HRMS migration

Migrate from The Applicant Manager to Crelate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between The Applicant Manager and Crelate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Crelate.

The Applicant Manager logo

The Applicant Manager

Source

Crelate

Destination

Crelate logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between The Applicant Manager and Crelate.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from The Applicant Manager to Crelate is a file-reconciliation and schema-mapping problem. TAM has no public REST API; data leaves as a password-protected Standard Applicant Data CSV paired with a zip archive of applicant files. We extract both packages, re-associate each file to its applicant record, and map TAM's custom workflow stage names and sequence to Crelate's pipeline stages so candidate progress carries over intact. Crelate's CRM-ATS hybrid model treats candidates as Contacts with a Jobs-linked pipeline rather than as standalone applicant records, which requires a structural mapping decision during scoping. We do not migrate TAM workflows, custom application forms, or onboarding automations; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Crelate.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

The Applicant Manager logo

The Applicant Manager

What's pushing teams away

  • Staffing agencies explicitly identify TAM as unsuitable for their high-volume, agency-specific workflows, prompting a switch to platforms like Greenhouse or Jobvite designed for agency use.
  • Users report limited filtering capabilities, wishing the search and filter tools were more powerful for managing larger applicant pools efficiently.
  • The platform is missing some integrations commonly expected in modern ATS platforms, requiring workarounds or manual processes for teams with complex tech stacks.
  • A dashboard navigation limitation frustrates users—clicking on a position from the main dashboard does not link directly to the job posting, requiring an extra step to reach the job listing.
  • As teams grow, the relatively simple feature set may no longer meet the advanced analytics, reporting, and customization needs of scaling organizations.

Choosing

Crelate logo

Crelate

What's pulling them in

  • Affordable per-seat pricing with transparent tiers makes Crelate accessible for small-to-mid staffing firms evaluating ATS platforms for the first time.
  • Fast implementation reported by customers—some describe getting live in a matter of minutes with support team assistance.
  • Unified ATS + CRM in a single product eliminates the need to buy and synchronize separate recruiting and sales tools.
  • Flexible custom fields across Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities allow recruiting teams to capture firm-specific data without developer involvement.
  • Positive reviews highlight the product's intuitive interface and functional breadth for teams that need recruiting workflows without enterprise overhead.

Object mapping

How The Applicant Manager objects map to Crelate

Each row shows how a The Applicant Manager object lands in Crelate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

The Applicant Manager

Position

maps to

Crelate

Job

1:1
Fully supported

TAM Positions map to Crelate Jobs. The Position title, description, department, and status fields map directly to Crelate's Job Name, Description, Department, and Status. Job status (open, closed, on hold) maps to Crelate's Job status picklist. We preserve the TAM Position ID as a reference field so the customer can cross-reference back to the TAM export during reconciliation. Department assignments require lookup resolution if the customer uses a separate Departments configuration in Crelate.

The Applicant Manager

Applicant

maps to

Crelate

Contact

1:1
Fully supported

TAM Applicants map to Crelate Contacts. Each applicant record carries the candidate's name, email, phone, address, application date, source, and current workflow stage. We map applicant contact fields directly to Crelate Contact fields. The TAM applicant ID is preserved in a custom reference field on the Crelate Contact for cross-referencing. Application date migrates to a custom field on Contact; Crelate does not have a native application-date concept outside of the Job pipeline.

The Applicant Manager

Workflow Stage

maps to

Crelate

Pipeline Stage

lossy
Fully supported

TAM's custom workflow stage names and sequences vary by customer configuration, so there is no standard mapping. We collect the complete TAM workflow stage inventory during discovery, map each customer-defined stage to an equivalent Crelate pipeline stage name, and preserve the stage order so candidate progression reflects correctly after cutover. Stage probability percentages from TAM migrate to Crelate's stage probability values. If Crelate has fewer stages than TAM, we map the most-critical stages and flag the remainder for the customer's admin to consolidate post-migration.

