Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Allegra and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
Allegra
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
7 of 13
objects map 1:1 between Allegra and Trello.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Allegra to Trello is a structural simplification as much as a data move. Allegra uses a self-hosted Item-Attribute-FormField data model with attachments stored in the filesystem and a documented maintenance-window shutdown procedure for server backup. Trello is a cloud-hosted, Atlassian-ecosystem kanban platform with cards as the primary record, custom fields as a power-up, and no native MS Project import. We export from Allegra's database and ALLEGRA_HOME filesystem simultaneously, resolve Allegra Attributes versus Form Fields into Trello custom fields or card properties, convert MS Project tasks to Trello checklist items, map Custom Lists to Trello Labels, and ingest via Trello's REST API with rate-limit handling. Automations and workflows from Allegra do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for Butler or Power-Up rebuild.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Allegra object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Allegra
Item
Trello
Card
1:1Allegra Items are the primary record type and map 1:1 to Trello Cards. We query the Allegra schema endpoint to retrieve all item attributes and values, then create Trello Cards via POST /1/cards with name, desc (from Allegra description attribute), and due dates mapped from Allegra date attributes. Each Allegra Item becomes a Trello Card placed in the List corresponding to its Allegra workflow status or project assignment. Parent-child item relationships from Allegra (sub-items) map to Trello Card attachments or checklist parent-child structure depending on the customer's preference.
Allegra
Attribute (item-native)
Trello
Card Custom Field
lossyAllegra item attributes (item-native properties) map to Trello Custom Fields. Custom Fields are a Premium and Enterprise feature in Trello; for Standard-tier destinations, we map text attributes to the card description (desc) and flag unsupported types in the inventory. We discover all attribute definitions via the Allegra schema endpoint before creating corresponding Custom Field definitions in Trello. Date, number, and select-type attributes become typed Custom Fields; long-text attributes migrate to the card description with a header noting the original attribute name.
Allegra
Form Field (form-native)
Trello
Card Custom Field
lossyAllegra Form Fields belong to input forms rather than items, which requires a separate discovery step. We extract the form-field definitions separately from item attributes via GET /v2/forms and map each field to a Trello Custom Field or to the card description. Form-field picklist values map to Trello Custom Field options. If the form field references a Custom List, we resolve that lookup and map to the corresponding Trello Label.
Allegra
Attachment
Trello
Card Attachment
1:1Allegra attachments reside in the ALLEGRA_HOME filesystem, not the database. We export the entire attachments directory simultaneously with the database export, preserving the directory structure and item-to-file mapping from the Allegra database records. We upload each file to Trello via POST /1/cards/{id}/attachments using the Trello REST API. Files are stored in Atlassian's S3-backed cloud storage. We validate attachment integrity (checksum) before upload and flag any files that exceed Trello's 10 MB per-attachment limit for customer action before migration.
Allegra
Custom List
Trello
Label
1:1Allegra Custom Lists with list entries accessible via GET /v2/lists map to Trello Labels. We retrieve all Custom List definitions and their entries via the Allegra REST API, then create Trello Labels with names matching the list entry values. Label colors are assigned automatically by Trello or optionally mapped from Allegra color attributes if present. A Custom List entry used as a lookup on an Allegra Item attribute becomes a Label filter on the Trello Card.
Allegra
User
Trello
Member
1:1Allegra Users and Roles are exported from the Allegra database and mapped to Trello Members. We match by email address. If a Trello Member account does not exist at migration time, we hold the user in a reconciliation queue and the customer provisions the Trello account before record assignment proceeds. Role-based permissions from Allegra (Viewer, Editor, Manager) are noted in the Trello Member invite inventory for the customer to reassign at their discretion; Trello permission management is workspace-level rather than item-level.
Allegra
MS Project File (MPP import)
Trello
Card Checklist
1:manyAllegra supports MS Project file import with task recognition, storing tasks as Allegra Items with hierarchy metadata. When the source Allegra instance has imported MS Project files, we parse the task hierarchy, dependencies, start dates, and end dates. We map each MS Project task to a Trello Card with a Checklist that includes task name, start date, end date, duration, and percent complete as checklist items. Summary tasks from MS Project become parent Cards with child Cards for sub-tasks. MS Project task dependencies are noted in card descriptions as Trello does not natively support task dependency visualization.
Allegra
Comment
Trello
Card Comment
1:1Allegra Item comments are extracted from the database and ingested into Trello Cards via POST /1/cards/{id}/actions/comments. Comment authorship (user) is preserved as the Trello comment author by matching the Allegra user to the migrated Trello Member. Comment timestamps are preserved by setting the comment date to the original Allegra timestamp. Rich-text comments are rendered as plain text in Trello comments with HTML stripped to Trello-supported formatting.
Allegra
Checklist
Trello
Checklist
1:1Allegra Item checklists (if present as a custom attribute type) map directly to Trello Card checklists. We discover checklist definitions from Allegra's attribute schema, then create Trello Checklists via POST /1/cards/{id}/checklists with checklist items preserving name, completion status, and assignee if available. Checklist item order is preserved from Allegra's sequence.
