Project Management migration

Migrate from TaskRay to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between TaskRay and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

TaskRay logo

TaskRay

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between TaskRay and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from TaskRay to Trello is a structural simplification, not a straightforward record copy. TaskRay's four-level hierarchy (Project → Task Group → Sub-Project → Task) has no direct Trello equivalent; Trello operates on a two-level model (Board → List → Card) with no native Milestone, Dependency, or Resource object. We flatten Sub-Projects into child Cards or sibling Boards depending on volume, re-attach Checklist Items as native Trello Card checklists, and preserve Milestone flags as Due Dates and Card labels. Trello's Butler automation, custom fields via Power-Up, and board templates cover most of what remains, but cost tracking, Resource Management, and Field Trickler lookups do not have Trello equivalents and we surface those gaps during discovery. Workflows, Project Templates, and Field Trickler Flows do not migrate as code; we deliver a written automation inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Trello Butler or through Power-Up integrations.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

TaskRay logo

TaskRay

What's pushing teams away

  • TaskRay covers only 34% of PMI project management processes — it scores 0% on cost management and procurement, and lacks native billing or invoicing entirely, forcing teams to buy a separate PSA for revenue-generating services.
  • High per-user licensing cost ($60/user/month on Premium) adds up quickly when every viewer and task assignee on a project requires a license, making it expensive for large implementation teams.
  • Core PSA features like expense tracking, budget-to-actual reporting, and purchase order management are absent, prompting teams to migrate to Kantata, Certinia, or similar full-suite PSA platforms.
  • Limited email notification flexibility — out-of-the-box assignment notifications lack customization depth, frustrating teams with specific communication workflow requirements.
  • Lack of native integrations beyond Salesforce means complex multi-system environments need custom development to push project data elsewhere.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How TaskRay objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a TaskRay object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

TaskRay

TaskRay Project

maps to

Trello

Trello Board

1:1
Fully supported

Each TaskRay Project maps to a Trello Board. Project Name maps to Board name (80-character limit enforced). Project Start and End dates map to optional Board start date and due date fields via a Power-Up if the customer licenses Standard or above. Archived Projects map to archived Trello Boards with a customer-confirmed decision on whether to include archived boards in migration scope. Owner from TaskRay maps to a Trello Workspace member by email lookup.

TaskRay

Task Group

maps to

Trello

Trello List

1:1
Fully supported

TaskRay Task Groups map directly to Trello Lists within the parent Board. Task Group Name maps to List name. The Task Group-to-Project parent linkage is represented by the List's membership in the Board. The ordering of Task Groups within the Project determines the left-to-right List order in Trello. Sub-Projects in TaskRay can either create their own child Board (if the customer wants full isolation) or become a Trello List (if the team prefers a single-board view). We confirm the strategy during scoping based on Task count and team structure.

TaskRay

Sub-Project

maps to

Trello

Trello List or Board (split decision)

lossy
Fully supported

TaskRay Sub-Projects introduce a structural challenge because Trello has no Sub-Project equivalent. We offer two strategies during scoping: (1) Sub-Project becomes a Trello List within the parent Board, with Tasks under the Sub-Project becoming Cards in that List, preserving visual hierarchy within one Board; (2) Sub-Project becomes a separate Trello Board linked via a Power-Up or Butler rule to the parent Board. Strategy selection depends on Task volume per Sub-Project and whether the customer wants cross-Board dependency tracking. Projects with deeply nested Sub-Project chains (more than two levels) are flattened per TaskRay's own depth limitation.

TaskRay

Task

maps to

Trello

Trello Card

1:1
Fully supported

TaskRay Tasks map directly to Trello Cards within the parent List. Task Name maps to Card name. Due Date, Description, Assignee, Status (blocked, completed), Blocked flag, and Repeating flag all map to native Card fields or Checklist items. Custom fields on TaskRay Tasks map to Trello custom fields via the Custom Fields Power-Up on Standard and above; Free tier does not support custom fields and we flag this tier requirement upfront.

TaskRay

Milestone

maps to

Trello

Trello Card with label or due date

lossy
Fully supported

TaskRay Milestones are a distinct Task record type with a milestone flag and a single-day date. We migrate Milestones as Trello Cards with the Card name prefixed by a Milestone label (e.g., '[MILESTONE]'), the milestone date set as the Card due date, and the milestone flag stored as a Card label. Trello has no native Milestone concept, so this is a visual convention that the customer's team adopts post-migration. Alternatively, the customer can use a dedicated Power-Up like Project Manager or Chrono to render milestone views.

