Project Management migration

Migrate from OpenProj to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between OpenProj and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

OpenProj logo

OpenProj

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

33%

4 of 12

objects map 1:1 between OpenProj and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from OpenProject to Trello is a structural simplification: OpenProject's hierarchical Work Packages with types, statuses, priorities, and time entries must flatten into Trello cards, lists, and labels. OpenProject's Gantt chart dependency chains have no native Trello equivalent; we document those relationships in card descriptions for the team to rebuild manually. We migrate Projects as Boards, Work Packages as Cards, Types as Labels, Statuses as List positions, and Time Entries as card descriptions or a dedicated Power-Up. Custom fields (Enterprise-only on OpenProject) map to Trello custom field structures where present; budgets, versions, meetings, and wiki pages migrate as attachments or card descriptions. Trello does not have a native API equivalent for OpenProject's meeting module or wiki pages, so those become linked PDFs or Markdown files attached to the relevant board. Workflows, custom actions, and LDAP group sync do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of OpenProject workflows requiring Butler rebuild in Trello. The API-to-API migration uses OpenProject's v3 REST API with rate-limit handling and Trello's REST API with batch chunking, targeting a Sandbox validation pass before production cutover.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

OpenProj logo

OpenProj

What's pushing teams away

  • The interface is described as cumbersome and navigation unintuitive, with a mobile experience that lacks the responsiveness teams expect from modern SaaS tools.
  • Initial setup and configuration is time-consuming; per-project module activation and workflow customization require significant planning overhead.
  • Search functionality within the platform is weak, making it difficult to locate work packages or documents across large project sets.
  • Enterprise-only restrictions on custom fields, LDAP group sync, and two-factor authentication push smaller teams toward platforms with fewer feature gates.
  • Performance degrades with large numbers of work packages and attachments, creating friction for data-heavy migrations and ongoing use.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How OpenProj objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a OpenProj object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

OpenProj

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

OpenProject Projects map to Trello Boards. The Project name becomes the Board name; Project description maps to the Board description or the first card pinned to the board as a summary. Members with roles map to Board members, though Trello has a simpler permission model (Admin, Member, Observer) without OpenProject's per-project role inheritance. We attempt email-matched member mapping; unmapped members are listed in a reconciliation card on the destination board.

OpenProj

Work Package

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

OpenProject Work Packages map to Trello Cards. Subject maps to Card title; description maps to Card description; startDate maps to Card due date (or as a custom card field); dueDate maps to the due date picker. Assignee maps to Card member if a matching Trello user exists via email. Status is preserved as a Card label (using the status name as label text) and the Card position within its List reflects the status column where applicable. Priority and responsible fields map to additional labels or description notes.

OpenProj

Work Package Type

maps to

Trello

Label

lossy
Fully supported

OpenProject Types (Task, Feature, Bug, Milestone, Phase, Epic, and any custom types) map to Trello Labels. We create Labels on each destination Board with the exact type name as label text and a consistent color mapping derived from the source type. Trello limits labels to 25 characters; types exceeding this are truncated at 25 characters with a note in the migration report. Types without a matching Label on the destination board are created during migration.

OpenProj

Work Package Status

maps to

Trello

List position

lossy
Fully supported

OpenProject Statuses (New, In Progress, Closed, and custom statuses) map to Trello List positions within a board. We configure the destination board's Lists to match the most commonly used OpenProject status values per project. Cards are placed in the List matching their source status. Closed work packages are archived in Trello if the destination board has an Archive List configured. Status probability and workflow configuration do not migrate; Trello cards do not carry stage probability data.

OpenProj

Work Package hierarchy

maps to

Trello

Card + Checklist

1:many
Fully supported

OpenProject's parent-child Work Package hierarchy has no native Trello equivalent. Child Work Packages are created as separate Cards on the destination board, and the parent-child relationship is documented in each child's Card description as a reference link (parent Card ID or name). For branches of up to 10 children, we optionally create Checklist items on the parent Card pointing to child Card links. This is a documentation pattern, not a structural hierarchy, since Trello does not enforce parent-child rules.

OpenProj

Time Entry

maps to

Trello

Card Description or Power-Up

lossy
Fully supported

OpenProject time entries (hours, rate, cost, spent-date, comment) cannot map to any native Trello field. We encode each time entry as a structured text block in the Card description with format 'Logged: Xh on YYYY-MM-DD — comment'. For migrations in scope, we ask the customer to select the Trello Power-Up (Toggl Track, Clockify, or Planyo) they will adopt post-migration and we configure time entry descriptions to match that Power-Up's expected input format so manual re-entry is minimised. Time entries are not deleted; they are preserved in the migration record for the customer's admin to import into the selected Power-Up.