The Applicant Manager

Resume and Cover Letter

maps to

Crelate

ContentDocument (file attachment)

1:1
Fully supported

TAM resumes and cover letters are stored in a password-protected zip archive separate from the Standard Applicant Data CSV. We download and unpack both packages, cross-reference each file by applicant ID or filename to its corresponding Crelate Contact record, and attach files as ContentDocument records linked via ContentDocumentLink. The re-association step is the primary risk point; we use a deterministic filename pattern (applicantID_resume.pdf) or a lookup table built from the CSV to ensure files attach to the correct Contact.

The Applicant Manager

Screening Question (Position-level)

maps to

Crelate

Custom Form / Application Question

1:1
Fully supported

TAM stores application questions as a schema on the Position, with answers stored per Applicant. We extract both the question definitions and the answer values. Question text and answer type migrate to Crelate's Custom Questionnaires attached to the corresponding Job. Applicant answers migrate to custom fields on the Contact or to the Crelate Activity Form associated with the Job submission. Crelate's Business tier supports up to 20 custom fields per entity; we flag any TAM screening schema that exceeds this and negotiate a field consolidation approach with the customer before migration.

The Applicant Manager

Activity Note and Scorecard

maps to

Crelate

Note / Activity Form

1:1
Fully supported

Hiring team notes, scorecard ratings, and stage-change timestamps migrate as Crelate Notes attached to the Contact record, or as Activity Form entries tied to the Job. Stage-change timestamps preserve the original TAM timestamp so candidate movement through the pipeline can be reconstructed from the activity timeline. Formatting of notes may vary from TAM's original presentation; we capture plain text and preserve attachment links where TAM supported them.

The Applicant Manager

User / Hiring Manager

maps to

Crelate

User

1:1
Fully supported

TAM user accounts (recruiters and hiring managers) are tied to applicant assignments and workflow actions. We map TAM user accounts by email address to Crelate User records. Assignments on applicant records migrate as Crelate Contact owners or as a hiring team entry depending on the customer's Crelate configuration. Any TAM user without a matching Crelate User is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes.

The Applicant Manager

Onboarding Document

maps to

Crelate

ContentDocument / Custom Object

1:1
Fully supported

TAM onboarding document metadata and storage references can be migrated, but the destination system's onboarding module acceptance determines whether forms are fully functional post-migration. We extract document metadata and attach files to the Contact record where Crelate's onboarding module does not have a direct equivalent. Crelate's onboarding suite (Business Plus and Enterprise) uses a separate onboarding workflow; we document the TAM onboarding field inventory for the customer's admin to reconfigure in Crelate's onboarding tool.

The Applicant Manager

Applicant Source

maps to

Crelate

Contact Source Field

1:1
Fully supported

TAM tracks the origin of each applicant (job board, referral, direct, agency). The source field migrates to a Crelate Contact custom field or to the built-in source attribution field if available on the customer's tier. Source tracking supports downstream reporting in Crelate's Analytics module. We flag any TAM custom source categories that do not map to Crelate's standard source picklist values for the admin to add post-migration.

The Applicant Manager

Candidate Tags

maps to

Crelate

Tag

lossy
Fully supported

If TAM uses internal tags or rating flags on applicants, these migrate to Crelate's Tag feature on the Contact record. Tags are represented in Crelate's API as a Tags object keyed by category name. We flatten any hierarchical TAM tags to Crelate-compatible string tags and preserve the full original tag label in a custom field if the tag structure is important for the customer's segmentation.

The Applicant Manager

Custom Application Fields

maps to

Crelate

Custom Fields on Contact or Job

lossy
Fully supported

TAM supports custom profile fields per applicant beyond the standard contact schema. We extract the full custom field inventory, map field types to Crelate's equivalent types (text, number, date, picklist, checkbox), and provision them on the Contact object or the Job object depending on whether the field is position-level or applicant-level. Crelate's Business tier caps custom fields at 20 per entity; we audit the TAM custom field count during discovery and flag any overflow for consolidation or Business Plus tier consideration.