TaskRay

Dependency

maps to

Trello

Card link or Butler rule

lossy
Fully supported

TaskRay Task Dependencies (predecessor/successor links) have no native Trello equivalent. We migrate dependency references as Card links (Trello's native cross-card linking via the card URL in Card Description) and flag that the customer should evaluate the Dependencies Power-Up or a Butler rule-based dependency tracker for ongoing dependency management. The migration does not build a full dependency graph in Trello; we document the complete dependency chain in a CSV deliverable for the customer's admin to implement via Power-Up if needed.

TaskRay

Checklist Group + Checklist Item

maps to

Trello

Trello Card Checklist

1:1
Fully supported

TaskRay Checklist Groups and their Checklist Items map to Trello native Card Checklists. Each Checklist Group becomes a Trello Checklist on the parent Card. Checklist Item name maps to Checklist item text, and completion state (checked/unchecked) migrates as the item completion flag. Trello Checklists are flat (one level only), so any nested Checklist Item structure from TaskRay flattens at import time. The parent Task's Checklist container structure is preserved as a named Checklist per TaskRay's Checklist Group naming convention.

TaskRay

Project Template

maps to

Trello

Trello Board Template (via Butler or Power-Up)

lossy
Fully supported

TaskRay Template Projects (available on Starter and above, with Template Migration feature on Premium) cannot migrate directly as Trello templates because the template structure is Salesforce-object-based and Trello uses a different template model. We export template structure as a written specification (object names, Task Group order, Task count, Milestone dates) and deliver it to the customer's admin for manual recreation as a Trello Board Template. Template-based Stitching rules (automated project creation via Flow) do not migrate and are documented in the automation inventory.

TaskRay

Files and Attachments

maps to

Trello

Trello Card Attachment

1:1
Mapping required

TaskRay files are stored on the Salesforce ContentDocumentLink model and attached to Project or Task records. We export files by querying ContentDocumentLink for each TaskRay record, download the ContentVersion binary, and re-attach to the corresponding Trello Card via the Trello API. Files with no parent TaskRay record (Project-level attachments) attach to the parent Board description or a dedicated Card designated as the project assets card. File type preservation (PDF, image, document) is maintained. Very large files (above Trello's 10 MB per attachment limit) are flagged for the customer's admin to store externally and link.

TaskRay

Custom Fields on Projects and Tasks

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields Power-Up (Standard+) or Card labels

1:1
Mapping required

TaskRay custom fields on Project, TaskGroup, and Task objects are standard Salesforce custom fields and migrate as field-value pairs. In Trello, custom fields require the Custom Fields Power-Up which is available on Standard ($5/user/month) and above. We map text, number, and date custom fields to Trello Custom Fields; checkbox fields map to Card labels; picklist fields map to Trello dropdown Custom Field type. Free-tier destinations are flagged as incompatible with custom field migration. The customer's admin must install and configure the Power-Up in the destination Trello Workspace before migration begins.

TaskRay

Resource

maps to

Trello

Trello Workspace Member

1:1
Fully supported

TaskRay Resources represent individual users who own and complete work. Roles serve as placeholder owners without an assigned user. We map Resources to Trello Workspace Members by email address lookup. Any TaskRay Resource without a matching Trello member email is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before Task assignment import resumes. Role placeholders are documented separately as a CSV deliverable for manual assignment post-migration because Trello does not have a native Role concept.

