Project Management migration

Migrate from ProjectManager to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ProjectManager and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

50%

6 of 12

objects map 1:1 between ProjectManager and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from ProjectManager to Trello is a structural simplification: ProjectManager organizes work into Workspaces containing Projects with Gantt views, resource scheduling, and automated cost tracking, while Trello organizes work into Boards with Lists and Cards using a Kanban-first model. The migration flattens a hierarchical project structure into a card-centric board model, translating Projects to Boards, Tasks to Cards, and Resources to Board Members. ProjectManager's dynamic scheduling engine and resource workload views have no direct Trello equivalent; we flag these for the customer's admin to address through Butler automations or a companion resource planning Power-Up. Custom ProjectFields and TaskFields map to Trello's five Custom Field types (text, number, dropdown, date, checkbox), and any field types that cannot be represented are preserved in card descriptions with a structured note. We do not migrate ProjectManager Workflows or ProjectManager Automations to Butler as code; we deliver a written Butler inventory document for the admin to rebuild. Timesheet records, Risks, and historical billing data are migrated as labeled cards with custom fields or flagged for manual export because Trello has no native timesheet or risk management object.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager

What's pushing teams away

  • The mobile app is described as a lite version of the desktop interface, frustrating field teams who need full Gantt and task functionality on-site.
  • New users report a steep learning curve with no guided onboarding flow, leading to low adoption in organizations that skip formal training.
  • Report customizations and forecasting capabilities are limited compared to purpose-built BI tools, limiting insight depth for data-driven PMOs.
  • The interface is described as cluttered with an outdated aesthetic, particularly compared to newer visually-driven alternatives like monday.com or Asana.
  • Integration with external CRMs, ERPs, or time-tracking tools often requires expensive add-ons not included in base licensing.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How ProjectManager objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a ProjectManager object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

ProjectManager

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Each ProjectManager Project maps to a Trello Board. Project name becomes Board name; Project description becomes the Board description. We create the Board via POST /1/boards/ using the authenticated Trello API, and set the Workspace (Team) member access during board creation. Projects with multiple task status columns (e.g., Design, Development, QA, Done) inform the initial List structure, but Lists are configurable post-migration based on the customer's workflow preferences.

ProjectManager

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Each ProjectManager Task maps to a Trello Card within the parent Project's Board. Task name becomes Card name; Task description becomes Card description. Due dates migrate to Card due dates. Task status maps to the Card's List position (by matching ProjectManager TaskStatus value to the most relevant Trello List). Parent-child task hierarchies migrate as Card checklists or as linked cards via Trello's cross-board card linking feature, depending on hierarchy depth. We flag hierarchies deeper than two levels for manual review because Trello's card model is not designed for deeply nested WBS structures.

ProjectManager

TaskAssignee

maps to

Trello

Card Member

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager TaskAssignees (Resources assigned to Tasks) map to Trello Card Members. We resolve ProjectManager Resources to Trello Workspace members by email match. Any Resource without a matching Trello user account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before card member assignment. Multi-assignee tasks create multiple Card Member records on the same Card.

ProjectManager

Resource

maps to

Trello

Workspace Member

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager Resources map to Trello Workspace members. Resource name, email, and availability windows are mapped to Trello member profile data. ResourceSkills are preserved as Labels on any Cards the Resource is assigned to, providing a tagging system that approximates ProjectManager's skill-based filtering. Note: Trello has no native availability or allocation tracking; we document this gap in the migration handoff for the customer to address via a resource management Power-Up or external tool.

ProjectManager

ResourceTeam

maps to

Trello

Team or Label

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectManager ResourceTeams (groupings for scheduling and reporting) map to Trello Teams if the destination Trello workspace uses multiple Teams, or to Label color-codes if a single Team model is used. The customer chooses the mapping strategy during scoping. ResourceTeam membership does not have a native Trello equivalent, so we preserve it as a structured note on each member's profile card and as a Label on any Cards they are assigned to.

ProjectManager

ProjectFields

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

lossy
Mapping required

ProjectManager ProjectFields map to Trello Custom Fields where types match Trello's five supported types (text, number, dropdown, date, checkbox). String fields become text Custom Fields; number fields become number Custom Fields; date fields become date Custom Fields; choice fields with up to 25 options become dropdown Custom Fields; boolean fields become checkbox Custom Fields. Fields with types not supported by Trello (e.g., multi-select choice lists with more than 25 options, file attachments as field values) are preserved as structured text in the Card description with a [ProjectManager Field Migration] section for manual review and manual Custom Field population post-migration.

ProjectManager

TaskFields

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

lossy
Mapping required

ProjectManager TaskFields migrate identically to ProjectFields, mapped to Trello Custom Fields on the Card. The same type-matching logic applies: string to text, number to number, date to date, choice to dropdown, boolean to checkbox. TaskField values written via PUT /api/data/projects/{projectId}/fields/{fieldId} are translated to Trello Custom Field values set via PUT /1/cards/{cardId}/customFields/{fieldId}.

