Project Management migration

Migrate from actiTIME to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between actiTIME and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

actiTIME logo

actiTIME

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between actiTIME and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from actiTIME to Asana is a structural remapping: actiTIME's time-tracking-centric hierarchy (Customer → Project → Task → Time Track) has no direct equivalent in Asana, which is a task-and-dependency management tool. We resolve the actiTIME Customer-to-Team mapping during scoping, push task estimates into a numeric custom field in Asana, and preserve time-track entries as structured notes on Tasks since Asana's native Actual Time field is read-only post-creation and does not accept migrated values. The Types of Work taxonomy becomes a single-select custom field, and feature-gated objects (Departments, Time Zone Groups, Leave Time, Workflow Statuses) are audited in the source /info endpoint before any objects are read. Asana Rules and actiTIME workflows are not migrated as code; we deliver a written inventory of every actiTIME workflow requiring rebuild in Asana's Rules engine.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

actiTIME logo

actiTIME

What's pushing teams away

  • The product lacks native integrations with CRM and invoicing platforms, forcing teams into manual CSV exports and re-entry that erodes the value of time tracking.
  • Users report that the mobile app requires manual synchronization — hours entered offline do not push automatically when connectivity returns, leading to lost or forgotten entries.
  • actiTIME's feature set is centred on time tracking and basic project management; teams seeking full project-management capabilities like Gantt charts, resource-leveling, or advanced dependencies outgrow it.
  • Limited API documentation and the absence of OAuth authentication create friction for teams trying to automate data flows or build custom integrations.
  • Some users note that actiTIME's UI, while functional, feels dated compared to newer time-tracking tools, particularly on mobile.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How actiTIME objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a actiTIME object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

actiTIME

Customer

maps to

Asana

Team

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME Customers are the top-level organizational container and map to Asana Teams. We create one Asana Team per actiTIME Customer, preserving the Customer name and archived status as a Team description note. If the actiTIME instance has multiple active Customers, each becomes a separate Asana Team so that project scoping and team-based permissions remain intact after migration.

actiTIME

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME Projects belong to a Customer and map directly to Asana Projects. We preserve estimatedTime and deadline from actiTIME as Asana Due Date and a numeric custom field Estimated Hours. Project status (active, archived) maps to Asana's project archived state. Each Project is assigned to its corresponding Team during import so that project-team membership reflects the source Customer hierarchy.

actiTIME

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME Tasks map to Asana Tasks. We preserve name, status, estimatedTime, deadline, and custom workflow status. In actiTIME, estimatedTime is a feature-gated field controlled by the taskEstimates flag — we check this flag before reading any estimate data. Where enabled, estimated hours migrate to a numeric custom field in Asana. The actiTIME task's custom workflow stage migrates to a single-select custom field that we pre-create in Asana based on the exported workflow taxonomy.

actiTIME

Time-Track Entry

maps to

Asana

Task Note (structured)

lossy
Fully supported

actiTIME Time-Track entries represent logged work hours and are the core data object in actiTIME. Asana does not have a native time-track entry object that accepts migrated data — the Actual Time field (task.actual_time_minutes) is read-only and cannot be written via API. We preserve time-track data as structured notes on the corresponding Asana Task, formatted with date, hours, type of work, billability flag, and comments. This preserves the data for reporting but requires a custom Asana report or third-party integration to query time across tasks.

actiTIME

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

actiTIME Users map to Asana Users by email match. We export the complete user roster including active/inactive status and time zone group assignment. Inactive actiTIME users who are still referenced on historical time-track entries are provisioned in Asana as inactive members so that Owner assignment on migrated tasks remains valid. Users without an email match enter a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision.

actiTIME

Department

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (single-select) or Team membership

1:1
Fully supported

Departments are a feature-gated object controlled by the Departments flag in actiTIME's /info endpoint. Not all instances have this feature enabled. Where enabled, we export the department roster and user assignments. In Asana, we create a Department custom field on the User profile or map users to Teams representing their department — the customer chooses the strategy during scoping. If the actiTIME Departments feature is disabled, no department data exists to migrate.

actiTIME

Type of Work

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (single-select on Task)

lossy
Fully supported

actiTIME Types of Work (e.g., Development, Meeting, Research) categorise time-track entries and are a read-only taxonomy per instance. We export the full type-of-work list and create a matching single-select custom field in Asana. Every migrated time-track note carries the Type of Work value so that work-type reporting can be reconstructed from the structured note content.

actiTIME

Workflow Status

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (single-select on Task)

lossy
Fully supported

Custom Workflow Statuses are feature-gated by the taskWorkflow flag in actiTIME's /info endpoint. Where this feature is enabled, we export the current status definitions from the instance and pre-create a matching single-select custom field in Asana before any Task import. If taskWorkflow is false, no workflow status data exists in the instance and this mapping step is skipped.

