HRMS migration

Migrate from empeon to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between empeon and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

empeon logo

empeon

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

33%

4 of 12

objects map 1:1 between empeon and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Empeon to Bullhorn is a platform-category transition from a healthcare HCM system to a staffing ATS and CRM. Empeon structures its data around employee profiles, payroll registers, accrual balances, and benefit enrollments; Bullhorn uses a Candidate and ClientCorporation model built around the recruiting and placement lifecycle. We resolve the employee-to-candidate split during scoping: currently employed staff at a staffing firm become Bullhorn Candidates, former employees become inactive Candidates or archived records, and contractors map to Placement records once placed. Direct deposit routing and benefit enrollments are not native Bullhorn fields; we map them to custom fields on the Candidate entity and document the configuration for the customer's Bullhorn admin. Empeon's ESS Hub email-must-match requirement means we flag every email address mismatch before cutover to prevent self-service access breakage. Bullhorn does not include payroll processing as standard scope; we do not migrate payroll register data as an operational system. We deliver benefit enrollment data and accrual balances as structured CSV exports alongside the Bullhorn import for the customer's HR admin to reconcile against any retained payroll system.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

empeon logo

empeon

What's pushing teams away

  • Session timeout behavior logs users out after short periods of inactivity, requiring repeated logins and disrupting daily workflows for power users.
  • Login reliability issues appear in reviews, with multiple users reporting being unexpectedly kicked out mid-task.
  • Tax calculation errors surface occasionally, forcing HR teams into manual corrections and creating compliance risk during payroll runs.
  • The API Connector carries a $2,000 one-time fee plus $200/month, making programmatic data extraction expensive for migration projects.
  • Limited public documentation and opaque pricing make it difficult for organizations to evaluate total cost of ownership before committing.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How empeon objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a empeon object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

empeon

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Empeon Employee records map to Bullhorn Candidate records. The primary mapping key is employee email address to Candidate email. Employment status in Empeon (Active, Inactive, Terminated) maps to Candidate status in Bullhorn (Active, Lead, Inactive). Hire date maps to dateAdded; job title maps to occupation. We flag candidates who are currently employed versus former employees so the customer can set appropriate Candidate statuses in Bullhorn. The mapping excludes payroll compensation fields that have no standard Bullhorn equivalent; those are passed as structured CSV alongside the Bullhorn import.

empeon

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Contact (on ClientCorporation)

1:many
Fully supported

Empeon employees who represent staffing firm clients or contacts map to Bullhorn Contact records on the relevant ClientCorporation. This handles the scenario where a healthcare facility's HR contact at a client organization is stored in Empeon and needs to become a Bullhorn Contact for business development purposes. We distinguish between internal employees (mapped to Candidate) and external client contacts (mapped to Contact on ClientCorporation) using Empeon's organizational hierarchy data.

empeon

Company Settings (Departments)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation

1:1
Fully supported

Empeon Company Settings departments and cost centers map to Bullhorn ClientCorporation records when the department represents a client organization. For internal-only departments (IT, Finance, Clinical), we document the mapping without creating Bullhorn records since Bullhorn is a staffing ATS and does not use internal org structures. The customer's Bullhorn admin decides which departments represent staffing clients requiring ClientCorporation records.

empeon

Direct Deposit

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields on Candidate

lossy
Mapping required

Empeon direct deposit routing numbers and account numbers do not have native Bullhorn equivalents because Bullhorn ATS is not a payroll system. We map these to Bullhorn custom text fields on the Candidate entity. Routing numbers are encrypted in transit and stored with masked display (showing only last four digits). The customer provisions these custom fields during Bullhorn admin setup, or we coordinate with Bullhorn Support to create the fields. Direct deposit data is never written to logs or intermediate files.

empeon

Benefit Enrollments

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields on Candidate

lossy
Mapping required

Empeon benefit plan names, carrier codes, coverage tiers, and enrollment dates are exported as structured records per employee and mapped to Bullhorn custom fields on the Candidate entity. Plan names and carrier codes require a cross-reference table because Empeon plan identifiers often differ from the carrier's standard naming convention. We deliver benefit enrollment data as a structured CSV alongside the Bullhorn import, with the customer deciding whether to use Bullhorn Onboarding (formerly Able) for digital benefit enrollment post-migration.

empeon

Accrual Balances

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields on Candidate

lossy
Fully supported

Empeon PTO, sick leave, and accrual balances map to Bullhorn custom numeric fields on Candidate. Effective-dated balance snapshots migrate as the current balance value only; historical balance change logs are not transferred because Bullhorn does not have a native accrual audit trail object. We flag accrual balance data in the scoping document and recommend the customer retain Empeon for accrual tracking if the business requires historical accrual audit trails.

empeon

Documents

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Document Attachments

1:1
Mapping required

Empeon documents attached to employee profiles (offer letters, performance reviews, certifications, credentials) are exported as binary files with metadata and mapped to Bullhorn Candidate document attachments via the Bullhorn REST API. Certification documents migrate with the certification name in the document title and the expiration date stored in a custom date field. We process documents in batches of 50 to observe Bullhorn API rate limits and retry failed uploads with exponential backoff.

