Project Management migration

Migrate from Teamwork.com to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Teamwork.com and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Teamwork.com logo

Teamwork.com

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Teamwork.com and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Teamwork.com to Microsoft Project is a structural simplification because the platforms organize work differently. Teamwork.com is a client-services PM tool with nested Subtasks, Task Lists, billable Time Entries, and project-level Custom Fields. Microsoft Project centers on Gantt scheduling with summary tasks, predecessors for dependency chains, and a Resource sheet. We extract the full Teamwork hierarchy, flatten Subtasks into indented summary task rows in the destination MPP format, map Task List names to the top-level task grouping structure, and resolve predecessor links from any date-based dependencies recorded in Teamwork. Custom Fields require a Premium-equivalent plan on Teamwork.com before we can read them via API; we detect the subscription tier during scoping and flag inaccessible fields for manual documentation. We do not migrate Teamwork Automations, Client Portals, or Invoices because Microsoft Project does not support these as data objects — we deliver a written inventory of these records for the customer's project manager to reference during rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Teamwork.com logo

Teamwork.com

What's pushing teams away

  • Performance degrades noticeably as workspace size grows, with users reporting slower run times once multiple concurrent projects accumulate significant task volumes.
  • UI changes happen regularly and some frequently-used features become buried under new menu structures or require multi-step hover interactions to access.
  • Most advanced features including Custom Fields, billing, and workload management require upgrading to paid tiers, locking core functionality behind per-user costs.
  • Onboarding curve is steep for non-technical team members who need to understand the distinction between Projects, Tasks, Lists, and Milestones before the tool feels intuitive.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Teamwork.com objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Teamwork.com object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Teamwork.com

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project (MPP file)

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Projects map 1:1 to Microsoft Project MPP files. We preserve the project Name, Description, Start Date, and End Date as the project calendar start and finish. Project status (Active, Completed, On Hold) maps to the project-level state. If the customer uses multiple concurrent MPP files, we generate one MPP per Teamwork.com Project. MPP files with blank rows between tasks cause upload failure per Teamwork.com's own import documentation; we strip any null rows during export.

Teamwork.com

Task List

maps to

Microsoft Project

Summary Task row

1:many
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Task Lists are section headers within a Project that group related Tasks. Microsoft Project does not have a distinct Task List object type. We create a top-level Summary Task row per Task List with the Task List name, and indent all child Tasks beneath it. Task List-level start/due dates become the summary task's constraint dates. If the customer uses list-level milestones, these map to milestone rows under the relevant summary task.

Teamwork.com

Task

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Tasks map directly to Microsoft Project Task rows. Task Name, Description (mapped to Task Notes), Start Date (maps to Task Start and Baseline Start), Due Date (maps to Task Finish and Baseline Finish), Priority (mapped to a custom Priority field or Text1 column), and estimated time (Work field) transfer 1:1. Task Status (Active, Complete) maps to Percent Complete or Physical Percent Complete depending on the customer's progress-tracking preference.

Teamwork.com

Subtask

maps to

Microsoft Project

Indented Task (child row)

1:many
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Subtasks nested under a parent Task become indented child Task rows in Microsoft Project. The parent Task becomes a Summary Task with an outline level above its child rows. Subtask assignees, due dates, and estimated time carry forward to the child row. Microsoft Project does not auto-complete child tasks when a parent Summary Task is marked complete — this replicates Teamwork.com's native behavior where completing a parent does not cascade to subtasks.

Teamwork.com

Milestone

maps to

Microsoft Project

Milestone

1:1
Fully supported

Milestones in Teamwork.com map directly to Milestone rows in Microsoft Project (Task with Milestone = Yes). Milestone names and dates preserve. Milestones linked to specific tasks in Teamwork.com retain their date anchor rather than being re-derived from the linked task timeline.

Teamwork.com

Custom Field (project-level)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom column (Text1-Text30)

lossy
Fully supported

Project-level Custom Fields in Teamwork.com (available on Premium plan and above) map to custom Text columns in the destination MPP file. We read the Custom Field definitions via the V2 API during extraction, then write values to named custom columns. If the source account is on a Starter or Deliver plan, Custom Fields are API-inaccessible; we flag this during scoping and document the field names and types for manual column addition post-migration.

Teamwork.com

Custom Field (site-wide task)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Custom column (Text1-Text30)

lossy
Fully supported

Site-wide task Custom Fields (administrator-created, globally applied to tasks) require the same Premium-tier access. We retrieve both project-level and site-wide task Custom Fields via the V3 custom fields endpoint filtered by projectId, merge them, and map dropdown-type Custom Fields with their options array to ensure enumerated values are valid in the destination column.

Teamwork.com

Tag

maps to

Microsoft Project

Text column (e.g., Text1)

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Tags are comma-separated string labels applied across Projects and Tasks. Microsoft Project does not have a native tag object. We map tags to a Text column in the MPP file with a 'Tags' column header. Multi-value tags are concatenated as a single comma-separated string, matching the behavior of Teamwork.com's native tag storage.

