. Jira requires each custom field to be created with a specific field type (e.g., Free Text Field, Number Field, Date Picker, Select, Radio Button, Multi-Select Checkboxes) and then added to the relevant screens and issue types per project. We create Jira custom fields during project schema setup before any issue data loads. If Orangescrum used field names that conflict with Jira's reserved field names, we append a suffix. Migrations that load issue data before custom fields are configured silently drop those field values.

  • Invoices have no native Jira equivalent and cannot be fully migrated

    Orangescrum's invoice module generates invoices from time logs with line items, totals, client references, and payment status. Jira has no native invoicing module. We migrate invoice metadata (client name, line item descriptions, totals, status, and date) as a structured data file that can be imported into a separate accounting tool, or as a PDF attachment on a designated Jira issue per project. We do not create invoice records inside Jira because Jira does not support them. Customers with active invoicing workflows in Orangescrum must adopt a separate billing tool (e.g., QuickBooks, FreshBooks, or Atlassian's separate invoicing product) before cutover.

  • Wiki content migrates as text only, not as a structured knowledge base

    Orangescrum Wiki pages with rich text content and category hierarchy have no native Jira equivalent. Confluence is a separate Atlassian product with a different data model, API, and licensing. We migrate Wiki page content as plain-text descriptions or as text file attachments on Jira issues. Category hierarchy, internal page links, and page attachments do not migrate as live structured data. The customer receives a written inventory of all Wiki pages with their content, category path, and linked project so that an admin can recreate them in Confluence or another knowledge base tool.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Orangescrum to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and agile-status audit

    We audit every Orangescrum project to determine which have the Agile module enabled, which have sprints with linked tasks, and which are using the flat backlog. We extract all custom fields by type, all user accounts by email, all time log entries, all bug and defect records, and all Wiki pages with their category paths. We confirm whether the source environment is Orangescrum SaaS or self-hosted, as self-hosted instances may be running an older API version with different field names. The discovery output is a written scope with a Jira project-per-Orangescrum-project mapping plan, a sprint inventory, and a custom field crosswalk table.

  2. Jira project and schema configuration

    We configure the Jira destination environment: one Jira Project per Orangescrum Project (or consolidated if the customer requests), with Issue Types enabled (Task, Story, Bug, Sub-Task, Epic), Workflows assigned, Screens configured, and custom fields created to match the Orangescrum field inventory. For projects that are not agile-enabled in Orangescrum, we create a Kanban board in Jira with the standard Jira workflow; for agile-enabled projects, we create a Scrum board. All configuration happens in a Jira Sandbox or dev environment first for validation.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the Jira staging environment using representative data volume. The customer's project manager and Jira admin reconcile record counts (issues in, sprints in, time logs in, custom field values present), spot-check 20-30 random issues against the Orangescrum source, and verify that sprint associations and backlog ordering are correctly represented in Jira. Any missing custom fields, incorrect issue type assignments, or sprint mapping errors are corrected before production migration begins.

  4. User provisioning and owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Orangescrum user referenced on tasks, time logs, and bug records, and match by email against the Jira destination's User table. Any user without a matching Jira account is placed in a reconciliation queue. The customer's Jira admin provisions missing users (active or inactive depending on whether the user is still active in Orangescrum) before production migration. Jira project roles are assigned by the admin post-migration using the role mapping document we deliver.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run the production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Users (provisioned, not migrated), Projects, Issues (Tasks, Stories, Bugs with custom fields resolved), Sub-Tasks, Sprints (linked to boards after issues are in place), Worklog entries (per issue, author-resolved), Bug severity-to-priority mapping, and Wiki content (as text attachments or descriptions). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We run the migration in a single continuous session to avoid exposure to Orangescrum SaaS stability risk during a prolonged parallel period.

  6. Cutover, validation, and rebuild handoff

    We freeze Orangescrum writes at cutover, run a final delta migration for any records created or modified during the migration window, then enable Jira as the system of record. We deliver the Workflow and Automation Inventory document (documenting Orangescrum's automated actions requiring Jira rule rebuild), the Wiki Content Inventory, and the Invoice Gap Report. We support a one-week post-migration window to resolve any data quality issues reported by the team. We do not rebuild Orangescrum workflows as Jira automation rules inside the migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's Jira admin or a Jira partner using the inventory document we deliver.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Orangescrum logo

Orangescrum

Source

Strengths

  • Per-user pricing capped at $349/month for Premium Unlimited with unlimited users and projects.
  • Includes Gantt charts, Kanban, sprint boards, time tracking, and invoicing in a single subscription.
  • Self-hosted open-source option under GPL v3 for teams requiring on-premises data residency.
  • API access on Premium and Enterprise tiers enables integrations with ERP, CRM, and payroll systems.
  • Supports both waterfall and agile methodologies simultaneously within the same workspace.

Weaknesses

  • Stability concerns documented across multiple reviews, with users reporting crashes and service interruptions on the SaaS version.
  • Open-source edition lacks agile boards, backlogs, time tracking, and role management — core features are paywalled.
  • UI and feature set are perceived as outdated compared to newer project management platforms like ClickUp and monday.com.
  • Manual setup required for integrations and workflows; limited out-of-the-box automation relative to competitors.
  • Enterprise API requires explicit access approval, adding friction for technical teams evaluating the platform.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Orangescrum and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Orangescrum: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Orangescrum doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Orangescrum to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Orangescrum to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Orangescrum to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Orangescrum to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 2,000 issues and 50 sprints with no custom fields typically complete in three to five weeks. Migrations with multiple Jira projects, 20+ custom fields, large sprint histories (100+ sprints), or a self-hosted Orangescrum source move to eight to twelve weeks because of project schema configuration, Jira board setup, and Jira admin reconciliation. The discovery and sandbox phases each add one to two weeks to the timeline before production migration begins.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Orangescrum.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day