Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Allegra and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Allegra
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
6 of 12
objects map 1:1 between Allegra and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Allegra and Asana represent two fundamentally different deployment models that shape every decision in the migration. Allegra is a self-hosted platform where Items, attributes, and attachments live across both the database and the filesystem; Asana is a cloud-native work management tool where Tasks, custom fields, and attachments are API-first objects. The most consequential difference is that Allegra distinguishes between item-level attributes (which belong to Items) and form-level fields (which belong to input forms) — a distinction that has no equivalent in Asana and requires explicit routing during field mapping. We extract attachments from ALLEGRA_HOME alongside the database export so that re-attachment succeeds in Asana without broken links. MS Project files that Allegra recognized on import map to Asana Tasks with hierarchy preserved. We do not migrate Allegra workflows or custom form definitions as code; we deliver a written inventory of both for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana's Rules and Forms.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Allegra object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Allegra
Item
Asana
Task
1:1Allegra Items map directly to Asana Tasks. Item name becomes Task name; Item description becomes Task notes (rich text). We resolve the parent-project context from Allegra's folder or workspace structure and create a corresponding Asana Project before inserting Tasks. Subtasks within Allegra Items map to Asana subtasks via the parent_task relationship. Item status (active, completed, archived) maps to Task completion status in Asana.
Allegra
Item Attribute
Asana
Task Custom Field
lossyAllegra attributes belong to Items natively and differ from form fields. We query the Allegra schema endpoint to retrieve all attribute definitions and their data types, then configure corresponding Asana custom fields within each destination Project. Text attributes map to Asana text custom fields; date attributes map to date custom fields; numeric attributes map to numeric custom fields; list attributes map to enum (single-select) or multi-enum (multi-select) custom fields based on whether the Allegra list allows multiple selections.
Allegra
Form Field (Input Form)
Asana
Asana Form + Custom Field
1:1Allegra form fields belong to input forms rather than Items. We extract form field definitions separately from Item attributes and treat them as Asana Forms (for intake workflows) or custom fields scoped to the relevant Project. Form field types map to Asana custom field types. Note that Asana Forms require manual setup in the UI; we create the form structure in our written inventory and the customer's admin builds the form from that template post-migration.
Allegra
Attachment
Asana
Task Attachment
lossyAllegra attachments reside on the filesystem under ALLEGRA_HOME and are not stored in the database. We export the ALLEGRA_HOME attachments directory alongside the database export, preserving the directory structure that maps Items to their file references. During Asana import, we upload each file via the Asana attachments API (POST /tasks/{task_gid}/attachments) and associate it with the correct Task by matching the original Allegra Item identifier embedded in the file path. We validate that file sizes are within Asana's 100 MB per-attachment limit and flag any files exceeding that threshold.
Allegra
Custom List
Asana
Custom Field Option Set
lossyAllegra custom lists with list entries accessible via GET /v2/lists map to Asana enum (single-select) or multi-enum custom field options. We retrieve all custom list definitions and entries via the Allegra REST API and create corresponding option sets in Asana custom fields. If the custom list is used across multiple Projects, we create the field as a portfolio-level or team-level custom field in Asana to avoid duplicating option sets.
Allegra
User
Asana
Asana User
1:1Allegra users and roles export from the database with user identifiers and role assignments. We match users by email address against the destination Asana workspace. Any Allegra user without a matching Asana user account is added to a reconciliation queue; the customer's admin provisions the missing Asana accounts before record migration resumes. Role assignments (admin, member, viewer) map to Asana team membership levels.
Allegra
Item Hierarchy (Parent-Child)
Asana
Task Subtask and Section Structure
1:manyAllegra Items support parent-child relationships for multi-level hierarchies. We traverse the Item hierarchy during extraction and map top-level Items to Asana Tasks, child Items to Asana subtasks (via the parent_task field), and any further nesting to subtasks of subtasks. Asana supports up to four levels of subtasks natively. We flag any Items with more than four levels of nesting and collapse the deepest level to maintain hierarchy within Asana's constraint.
Allegra
MS Project File (Import)
Asana
Task Hierarchy
1:1Allegra can import Microsoft Project (.mpp) and Project Libre files and attempts to recognize existing tasks. We handle MS Project file parsing separately: we extract tasks, task hierarchy (summary tasks and subtasks), start dates, finish dates, and resource assignments from the exported Allegra structure. These map to Asana Tasks with subtasks and start/due dates. MS Project task assignments map to Asana Task assignees resolved against the User mapping.
Allegra
Comment / Activity Note
Asana
Task Story
1:1Allegra does not expose a public API endpoint for activity history or comments, and internal engagement records are not guaranteed to be accessible via the REST API in all deployments. We attempt to extract Item-level notes and activity entries from the Allegra database where available. These map to Asana Stories on Tasks. If the database schema does not expose comment records, we document this gap in the migration report and note that activity history requires manual export from the Allegra UI.
