HRMS migration

Migrate from In-recruiting to BambooHR

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between In-recruiting and BambooHR. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in BambooHR.

In-recruiting logo

In-recruiting

Source

BambooHR

Destination

BambooHR logo

Compatibility

70%

7 of 10

objects map 1:1 between In-recruiting and BambooHR.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

In-recruiting is a European ATS built for recruitment agencies managing the full candidate lifecycle. BambooHR is a US-based HRIS with a lightweight ATS module designed for internal HR teams handling inbound applicants. The migration from In-recruiting to BambooHR crosses from a purpose-built ATS into an HRIS that happens to include an ATS add-on. The schema difference is significant: In-recruiting tracks candidates, applications, pipeline stages, and placements as first-class objects; BambooHR's ATS stores Candidates and Job Openings, with pipeline stages implemented as status fields and workflow-driven transitions. We map In-recruiting pipeline stages to BambooHR Hiring statuses and preserve the original stage labels as custom fields for reporting continuity. Custom fields, localized date formats, and multi-language data from In-recruiting require field-by-field translation to BambooHR's supported field types before import. We do not migrate In-recruiting workflows, automations, or email templates; we deliver a written inventory of every active workflow for the customer's BambooHR admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

In-recruiting logo

In-recruiting

What's pushing teams away

  • Pricing structure is complex — four named tiers plus custom Enterprise plus add-ons make it hard to estimate total cost without sales engagement.
  • Reviewer feedback notes the application form usability and statistical/reporting depth need improvement compared to modern competitors.
  • Entry-level cost (€49–54/month) is higher than some flat-rate annual alternatives that target the same SMB segment.
  • No anti-cheating features for assessments are documented, limiting suitability for high-volume technical screening at scale.
  • Public API capability is not documented in reviewer write-ups, suggesting either limited or sales-gated developer access.

Choosing

BambooHR logo

BambooHR

What's pulling them in

  • Lowest friction entry point for SMBs moving off spreadsheets — intuitive interface means most teams are functional within days, not weeks.
  • Consolidation value: BambooHR merges ATS, onboarding, HR records, time-off, and payroll into a single pane of glass that employees never need to leave.
  • Volume discounts applied automatically by headcount, so pricing scales predictably as the company grows without renewal negotiations.
  • BambooHR reports most customers go live in four to six weeks, making it a realistic commitment for under-resourced HR teams.
  • Award-winning Support Heroes cited frequently in reviews — responsive human support after implementation is a differentiator.

Object mapping

How In-recruiting objects map to BambooHR

Each row shows how a In-recruiting object lands in BambooHR, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

In-recruiting

Candidate

maps to

BambooHR

Candidate (People module)

1:1
Fully supported

In-recruiting Candidate records map to BambooHR People as Candidate records (not Employee records, which are reserved for hired employees). The In-recruiting candidate first name, last name, email, phone, address, and source channel map to the equivalent BambooHR fields. We resolve duplicate candidates by email dedupe before import. Any In-recruiting GDPR consent flags map to BambooHR custom fields; the customer's BambooHR admin configures the corresponding consent records post-migration.

In-recruiting

Job

maps to

BambooHR

Job Opening

1:1
Fully supported

In-recruiting Job records map to BambooHR Job Openings. The In-recruiting job title, description, department, location, and employment type map to the equivalent BambooHR fields. Open/closed status maps directly. Active In-recruiting jobs are handled last in the migration sequence so that live job postings remain functional through cutover. In-recruiting job fields with HTML-formatted descriptions are stripped to plain text before insertion into BambooHR.

In-recruiting

Application

maps to

BambooHR

Candidate (linked to Job Opening)

1:1
Fully supported

In-recruiting Application records (the join entity between Candidate and Job) map to BambooHR Candidate records linked to a Job Opening. The Application ID is preserved in a custom BambooHR field for reconciliation. If the In-recruiting source system uses a separate Application object rather than a direct candidate-to-job relationship, we flatten it by linking the Candidate to the corresponding BambooHR Job Opening and preserving the application timestamp and status.