The Applicant Manager

Job Board Posting

maps to

Crelate

Job Distribution Record

1:1
Fully supported

TAM job posting status and job board distribution references migrate as job distribution records in Crelate. If TAM tracks which boards a position was posted to (Indeed, Monster, LinkedIn, etc.), we map these to Crelate's Sponsored Job Posting integration references or to a custom field on the Job record. Active posting status migrates to the Job's publish status in Crelate's branded job portal.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

The Applicant Manager logo

The Applicant Manager gotchas

Medium

Feature-based per-month pricing compounds with team size

High

No publicly documented REST API

Medium

Custom workflow stages lack standardized naming

Low

Resume and cover letter files are stored separately from the CSV export

Crelate logo

Crelate gotchas

High

120 req/min API rate limit throttles bulk migrations

High

20 custom field per-entity cap forces data model decisions

Medium

15,000-record export ceiling on single operations

Medium

Sequences and automation workflows do not migrate

Low

API key is a querystring parameter, not a header

Pair-specific challenges

  • TAM has no public REST API

    TAM does not expose a documented public API. The primary export mechanism is a password-protected Standard Applicant Data CSV combined with a zip archive of applicant files. We work around this by extracting all available CSV fields and pairing them with the file archive. Any fields not present in the CSV, such as internal notes or custom flags, are handled as unstructured data or flagged for manual export. This two-package export process adds time to migration timelines and limits the degree of automation possible during the extraction phase.

  • Resume and cover letter files require re-association

    The Standard Applicant Data CSV does not embed file content. Applicant files (resumes, cover letters, portfolio attachments) are delivered as a separate password-protected zip archive. We download and unpack both packages, then re-associate each file with its corresponding applicant record using the filename or applicant ID cross-reference. TAM does not enforce a consistent filename convention across exports, so we build a lookup table from the CSV to match records. Mis-attachment risk is highest for records where the applicant name in the CSV does not match the filename exactly. We validate re-association with a sample audit before committing the full file set.

  • Custom workflow stages require per-customer mapping

    TAM allows customers to define their own workflow stage names and sequences. No two TAM instances necessarily share the same stage vocabulary. We cannot assume a standard set of stages. We handle this by collecting the complete workflow configuration from TAM during discovery, mapping each customer-defined stage to an equivalent Crelate pipeline stage, and preserving the order so candidate progress reflects correctly after cutover. If TAM has more stages than Crelate's pipeline, we consolidate to the most operationally significant ones and flag the remainder for the customer's admin to address post-migration.

  • Crelate caps custom fields at 20 per entity on Business

    Crelate's Business plan limits custom fields to 20 per entity (Contact, Company, Job). TAM has no published custom field cap, and organizations with extensive screening question schemas or custom applicant profile fields may exceed this. We audit the full TAM custom field inventory during discovery. If the inventory exceeds 20 fields on any entity, we recommend either Business Plus (with higher limits) or a field consolidation approach where related fields are merged into structured picklist values or multi-select fields before migration.

  • TAM's per-feature pricing does not map to Crelate's per-user model

    TAM's Basic plan charges $90 per feature per month, an unusual billing model that scales with enabled features rather than team size. This means TAM costs are not directly comparable to Crelate's per-user model. We flag the full TAM feature inventory during migration scoping so customers understand their current TAM spend and can model destination pricing accurately without assuming a simple user-count conversion. Crelate's Business plan at $119 per user per month bundles CRM, ATS, API, and Analytics rather than metering each capability individually.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful The Applicant Manager to Crelate data migration

  1. Discovery and TAM export preparation

    We request the Standard Applicant Data CSV and the applicant file zip archive from TAM. We simultaneously audit the TAM configuration: active and closed positions, applicant count, custom workflow stage names and sequence, custom application question schemas, onboarding document inventory, and user accounts. We flag any fields that appear in the TAM admin panel but not in the CSV as requiring manual extraction or noted as data that cannot be migrated. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with the full object inventory, a field-to-field mapping draft, and a Crelate edition recommendation based on custom field and storage requirements.

  2. File archive extraction and re-association

    We download and decrypt the TAM file zip archive and the Standard Applicant Data CSV. We parse the CSV to build a lookup table keyed on applicant ID and applicant name. We unzip the file archive, inspect the filename convention (applicantID_resume.pdf, full_name_coverletter.pdf, or similar), and match each file to its corresponding applicant record. Any unmatched files are flagged in a reconciliation report for the customer to resolve manually before migration proceeds. This two-package extraction and re-association step is completed before any Crelate ingestion begins.

