Project Management migration

Migrate from actiTIME to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between actiTIME and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

actiTIME logo

actiTIME

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

54%

7 of 13

objects map 1:1 between actiTIME and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

actiTIME and Trello serve fundamentally different purposes, which shapes every decision in this migration. actiTIME is a time-tracking platform whose project and task objects exist to support hour logging and billing reconciliation. Trello is a card-based visual work management tool that does not have native time tracking, billing, or leave-time management. We collapse actiTIME's three-tier Customer → Project → Task hierarchy into a Trello workspace and board structure, map time-track entries to card Custom Fields (since no native time-tracking object exists in Trello), and preserve billability flags, work types, and locked-status indicators in structured fields on each card. actiTIME's feature flags (departments, taskEstimates, leavetimeRegistration, taskWorkflow) are read from the /info endpoint at migration start; any feature whose flag is false is skipped, and any feature whose flag is true but has no Trello equivalent is flagged in the handoff document for manual rebuilding in Butler or a Power-Up.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

actiTIME logo

actiTIME

What's pushing teams away

  • The product lacks native integrations with CRM and invoicing platforms, forcing teams into manual CSV exports and re-entry that erodes the value of time tracking.
  • Users report that the mobile app requires manual synchronization — hours entered offline do not push automatically when connectivity returns, leading to lost or forgotten entries.
  • actiTIME's feature set is centred on time tracking and basic project management; teams seeking full project-management capabilities like Gantt charts, resource-leveling, or advanced dependencies outgrow it.
  • Limited API documentation and the absence of OAuth authentication create friction for teams trying to automate data flows or build custom integrations.
  • Some users note that actiTIME's UI, while functional, feels dated compared to newer time-tracking tools, particularly on mobile.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How actiTIME objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a actiTIME object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

actiTIME

Customer

maps to

Trello

Workspace or Board

lossy
Fully supported

actiTIME Customers are the top-level organizational unit and contain Projects. Each Customer maps to either a separate Trello Workspace (recommended when Customers represent distinct business units with separate member rosters) or to a top-level Board within a shared Workspace (recommended when Customers represent clients within a single team). The choice is a scoping decision made with the customer before migration. Workspace-level member permissions and board visibility settings are configured in Trello after object import. Archived Customers in actiTIME map to archived Boards in Trello.

actiTIME

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME Projects belong to a Customer and contain Tasks. Each Project maps to a Trello Board within the target Workspace or Workspaces defined by the Customer mapping. Project properties (estimatedTime, deadline, status) transfer to Board descriptions and Power-Up fields where available. The actiTIME customerId reference resolves to the target Workspace or Board at migration time via the parent lookup chain.

actiTIME

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME Tasks are the leaf nodes of the hierarchy, assigned to a Project. Each Task maps to a Trello Card within the target Board. Task name becomes Card title, description maps to Card description, deadline becomes a Card due date Custom Field, and status maps to the Card's List position or a Custom Field if the actiTIME instance uses custom taskWorkflow stages. We preserve the projectId lookup so the correct Board assignment is resolved at migration time.

actiTIME

Time-Track Entry

maps to

Trello

Card Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME time-track entries are the migration's most consequential object because Trello has no native time-tracking record type. Each time-track entry maps to a set of Custom Fields on the corresponding Card: date worked, hours logged, billable flag (boolean Custom Field), type of work (label or Custom Field), and any comment text. This preserves the full temporal and financial context of logged hours against the right Card. Note that Trello Standard limits Custom Fields to a subset of types per board, so we select the most critical fields first during scoping. Custom Fields are created via the Custom Fields Power-Up API before record import begins.

actiTIME

Type of Work

maps to

Trello

Label

lossy
Fully supported

actiTIME Types of Work (e.g., 'Development', 'Meeting', 'Research') are a read-only taxonomy per instance. We create a Trello Label for each Type of Work and apply it to every Card whose time-track entry carries that type. Label name matches the actiTIME Type of Work name; Label color is assigned from the Trello palette. The type-of-work taxonomy is preserved as label names rather than Custom Fields because Labels are natively visible on Cards without additional interaction, making type attribution immediately readable on the Board.

