HRMS migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between The Applicant Manager and Recruit CRM & ATS. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Recruit CRM & ATS.
The Applicant Manager
Source
Recruit CRM & ATS
Destination
Compatibility
10 of 12
objects map 1:1 between The Applicant Manager and Recruit CRM & ATS.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from The Applicant Manager to Recruit CRM is a data-centric migration for corporate recruiting teams that have outgrown TAM's feature set and want the candidate-plus-client CRM model Recruit CRM provides. TAM has no public REST API, so the primary export is a password-protected Standard Applicant Data CSV paired with a separate zip archive of applicant files. We extract both packages, re-associate each file (resume, cover letter, portfolio item) with its corresponding applicant record using filename or ID cross-references, and load the combined dataset into Recruit CRM via its REST API. Custom workflow stage names and ordering migrate as Recruit CRM pipeline stages with the original stage order preserved. Workflow configurations, custom application question logic, and onboarding form builders do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for your admin to rebuild in Recruit CRM's workflow builder.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a The Applicant Manager object lands in Recruit CRM & ATS, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
The Applicant Manager
Position (Job Posting)
Recruit CRM & ATS
Job Order
1:1TAM Positions (job title, description, department, open/closed status) map to Recruit CRM Job Orders. We extract the position status field to set the Job Order's open/closed flag. Department assignments from TAM become custom picklist values or tags in Recruit CRM's job configuration. Active positions migrate as open jobs; archived positions migrate as closed records with historical data intact. The job order is created first so that applicants can reference it during import.
The Applicant Manager
Applicant
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate
1:1Each TAM Applicant (contact information, application date, source, current workflow stage, custom profile fields) maps to a Recruit CRM Candidate record. We use the applicant email address as the dedupe key. Application date migrates as the created_at timestamp. Source attribution (Indeed, LinkedIn, referral, direct) becomes a custom field or tag in Recruit CRM. Current workflow stage resolves via the stage name mapping established during discovery so the candidate lands in the correct pipeline stage on day one.
The Applicant Manager
Workflow Stage
Recruit CRM & ATS
Pipeline Stage
lossyTAM's customer-defined workflow stage names and sequence have no standard vocabulary across TAM instances. We collect the complete workflow configuration during discovery, map each TAM stage to an equivalent Recruit CRM pipeline stage preserving the original order, and configure the pipeline in Recruit CRM before applicant migration begins. Stage probability percentages from TAM migrate as informational fields in Recruit CRM if the customer uses them for reporting.
The Applicant Manager
Resume and Cover Letter Files
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate File Attachment
1:1TAM delivers applicant files (resumes, cover letters, portfolio items) as a separate password-protected zip archive. We unpack the archive, match each file to its applicant record using filename or ID cross-reference from the CSV export, then attach the file to the corresponding Recruit CRM Candidate record via the API. This two-step extraction and re-association adds a processing layer that must be handled carefully to avoid misattachment. File metadata (upload date, file type) migrates where available in the export.
The Applicant Manager
Screening Question Schema
Recruit CRM & ATS
Custom Application Question
1:1TAM stores custom application questions per position along with each applicant's responses. We migrate the question text, answer type (text, multiple choice, yes/no, rating), and required flag as a Recruit CRM custom form field group attached to the Job Order. Conditional question logic (showing one field based on a prior answer) does not migrate and must be rebuilt in Recruit CRM's form builder. Applicant responses map to the corresponding custom field values on the Candidate record.
The Applicant Manager
Activity Notes and Scorecard Ratings
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate Activity / Note
1:1Hiring team notes, scorecard ratings, and stage-change timestamps tracked per applicant in TAM migrate as activity history entries in Recruit CRM. We preserve the timestamp, author (linked to the matching Recruit CRM user), and note body. Scorecard ratings map to custom numeric or picklist fields on the Candidate record. Formatting of note bodies may vary between platforms; we do a best-effort rich-text pass on import.
The Applicant Manager
Hiring Manager Assignment
Recruit CRM & ATS
Team Member Assignment
1:1TAM user accounts tied to applicant assignments and workflow actions map to Recruit CRM team member records. We match by email address. Any TAM user without a matching Recruit CRM account is held in a reconciliation queue for the admin to provision before record import resumes. Active versus inactive status and role (recruiter, hiring manager, read-only) maps to Recruit CRM's role and permission configuration.
The Applicant Manager
Onboarding Document Metadata
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate Document Reference
1:1TAM's onboarding paperwork collection metadata migrates as document reference fields on the Candidate record in Recruit CRM. The actual form files migrate as attachments where the TAM export provides a file path. Form logic and conditional onboarding steps (common in agency temp-to-hire placements) do not migrate as configured rules and must be rebuilt in Recruit CRM's onboarding module.
The Applicant Manager
TAM User Account
Recruit CRM & ATS
Recruit CRM Team Member
1:1TAM recruiter and hiring manager accounts migrate to Recruit CRM team member records with the same email as the dedupe key. Role-based access (full recruiter, hiring manager, admin) maps to Recruit CRM's permission groups. We preserve the account creation date as a reference field. Any TAM user accounts without a corresponding team member provisioning in Recruit CRM go to a reconciliation queue for the customer admin to resolve before the applicant import phase.