  3. Crelate schema provisioning and stage mapping

    We create the destination schema in Crelate. This includes provisioning any custom fields on the Contact and Job objects to accommodate TAM custom application fields, creating or confirming the pipeline stages in Crelate's Job configuration to match the TAM workflow stage sequence, and setting stage probability values from the TAM stage configuration. If TAM has more than 20 custom fields on any entity, we coordinate a consolidation approach with the customer or recommend a Crelate Business Plus tier upgrade before migration begins.

  4. Test migration to Crelate sandbox

    We run a full migration into a Crelate staging environment using production-like data volume. The customer's HR or recruiting lead reconciles record counts (Contacts in, Jobs in, documents attached), spot-checks 25-50 random applicant records against the TAM source, and verifies that workflow stage assignments and file attachments appear correctly in Crelate. We correct any mapping errors identified during the sandbox review before scheduling the production migration window. Crelate's Import Data+ and staging environment review tools support this validation step.

  5. User and owner reconciliation

    We extract every distinct TAM user account referenced on applicant records and match them by email address to Crelate User records. Any TAM user without a matching Crelate User account is held in a reconciliation queue. The customer's Crelate admin provisions missing users before record import resumes. Owner assignments on applicant records migrate as Contact owner assignments in Crelate. This step gates the production migration because Crelate requires a valid OwnerId on Contact records.

  6. Production migration and cutover

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jobs first (as the position container), then Contacts (with file attachments linked via ContentDocumentLink), then Activity history (notes, scorecards), then any onboarding document metadata. We freeze TAM writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration, attach the remaining file archive entries, and then mark Crelate as the system of record. We deliver a written Workflow and Automation inventory document noting that TAM custom workflows, application forms, and onboarding automations do not migrate and providing the rebuild guidance for the customer's admin.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

The Applicant Manager logo

The Applicant Manager

Source

Strengths

  • Intuitive, workflow-based interface that corporate recruiting teams can adopt without extensive training
  • Affordable per-feature pricing that remains competitive against enterprise ATS platforms
  • Highly responsive customer support that implements feature requests rapidly
  • Centralized applicant data storage combining resumes, cover letters, and screening information in one place
  • Strong suitability for SMB corporate recruiting across hospitality, construction, nonprofit, and government contracting sectors

Weaknesses

  • No free plan—fully paid platform limits initial evaluation without a demo or trial commitment
  • Staffing agencies find the platform unsuitable due to lack of high-volume, agency-specific workflow features
  • Limited filtering capabilities frustrate users managing large applicant pools
  • Fewer integrations than competitors require manual workarounds for complex HR tech stacks
  • Dashboard navigation requires extra steps to access job postings directly from the main view
Crelate logo

Crelate

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM in a single platform reduces data synchronization overhead for recruiting teams.
  • Fast setup with guided implementation reported as a significant time saver for small teams.
  • Transparent per-seat pricing without surprise fees at the base tier.
  • Flexible custom field configuration across core objects without developer dependency.
  • Export capability supports up to 15,000 records per operation for Contacts, Companies, and Opportunities.

Weaknesses

  • API rate limit of 120 requests per minute restricts bulk migration throughput.
  • Custom field cap of 20 per entity requires field consolidation for complex recruiting schemas.
  • All advanced features (Activities, Activity Forms, Core Record Field customization) are tier-gated add-ons.
  • Customer service responsiveness receives consistent negative feedback in reviews.
  • Resume parsing quality trails competitors and generates support requests.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across The Applicant Manager and Crelate.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    The Applicant Manager: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    The Applicant Manager doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your The Applicant Manager to Crelate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about The Applicant Manager to Crelate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during The Applicant Manager to Crelate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your The Applicant Manager to Crelate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 1,000 applicants and 50 positions with straightforward workflow configurations complete in two to four weeks. Migrations with high applicant volume (over 5,000), multiple custom workflow stages, large file archives requiring individual re-association, or extensive screening question schemas move to five to eight weeks because of the two-package export extraction and per-customer stage mapping work required during discovery.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from The Applicant Manager.
Land in Crelate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day