TaskRay

Field Trickler lookup

maps to

Trello

Manual re-establishment (no equivalent)

lossy
Fully supported

TaskRay's Field Trickler propagates Account and Opportunity lookups from Project level to all Tasks within that project automatically. Trello has no native CRM lookup or cross-object reference capability. We extract the Field Trickler configuration (which fields are propagated from which source object) during export and deliver it as a written specification. The customer's admin rebuilds the equivalent behavior using Butler rules (if-when conditions) or a Power-Up integration with the CRM system. We do not build CRM integrations as part of standard migration scope.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

TaskRay logo

TaskRay gotchas

High

No standalone API — migration runs through Salesforce

High

Licensing count explosion during inbound migration

High

No native cost or invoice objects

Medium

Field Trickler lookups require post-migration validation

Medium

Sub-Project hierarchy depth limits

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • TaskRay has no standalone API — all export runs through Salesforce

    TaskRay exposes no independent REST or GraphQL endpoint. All data export and import operations run through Salesforce's standard REST API, Bulk API 2.0, or Data Loader, inheriting all edition-based API limits (1,000 daily calls on Salesforce Essentials through unlimited on Unlimited). We scope API headroom before migration begins, prefer Bulk API 2.0 for large record volumes to minimize call counting, and throttle write operations to stay within the org's daily limit. Salesforce org maintenance windows will pause migration. We require confirmation of the customer's Salesforce edition and current API consumption before migration begins.

  • Sub-Project hierarchy flattens to one level in Trello

    TaskRay supports Projects and Sub-Projects as a two-level child hierarchy (Sub-Projects can contain Task Groups and Tasks but not nested Sub-Projects). Trello has no Sub-Project concept at all. We resolve this by either mapping Sub-Projects to separate Trello Boards (full isolation) or to Trello Lists within the parent Board (single-board view). The customer's admin chooses the strategy during scoping. If Sub-Projects contain further structural depth from the source system, we flatten per TaskRay's own two-level constraint and warn that original nesting depth will be reduced in the destination.

  • Trello Free tier lacks custom fields — upgrade required

    Trello's Free tier does not support the Custom Fields Power-Up. If the source TaskRay org has custom fields on Project, TaskGroup, or Task objects, the destination Trello Workspace must be on Standard ($5/user/month) or above to preserve those field values. We flag this tier requirement during scoping. If the customer chooses to migrate to a Free-tier Workspace, custom field values are excluded from migration scope and documented as a data-loss gap in the handoff report. The admin must either upgrade or accept the loss before migration begins.

  • Milestones and Dependencies have no native Trello equivalent

    TaskRay Milestones (distinct Task record type with milestone flag and date) and Task Dependencies (predecessor/successor links) cannot map to native Trello objects. We migrate Milestones as Cards with milestone-prefixed labels and due dates, and we migrate Dependencies as Card links with a written dependency chain CSV. Neither behaves like a native TaskRay Milestone or Dependency. If the customer relies heavily on these features, we recommend evaluating a Trello Power-Up (Dependencies Power-Up, Chrono, Project Manager) before migration and budget time for post-migration configuration.

  • Resource Management and capacity data have no Trello analog

    TaskRay's Resource Management features (capacity, utilization, Dynamic Team Builder on Premium tier) track team workload across projects. Trello assigns members to Cards but has no capacity modeling, workload view, or resource allocation feature. Resource capacity data from TaskRay cannot migrate as operational data; we export Resource records as a written specification for the customer's admin to reference when assigning Trello Workspace members post-migration. Teams that rely on Resource Management for PSA-style billing should evaluate a dedicated PSA platform rather than Trello as a destination.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful TaskRay to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and Salesforce edition confirmation

    We audit the source TaskRay Salesforce org: edition tier (Starter, Standard, or Premium), daily API call consumption, project count, Task count, Checklist Item volume, Sub-Project depth, custom field count on each object, archived project scope, and active Template Projects. We also confirm the destination Trello Workspace plan (Free or Standard/Premium required for custom fields) and collect Workspace member email list for Resource-to-member mapping. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a Salesforce edition API headroom assessment, and a Power-Up requirement checklist for the destination Workspace.

  2. Hierarchy design and Sub-Project strategy decision

    We design the destination Trello structure during a working session with the customer's admin. For each TaskRay Project, we confirm whether Sub-Projects become separate Trello Boards or Trello Lists within the parent Board. We assign List ordering within Boards based on Task Group sequence, confirm Milestone labeling convention, and define the Custom Fields Power-Up schema if the destination is Standard or above. We also map TaskRay Resource emails to Trello Workspace members and identify any Role placeholders requiring manual post-migration assignment. The hierarchy design document is approved before export begins.