actiTIME

Task Estimate

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (numeric on Task)

1:1
Fully supported

Task estimates (planned hours per task) are controlled by the taskEstimates feature flag. We check this flag before attempting to read any estimate data. Where enabled, estimated hours migrate to a numeric custom field Estimated Hours in Asana. Asana's native estimated time field (Custom Field with estimated_time type) is available on Premium and above; we verify the destination workspace tier during scoping.

actiTIME

Leave Time

maps to

Asana

Not migrated (external HR system required)

lossy
Mapping required

Leave time tracking is feature-gated by the leavetimeRegistration flag in actiTIME's /info endpoint. Where enabled, leave-time records are exported and documented in the migration report, but do not migrate to Asana because Asana does not have a leave-time or PTO object. The customer uses the exported leave-time data to configure an external HR tool (BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling) post-migration. Leave-time records are flagged as requiring separate system setup in the handoff documentation.

actiTIME

Time Zone Group

maps to

Asana

Asana User time zone setting

1:1
Fully supported

Time Zone Groups group users by timezone in actiTIME for reporting across distributed teams. This feature is controlled by the timeZoneGroups flag. We export the TZG roster and user assignments, then set each mapped Asana User's time zone preference to match the source TZG assignment. Individual user time zones are applied at the User level in Asana rather than as a group construct since Asana does not have a time zone group object.

actiTIME

Locked Timesheet

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (checkbox on Task)

lossy
Fully supported

actiTIME supports timesheet locking to prevent modification of submitted time entries. Locked time-track entries are detected during the export phase and flagged in the migration report. In Asana, we apply a custom field Locked Timesheet (checkbox) to tasks with associated locked time-track data. Asana does not have an equivalent locking mechanism, so the flag documents the source lock status for the customer's awareness rather than enforcing it at the destination.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

actiTIME logo

actiTIME gotchas

High

Basic Authentication only — no OAuth

High

Feature flags gate entire object classes

High

Deleting a project permanently erases all associated time-track data

Medium

Locked timesheets prevent time-track modification

Medium

Batch API maxBatchSize caps concurrent requests

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Asana Actual Time field is read-only after task creation

    Asana's task.actual_time_minutes property is designed for native time tracking within the Asana UI and does not accept values via API write after task creation. Teams expecting time-track entries from actiTIME to populate the Actual Time field will find that field blank. We preserve actiTIME time-track data as structured notes on the corresponding Asana Task, preserving hours, date, type of work, and billability. Customers who need time-tracking dashboards in Asana should evaluate Asana's native time tracking feature (Premium and above) to log future hours, or connect to a third-party time-tracking integration.

  • actiTIME time-track deletion is permanent and unrecoverable

    actiTIME documentation states that deleting a project with tasks and reported time-tracks permanently destroys all associated time-track data — no soft-delete, no archival, no recovery. If the source actiTIME instance still contains active data, we perform a read-only export of the full dataset before any deletion operations. We strongly recommend the customer performs a complete API export as a baseline backup and does not initiate any cleanup in actiTIME until migration is fully validated at the destination. This is a hard constraint with no workaround in the actiTIME platform.

  • Feature flags gate entire object classes in actiTIME

    actiTIME instances do not expose all objects universally. The /info endpoint exposes booleans for departments, taskWorkflow, taskEstimates, leavetimeRegistration, timeZoneGroups, and other optional modules. If leavetimeRegistration is false, there is no leave-time data to migrate regardless of whether the leave-time UI appears in the menu. We query /info at the start of every migration, record all feature flags, and skip any object whose controlling flag is false. This prevents 404 errors and empty-payload surprises mid-migration. Customers with multiple actiTIME deployments may find that different instances have different feature flags set.

  • Asana file attachments are capped at 100MB

    Asana's API does not accept file attachments exceeding 100MB. If actiTIME contains attachments (such as documents linked to projects or tasks) that exceed this threshold, those files are flagged in the migration report and skipped. We recommend the customer upload oversized files to a linked Google Drive or SharePoint folder and store the share link in the corresponding Asana Task description as a workaround. Smaller attachments migrate normally as Asana attachments on the corresponding Task.

  • Asana Rules and actiTIME Workflows do not migrate as code

    Asana Rules (task notifications, auto-assignment, field updates) and actiTIME workflow rules (automated task status changes, deadline notifications, timesheet approval triggers) are both automation systems, but they operate on different object models and triggers. We do not migrate either as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active actiTIME workflow with its trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Asana Rules equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds the Rules in Asana post-migration. Leave-time approval workflows have no Asana equivalent and require an external HR tool.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful actiTIME to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and feature flag audit

    We authenticate to actiTIME using Basic Authentication with a dedicated API service account (requested during scoping if the instance uses SSO or external directory auth). We query the /info endpoint to capture all feature flags — departments, taskWorkflow, taskEstimates, leavetimeRegistration, timeZoneGroups, and maxBatchSize. We export the complete object roster: Customers, Projects, Tasks, Time-Track entries, Users, Types of Work, Workflow Statuses, and any feature-gated objects with their controlling flags set to true. This audit output defines the exact migration scope and identifies which optional objects exist in the source instance.

