Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Favro and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
Favro
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
11 of 13
objects map 1:1 between Favro and Asana.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Favro to Asana is a structural migration that requires careful resolution of three schema differences. Favro's Cards can exist on multiple Boards simultaneously, which has no native Asana equivalent — we preserve that cross-team context as linked task records or by tagging each migrated task with all its originating Board identifiers. Favro Collections aggregate Boards for management visibility, which maps to Asana Portfolios but requires a decision between a single Portfolio with all projects or separate Portfolios per team. We use the Asana REST API with pagination and exponential backoff to handle large Card sets, and we document every Favro Automation and Dashboard as a plain-language inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules and the reporting layer. We do not migrate Automations or Dashboards as code.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Favro object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Favro
Card
Asana
Task
1:1Favro Cards map 1:1 to Asana Tasks as the atomic work unit. Each Task receives title, description (migrated as rich text), assignee, due date, start date, and priority from the corresponding Card. Card-level labels migrate as Asana Tags. We preserve the original Card creation timestamp as a custom field favro_created_at__c because Asana's native created_at on Tasks is set at import time. Cards with no assignee migrate as unassigned Tasks in the target Project.
Favro
Board
Asana
Project
1:1Favro Boards map 1:1 to Asana Projects. Board columns (Kanban swimlanes, status lanes) migrate as Asana Sections within the Project. Board-level permission settings are documented as a project-access inventory for the customer to reapply in Asana's sharing settings. Board card ordering is preserved as Section order and task position within Section.
Favro
Card (cross-board instance)
Asana
Task + Task Link
1:manyFavro Cards that exist on multiple Boards simultaneously require resolution. We create a primary Task in the first target Project, then add Asana Task Links (or cross-project dependencies) to associate the same work item with the additional Projects. Each linked Task carries a custom field favro_also_on_boards__c listing the additional Board names, preserving the multi-team context that is core to how Favro structures cross-functional work. The customer chooses between linked records or dependency chains during scoping.
Favro
Collection
Asana
Portfolio or Project Grouping
lossyFavro Collections aggregate multiple Boards for team or management visibility. We map Collections to Asana Portfolios (Business plan) or to a tagged grouping of Projects (Basic plan) depending on the destination Asana edition. The mapping choice is made during scoping: Portfolios provide a native management view with progress reporting; tagged groupings require the customer to apply a Portfolio-like structure manually. Collection membership (which Boards belong to which Collection) is preserved as Portfolio membership or as a custom tag applied to each Project.
Favro
Relation
Asana
Task Dependency or Task Link
1:1Favro Relations link Cards and Boards across teams to model dependencies or cross-functional ownership. We map Relations to Asana Dependencies (blocker-blocked pairs) for dependency-type Relations, and to Task Links (relates-to) for association-type Relations. The Relation type is documented during scoping and the appropriate Asana link type is selected per Relation instance. Cross-board Relations are resolved against the split-card mapping so that the correct Task instances are linked in the destination.
Favro
Custom Field
Asana
Custom Field
1:1Favro Card custom fields (dropdown, date, number, text) map field-by-field to Asana Custom Fields of matching type. Multi-select dropdown fields in Favro map to Asana multi-select custom fields. We pre-create all custom fields in the destination Asana Project via the API before Task import begins. If a Favro custom field name conflicts with an existing Asana custom field in the same Project, we append a numeric suffix per Asana's custom field naming convention.
Favro
Label
Asana
Tag
1:1Favro Labels applied to Cards migrate as Asana Tags. Label colors are preserved as hex values in a custom field tag_color__c on the Tag because Asana Tags do not natively support color metadata. We deduplicate any label collisions during import where the same label name exists in multiple Boards.
Favro
Comment
Asana
Comment (Story)
1:1Favro Comments on Cards migrate as Asana Comments on the corresponding Task. Author attribution is preserved by matching the comment author's Favro user ID to the migrated Asana User (resolved by email). Comment timestamps are preserved. Threaded replies in Favro are migrated as a flat chronological comment list in Asana because Asana Comments do not support nested threading.
Favro
Attachment
Asana
Attachment
1:1Favro file attachments on Cards migrate as Asana Attachments on the corresponding Task. We transfer file URLs from Favro's stored attachment references and re-upload to Asana's attachment storage. Attachments exceeding 100 MB are flagged in the scoping report because Asana's API does not support attachments larger than 100 MB. External URL attachments migrate as a link attachment in Asana.
Favro
External Member
Asana
Guest Member
1:1Favro guest accounts with restricted Board and Collection visibility are mapped to Asana Guest membership. We flag all external member records during scoping so the customer can decide which should become Asana Guests (limited access) versus full Members. Favro guest visibility restrictions that cannot be expressed in Asana's guest model are documented as an access-inventory item for the customer's admin to reapply manually in Asana's project sharing settings.