actiTIME

User

maps to

Trello

Member

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME Users (first/last name, username, email, active/inactive status) map to Trello Members by email address. We export the full user roster and match by email against Trello Members in the destination Workspace. Users in actiTIME without a corresponding Trello Member go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Inactive actiTIME users who are still referenced on time-track entries are imported as Members with a deprovisioned flag so historical assignments remain intact.

actiTIME

Workflow Status (taskWorkflow)

maps to

Trello

Label

lossy
Fully supported

actiTIME custom taskWorkflow stages are a feature-gated capability controlled by the taskWorkflow flag in the /info endpoint. Custom stages vary by instance, so we export the full status definition set and create a corresponding Label for each stage. The Label color is assigned from the Trello palette. On the Trello Board, List positions can also represent workflow stages; the customer chooses whether to use Labels (finer-grained, multiple per Card) or Lists (coarser-grained, one per Card) during scoping. Both approaches are valid and the choice affects how Butler automation triggers afterward.

actiTIME

Task Estimate (taskEstimates)

maps to

Trello

Card Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Task estimates (planned hours per task) are an optional feature controlled by the taskEstimates flag in actiTIME. Where enabled, we create a numeric Custom Field on each Card named 'Estimated Hours' and populate it with the actiTIME estimatedTime value. Trello Custom Fields support numeric type natively, so no string parsing is required. We verify the target Trello board plan supports the numeric field type during the pre-migration Custom Field enumeration phase.

actiTIME

Locked Timesheet Record

maps to

Trello

Card Custom Field (read-only indicator)

lossy
Fully supported

actiTIME timesheet locking prevents modification of submitted time entries. Trello has no native timesheet or timesheet-locking equivalent. We preserve the locked status as a read-only single-select Custom Field on the Card named 'Timesheet Status' with values 'Open' or 'Locked'. This is a configuration mapping — no additional Trello feature is required. The locked flag provides audit context without blocking future edits in Trello.

actiTIME

Leave Time (leavetimeRegistration)

maps to

Trello

CSV Export (no Trello equivalent)

1:1
Fully supported

Leave time tracking is controlled by the leavetimeRegistration feature flag and may not exist in every actiTIME instance. Trello does not have a leave-time or PTO management object. Where leave-time records exist, we export them as a structured CSV file delivered alongside the migration package. The file includes employee name, leave type, start date, end date, and status. The customer distributes this CSV to their HR or payroll tool or uses a dedicated Trello Power-Up if leave tracking is needed in Trello. Leave data is not imported as Cards because Trello Cards do not represent employee leave entitlements.

actiTIME

Department

maps to

Trello

Label or Trello Team

lossy
Fully supported

Departments are an optional feature gated by the Departments parameter in actiTIME's /info endpoint. Trello has Workspace-level Teams as an organizational unit in Enterprise plans and Label-based categorization in Standard and Premium. We export the Department roster and user assignments from actiTIME, then map each Department to either a Trello Team (Enterprise destination, one Team per Department) or a Label on each Card (Standard or Premium destination, label per Department). The customer selects the mapping strategy during scoping. If the actiTIME Departments feature flag is false, no Department data exists and this mapping step is skipped.

actiTIME

Time Zone Group

maps to

Trello

Workspace-level note

lossy
Fully supported

actiTIME Time Zone Groups group users by timezone for cross-timezone reporting. Trello has no native timezone-grouping concept. We export the TZG roster and user assignments and document them as a Workspace-level note in the migration delivery. The customer can use this documentation to configure Workspace or Board-level timezone settings in Trello if distributed-team visibility is a reporting requirement.