ProjectManager

Risk

maps to

Trello

Card with Label

1:many
Fully supported

ProjectManager Risk objects map to Trello Cards created in a dedicated Risk Board or a dedicated List within the parent Project Board. Risk severity maps to a Label (e.g., Critical, High, Medium, Low) using the customer's label color convention. Risk status (open, mitigated, closed) maps to Card List position. We preserve Risk.description, Risk.severity, Risk.status, and linked ProjectId as Card description fields. RiskFiles migrate as Card attachments. Risks without a linked ProjectId are placed in a standalone Risk Overview Board.

ProjectManager

Timesheet

maps to

Trello

Card with Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectManager Timesheet records (hours logged by Resources against Tasks) have no native Trello equivalent. We migrate Timesheet data as a structured Card attachment or as a number Custom Field on the relevant Card (HoursLogged). ProjectManager's embedded billing rates do not migrate because Trello has no cost tracking. We flag Timesheet data during discovery and give the customer the choice to migrate hours only or export to a separate timesheet report for manual reconciliation. Historical Timesheet data is preserved as a CSV attachment on the parent Card.

ProjectManager

Tag

maps to

Trello

Label

1:1
Fully supported

ProjectManager Tags and TaskTags map to Trello Labels. Tag names transfer directly; tag associations transfer as Card-Label linkages. Trello Label colors are assigned based on the customer's label color convention or set to a default palette. We flag tag names exceeding Trello's 50-character limit for manual truncation.

ProjectManager

UserRole

maps to

Trello

Label or Member Note

lossy
Fully supported

ProjectManager UserRoles (permission profiles scoped to Workspaces) have no native Trello equivalent. We preserve UserRole definitions as a structured note on each member's Trello profile, and optionally as a Label on any Cards where the role-specific access pattern matters. The customer's admin uses the Trello Workspace settings to configure member permissions (Admin, Normal, Observer) post-migration.

ProjectManager

Teams

maps to

Trello

Workspace

1:1
Mapping required

ProjectManager Teams (organizational membership object, distinct from ResourceTeams) map to Trello Workspaces. We create the Trello Workspace if it does not exist, and map team memberships to Workspace members. ProjectManager team-level access control is translated to Trello Workspace member roles (Admin, Normal, Observer) based on the customer's access matrix.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager gotchas

Medium

Custom field migration requires two-step API process

Medium

Dynamic scheduling recalculates dates during import

Low

Historical timesheet billing rates vary by source

Low

ResourceTeam vs Teams object distinction

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Trello Custom Fields support five types only

    ProjectManager ProjectFields and TaskFields support string, number, date, choice, and other extended types. Trello Custom Fields support only text, number, dropdown, date, and checkbox. Fields with types not supported by Trello (e.g., URL, currency, formula, multi-select choice lists with more than 25 options) cannot be migrated as typed Custom Fields. We preserve these field values in a structured migration section within the Card description and flag them for manual Custom Field creation post-migration. Skipping this step results in silent field-value loss for unsupported field types.

  • Task dependencies have no native Trello equivalent

    ProjectManager's dynamic scheduling engine maintains task dependency chains (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, etc.) and cascades date changes when upstream tasks shift. Trello has no native dependency graph. Cross-card links exist but do not trigger date recalculation. We document every ProjectManager dependency as a Butler rule candidate (or Power-Up automation rule) in the migration handoff. For critical-path dependencies, we recommend using the screenful.com or planyway.com Power-Up to maintain a dependency view. Migrations that skip dependency documentation leave teams without visibility into task sequencing.

  • ProjectManager Workflows and Automations do not migrate to Butler

    ProjectManager's workflow automation features (task approvals, automatic status transitions, deadline reminders) have no direct Butler equivalent. Butler uses a different trigger-action model with different available actions. We do not migrate automations as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active ProjectManager automation with its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Butler rule equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds these in Butler or through a Power-Up post-migration. Workflow automation gaps are one of the most common post-migration surprises for teams migrating from ProjectManager Business tier.

  • Resource workload and allocation data has no Trello home

    ProjectManager's color-coded workload views show team allocation percentages and flag overloaded assignees across the portfolio. Trello has no native resource management, allocation tracking, or workload view. We migrate Resource availability data as a structured attachment or as member profile notes, but the customer must address workload visibility through a Power-Up (Planyway Resource Planning, for example) or a separate resource management tool post-migration. We flag this gap explicitly in the migration scope document.

