Project Management migration

Migrate from Favro to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Favro and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Favro logo

Favro

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

85%

11 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Favro and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Favro to Asana is a structural migration that requires careful resolution of three schema differences. Favro's Cards can exist on multiple Boards simultaneously, which has no native Asana equivalent — we preserve that cross-team context as linked task records or by tagging each migrated task with all its originating Board identifiers. Favro Collections aggregate Boards for management visibility, which maps to Asana Portfolios but requires a decision between a single Portfolio with all projects or separate Portfolios per team. We use the Asana REST API with pagination and exponential backoff to handle large Card sets, and we document every Favro Automation and Dashboard as a plain-language inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules and the reporting layer. We do not migrate Automations or Dashboards as code.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Favro logo

Favro

What's pushing teams away

  • The user-bucket billing model charges by tier (2, 5, 10, 25, 50+) rather than actual headcount, so a 6-person team pays for 10 seats — a pattern that frustrates reviewers who expect per-seat precision.
  • The Standard plan's 1,000 API calls/month ceiling is severely limiting for programmatic exports or integrations, and the lack of a publicly documented bulk API means large workspace migrations require careful pagination and retry logic.
  • No single-user plan exists, making Favro impractical for solo practitioners or two-person startups who want to evaluate the tool before committing to the minimum 2-user bucket.
  • Dashboards on Standard are limited — not all widgets are available — which reviewers looking for portfolio-level reporting find disappointing compared to the full Enterprise feature set.
  • Automations are capped at 5,000 actions/month on Standard, and teams with high-frequency workflow triggers find themselves pushed toward Enterprise pricing to avoid hitting the ceiling.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Favro objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Favro object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Favro

Card

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Favro Cards map 1:1 to Asana Tasks as the atomic work unit. Each Task receives title, description (migrated as rich text), assignee, due date, start date, and priority from the corresponding Card. Card-level labels migrate as Asana Tags. We preserve the original Card creation timestamp as a custom field favro_created_at__c because Asana's native created_at on Tasks is set at import time. Cards with no assignee migrate as unassigned Tasks in the target Project.

Favro

Board

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Favro Boards map 1:1 to Asana Projects. Board columns (Kanban swimlanes, status lanes) migrate as Asana Sections within the Project. Board-level permission settings are documented as a project-access inventory for the customer to reapply in Asana's sharing settings. Board card ordering is preserved as Section order and task position within Section.

Favro

Card (cross-board instance)

maps to

Asana

Task + Task Link

1:many
Fully supported

Favro Cards that exist on multiple Boards simultaneously require resolution. We create a primary Task in the first target Project, then add Asana Task Links (or cross-project dependencies) to associate the same work item with the additional Projects. Each linked Task carries a custom field favro_also_on_boards__c listing the additional Board names, preserving the multi-team context that is core to how Favro structures cross-functional work. The customer chooses between linked records or dependency chains during scoping.

Favro

Collection

maps to

Asana

Portfolio or Project Grouping

lossy
Fully supported

Favro Collections aggregate multiple Boards for team or management visibility. We map Collections to Asana Portfolios (Business plan) or to a tagged grouping of Projects (Basic plan) depending on the destination Asana edition. The mapping choice is made during scoping: Portfolios provide a native management view with progress reporting; tagged groupings require the customer to apply a Portfolio-like structure manually. Collection membership (which Boards belong to which Collection) is preserved as Portfolio membership or as a custom tag applied to each Project.

Favro

Relation

maps to

Asana

Task Dependency or Task Link

1:1
Fully supported

Favro Relations link Cards and Boards across teams to model dependencies or cross-functional ownership. We map Relations to Asana Dependencies (blocker-blocked pairs) for dependency-type Relations, and to Task Links (relates-to) for association-type Relations. The Relation type is documented during scoping and the appropriate Asana link type is selected per Relation instance. Cross-board Relations are resolved against the split-card mapping so that the correct Task instances are linked in the destination.

Favro

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Favro Card custom fields (dropdown, date, number, text) map field-by-field to Asana Custom Fields of matching type. Multi-select dropdown fields in Favro map to Asana multi-select custom fields. We pre-create all custom fields in the destination Asana Project via the API before Task import begins. If a Favro custom field name conflicts with an existing Asana custom field in the same Project, we append a numeric suffix per Asana's custom field naming convention.