actiTIME

Project Deadline

maps to

Trello

Card dueDate Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME Project records carry a deadline property. We map this to a Card dueDate Custom Field named 'Project Deadline' on each Card belonging to the Project. Trello natively supports due dates on Cards, so we use the native due date field rather than a Custom Field when the project deadline applies uniformly to all tasks. If individual tasks carry their own deadlines, those map to separate due date fields using the same approach.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

actiTIME logo

actiTIME gotchas

High

Basic Authentication only — no OAuth

High

Feature flags gate entire object classes

High

Deleting a project permanently erases all associated time-track data

Medium

Locked timesheets prevent time-track modification

Medium

Batch API maxBatchSize caps concurrent requests

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Trello has no native time-tracking object

    actiTIME's primary data object is the time-track entry: hours logged, date worked, billability, type of work, and approval status. Trello has no native equivalent. We map time-track entries to Custom Fields on Cards (date, hours, billable flag, type-of-work label). This preserves the financial and temporal context of logged hours against the right Card but requires a Custom Fields Power-Up on the destination board. Trello Standard has field-type limitations; Premium unlocks full numeric, date, and checkbox field types. We enumerate required Custom Field types during discovery and confirm the customer's Trello plan supports them before migration begins.

  • actiTIME uses Basic Auth; Trello requires OAuth

    actiTIME's API exclusively supports HTTP Basic Authentication (username:password Base64 in headers). Trello uses OAuth 1.0a tokens issued per integration. We handle both authentication models separately: we request a dedicated API service account from the customer's actiTIME instance (avoiding any SSO-gated account), and we request a Trello API token scoped to the target Workspace. If the actiTIME instance uses external directory authentication, the dedicated service account must be provisioned before we begin. We do not store credentials in plain text; they are embedded in migration request headers and never logged.

  • Trello API rate limits at 300 requests per 10 seconds

    Trello's API enforces a rate limit of 300 requests per 10 seconds per API key for all issued tokens. actiTIME's API does not publish a public rate limit but the /info endpoint exposes a maxBatchSize parameter that constrains parallel batch calls. We tune our parallelization to the lower of the two limits. For Trello, we implement request throttling at 250 requests per 10 seconds (a 17% safety margin), chunk bulk operations into pages of 1,000 Cards, and use exponential backoff on 429 responses. Large time-track histories (over 50,000 entries) require more sequential cycles, which extends migration duration proportionally.

  • actiTIME Workflow Stages have no structural equivalent in Trello

    actiTIME custom taskWorkflow stages are per-instance and vary in count and definition. Trello Lists represent sequential stages but a Card can only belong to one List at a time, whereas actiTIME Tasks can carry multiple workflow statuses simultaneously in some configurations. We scope the mapping approach during discovery: Lists map cleanly to linear stages, but branching or concurrent workflow stages require Label-based representation plus Butler automation. If the actiTIME instance uses taskWorkflow stages, we export the full stage definition set and document the recommended Trello representation (List, Label, or Label-plus-Butler combination) in the migration handoff.

  • Workflows, Automations, and Leave-Time rules do not migrate

    actiTIME's timesheet approval workflows, overtime calculation rules, and leave-time approval chains are platform-specific constructs that have no direct Trello equivalent. Trello uses Butler (rule-based automation) and Power-Up-driven workflows which are architecturally different. We do not migrate automations as functional code. We deliver a written inventory of every active actiTIME workflow, overtime rule, and leave-time approval chain with its trigger, conditions, and actions, plus a recommended Butler recipe or Power-Up equivalent for each. The customer's admin rebuilds them post-migration. This is a separate scope item from the data migration and is priced accordingly.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful actiTIME to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and feature-flag audit

    We query actiTIME's /info endpoint to retrieve all feature flags (departments, taskEstimates, leavetimeRegistration, taskWorkflow, timeZoneGroups, maxBatchSize) before any other operation. This tells us exactly which objects exist in the source instance and which are gated off. We then enumerate the full object inventory: Customers, Projects, Tasks, time-track entries (with volume estimates by date range), Users, Types of Work, and any enabled optional objects. We pair this with a Trello Workspace audit, confirming the destination plan tier and enumerating existing Boards, Labels, and Custom Field types to avoid namespace collisions during import.