In-recruiting

Pipeline Stage

maps to

BambooHR

Candidate Status (custom workflow field)

lossy
Fully supported

In-recruiting pipeline stages (Configured Pipeline Stage 1, Stage 2, etc.) do not have a direct BambooHR equivalent because BambooHR uses a simpler candidate status model (Applied, Phone Screen, Interview, Offer, Hired). We map each In-recruiting stage to the nearest BambooHR status and preserve the original stage label in a custom multi-select picklist field original_pipeline_stage__c on the Candidate for reporting continuity. If In-recruiting uses more than five custom pipeline stages, we recommend consolidating during migration because BambooHR's status workflow is less flexible.

In-recruiting

Interview

maps to

BambooHR

Interview (BambooHR ATS feature)

1:1
Fully supported

In-recruiting Interview records map to BambooHR Interview records on the Candidate. We transfer the interview date, interviewer name (resolved to a BambooHR User by email), interview type, duration, and interviewer score if present. Interviewer feedback notes migrate as a text custom field on the Interview record. If In-recruiting stores scorecard ratings in structured fields, we flatten them to a text field since BambooHR's ATS interview model does not support structured scorecard fields by default.

In-recruiting

Note

maps to

BambooHR

Note (attached to Candidate)

1:1
Fully supported

In-recruiting Notes linked to Candidates, Applications, or Jobs map to BambooHR Notes attached to the corresponding Candidate or Job Opening. We preserve the note creation date, author (resolved to a BambooHR User by email), and note body. Rich-text notes from In-recruiting are converted to plain text with bullet points preserved. Notes attached to Placement records are migrated to the hired Employee's BambooHR People record.

In-recruiting

Company / Client

maps to

BambooHR

Company (BambooHR ATS) or Employee's employment data

1:1
Fully supported

In-recruiting Company or Client records (used by staffing agencies to track client organizations) map to BambooHR Company records if the BambooHR account has the ATS Company feature enabled. If the destination BambooHR account does not use ATS Companies, we store the client organization name as a custom text field on the Candidate or Employee record. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping.

In-recruiting

User / Consultant

maps to

BambooHR

Employee (People module)

1:1
Fully supported

In-recruiting User records (internal recruiting team members) map to BambooHR Employee records in the People module if the customer wants to manage their recruiting team within BambooHR. For organizations that only use BambooHR for candidate and employee data and not for internal user management, In-recruiting Users are not migrated; instead we map Owner references on records to the corresponding BambooHR User by email resolution.

In-recruiting

Tag / Skill

maps to

BambooHR

Custom fields (multi-select picklist)

lossy
Fully supported

In-recruiting tags (used to label candidates by skill, source, or category) map to BambooHR custom multi-select picklist fields. We create the custom field in BambooHR before migration, populate it with the unique tag values, and link it to the Candidate object. Tags used for candidate classification migrate to the custom field; tags used for sourcing attribution migrate to the candidate_source custom field. The customer specifies the tag strategy during scoping.

In-recruiting

Custom Fields

maps to

BambooHR

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

In-recruiting custom fields on Candidate, Application, Job, and Interview migrate to BambooHR custom fields of the closest matching type. We translate In-recruiting field types (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox, multi-select) to their BambooHR equivalents. Localized date formats from In-recruiting are converted to the format configured in the BambooHR destination account. Any In-recruiting custom fields with unsupported data types are flagged during discovery and resolved by the customer before migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