Favro

Label

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Favro Labels applied to Cards migrate as Asana Tags. Label colors are preserved as hex values in a custom field tag_color__c on the Tag because Asana Tags do not natively support color metadata. We deduplicate any label collisions during import where the same label name exists in multiple Boards.

Favro

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment (Story)

1:1
Fully supported

Favro Comments on Cards migrate as Asana Comments on the corresponding Task. Author attribution is preserved by matching the comment author's Favro user ID to the migrated Asana User (resolved by email). Comment timestamps are preserved. Threaded replies in Favro are migrated as a flat chronological comment list in Asana because Asana Comments do not support nested threading.

Favro

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Favro file attachments on Cards migrate as Asana Attachments on the corresponding Task. We transfer file URLs from Favro's stored attachment references and re-upload to Asana's attachment storage. Attachments exceeding 100 MB are flagged in the scoping report because Asana's API does not support attachments larger than 100 MB. External URL attachments migrate as a link attachment in Asana.

Favro

External Member

maps to

Asana

Guest Member

1:1
Fully supported

Favro guest accounts with restricted Board and Collection visibility are mapped to Asana Guest membership. We flag all external member records during scoping so the customer can decide which should become Asana Guests (limited access) versus full Members. Favro guest visibility restrictions that cannot be expressed in Asana's guest model are documented as an access-inventory item for the customer's admin to reapply manually in Asana's project sharing settings.

Favro

Automation

maps to

Asana

Rule (documented only)

1:1
Fully supported

Favro Automations are not accessible via API in a form that allows replay in Asana. We document every active Automation as part of migration scoping: trigger type, conditions, actions, and delay settings. This automation inventory is delivered as a plain-language checklist that maps each Favro Automation to a recommended Asana Rule equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds the rules in Asana's Rule builder post-migration.

Favro

Dashboard

maps to

Asana

Portfolio Report (documented only)

1:1
Fully supported

Favro Dashboards aggregate Board and Card metrics into widget-based views. We export the dashboard widget configuration as a data record but do not rebuild dashboards in Asana because the widget engine differs significantly. The dashboard inventory — widget types, Board references, metric definitions, and refresh settings — is delivered as a written handoff document so the customer's team can recreate the reporting views in Asana Portfolios, the reporting dashboard, or a connected BI tool.

Favro

Timesheet

maps to

Asana

Time Tracking (add-on)

1:1
Fully supported

Favro timesheet entries (available on Enterprise plan) migrate as time entries against the corresponding Asana Task. Asana's native time tracking is available as an add-on on Business and Enterprise plans. We preserve hours logged, date, user attribution, and any timesheet notes as a custom field group on the Task. If the destination Asana plan does not include the time tracking add-on, the data is migrated as a structured custom field set and the customer can enable the add-on post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Favro logo

Favro gotchas

High

Standard plan API limit is 1,000 calls/month

Medium

User bucket billing creates overage on growth

Medium

Cross-board Card existence has no direct equivalent

Low

Guest and external member access scoping

Low

Automations do not migrate programmatically

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Cross-board Card existence has no native Asana equivalent

    A Favro Card can exist on multiple Boards simultaneously, which is central to how cross-team collaboration is structured in Favro. Asana Tasks belong to a single Project by default. We handle this by creating a primary Task in the first target Project and adding Asana Task Links or dependencies to associate the same work item with additional Projects, while preserving a custom field listing all Boards where the Card originally lived. If the customer prefers a flat model (one Card per Project), we split cross-board Cards into separate Tasks and flag the split in the migration report. The choice between linked records and split tasks must be confirmed during scoping because it affects downstream reporting.

  • Favro Standard's 1,000 API calls/month budget limits export speed

    Favro's Standard plan imposes a 1,000 API calls/month ceiling that is a monthly budget, not a per-minute rate. For workspaces with more than a few hundred Cards, exhausting this budget during export is nearly guaranteed. We monitor call consumption against this budget during scoping and use Favro's manual CSV export for the bulk Card data when the workspace exceeds the limit, reserving API calls for Relations, custom field metadata, and Collection membership queries. Enterprise workspaces have higher limits and can rely more heavily on API-based export.