  2. Schema design and Asana custom field creation

    We design the Asana destination schema based on the actiTIME audit. This includes creating Asana Teams (one per actiTIME Customer), Projects (mapped from actiTIME Projects with due dates), custom fields (Type of Work as single-select, Workflow Status as single-select, Estimated Hours as numeric), and workspace-level custom field definitions. We verify the destination Asana workspace tier to confirm that required custom field types are available. Schema is built in the customer's Asana workspace before any data import begins.

  3. User provisioning and reconciliation

    We extract every distinct actiTIME User referenced on Tasks and Time-Track entries and match by email against the destination Asana workspace. Inactive actiTIME users are provisioned as inactive Asana members to preserve owner assignment on historical tasks. Users without an email match enter a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Time zone assignments from actiTIME Time Zone Groups are applied to the corresponding Asana User profiles.

  4. Team, Project, and Task migration in dependency order

    We run migration in dependency order: Teams first (from actiTIME Customers), then Projects (with estimatedTime and deadline preserved as Due Date and Estimated Hours custom field), then Tasks (with workflow status and estimated hours mapped to custom fields, owner resolved via user email match, and parent Project assignment). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Time-track entries are processed last and written as structured notes on the corresponding Task, preserving hours, date, type of work, and billability flag.

  5. Lock-status flagging and leave-time export

    We detect locked timesheet entries during the time-track export phase and flag them in the migration report. For tasks with associated locked time-track data, we apply a Locked Timesheet custom field (checkbox) set to true. Leave-time records are exported as a standalone CSV and documented in the handoff package with a recommendation to configure an external HR tool. Types of Work and Workflow Status taxonomies are confirmed as custom field options and any unmapped statuses are documented for the admin to resolve.

  6. Cutover, delta migration, and workflow inventory handoff

    We freeze writes in actiTIME during cutover, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We disable Asana notifications before migration to prevent team spam. We deliver the actiTIME Workflow inventory document listing every active workflow with its trigger, conditions, and recommended Asana Rules equivalent. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild actiTIME workflows as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

  7. Post-migration validation and time-tracking strategy

    We spot-check 25-50 migrated tasks against the actiTIME source for name accuracy, due date preservation, owner assignment, and time-track note completeness. We verify custom field values (Estimated Hours, Type of Work, Workflow Status) are correctly populated. We document the Asana time-tracking gap — that future time tracking requires Asana's native time-tracking feature or a third-party integration — and provide a recommendation based on the customer's reporting needs. We do not provide post-migration admin training or ongoing workflow support as standard scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

actiTIME logo

actiTIME

Source

Strengths

  • Long-established platform with over 20 years of market presence and a stable, well-understood data model.
  • Offers both SaaS (Online) and self-hosted deployment options for organizations with data-residency requirements.
  • Hierarchical Customer → Project → Task structure is clean and maps predictably to most destination systems.
  • Rich time-track data including billability flags, type of work, comments, and approval statuses.
  • Integrated leave-time tracking and timesheet approval workflows reduce the need for separate HR tools.

Weaknesses

  • API authentication is limited to Basic Authentication only — no OAuth 2.0, which restricts automated integrations in environments requiring modern auth patterns.
  • Feature gates throughout the instance mean not all objects exist in every deployment, requiring a pre-migration feature scan.
  • Limited native integrations with CRM, invoicing, or ERP platforms, making actiTIME a data silo for many organizations.
  • Mobile app requires manual data synchronization rather than automatic background sync when connectivity is restored.
  • The platform lacks advanced project-management features like Gantt charts, resource-leveling, or dependency tracking.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across actiTIME and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    actiTIME: maxQueryLimit and maxBatchSize exposed per-instance via the /info endpoint; not publicly documented in general API guide.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    actiTIME exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your actiTIME to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about actiTIME to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during actiTIME to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your actiTIME to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 5,000 tasks and 50,000 time-track entries with no feature-gated objects requiring custom field reconstruction. Migrations with large time-track histories (over 200,000 entries), multiple actiTIME Customers mapping to distinct Asana Teams, feature-gated Departments or Workflow Statuses requiring custom field schema work, or an existing Asana workspace with pre-existing custom fields that need merge reconciliation move to eight to twelve weeks because of batch sequencing, custom field design, and delta validation cycles.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from actiTIME.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day