Favro
Automation
Asana
Rule (documented only)
1:1Favro Automations are not accessible via API in a form that allows replay in Asana. We document every active Automation as part of migration scoping: trigger type, conditions, actions, and delay settings. This automation inventory is delivered as a plain-language checklist that maps each Favro Automation to a recommended Asana Rule equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds the rules in Asana's Rule builder post-migration.
Favro
Dashboard
Asana
Portfolio Report (documented only)
1:1Favro Dashboards aggregate Board and Card metrics into widget-based views. We export the dashboard widget configuration as a data record but do not rebuild dashboards in Asana because the widget engine differs significantly. The dashboard inventory — widget types, Board references, metric definitions, and refresh settings — is delivered as a written handoff document so the customer's team can recreate the reporting views in Asana Portfolios, the reporting dashboard, or a connected BI tool.
Favro
Timesheet
Asana
Time Tracking (add-on)
1:1Favro timesheet entries (available on Enterprise plan) migrate as time entries against the corresponding Asana Task. Asana's native time tracking is available as an add-on on Business and Enterprise plans. We preserve hours logged, date, user attribution, and any timesheet notes as a custom field group on the Task. If the destination Asana plan does not include the time tracking add-on, the data is migrated as a structured custom field set and the customer can enable the add-on post-migration.
| Favro | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Card | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Card (cross-board instance) | Task + Task Link1:many | Fully supported | |
| Collection | Portfolio or Project Groupinglossy | Fully supported | |
| Relation | Task Dependency or Task Link1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Label | Tag1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Comment (Story)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| External Member | Guest Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Automation | Rule (documented only)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Dashboard | Portfolio Report (documented only)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Timesheet | Time Tracking (add-on)1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Favro gotchas
Standard plan API limit is 1,000 calls/month
User bucket billing creates overage on growth
Cross-board Card existence has no direct equivalent
Guest and external member access scoping
Automations do not migrate programmatically
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and scoping
We audit the source Favro workspace across plan tier (Lite/Standard/Enterprise), Board count, Card volume, Collection membership, Relation types, custom field definitions, active automation rules, dashboard widget configurations, external member count, and timesheet data (Enterprise). We pair this with an Asana edition review (Basic, Premium, Business, or Enterprise) and determine the Collection-to-Portfolio mapping strategy, the cross-board card resolution approach (linked records vs split tasks), and which guest accounts should become Asana Guests versus full Members. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, mapping decisions, and an Asana edition recommendation.
Schema design in Asana
We pre-create the destination schema in Asana before any data import. This includes provisioning Custom Fields (with type-matched Asana field types per Favro custom field), Sections in each Project (mapped from Favro Board columns), Tags (from Favro Labels with color metadata preserved), and Portfolio membership or tagged grouping structure (from Favro Collections). The schema is deployed via Asana's API into a sandbox workspace first for validation, then replicated to the production workspace before record migration begins.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a test Asana workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project lead reconciles record counts (Cards in, Boards in as Projects, Collections mapped, Relations resolved), spot-checks 25-50 random Tasks against the Favro source, validates cross-board card resolution, and reviews comment and attachment integrity. Any mapping corrections — custom field type mismatches, incorrect Section assignments, Relation resolution gaps — are resolved here before production migration begins.
User and guest provisioning
We extract every distinct Favro user referenced on Cards (assignees), Comments (authors), and Automation ownership, and match them by email against the Asana destination workspace's user list. Guests and external members are flagged separately for the customer to classify as Asana Guests or full Members. Any Favro user without a matching Asana account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Projects (from Favro Boards with Sections), Custom Fields and Tags (pre-created), then Tasks (Cards migrated with cross-board resolution applied), Relations (converted to Dependencies or Task Links), Comments (chronological order preserved), Attachments (with 100 MB threshold enforced), Timesheet entries (as custom field data or native time entries if the add-on is enabled). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. The Favro workspace is set to read-only during cutover to prevent drift between export and import.
Cutover, validation, and handoff
We freeze writes in Favro during cutover, run a final delta migration of any Cards modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the Automation inventory and Dashboard specification documents to the customer's admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild Favro Automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.
Platform deep dives
Favro
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Favro and Asana.
Object compatibility
2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Favro: 50 calls per hour at the user level. Organization-level routes are limited based on the organization's payment plan, enforced via a token-bucket algorithm. Requests that would exceed a 10-second back-off fail with HTTP 429..
Data volume sensitivity
Favro doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Favro to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Favro to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Favro
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.