  2. Schema design and hierarchy mapping

    We design the Trello structure based on the actiTIME object inventory. This includes decisions on Workspace vs. Board per Customer, List naming strategy aligned to actiTIME taskWorkflow stages or a simplified Kanban model, Label taxonomy for Types of Work and workflow statuses, and Custom Field definitions for time-track data and task estimates. We create all Custom Fields via the Trello API before any Card import begins. We also design the time-track-to-Custom-Field mapping table documenting which actiTIME time-track property maps to which Trello Custom Field on which Card.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Trello Workspace using a representative subset of production data. The customer's project manager and system admin reconcile record counts (Projects imported vs. Boards created, Tasks imported vs. Cards created, time-track entries mapped to Custom Fields), spot-check 25-50 random Cards against the actiTIME source, and verify Label taxonomy and Custom Field values. Any mapping corrections, Custom Field type adjustments, or Workspace structure changes happen in this phase. Production migration does not begin until written sign-off.

  4. User provisioning and assignment reconciliation

    We export every distinct actiTIME User referenced on Tasks and time-track entries and match by email against Trello Members in the destination Workspace. Users without a matching Trello Member go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing Members before record import resumes. Migration cannot proceed past this step because Card assignees (Members) must be resolved at import time. We also flag any actiTIME Users whose accounts are inactive but still referenced on historical time-track entries.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Workspaces and Boards first (from actiTIME Customers and Projects), then Cards (from Tasks, with due dates and Custom Fields set during Card creation), then time-track Custom Field values applied per Card. Labels are created before Card import so they are available at Card creation time. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We throttle to Trello's 300 req/10s rate limit with a 17% safety margin, chunking Card imports into batches of 1,000 and time-track field updates into batches of 500.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze actiTIME writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Trello as the system of record. We deliver a full reconciliation report (source record counts vs. destination record counts), a time-track Custom Field audit (spot-checking billability flags and hours totals), and the automation inventory document listing every actiTIME workflow, overtime rule, and leave-time rule with a recommended Butler recipe. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflow and automation rebuilds are outside the data migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

actiTIME logo

actiTIME

Source

Strengths

  • Long-established platform with over 20 years of market presence and a stable, well-understood data model.
  • Offers both SaaS (Online) and self-hosted deployment options for organizations with data-residency requirements.
  • Hierarchical Customer → Project → Task structure is clean and maps predictably to most destination systems.
  • Rich time-track data including billability flags, type of work, comments, and approval statuses.
  • Integrated leave-time tracking and timesheet approval workflows reduce the need for separate HR tools.

Weaknesses

  • API authentication is limited to Basic Authentication only — no OAuth 2.0, which restricts automated integrations in environments requiring modern auth patterns.
  • Feature gates throughout the instance mean not all objects exist in every deployment, requiring a pre-migration feature scan.
  • Limited native integrations with CRM, invoicing, or ERP platforms, making actiTIME a data silo for many organizations.
  • Mobile app requires manual data synchronization rather than automatic background sync when connectivity is restored.
  • The platform lacks advanced project-management features like Gantt charts, resource-leveling, or dependency tracking.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across actiTIME and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    actiTIME: maxQueryLimit and maxBatchSize exposed per-instance via the /info endpoint; not publicly documented in general API guide.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    actiTIME exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your actiTIME to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about actiTIME to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during actiTIME to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your actiTIME to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations with fewer than 2,000 Projects, 20,000 Tasks, and 50,000 time-track entries complete in two to four weeks. Migrations with large time-track histories, multi-customer workspace segregation decisions, label taxonomy design, and a full automation inventory deliver in eight to twelve weeks. The time-track volume is the primary duration driver because each entry requires a separate Custom Field write operation against Trello's rate-limited API, and time-track records cannot be bulk-imported via CSV in Trello.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from actiTIME.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day