Teamwork.com

User / Team Member

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Users with assigned tasks map to Microsoft Project Resources. The Resource Name maps from the user's Display Name, and the user's email address becomes the Resource Initials or Notes field for identification. Hourly cost rates from Teamwork.com transfer to the Resource Standard Rate field if the customer uses resource cost tracking. Teamwork.com Teams are grouping constructs that do not map to a Microsoft Project entity; we flatten team memberships to individual Resource assignments per task.

Teamwork.com

Task Assignment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com task assignments (a user linked to a Task with optional allocation percentage) map to Microsoft Project Resource Assignments on the task row. The Assigned Resources column in Teamwork.com maps to the Names field on the Assignment row in Microsoft Project. Allocation percentage maps to Units on the assignment.

Teamwork.com

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Work field (logged hours)

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Time Entries linked to Tasks carry billable/non-billable flags, hourly rates, and logged durations. Microsoft Project has no native billing or time tracking object; we map the logged hours to the Work field on the corresponding Task, with the billable flag preserved in a custom Notes entry or a Text column. If the customer requires billable vs non-billable differentiation, we document it for reconstruction in a separate time-tracking tool or Project Online resource plan.

Teamwork.com

Comment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Notes (appended)

1:1
Fully supported

Teamwork.com Comments on Tasks include author attribution, timestamp, and formatted text. Microsoft Project Task Notes is a single rich-text field per task. We append all comments to the task Notes field in chronological order with author and timestamp headers. Nested comment threads are flattened to maintain the conversation order. Large comment volumes per task may require truncation or a companion document for review.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Teamwork.com logo

Teamwork.com gotchas

High

Custom Fields are locked behind the Premium subscription tier

Medium

API returns different field sets depending on endpoint version

Medium

Project-level and site-wide custom fields are distinct schema entities

Low

Completing parent tasks does not cascade to subtasks

Low

Rate limits are per-user-seat multiplier, not fixed

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Custom Fields are API-inaccessible below Premium tier

    Teamwork.com explicitly gates Custom Field read/write behind the Premium per-user plan and above. If a customer on a Starter or Deliver plan has created project-level or site-wide Custom Fields, those fields exist as data in the UI but are inaccessible via the V2 and V3 API endpoints. We detect the subscription tier during scoping and attempt a V2 API read for Custom Field definitions before extraction. If the read returns a 403 or empty result, we flag the Custom Fields as inaccessible and document their names, types, and last-seen values for the customer to manually recreate as custom columns in the destination MPP file. Migration of Custom Field values requires a Premium-equivalent plan on the source account; if one is not available we cannot extract them programmatically.

  • Teamwork Subtasks require hierarchy flattening for MPP format

    Microsoft Project does not support a distinct Subtask record type. Subtasks in Teamwork.com must become indented child rows under a Summary Task parent in the MPP file. This flattening changes how the data is represented: a parent Task with three Subtasks becomes a Summary Task with three child rows at Outline Level 2. Outlining levels beyond the third level in Teamwork.com (sub-subtasks using double-character prefixes) map to deeper outline levels in MPP with potential visual truncation in the default column width. We reconstruct the full hierarchy during extraction but recommend the customer validate deep-nested subtasks after migration.

  • No explicit predecessor links in Teamwork.com source data

    Teamwork.com task dependencies are implicit date-based relationships (Task B starts after Task A finishes) rather than explicit predecessor-successor links with dependency types (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, Finish-to-Finish, Start-to-Finish). Microsoft Project requires explicit predecessor links to drive automatic scheduling. We infer predecessor relationships from the Task List grouping order and any start-date-offset logic in Teamwork.com's Gantt view, but the inference is not deterministic for all dependency chains. We deliver a predecessor reconstruction report identifying the inferred links and flag tasks where no clear predecessor can be determined for the customer's project manager to validate and set manually in Microsoft Project.

  • Time tracking and billing objects have no Microsoft Project equivalent

    Teamwork.com Time Entries (first-class records with billable flags, hourly rates, and duration) and Invoices (generated from billable time) do not map to any native Microsoft Project object. Project Plan 3 and Plan 5 do not include billing, invoicing, or profitability reporting. We map Time Entry hours to the Work field on tasks for schedule reconstruction, but the billable/non-billable flag, rate information, and invoice records are not transferable. The customer must implement a separate billing workflow using Microsoft Dynamics 365, an ERP connector, or a third-party PSA tool if billing continuity is required after migration.