OpenProj

Version

maps to

Trello

Label

lossy
Fully supported

OpenProject Versions (sprints, milestones, releases) map to Trello Labels with a version-name prefix (e.g., 'v2.1', 'Sprint 14', 'Release Q3'). Version status (open, locked, closed) is noted in the Label description field. Version date (effectiveDate) is preserved in the Card description for milestone versions. Versions are not enforced as a scoping mechanism in Trello; they are informational labels on cards.

OpenProj

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Files attached to OpenProject Work Packages migrate as Card attachments in Trello. OpenProject's API limits file link creation to 20 elements per request; we pre-scan the source to identify Work Packages exceeding this threshold and batch them into safe chunks. File metadata (filename, author, created-at) is preserved in the attachment record. Trello Free caps attachments at 10 MB per file; we flag files exceeding this limit and upload them to a Google Drive or SharePoint folder with a link substituted in the Card.

OpenProj

Wiki Page

maps to

Trello

Card Description or PDF Attachment

lossy
Fully supported

OpenProject Wiki Pages belong to a project and support Markdown content. Trello has no native wiki equivalent. We convert each wiki page to a PDF or Markdown file and attach it to a summary Card on the destination board. Card description includes the page title, project name, and a note that the full content is in the attached file. Hyperlinks within wiki pages are preserved if the target exists on the destination board; external links are kept as-is.

OpenProj

Meeting

maps to

Trello

Card Description

lossy
Fully supported

OpenProject Meetings (title, date, duration, location, attendees, minutes text) have no Trello equivalent. We create a Card per meeting with the meeting title, date, duration, and attendee list in the Card description. Meeting minutes in Markdown are attached as a PDF to the Card. The meeting Card is placed in a dedicated 'Meetings' List on the board if the destination board has one, otherwise in the first List.

OpenProj

Document

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

OpenProject Documents (project-scoped files with descriptions) map to Card attachments on a summary Card for the project, or to individual Cards with the document name as the title and the description preserved. Document folder hierarchy is not maintained in Trello; we document the original path in the Card description. Documents are the most attachment-heavy object in OpenProject and may require the Trello attachment size fallback (Google Drive link substitution) if file sizes exceed the 10 MB limit.

OpenProj

Budget and Cost Entry

maps to

Trello

Card Description note

lossy
Fully supported

OpenProject Cost module data (budget, labour costs, unit costs) has no Trello equivalent at any tier. We document the full budget and cost entry summary in a dedicated Card per project titled 'Budget Summary — do not archive', with the estimated budget, actuals, and variance encoded as a structured table in the Card description. This is a read-only reference record; Trello does not support cost tracking or financial fields. The customer may link this card to a financial tracking tool via Power-Up or external URL.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

OpenProj logo

OpenProj gotchas

High

Custom fields are Enterprise-only and require a paid plan

High

API requires lockVersion for every write operation

Medium

Attachment file links are capped at 20 per API request

Medium

Community edition cannot import data via API in some hosting modes

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Time entries and cost data have no native Trello destination

    OpenProject's time tracking module (available in Community) stores hours, rates, and calculated cost per Work Package. Trello has no native time tracking or cost fields at any tier (Free, Standard, Premium, Enterprise). We preserve time entries as structured text in Card descriptions, but Trello does not aggregate, sum, or report on those values. If the team relies on time reporting for billing or resource planning, they must adopt a Trello Power-Up (Toggl Track, Clockify, or Planyo) post-migration. We do not migrate cost module budgets as functional budget records; they become a static reference Card per project.

  • Work Package hierarchy and dependency chains do not transfer

    OpenProject supports unlimited parent-child Work Package nesting and cross-Work Package dependency arrows (precedes, follows, blocked by, blocks). Trello Cards have no native hierarchy and no dependency line feature. We flatten the hierarchy by creating child Work Packages as separate Cards and documenting the parent link in each Card description, but Trello does not enforce or visualise these relationships. Cross-card dependencies are documented in Card descriptions as manual reference notes. Teams that rely on Gantt dependency chains for critical path planning must use a Trello Gantt Power-Up post-migration to rebuild that view.

  • Custom fields are Enterprise-only on OpenProject and require Trello Power-Up

    OpenProject custom fields (text, integer, list, date, user, hierarchy) are gated behind paid Enterprise Basic, Professional, and Premium tiers. Trello Free has no custom field support; custom fields require the Custom Fields Power-Up available on Standard ($5/user) and Premium ($10/user). Migrations sourced from an Enterprise OpenProject with active custom fields require the customer to enable the Custom Fields Power-Up on their Trello boards before migration, and we must confirm the Trello custom field types (checkbox, date, dropdown, number, text) match the OpenProject field formats before committing to migrate that data.

  • OpenProject API lockVersion requires fresh-card creation strategy

    OpenProject's v3 API enforces optimistic locking: every update request requires the current lockVersion value, and concurrent modifications invalidate the token. During bulk export, source records exported in parallel may return stale lockVersion values, causing API write errors. We handle this by creating all destination Cards as fresh POST operations rather than PATCH updates, bypassing the lockVersion requirement entirely. We track which records were created fresh versus updated to maintain an audit trail and flag any records that failed initial creation for manual resolution.