Allegra
Workflow Status
Trello
List
lossyAllegra workflow statuses and project assignments define the state progression for Items. We discover the full set of workflow status values from the Allegra schema and map each distinct status to a Trello List within the target Board. The customer defines the board structure during scoping (one board per Allegra project, or a unified board with Lists per status). Trello List names are created to match Allegra status names exactly, preserving the workflow sequence as the List ordering.
Allegra
Project
Trello
Board
1:1Allegra Projects group Items, Custom Lists, and workflow statuses. Each Allegra Project maps to a Trello Board. We export the project hierarchy, project description, project start and end dates, and project members. Board members are set to the corresponding Trello Members. Project metadata is stored in the Board description field. If the customer has multiple Allegra Projects, we create one Trello Board per Project with the option to consolidate into a workspace with multiple boards.
Allegra
Automation / Workflow
Trello
Butler Inventory
lossyAllegra automations and workflows cannot migrate to Trello as code because Butler uses a different trigger-action model. We do not migrate workflows. We audit every Allegra workflow and automation during discovery, document its trigger conditions and actions in a written Butler rebuild guide, and deliver this to the customer at cutover. The customer or a Trello partner rebuilds automations in Butler or selects equivalent Power-Ups post-migration.
Allegra
Reporting / Dashboard
Trello
Not Migrated
lossyAllegra reporting and dashboard configurations do not have a direct Trello equivalent. Trello's reporting is limited to board-level activity and card counts. We do not migrate reports as code. We deliver a written inventory of every Allegra report with its definition, filters, and chart type, and the customer rebuilds them in Trello-compatible formats (using Power-Ups like Corrello, Screenful, or native Trello workspace views) post-migration.
| Allegra | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attribute (item-native) | Card Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Form Field (form-native) | Card Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Card Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom List | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User | Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| MS Project File (MPP import) | Card Checklist1:many | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Card Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Checklist | Checklist1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Workflow Status | Listlossy | Fully supported | |
| Project | Board1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Automation / Workflow | Butler Inventorylossy | Fully supported | |
| Reporting / Dashboard | Not Migratedlossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Allegra gotchas
Attachments reside in ALLEGRA_HOME filesystem, not the database
Attributes vs. fields distinction causes field mapping errors
Server migration requires full installation shutdown
Database system change during migration risks field-length data loss
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and plan selection
We audit the source Allegra instance via the REST API and database query, enumerating all Items, Attributes, Form Fields, Custom Lists, MS Project imports, Attachments, Users, workflow statuses, automations, and reports. We pair this with a Trello workspace audit confirming the plan tier and Custom Fields Power-Up status. The discovery output is a written migration scope with a board-list-card structure recommendation based on Allegra's project and workflow hierarchy.
Schema design and Trello structure planning
We design the destination Trello structure before data ingestion. This includes defining the Board-per-project or consolidated-board approach, creating Lists to match Allegra workflow statuses, configuring Labels to match Allegra Custom List entries, and defining Custom Fields to match Allegra item attributes. If Custom Fields Power-Up is unavailable on the destination plan, we define the card-description attribute convention. Schema is validated in a test workspace before production migration.
Attachment export and integrity preparation
We export the ALLEGRA_HOME attachments directory simultaneously with the Allegra database export during a scheduled maintenance window. We preserve the full directory structure and cross-reference file paths with Allegra database records to build a complete item-to-attachment mapping table. We validate each file's checksum and flag any attachments exceeding Trello's 10 MB limit for customer resolution before upload.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Trello test workspace mirroring the planned production board structure. The customer reconciles record counts (Items in, Cards in, Attachments in, Labels in), spot-checks 25-50 random Cards against Allegra source records, and reviews label and checklist completeness. MS Project task decomposition and Custom List-to-Label mapping are validated here. Any mapping corrections occur in this phase.
User provisioning and Member reconciliation
We extract every Allegra User referenced on Items, Comments, and Attachments. We match by email against the destination Trello workspace Members. Any Allegra User without a corresponding Trello Member is held in a reconciliation queue, and the customer provisions the account before record ingestion resumes. Member assignments on Cards (assignees) are resolved at this stage.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in dependency order: Board and List creation first, then Cards (Items) via bulk-compatible API calls with rate-limit handling, Labels (Custom Lists), Custom Field values, Attachments (filesystem export to Trello API), Comments, Checklists, and MS Project task decomposition as Card Checklists. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Trello API 429 responses trigger exponential backoff before retry.
Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff
We freeze Allegra writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any Items or comments modified during the migration window, then close the Allegra instance and declare Trello the system of record. We deliver the Automation and Workflow inventory document (Butler rebuild guide) and the Reports inventory document (with Trello-compatible rebuild options) to the customer. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Allegra automations in Butler as part of migration scope; that is a separate engagement.
Platform deep dives
Allegra
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Allegra and Trello.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Allegra: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Allegra doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Allegra to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Allegra to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Allegra
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.