  3. Salesforce data export in dependency order

    We export TaskRay data from Salesforce using the dependency-ordered sequence documented in the TaskRay support guide: Project first, then Task Group, then Task, then Checklist Group, then Checklist Item, then Dependency. Export runs through Salesforce REST or Bulk API 2.0 (Bulk API preferred for volumes above 10,000 records). We extract ContentDocumentLink for all TaskRay-attached files and download ContentVersion binaries. Archived records are included or excluded based on the scoping decision. Salesforce field-level security is reviewed before export to ensure the migration user has read access to all target objects.

  4. Trello Workspace and Board provisioning

    We provision Trello Boards via the Trello REST API using the hierarchy design from Step 2. Each Board is created with the correct name, optional description, and member access. Lists are created within each Board in Task Group order. For Board-per-Sub-Project strategy, we create child Boards and link them via a Butler rule or Power-Up. We install the Custom Fields Power-Up on the Workspace if custom field mapping is in scope. We also configure the Milestone-labeling convention and set up any required Butler rules for automation inventory items that can be implemented immediately. Owner mapping resolves TaskRay Resources to Trello Workspace members by email; unresolved Resources go to the reconciliation queue.

  5. Card creation, checklist migration, and file attachment

    We create Trello Cards in List order using the Trello API, mapping Task fields (name, description, due date, assignee, blocked state, repeating flag) to Card fields. Milestone Tasks are created with the agreed label prefix and due date set to the milestone date. Checklist Groups become Trello Card Checklists with Checklist Items preserving completion state. Dependencies are documented as Card links in Card descriptions and as a separate dependency chain CSV deliverable. Files are uploaded to Cards via the Trello API attachment endpoint; files above 10 MB are flagged for external storage. Custom field values are written via the Custom Fields Power-Up API for Standard-tier destinations.

  6. Validation, automation inventory handoff, and hypercare

    We run row-count reconciliation across Projects (Boards), Task Groups (Lists), Tasks (Cards), Checklist Items, and Files. The customer's admin spot-checks 25-50 Cards for field accuracy, due date correctness, and Checklist completeness. We deliver the automation inventory document: for each TaskRay Flow that implements Field Trickler, Stitching, or template automation, we describe the trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Trello Butler equivalent. We do not rebuild Flows as Butler rules inside migration scope. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Post-migration admin work (Butler rule implementation, Power-Up configuration, dependency Power-Up setup) is outside standard scope and requires a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

TaskRay logo

TaskRay

Source

Strengths

  • Hierarchical project structure (Projects → Task Groups → Tasks → Milestones) accommodates multi-phase implementation and onboarding workflows natively in Salesforce.
  • Templating and cloning capabilities let teams replicate structured project plans at scale without manual re-entry.
  • Field Trickler propagates Account and Opportunity lookups from Project to Task level automatically.
  • Multiple views (Plan/Gantt, Kanban, Spreadsheet, Calendar, My Work) give different team roles their preferred interface without leaving Salesforce.
  • External collaboration via Collaboration Hub lets customers and stakeholders participate in project workspaces without Salesforce licenses.

Weaknesses

  • TaskRay covers only 34% of PMI project management processes, with 0% coverage on cost management, procurement, and risk management — insufficient for revenue-generating professional services.
  • No native billing, invoicing, or expense tracking; organizations requiring these must purchase a separate PSA tool alongside TaskRay.
  • Per-user licensing applies to anyone who views or edits project data, making it expensive at scale for large implementation or CS teams.
  • No public TaskRay API — migrations are entirely dependent on Salesforce REST and Bulk API performance and edition limits.
  • Limited email notification customization for task assignment alerts frustrates teams with specific communication workflow requirements.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across TaskRay and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    TaskRay: Not documented for TaskRay specifically — governed by Salesforce API limits (edition-dependent, 1,000–unlimited daily calls).

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    TaskRay exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your TaskRay to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about TaskRay to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during TaskRay to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your TaskRay to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts with fewer than 50 Projects, 500 Tasks, and no complex Sub-Project hierarchies. Migrations with more than 5,000 Checklist Items, archived project archives, Sub-Project depth requiring Board-per-Sub-Project structuring, or more than twenty custom fields per object move to seven to twelve weeks because of hierarchy design work, Power-Up configuration, and Trello API throughput constraints. Trello's API rate limits (1,000 reads per minute per token, 100 writes per minute per token) cap throughput and extend migration windows for large record sets.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from TaskRay.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day