  • Trello attachment size limits require Google Drive fallback

    Trello Free caps individual file attachments at 10 MB. OpenProject document-heavy projects commonly have files exceeding this threshold. We pre-scan all attachments during scoping to identify files above 10 MB, upload those files to a shared Google Drive or SharePoint folder (customer-provided), and substitute the Trello Card attachment with a direct link to the cloud-hosted file. This preserves file accessibility while bypassing the Trello size limit. The customer must provision the cloud storage destination before migration begins.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful OpenProj to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the source OpenProject instance across edition (Community, Basic, Professional, Premium), active Projects, Work Package count, type and status inventories, custom field definitions, time entry volume, attachment file list with sizes, and any Enterprise-only modules in use (LDAP sync, custom actions, costs). We confirm the destination Trello workspace structure (existing Boards or new Boards per Project), list names per board, and whether the Custom Fields Power-Up is available. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, any Enterprise-gated feature gaps, and the customer-provided Google Drive destination for large attachments.

  2. Schema design and label/list configuration

    We design the destination Trello schema. This includes configuring Board Lists to map OpenProject Status values, creating Labels for Work Package Types, configuring Label colours for consistency, and enabling the Custom Fields Power-Up on destination boards if custom fields are in scope. We map Work Package hierarchy into a flattening strategy: parent IDs are recorded in Card descriptions, child Cards are created independently, and the parent-child note is cross-referenced. We document the time entry encoding format chosen with the customer and prepare the budget reference Card template.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Trello workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project lead reconciles record counts (Projects in, Boards out; Work Packages in, Cards out; Attachments in, Attachments plus links out), spot-checks 20-30 random Cards against the OpenProject source for field accuracy, and validates label and list assignments. Any mapping corrections — incorrect status-to-list mapping, label colour mismatches, or time entry format changes — happen here. We do not begin production migration until the sandbox sign-off is received.

  4. User mapping and member provisioning

    We extract every distinct OpenProject user referenced on Work Packages, Meetings, and Time Entries and match by email against the destination Trello workspace members. Members without a matching Trello account are held in a reconciliation list. The customer's Trello admin provisions any missing members (or accepts that unmapped assignees are noted in Card descriptions rather than assigned as Trello members). Migration cannot proceed to production with unresolved assignee gaps because Trello card members are a distinct field from card description text.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record order: Boards (from Projects), Lists (status columns), Cards (Work Packages), Labels (types), Card members (assignees), Card attachments, time entry descriptions, version labels, budget reference Cards, meeting Cards, wiki page attachments, and document attachments. Attachment batching handles the OpenProject 20-link-per-request cap and the Trello 10 MB file limit via the Google Drive fallback. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Cards are created via Trello REST API with exponential backoff on 429 responses.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff

    We freeze OpenProject writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration of any records modified during migration, then designate Trello as the system of record. We deliver the workflow inventory document listing every OpenProject workflow, custom action, and LDAP group sync rule with a recommended Trello Butler or third-party automation equivalent. We do not rebuild OpenProject workflows as Trello Butler rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement. We support a 48-hour post-cutover validation window to resolve any data discrepancies raised by the project team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

OpenProj logo

OpenProj

Source

Strengths

  • Full open-source stack under GPLv3 with both self-hosted on-premises and managed cloud deployment options.
  • Supports Scrum, Kanban, classical Waterfall, and hybrid workflows in a single platform without requiring separate tools.
  • Generous free Community tier includes unlimited projects, work packages, time tracking, and wiki pages.
  • Rich permission model with global roles and per-project membership controls for fine-grained access management.
  • REST API (v3) with optimistic locking and custom field endpoints enables programmatic access and integration.

Weaknesses

  • Custom fields, LDAP sync, 2FA, and advanced reporting are gated behind paid Enterprise tiers, limiting Community edition functionality.
  • No documented public rate limit figures for the API; undocumented limits can cause unexpected 429 errors during bulk migrations.
  • Interface usability and navigation receive consistent negative feedback, particularly around search and mobile responsiveness.
  • Large attachment sets require manual batching due to the 20-file-link-per-request API cap, adding migration complexity.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across OpenProj and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    OpenProj: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    OpenProj doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your OpenProj to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about OpenProj to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during OpenProj to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your OpenProj to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 20 projects and 5,000 Work Packages with no Enterprise custom fields and under 500 attachments land between two and three weeks. Migrations with Enterprise custom fields, large time-entry histories (over 50,000 entries), document-heavy projects exceeding 1 GB of attachments, or multiple sub-projects move to five to eight weeks because of custom field mapping, time-entry description encoding, the OpenProject API batching for large attachment sets, and the wiki and meeting documentation pass.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from OpenProj.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day