empeon

Time and Attendance

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Bullhorn Time & Expense (add-on)

lossy
Fully supported

Empeon time entries and clock punches are not standard Bullhorn ATS records. If the customer licenses Bullhorn Time & Expense, we map Empeon clock punches to Bullhorn time entries by employee and date. If Bullhorn Time & Expense is not licensed, we deliver a time-and-attendance CSV export for the customer's payroll administrator to reconcile. We do not migrate Advanced Scheduling assignments because Bullhorn's scheduling model (Candidate availability, JobOrder shifts) differs fundamentally from Empeon's Employee View and Daily View scheduling paradigm.

empeon

Payroll History

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

CSV Export (not Bullhorn)

lossy
Mapping required

Empeon payroll registers, pay periods, gross/net pay amounts, tax withholding, and deduction line items do not migrate into Bullhorn because Bullhorn is not a payroll system. We export payroll history as structured CSV organized by pay period, with each row representing an employee's earnings for that period. The customer retains Empeon for payroll operations or migrates to Bullhorn One's back-office payroll module as a separate implementation project. We flag this clearly in the scoping document and do not attempt to map payroll fields to Bullhorn Candidate fields.

empeon

Custom Fields (Input and Checkbox)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Fields on Candidate

lossy
Fully supported

Empeon free-text Input fields and Checkbox fields map to Bullhorn custom text and checkbox fields on the Candidate entity. Free-text values are copied verbatim; checkbox values (yes/no) map to Bullhorn checkbox fields. Because Empeon does not support picklists or date fields natively, any structured data stored as free text (e.g., a date entered as '01/15/2024') is parsed and coerced to the appropriate Bullhorn field type during migration. Data quality in unstructured free-text fields cannot be guaranteed.

empeon

Live Reports

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Bullhorn Report Exports

1:1
Mapping required

Empeon Live Report definitions are documented as written specifications during scoping. We export the underlying row data as structured output and note the column configuration required to reproduce each report. Report formatting, grouping hierarchies, and custom column ordering do not transfer. The customer uses Bullhorn's built-in reporting to reconstruct equivalent views. Standard Reports are handled the same way.

empeon

ESS Hub Access

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Email Authentication Mapping

lossy
Mapping required

The ESS Hub email-must-match requirement means the employee's email in their Empeon Workforce profile must match the email they use for self-service authentication. We capture all employee email addresses during discovery and cross-reference against the destination Bullhorn candidate email to flag mismatches before cutover. Email domain changes during migration (e.g., corporate rebranding) break ESS access and require employee re-registration. We document all flagged mismatches in the migration handoff document.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

empeon logo

empeon gotchas

High

API Connector is a paid add-on required for programmatic migration

Medium

Frequent session timeouts disrupt migration scoping activities

Medium

ESS Hub email-must-match requirement can break self-service after migration

Low

Custom Field types are limited to Input and Checkbox

Low

Live Report exports require manual column selection

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Bullhorn is not a payroll system — payroll data has no home

    Empeon is a full payroll processing system with native payroll registers, pay periods, tax withholding, and direct deposit execution. Bullhorn ATS and Bullhorn One are not equivalent payroll processors. We do not migrate payroll register data into Bullhorn because there are no payroll fields on the Candidate or Placement entities. We export payroll history as structured CSV organized by pay period for the customer's HR admin to retain outside Bullhorn. If the customer needs payroll processing post-migration, Bullhorn One's back-office payroll module or a third-party integration (ADP, Paychex) must be evaluated as a separate engagement.

  • Custom Objects require a Bullhorn Support ticket, not admin self-service

    Bullhorn Custom Objects (customObject1 through customObject10) cannot be created through the Bullhorn administrative UI. Bullhorn Support must provision them via a support ticket, and each entity can have custom fields assigned only by Bullhorn Support. This adds a lead time of three to five business days per custom object type to the migration timeline. We open Bullhorn Support tickets for all required custom objects (benefit enrollment, accrual balances, direct deposit fields) during the discovery phase so provisioning completes before the migration phase begins.

  • ESS Hub email-must-match breaks self-service after email changes

    Empeon's ESS Hub requires the employee's email address in their Workforce profile to match the email used for authentication. If email addresses change during migration due to domain migration or employee re-enumeration, ESS access breaks and employees must re-register. We capture all employee email addresses during discovery, cross-reference against the destination Bullhorn candidate email, and flag mismatches before cutover. This is particularly disruptive for organizations with clinical staff who rely on ESS for PTO requests and benefits enrollment.

  • Empeon requires paid API Connector for any programmatic extraction

    Empeon does not expose a public API on its base subscription. Programmatic data extraction requires the API Connector add-on at $2,000 one-time plus $200/month. Without this add-on, migration must rely on manual Live Report exports and CSV downloads, which cannot be automated and require repeated manual intervention. We confirm API Connector status during discovery and factor the licensing cost into the migration proposal. This is a pre-migration cost borne by the customer before FlitStack AI engagement begins.