Allegra
Project / Folder
Asana
Project
1:1Allegra organizes Items within folders and workspaces. We extract the folder and workspace hierarchy and map it to Asana Projects and Teams. A top-level Allegra workspace maps to an Asana Team; Allegra folders within workspaces map to Asana Projects. We preserve the folder order as project order within the Team.
Allegra
Workflow / Status Configuration
Asana
Asana Section + Status Field
lossyAllegra workflows and status definitions do not have a migration equivalent in Asana's data model. We do not migrate workflows as code. We extract the Allegra workflow state definitions (status names, transitions, and any conditional logic) and document them as a written specification for rebuilding in Asana Rules or as a custom status field with section-based workflows. The customer's admin uses this specification to configure Asana sections and status-tracking custom fields post-migration.
Allegra
Form Definition
Asana
Asana Form Template
lossyAllegra form definitions (input forms with field sets, field types, and conditional visibility) do not migrate directly to Asana Forms. We extract form definitions including field names, types, and conditional logic from the Allegra schema and deliver them as a written form template. The customer's admin recreates the form in Asana's Form builder using the template. Form responses stored as Item records in Allegra migrate as completed Tasks with the form field values stored in corresponding custom fields.
| Allegra | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Item Attribute | Task Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Form Field (Input Form) | Asana Form + Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Task Attachmentlossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom List | Custom Field Option Setlossy | Fully supported | |
| User | Asana User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Item Hierarchy (Parent-Child) | Task Subtask and Section Structure1:many | Fully supported | |
| MS Project File (Import) | Task Hierarchy1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment / Activity Note | Task Story1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project / Folder | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Workflow / Status Configuration | Asana Section + Status Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Form Definition | Asana Form Templatelossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Allegra gotchas
Attachments reside in ALLEGRA_HOME filesystem, not the database
Attributes vs. fields distinction causes field mapping errors
Server migration requires full installation shutdown
Database system change during migration risks field-length data loss
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and Allegra schema audit
We audit the source Allegra instance across Items, custom attributes, form definitions, custom lists, user accounts, and attachment volume. We query the Allegra REST API for custom list definitions and entries, extract the database schema to identify attribute and field definitions, and assess the ALLEGRA_HOME filesystem for attachment count and total size. We also determine the database engine type (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, or Oracle) because Allegra's documentation warns that changing the database engine during migration risks data loss due to differing maximum field lengths. This discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object, attachment volume, and a list of attributes and form fields requiring Asana custom field configuration.
Asana workspace and project structure design
We design the destination Asana structure before any data moves. This includes creating Teams (mapped from Allegra workspaces), creating Projects (mapped from Allegra folders), and pre-creating all custom fields within each Project based on the Allegra attribute and form field audit. We configure Asana enum options for custom fields by extracting Allegra custom list entries and populating the option set. We also design the task hierarchy (subtask depth and section structure) based on Allegra's Item parent-child relationships, flagging any Items exceeding Asana's four-level subtask limit for manual review.
Attachment extraction and file preparation
We extract the ALLEGRA_HOME attachments directory alongside the database export, preserving the directory structure that maps Items to files. We validate file sizes against Asana's 100 MB per-attachment limit, flagging oversized files for the customer to either split or host externally with a link stored in Asana. We build a manifest mapping each file path to its Allegra Item identifier so that re-attachment in Asana succeeds without broken links. If Allegra's server is being shut down for the migration (required by the documented procedure), we coordinate the filesystem extraction with the database snapshot in the same maintenance window.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into an Asana test workspace using a representative data sample. The customer's project manager reconciles record counts (Items in, Tasks in, Attachments in, custom field values assigned), spot-checks 25-50 randomly selected Tasks against the Allegra source, and validates that subtask hierarchy and custom field values are correct. Any attribute-to-field mapping corrections, custom field type changes, or hierarchy flattening decisions happen in this phase. We do not proceed to production migration until the customer signs off on the sandbox results.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Teams and Projects first (workspace and folder structure), then Users (provisioned and reconciled by email match), then Tasks (with parent-child hierarchy resolved), then custom field values (after fields are confirmed to exist in each Project), then attachments (uploaded via the Asana attachments API and linked to the correct Task). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We disable Asana notifications during migration to prevent notification spam to the customer's team.
Cutover, delta sync, and automation rebuild handoff
We freeze Allegra writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any Items or attachments modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the workflow and form definition inventory document to the customer's admin team, detailing each Allegra workflow state definition and form structure with recommended Asana Rules and Form equivalents. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Allegra workflows as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.
Platform deep dives
Allegra
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Allegra and Asana.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Allegra: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Allegra doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Allegra to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Allegra to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Allegra
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.