In-recruiting logo

In-recruiting gotchas

High

Public API details are not surfaced in reviewer documentation

Medium

Tier structure couples user count, active jobs, and feature flags

Medium

Multiposting integrations are tier-gated and per-board configured

Low

Reporting/statistics weakness flagged by reviewers

BambooHR logo

BambooHR gotchas

High

Undocumented API rate limits can trigger 503 errors

High

Per-employee pricing model requires active record count verification

Medium

API credentials must be sent on every request to avoid extra round trips

Medium

Custom field schema varies per account and requires manual inventory

Low

Document and attachment exports are not covered by standard report exports

Pair-specific challenges

  • Pipeline stages require manual consolidation before migration

    In-recruiting supports multi-stage configurable pipelines with custom labels, probabilities, and timestamps. BambooHR's candidate status model uses a fixed set of stage labels (Applied, Phone Screen, Interview, Offer, Hired) with limited customization. Migrations with more than five In-recruiting pipeline stages must consolidate to BambooHR's supported status values during scoping. We preserve the original stage label in a custom field but the pipeline visualization in BambooHR will reflect the consolidated statuses. Teams that rely on granular pipeline metrics should plan to reproduce those reports in BambooHR's reporting module post-migration.

  • In-recruiting workflows and email templates do not migrate

    In-recruiting workflow rules (stage-change triggers, automated emails, task creation) and email templates are ATS-specific automation features with no direct BambooHR equivalent. BambooHR Automations support HR-process triggers (new hire, PTO request, onboarding) but the logic models are different. We do not migrate In-recruiting automations as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active In-recruiting workflow with its trigger conditions, actions, and recommended BambooHR Automation equivalent. The customer's BambooHR admin rebuilds them in BambooHR or a third-party tool like Zapier.

  • CSV export constraints limit structured data migration

    In-recruiting's CSV export may flatten multi-value fields (skills, tags, multi-select custom fields) into delimiter-separated strings. We handle the parsing and reconstruction of these values during the transform phase, mapping them to BambooHR custom multi-select picklist fields. Structured relationship data (Application-to-Candidate-to-Job) can also be lost in a flat CSV export, which is why we prefer API-based extraction where available and reconstruct the relational structure during import using record ID lookups and the BambooHR Hiring API.

  • GDPR consent fields require manual configuration in BambooHR

    In-recruiting's European-origin design includes explicit GDPR consent tracking per candidate record. BambooHR's standard fields include a legal checkbox and a hire date but no dedicated consent log for ATS candidates. GDPR consent records from In-recruiting migrate as custom fields on the BambooHR Candidate record. The customer's BambooHR admin configures the corresponding consent record structure in BambooHR after migration, including any data-retention policies that apply to candidates who have withdrawn consent.

  • Placement and billing records have no BambooHR equivalent

    Staffing agencies using In-recruiting to track placements (candidate placed at a client with billing terms) will find that BambooHR does not have a placement or billable assignment object. Placements can be migrated as BambooHR Employee records with client organization stored in a custom field, but the billing rate, commission, and contract terms stored in In-recruiting Placement records must be documented separately as a custom object or exported to a spreadsheet for admin reference. This gap is architectural, not a data migration limitation.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful In-recruiting to BambooHR data migration

  1. Discovery and data audit

    We audit the In-recruiting account across all modules: Candidates, Jobs, Applications, Pipeline Stages, Interviews, Notes, Companies, Users, Tags, and Custom Fields. We document the count of each object, the structure of custom fields (type, required, multi-value), the pipeline stage definitions, and the active workflow inventory. We verify the export method available from In-recruiting (CSV export or REST API) and flag any localized data formats, multi-language fields, or GDPR consent records that require special handling. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts and a pre-flight checklist.

  2. Field mapping and schema design

    We build the destination schema in BambooHR before any data moves. This includes creating custom fields on the Candidate and Employee objects (mapped from In-recruiting custom fields), configuring the candidate status workflow (mapped from In-recruiting pipeline stages), and setting up any required BambooHR Job Opening fields. For GDPR compliance, we create consent-related custom fields on the Candidate record. We design the custom field original_pipeline_stage__c to carry the In-recruiting stage label through the migration. The schema is reviewed with the customer before any import begins.