The Applicant Manager
Position Department
Recruit CRM & ATS
Job Order Tag / Custom Field
lossyTAM's department field on positions migrates as a Recruit CRM tag or custom picklist field on the Job Order. If the customer uses departments as a reporting dimension in TAM, we recommend creating a custom field rather than relying on tags so that department filtering works in Recruit CRM's analytics module. The customer confirms the preference during discovery.
The Applicant Manager
Applicant Source Attribution
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate Source Tag
1:1The application source field in TAM (Indeed, LinkedIn, Employee Referral, Walk-in, etc.) migrates as a source tag on the Recruit CRM Candidate record. Source attribution is preserved for reporting on candidate acquisition channels. If TAM uses a free-text source field, we categorize recognizable sources and tag the remainder as Direct/Unknown for the admin to correct post-migration.
The Applicant Manager
Application Date and Timestamps
Recruit CRM & ATS
Candidate Created At / Activity Timestamps
1:1TAM's application date (the date an applicant entered the system for a specific position) migrates as the Candidate's created_at timestamp in Recruit CRM. Stage-change timestamps migrate as individual activity entries with the original timestamp preserved for accurate pipeline history. This ensures the candidate timeline reflects the full journey from first application through each workflow stage transition.
| The Applicant Manager | Recruit CRM & ATS | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Position (Job Posting) | Job Order1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Applicant | Candidate1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Workflow Stage | Pipeline Stagelossy | Fully supported | |
| Resume and Cover Letter Files | Candidate File Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Screening Question Schema | Custom Application Question1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Activity Notes and Scorecard Ratings | Candidate Activity / Note1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Hiring Manager Assignment | Team Member Assignment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Onboarding Document Metadata | Candidate Document Reference1:1 | Fully supported | |
| TAM User Account | Recruit CRM Team Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Position Department | Job Order Tag / Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Applicant Source Attribution | Candidate Source Tag1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Application Date and Timestamps | Candidate Created At / Activity Timestamps1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
The Applicant Manager gotchas
Feature-based per-month pricing compounds with team size
No publicly documented REST API
Custom workflow stages lack standardized naming
Resume and cover letter files are stored separately from the CSV export
Recruit CRM & ATS gotchas
API rate limits are license-scaled and can throttle bulk migration
Custom field schemas vary per organization and require field-level mapping
Files and email attachments require separate extraction and re-upload
Email sequences and automation logic do not transfer between platforms
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and TAM export preparation
We request the Standard Applicant Data CSV and applicant file zip archive from TAM, using the credentials the customer provides. We audit the export contents: total applicant records, total positions, workflow stage names and order, custom application question schemas, hiring manager user accounts, and file attachment count. We also collect the TAM workflow configuration (stage names, count, order) during this phase. The discovery output is a written scope confirming record counts, mapping rules, and any fields absent from the CSV that the customer may need to supplement manually.
TAM to Recruit CRM field mapping
We map every TAM CSV column to a Recruit CRM candidate or job order field. This includes contact fields (name, email, phone, address), application metadata (source, date, stage), custom profile fields, and screening question responses. We resolve the workflow stage mapping using the TAM stage names collected during discovery, configuring the corresponding pipeline and stages in Recruit CRM before any data loads. Custom application questions are mapped to Recruit CRM custom form fields attached to the Job Order.
File re-association from zip archive
We unpack the TAM applicant file zip, extract all resumes, cover letters, and portfolio attachments, and match each file to its applicant record. The primary match key is applicant ID embedded in the filename; fallback matching uses email address or full name where the ID is absent. We attach matched files to the corresponding Recruit CRM Candidate record via the API and flag any unmatched files for manual review. This step runs in parallel with the CSV transformation pipeline so both streams are ready for import simultaneously.
User account reconciliation
We extract every distinct TAM user referenced on applicant assignments and workflow actions and match by email against the Recruit CRM destination's team member table. Any TAM user without a matching Recruit CRM account goes to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions missing team members (active or inactive based on whether the original TAM user is still active) before applicant import begins. This step must complete before applicant records load because OwnerId or assigned-to references are required on candidate records.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Recruit CRM sandbox environment using production-like data volume. The customer's team lead spot-checks 25-50 applicant records against the TAM source, verifies that workflow stages map correctly, confirms file attachments are associated with the right candidate, and validates that screening question responses landed in the correct fields. Any mapping corrections are made in this phase. The sandbox sign-off is required before production migration begins.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Job Orders first (so candidates can reference them), then Candidates with stage assignments resolved, then file attachments linked to the correct candidate records, then activity history entries and notes. We use Recruit CRM's REST API with batch chunking and rate-limit handling. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Any records modified in TAM during the migration window are caught in a final delta pass before cutover.
Cutover, validation, and workflow rebuild handoff
We freeze TAM writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Recruit CRM as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of TAM workflow configurations and custom application question logic that requires rebuild in Recruit CRM's pipeline and form builders. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild TAM workflows as Recruit CRM automation rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.
Platform deep dives
The Applicant Manager
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Recruit CRM & ATS
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across The Applicant Manager and Recruit CRM & ATS.
Object compatibility
1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
The Applicant Manager: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
The Applicant Manager doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during The Applicant Manager to Recruit CRM & ATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your The Applicant Manager to Recruit CRM & ATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave The Applicant Manager
Other ways to arrive at Recruit CRM & ATS
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.