  • Document attachment pipeline hits Bullhorn API rate limits at scale

    Healthcare staffing firms with large credential and certification archives can have tens of thousands of document attachments per migration. Bullhorn's REST API enforces rate limits on attachment uploads. We implement batched uploads (50 documents per batch), exponential backoff on 429 responses, and retry logic for transient failures. We schedule document migration as a separate overnight pipeline where possible to avoid daytime rate-limit contention with other Bullhorn API calls.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful empeon to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and API Connector confirmation

    We audit the Empeon instance for record counts (employees, benefit enrollments, accrual records, documents), custom field inventory (Input and Checkbox fields per employee), Live Report configurations, and ESS Hub setup. We confirm API Connector licensing status and advise the customer to provision it before the engagement begins if not already licensed. We identify all distinct email addresses across the employee population and begin cross-referencing against the destination Bullhorn candidate email field. Bullhorn Support tickets for custom object provisioning are opened in parallel. The discovery output is a written migration scope covering record counts, custom field mapping, and email mismatch flags.

  2. Schema design and custom field provisioning

    We design the Bullhorn candidate schema covering all required custom fields: direct deposit routing (text, encrypted), benefit enrollment plan and carrier (text), accrual balance amounts (numeric), and certification expiration dates (date). Bullhorn Support provisions the custom objects; we validate their API names against our mapping document. We map Empeon employment status to Bullhorn Candidate status and define the internal-employee versus external-client-contact split rule. Company hierarchy from Empeon Company Settings maps to ClientCorporation records for staffing clients only.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Bullhorn Sandbox using a representative data sample. The customer's Bullhorn admin reviews candidate record completeness, validates custom field values, confirms document attachment presence, and spot-checks 25-50 records against the Empeon source. Any mapping corrections (wrong field assignments, missing lookups, encoding issues in free-text custom fields) are resolved here before production migration begins. This step also validates Bullhorn Support's custom object provisioning and confirms that the Bullhorn API credentials have sufficient permission for the import pipeline.

  4. Employee-to-candidate split and direct deposit handling

    We apply the employment-status split rule to classify each Empeon Employee record as a Bullhorn Candidate (active or former employee), a Contact on a ClientCorporation (external client contact), or an archived record. Direct deposit routing numbers are encrypted at ingest, stored in masked custom fields, and never written to logs or intermediate files. We generate a parallel payroll history CSV organized by pay period as a separate deliverable outside the Bullhorn migration scope.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record order: custom fields provisioned and validated first, then Employees mapped to Candidates, then Company Settings mapped to ClientCorporations, then document attachments in batches of 50 with retry logic. Benefit enrollment and accrual balance CSV exports are delivered alongside the Bullhorn import as structured reference data. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Bullhorn API rate limits are respected throughout via batch chunking and exponential backoff.

  6. Cutover, validation, and ESS email mismatch handoff

    We freeze writes to the Empeon source during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the window, then mark Bullhorn as the system of record for candidate data. We deliver the ESS Hub email mismatch report to the customer's HR admin with recommended remediation steps (email update in Empeon or employee re-registration instructions). We do not rebuild Empeon workflows, time-and-attendance scheduling rules, or accrual calculation logic; these are documented as separate recommendations for the customer's Bullhorn admin or a Bullhorn implementation partner.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

empeon logo

empeon

Source

Strengths

  • All-in-one HCM bundle reduces vendor count for healthcare HR teams managing payroll, time, and benefits together.
  • Strong customer support reputation with multiple G2 reviewers highlighting responsive, helpful representatives.
  • Employee Self-Service Hub reduces HR administrative overhead by shifting routine tasks to employees.
  • Live and Standard reporting built directly into the platform without requiring third-party BI integrations.
  • Advanced Scheduling supports both Employee View and Daily View scheduling paradigms.

Weaknesses

  • API Connector requires a $2,000 one-time fee plus $200/month, making automated migration more costly.
  • Session timeout settings cause frequent logouts, creating friction during migration scoping and data review sessions.
  • Limited public documentation makes it difficult to assess API capabilities before purchasing the connector.
  • Pricing is opaque and requires direct sales contact, complicating budget planning for migration projects.
  • Tax calculation accuracy concerns appear in user reviews, raising compliance risk during payroll data exports.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across empeon and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    empeon: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    empeon doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your empeon to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about empeon to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during empeon to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your empeon to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for organizations under 5,000 employee records with a clean custom field inventory and no large document archives. Migrations with document attachment volumes exceeding 50,000 files, multiple benefit enrollment records, accrual balance history, or custom Credential objects requiring Bullhorn Support provisioning move to ten to fourteen weeks. Bullhorn Support custom object ticket resolution (three to five business days per custom object type) can extend the timeline if not opened during discovery.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from empeon.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day