  • Timesheet and cost tracking records require manual reconstruction

    ProjectManager Timesheet records capture hours logged and sometimes embed billing rates per Resource per Task. Trello has no timesheet or expense object. We migrate Timesheet hours as number Custom Fields on the relevant Cards, but billing rates do not transfer. Organizations that rely on ProjectManager's automated cost tracking must export a cost report separately and use Trello Power-Ups or external reporting (Screenful, for example) to reconstruct budget visibility. We flag Timesheet data during discovery and deliver the hours as a labeled CSV attachment on each Card for manual reconciliation.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ProjectManager to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and API credentialing

    We audit the source ProjectManager portal across Workspaces, Projects, Tasks, TaskAssignees, Resources, ResourceTeams, ProjectFields, TaskFields, Risks, Timesheets, and Tags. We extract field type definitions via GET /api/data/projects/fields and task-level data via the Bearer-token REST API. We authenticate to the Trello API using the customer's API key and token (generated at trello.com/app-key) and inventory existing Boards, Lists, and Custom Fields. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, field-type mapping table, and any unsupported field types flagged for the customer to decide on description-embedding versus manual rebuild.

  2. Schema design and board-list structure

    We design the Trello destination schema. This includes creating Boards (one per ProjectManager Project), default Lists within each Board (mapped from ProjectManager TaskStatus values or a standard To Do / In Progress / Done template), Custom Fields (matched to ProjectManager ProjectFields and TaskFields by type), Labels (mapped from ProjectManager Tags), and Workspace members (matched to ProjectManager Resources by email). We create the schema via Trello API (POST /1/boards/, POST /1/boards/{id}/lists, POST /1/boards/{id}/customFields) before any record data moves. Board permissions and Team access are set during board creation.

  3. Dependency mapping and Butler rule design

    We extract all ProjectManager task dependencies and map them to a dependency adjacency list. We evaluate which dependencies can be expressed as Butler rules (triggered by card movement or date changes) versus which require a Power-Up. We produce a written Butler rule inventory document with trigger conditions, action specifications, and implementation steps for each dependency automation. Dependencies that cannot be expressed in Butler are flagged as manual-process gaps for the customer to address with a Power-Up or a different workflow.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Trello Workspace using a representative subset of data (typically the 10 most active Projects). The customer's project lead reconciles record counts (Projects in, Boards in; Tasks in, Cards in; TaskAssignees in, Card Members in; Risks in, labeled Cards in), spot-checks 20-30 random Cards against the ProjectManager source, and validates that Custom Field values are populated and Labels are assigned. Any mapping corrections happen in this sandbox phase. We do not proceed to production migration until the customer signs off on the sandbox results.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Workspaces and Workspace members (to establish access), Boards (one per Project), Lists within each Board, Custom Fields on each Board, Cards (Tasks mapped to Cards with due dates, descriptions, and checklists), Card Members (TaskAssignees resolved by email), Labels (Tags linked to Cards), and Risks (as labeled Cards in a Risk List or Risk Board). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. For Timesheet data, we write hours as number Custom Fields on the parent Card and attach a CSV with full billing data for manual reconciliation.

  6. Cutover, validation, and Butler rebuild handoff

    We freeze ProjectManager writes during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window. We validate Card count, Custom Field completeness, and Label assignment against the source record counts. We deliver the Butler rule inventory document to the customer's admin team with step-by-step implementation instructions. We do not rebuild ProjectManager Workflows as Butler rules inside the migration scope. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not provide post-migration admin support, training, or Power-Up configuration as standard scope; these are separate engagements.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

ProjectManager logo

ProjectManager

Source

Strengths

  • Real-time portfolio dashboard aggregating time, cost, and workload across all projects simultaneously.
  • Dynamic scheduling engine that cascades date changes through task dependencies automatically.
  • Automated time and cost tracking features built directly into the platform without requiring add-ons.
  • Color-coded resource workload views that highlight overloaded assignees across the portfolio.
  • Enterprise security with SAML SSO and MFA, suitable for regulated industry deployments.

Weaknesses

  • Mobile app is a significantly reduced feature set compared to the full desktop interface.
  • Steep learning curve for new users with no built-in guided onboarding or walkthroughs.
  • Report customizations and forecasting capabilities are limited, requiring external BI tools for deeper analysis.
  • Interface is described as cluttered with an outdated visual design compared to newer competitors.
  • Integration add-ons for CRM, ERP, and external time-tracking are priced separately from base licensing.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ProjectManager and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ProjectManager: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ProjectManager doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ProjectManager to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ProjectManager to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ProjectManager to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ProjectManager to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts under 5,000 tasks and 50 projects with straightforward custom field types. Migrations with complex task dependency chains, unsupported ProjectField types requiring manual description translation, large resource directories (over 200 Resources), or Timesheet and Risk records requiring structured card reconstruction move to six to ten weeks because of dependency mapping, Butler rule design, and cross-object reconciliation work.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ProjectManager.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day