  3. Sandbox validation migration

    We run a full migration into a BambooHR sandbox or a test environment using a representative subset of production data (at minimum 50 candidates, 20 jobs, 10 interviews, and 5 candidates per pipeline stage). The customer's HR admin reviews the migrated records, verifies that custom field values appear correctly, confirms that pipeline stage consolidation is acceptable, and spot-checks search and filter functionality. Any field mapping corrections are documented and applied before the production migration begins. Sandbox validation is non-negotiable for this pair because of the pipeline stage consolidation step.

  4. Active job handling strategy

    We sequence the migration so that active job postings and open applications are migrated last, after all other record types are validated in BambooHR. During the active-job migration window, we freeze writes in In-recruiting for a brief cutover period (typically 4-8 hours) to capture any final application submissions. Live job postings remain functional in In-recruiting until the moment of cutover, then redirect to BambooHR if the customer has set up a careers page integration. Any applications submitted during the cutover window are captured in a delta migration and inserted into BambooHR before go-live.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: first Job Openings (no dependencies), then Candidates (no upstream dependencies), then Applications (linked to Job Openings and Candidates by ID), then Interviews (linked to Candidates), then Notes (linked to Candidates), then Tags (linked to Candidates by ID). Custom fields are created in BambooHR via the BambooHR API before data insertion. We use batched inserts with exponential backoff on API rate limit responses. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow inventory handoff

    We freeze In-recruiting writes at cutover, run a final delta migration for any records modified during the migration window, then enable BambooHR as the system of record. We validate record counts, spot-check 25-50 migrated records for field accuracy, and confirm that pipeline stage consolidation appears correctly in the BambooHR Hiring dashboard. We deliver the In-recruiting workflow and email template inventory document to the customer's BambooHR admin. We do not rebuild In-recruiting automations as BambooHR Automations inside the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

In-recruiting logo

In-recruiting

Source

Strengths

  • 11-language platform with strong European footprint and localisation.
  • Full-lifecycle ATS covering career pages, multiposting, screening, interviews, and reporting.
  • Named enterprise references (McDonald's, Burger King, Renault Trucks, DHL Express).
  • Tiered plans accommodating SMB through Enterprise.
  • 15+ years of product tenure (founded 2009 under Intervieweb).

Weaknesses

  • Complex pricing with four named tiers plus add-ons and custom Enterprise.
  • Reporting and application form usability flagged for improvement in reviews.
  • Public API documentation not surfaced via review aggregators.
  • No anti-cheating assessment features documented.
  • Higher entry price than some flat-fee annual SMB alternatives.
BambooHR logo

BambooHR

Destination

Strengths

  • Single platform consolidating ATS, onboarding, HR records, payroll, and time-off reduces system sprawl for SMBs.
  • Fast implementation — BambooHR reports four to six weeks from kickoff to go-live for most customers.
  • Per-employee pricing with automatic volume discounts makes cost predictable as headcount grows.
  • Strong customer support reputation (Support Heroes) cited consistently across G2, Capterra, and direct testimonials.
  • Well-documented API with UTF-8 encoding, clear field types, and HTTPS-only access.

Weaknesses

  • Mobile application is significantly limited compared to the desktop experience, frustrating remote and field workers.
  • Companies above 150–200 employees frequently outgrow the platform's feature depth and customization surface.
  • Limited advanced reporting and analytics compared to enterprise HR platforms — custom report building is the ceiling.
  • PTO and profile customization are pain points — non-standard accrual policies and complex org structures require workarounds.
  • Document management and attachment handling lack the granularity of dedicated document-centric HR systems.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across In-recruiting and BambooHR.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    In-recruiting: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    In-recruiting doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your In-recruiting to BambooHR migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about In-recruiting to BambooHR data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during In-recruiting to BambooHR migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your In-recruiting to BambooHR migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and three weeks for accounts under 5,000 candidates and 500 job records with fewer than five pipeline stages. Migrations with more than 10,000 candidates, multi-language datasets, GDPR consent history requiring custom field reconstruction, or complex custom field structures move to five to eight weeks because of the sandbox validation cycle and field-by-field mapping. Active-job handling during cutover adds a half-day to one day to the final phase.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from In-recruiting.
Land in BambooHR, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day