  • Teamwork Automations do not migrate to Microsoft Project

    Teamwork.com Automations (task triggers, status-change notifications, assignee updates, and recurring task rules at 100-100,000 executions per month depending on tier) have no equivalent engine in Microsoft Project. Project scheduling relies on manual constraint date entry and explicit predecessor links rather than event-driven automation. We deliver a written automation inventory document listing every active Teamwork.com Automation with its trigger, conditions, and actions for the customer's project manager to assess which rules require manual re-implementation as recurring calendar entries, template MPP files, or Power Automate flows if the customer licenses Project Online.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Teamwork.com to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Subscription tier verification and scoping

    We authenticate against the Teamwork.com API and verify the account subscription tier. If the account is Starter or Deliver tier, we check for Custom Field accessibility via the V2 API custom fields endpoint and flag any inaccessible field definitions. We inventory all Projects, Task Lists, Tasks, Subtasks, Milestones, Tags, Users, and Time Entries, and capture record counts per object type. We identify the Custom Field scope (project-level vs site-wide) and document the Premium-tier requirement if Custom Fields are present on Starter or Deliver accounts.

  2. Hierarchy extraction and subtask flattening design

    We extract the full Teamwork.com task hierarchy as a nested structure keyed by parent task ID. We identify the mapping pattern: Task Lists become Summary Task rows, Tasks become task rows at the appropriate outline level, and Subtasks become indented child rows. We apply Teamwork.com's subtask notation rules (single-character prefixes like # and - for subtasks, double-character for sub-subtasks) during extraction to preserve nesting depth. We also extract predecessor candidates from task ordering and date-offset logic for the predecessor reconstruction report.

  3. Resource and assignment mapping

    We extract all Teamwork.com Users referenced in task assignments and map them to Microsoft Project Resources. We carry forward display names, email addresses (for identification), and hourly cost rates to the Resource Standard Rate field. We flag any User referenced in an assignment that does not have a display name set in Teamwork.com to avoid blank Resource entries in the destination.

  4. Time Entry reconciliation and Work field population

    We aggregate Time Entries by linked Task ID and sum logged durations. We map total hours to the Work field on each Task row and preserve the billable/non-billable flag and hourly rate in a custom Notes entry or Text column. We cross-check total Work hours against estimated time (if present) and flag any significant discrepancies for the customer's review before MPP generation.

  5. MPP file generation and predecessor inference

    We generate the MPP file structure using the extracted hierarchy, resource assignments, milestone dates, and Work values. We apply the inferred predecessor links from the predecessor reconstruction analysis, defaulting to Finish-to-Start dependency type for date-offset relationships. We set baseline start and finish dates from the original Task Start and Due Date fields. We add custom Text columns for Tags, Custom Field values, and billable flags where applicable. We validate that no blank rows exist in the task list before finalizing the MPP.

  6. Cutover and automation inventory delivery

    We deliver the generated MPP files, the predecessor reconstruction report, the Custom Field gap report (listing any inaccessible fields and their definitions), and the automation inventory document. We run a final delta check on the Teamwork.com source for any records modified during the migration window and apply last-changes to the MPP before cutover. We do not provide post-migration project management support or Microsoft Project training as standard scope; these are separate engagements.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Teamwork.com logo

Teamwork.com

Source

Strengths

  • Tight integration between time tracking, billing rates, and project budgets enables profitability reporting without exporting to external tools.
  • Multiple simultaneous views on the same project data (Gantt, board, list, table) serve different team member working styles without context switching.
  • Client portal gives external stakeholders visibility without exposing internal project tooling or requiring email chains.
  • 150+ native integrations including HubSpot, QuickBooks, Salesforce, and NetSuite reduce the need for data duplication across tools.
  • AI-powered smart scheduler and resource assignments help teams identify capacity gaps before committing to new project work.

Weaknesses

  • Performance slows noticeably once workspaces accumulate multiple concurrent projects with hundreds of tasks and time entries.
  • UI undergoes frequent design updates that sometimes relocate frequently-used features, creating a persistent adjustment burden for power users.
  • Feature tier gating means custom fields, billing, and workload views are locked behind per-user Premium costs, limiting adoption for budget-constrained teams.
  • No native Gantt dependency automation means task chain sequencing requires manual maintenance or third-party add-ons.
  • Minimum user requirements on paid tiers (3+ users reported) make the platform impractical for very small solo or two-person agencies.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Teamwork.com and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Teamwork.com: Rate limits scale with user seat count; base quota units per hour multiplied by number of seats on the account.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Teamwork.com exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Teamwork.com to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Teamwork.com to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Teamwork.com to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Teamwork.com to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 20 projects and 5,000 total tasks with no Custom Fields on Starter-tier accounts. Migrations with deep subtask hierarchies (more than three levels), multiple Custom Field scopes requiring Premium-tier verification, milestone-heavy portfolios (50+ milestones across projects), or MPP files exceeding 1,000 tasks per project move to eight to twelve weeks because of the hierarchy flattening logic, predecessor reconstruction work, and the Custom Field accessibility verification process.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Teamwork.com.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day