Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ProjectManager and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
ProjectManager
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
6 of 12
objects map 1:1 between ProjectManager and Trello.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-4 weeks
Overview
Moving from ProjectManager to Trello is a structural simplification: ProjectManager organizes work into Workspaces containing Projects with Gantt views, resource scheduling, and automated cost tracking, while Trello organizes work into Boards with Lists and Cards using a Kanban-first model. The migration flattens a hierarchical project structure into a card-centric board model, translating Projects to Boards, Tasks to Cards, and Resources to Board Members. ProjectManager's dynamic scheduling engine and resource workload views have no direct Trello equivalent; we flag these for the customer's admin to address through Butler automations or a companion resource planning Power-Up. Custom ProjectFields and TaskFields map to Trello's five Custom Field types (text, number, dropdown, date, checkbox), and any field types that cannot be represented are preserved in card descriptions with a structured note. We do not migrate ProjectManager Workflows or ProjectManager Automations to Butler as code; we deliver a written Butler inventory document for the admin to rebuild. Timesheet records, Risks, and historical billing data are migrated as labeled cards with custom fields or flagged for manual export because Trello has no native timesheet or risk management object.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a ProjectManager object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
ProjectManager
Project
Trello
Board
1:1Each ProjectManager Project maps to a Trello Board. Project name becomes Board name; Project description becomes the Board description. We create the Board via POST /1/boards/ using the authenticated Trello API, and set the Workspace (Team) member access during board creation. Projects with multiple task status columns (e.g., Design, Development, QA, Done) inform the initial List structure, but Lists are configurable post-migration based on the customer's workflow preferences.
ProjectManager
Task
Trello
Card
1:1Each ProjectManager Task maps to a Trello Card within the parent Project's Board. Task name becomes Card name; Task description becomes Card description. Due dates migrate to Card due dates. Task status maps to the Card's List position (by matching ProjectManager TaskStatus value to the most relevant Trello List). Parent-child task hierarchies migrate as Card checklists or as linked cards via Trello's cross-board card linking feature, depending on hierarchy depth. We flag hierarchies deeper than two levels for manual review because Trello's card model is not designed for deeply nested WBS structures.
ProjectManager
TaskAssignee
Trello
Card Member
1:1ProjectManager TaskAssignees (Resources assigned to Tasks) map to Trello Card Members. We resolve ProjectManager Resources to Trello Workspace members by email match. Any Resource without a matching Trello user account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before card member assignment. Multi-assignee tasks create multiple Card Member records on the same Card.
ProjectManager
Resource
Trello
Workspace Member
1:1ProjectManager Resources map to Trello Workspace members. Resource name, email, and availability windows are mapped to Trello member profile data. ResourceSkills are preserved as Labels on any Cards the Resource is assigned to, providing a tagging system that approximates ProjectManager's skill-based filtering. Note: Trello has no native availability or allocation tracking; we document this gap in the migration handoff for the customer to address via a resource management Power-Up or external tool.
ProjectManager
ResourceTeam
Trello
Team or Label
lossyProjectManager ResourceTeams (groupings for scheduling and reporting) map to Trello Teams if the destination Trello workspace uses multiple Teams, or to Label color-codes if a single Team model is used. The customer chooses the mapping strategy during scoping. ResourceTeam membership does not have a native Trello equivalent, so we preserve it as a structured note on each member's profile card and as a Label on any Cards they are assigned to.
ProjectManager
ProjectFields
Trello
Custom Field
lossyProjectManager ProjectFields map to Trello Custom Fields where types match Trello's five supported types (text, number, dropdown, date, checkbox). String fields become text Custom Fields; number fields become number Custom Fields; date fields become date Custom Fields; choice fields with up to 25 options become dropdown Custom Fields; boolean fields become checkbox Custom Fields. Fields with types not supported by Trello (e.g., multi-select choice lists with more than 25 options, file attachments as field values) are preserved as structured text in the Card description with a [ProjectManager Field Migration] section for manual review and manual Custom Field population post-migration.
ProjectManager
TaskFields
Trello
Custom Field
lossyProjectManager TaskFields migrate identically to ProjectFields, mapped to Trello Custom Fields on the Card. The same type-matching logic applies: string to text, number to number, date to date, choice to dropdown, boolean to checkbox. TaskField values written via PUT /api/data/projects/{projectId}/fields/{fieldId} are translated to Trello Custom Field values set via PUT /1/cards/{cardId}/customFields/{fieldId}.
ProjectManager
Risk
Trello
Card with Label
1:manyProjectManager Risk objects map to Trello Cards created in a dedicated Risk Board or a dedicated List within the parent Project Board. Risk severity maps to a Label (e.g., Critical, High, Medium, Low) using the customer's label color convention. Risk status (open, mitigated, closed) maps to Card List position. We preserve Risk.description, Risk.severity, Risk.status, and linked ProjectId as Card description fields. RiskFiles migrate as Card attachments. Risks without a linked ProjectId are placed in a standalone Risk Overview Board.
ProjectManager
Timesheet
Trello
Card with Custom Field
lossyProjectManager Timesheet records (hours logged by Resources against Tasks) have no native Trello equivalent. We migrate Timesheet data as a structured Card attachment or as a number Custom Field on the relevant Card (HoursLogged). ProjectManager's embedded billing rates do not migrate because Trello has no cost tracking. We flag Timesheet data during discovery and give the customer the choice to migrate hours only or export to a separate timesheet report for manual reconciliation. Historical Timesheet data is preserved as a CSV attachment on the parent Card.
ProjectManager
Tag
Trello
Label
1:1ProjectManager Tags and TaskTags map to Trello Labels. Tag names transfer directly; tag associations transfer as Card-Label linkages. Trello Label colors are assigned based on the customer's label color convention or set to a default palette. We flag tag names exceeding Trello's 50-character limit for manual truncation.
ProjectManager
UserRole
Trello
Label or Member Note
lossyProjectManager UserRoles (permission profiles scoped to Workspaces) have no native Trello equivalent. We preserve UserRole definitions as a structured note on each member's Trello profile, and optionally as a Label on any Cards where the role-specific access pattern matters. The customer's admin uses the Trello Workspace settings to configure member permissions (Admin, Normal, Observer) post-migration.
ProjectManager
Teams
Trello
Workspace
1:1ProjectManager Teams (organizational membership object, distinct from ResourceTeams) map to Trello Workspaces. We create the Trello Workspace if it does not exist, and map team memberships to Workspace members. ProjectManager team-level access control is translated to Trello Workspace member roles (Admin, Normal, Observer) based on the customer's access matrix.
| ProjectManager | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Board1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| TaskAssignee | Card Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Resource | Workspace Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| ResourceTeam | Team or Labellossy | Fully supported | |
| ProjectFields | Custom Fieldlossy | Mapping required | |
| TaskFields | Custom Fieldlossy | Mapping required | |
| Risk | Card with Label1:many | Fully supported | |
| Timesheet | Card with Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| UserRole | Label or Member Notelossy | Fully supported | |
| Teams | Workspace1:1 | Mapping required |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
ProjectManager gotchas
Custom field migration requires two-step API process
Dynamic scheduling recalculates dates during import
Historical timesheet billing rates vary by source
ResourceTeam vs Teams object distinction
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and API credentialing
We audit the source ProjectManager portal across Workspaces, Projects, Tasks, TaskAssignees, Resources, ResourceTeams, ProjectFields, TaskFields, Risks, Timesheets, and Tags. We extract field type definitions via GET /api/data/projects/fields and task-level data via the Bearer-token REST API. We authenticate to the Trello API using the customer's API key and token (generated at trello.com/app-key) and inventory existing Boards, Lists, and Custom Fields. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, field-type mapping table, and any unsupported field types flagged for the customer to decide on description-embedding versus manual rebuild.
Schema design and board-list structure
We design the Trello destination schema. This includes creating Boards (one per ProjectManager Project), default Lists within each Board (mapped from ProjectManager TaskStatus values or a standard To Do / In Progress / Done template), Custom Fields (matched to ProjectManager ProjectFields and TaskFields by type), Labels (mapped from ProjectManager Tags), and Workspace members (matched to ProjectManager Resources by email). We create the schema via Trello API (POST /1/boards/, POST /1/boards/{id}/lists, POST /1/boards/{id}/customFields) before any record data moves. Board permissions and Team access are set during board creation.
Dependency mapping and Butler rule design
We extract all ProjectManager task dependencies and map them to a dependency adjacency list. We evaluate which dependencies can be expressed as Butler rules (triggered by card movement or date changes) versus which require a Power-Up. We produce a written Butler rule inventory document with trigger conditions, action specifications, and implementation steps for each dependency automation. Dependencies that cannot be expressed in Butler are flagged as manual-process gaps for the customer to address with a Power-Up or a different workflow.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a test Trello Workspace using a representative subset of data (typically the 10 most active Projects). The customer's project lead reconciles record counts (Projects in, Boards in; Tasks in, Cards in; TaskAssignees in, Card Members in; Risks in, labeled Cards in), spot-checks 20-30 random Cards against the ProjectManager source, and validates that Custom Field values are populated and Labels are assigned. Any mapping corrections happen in this sandbox phase. We do not proceed to production migration until the customer signs off on the sandbox results.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Workspaces and Workspace members (to establish access), Boards (one per Project), Lists within each Board, Custom Fields on each Board, Cards (Tasks mapped to Cards with due dates, descriptions, and checklists), Card Members (TaskAssignees resolved by email), Labels (Tags linked to Cards), and Risks (as labeled Cards in a Risk List or Risk Board). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. For Timesheet data, we write hours as number Custom Fields on the parent Card and attach a CSV with full billing data for manual reconciliation.
Cutover, validation, and Butler rebuild handoff
We freeze ProjectManager writes during cutover and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window. We validate Card count, Custom Field completeness, and Label assignment against the source record counts. We deliver the Butler rule inventory document to the customer's admin team with step-by-step implementation instructions. We do not rebuild ProjectManager Workflows as Butler rules inside the migration scope. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues. We do not provide post-migration admin support, training, or Power-Up configuration as standard scope; these are separate engagements.
Platform deep dives
ProjectManager
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ProjectManager and Trello.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
ProjectManager: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
ProjectManager doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ProjectManager to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your ProjectManager to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave ProjectManager
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.