  • Collection-to-Portfolio mapping requires an Asana edition decision

    Favro Collections aggregate multiple Boards for management visibility. Asana Portfolios provide equivalent aggregated views but are only available on the Business plan at $24.99/user/month. On Asana Basic ($10.99/user/month), there is no native Portfolio equivalent. We discuss the customer's Asana edition during scoping and either map Collections to Asana Portfolios (Business plan) or to a tagged grouping of Projects (Basic plan) that the customer recreates manually after migration. This decision affects the timeline because Portfolio creation requires additional schema configuration.

  • Automations and Dashboards do not migrate as functional code

    Favro Automations (trigger-action rules) and Dashboard widget configurations are not accessible via API in a form that replays in Asana. We document both as part of migration discovery and deliver a written automation inventory and dashboard specification that maps each Favro rule to a recommended Asana Rule, and each Favro widget to an Asana Portfolio metric or reporting view. The customer's admin rebuilds these in Asana post-migration. Timesheet dashboards on Favro Enterprise map to Asana's time tracking add-on if the customer has Business or Enterprise, otherwise the data migrates as custom fields only.

  • Guest and external member access must be remapped manually

    Favro guests have Board-level and Collection-level visibility restrictions that do not map directly to Asana's guest model, which uses project-level sharing. We flag all external member records during scoping with their current access scope and the Boards and Collections they can see. The customer decides whether to map each guest to an Asana Guest (limited access) or a full Member, and the admin reapplies access restrictions project-by-project in Asana after migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Favro to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the source Favro workspace across plan tier (Lite/Standard/Enterprise), Board count, Card volume, Collection membership, Relation types, custom field definitions, active automation rules, dashboard widget configurations, external member count, and timesheet data (Enterprise). We pair this with an Asana edition review (Basic, Premium, Business, or Enterprise) and determine the Collection-to-Portfolio mapping strategy, the cross-board card resolution approach (linked records vs split tasks), and which guest accounts should become Asana Guests versus full Members. The discovery output is a written migration scope with object counts, mapping decisions, and an Asana edition recommendation.

  2. Schema design in Asana

    We pre-create the destination schema in Asana before any data import. This includes provisioning Custom Fields (with type-matched Asana field types per Favro custom field), Sections in each Project (mapped from Favro Board columns), Tags (from Favro Labels with color metadata preserved), and Portfolio membership or tagged grouping structure (from Favro Collections). The schema is deployed via Asana's API into a sandbox workspace first for validation, then replicated to the production workspace before record migration begins.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Asana workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project lead reconciles record counts (Cards in, Boards in as Projects, Collections mapped, Relations resolved), spot-checks 25-50 random Tasks against the Favro source, validates cross-board card resolution, and reviews comment and attachment integrity. Any mapping corrections — custom field type mismatches, incorrect Section assignments, Relation resolution gaps — are resolved here before production migration begins.

  4. User and guest provisioning

    We extract every distinct Favro user referenced on Cards (assignees), Comments (authors), and Automation ownership, and match them by email against the Asana destination workspace's user list. Guests and external members are flagged separately for the customer to classify as Asana Guests or full Members. Any Favro user without a matching Asana account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Projects (from Favro Boards with Sections), Custom Fields and Tags (pre-created), then Tasks (Cards migrated with cross-board resolution applied), Relations (converted to Dependencies or Task Links), Comments (chronological order preserved), Attachments (with 100 MB threshold enforced), Timesheet entries (as custom field data or native time entries if the add-on is enabled). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. The Favro workspace is set to read-only during cutover to prevent drift between export and import.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze writes in Favro during cutover, run a final delta migration of any Cards modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the Automation inventory and Dashboard specification documents to the customer's admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild Favro Automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Favro logo

Favro

Source

Strengths

  • Four-building-block model (Cards, Boards, Collections, Relations) scales from single-team tasks to enterprise portfolio planning without forcing process changes.
  • Cross-board Card existence is a genuinely unique pattern that preserves multi-team context without data duplication.
  • Real-time collaboration with OAuth via Google and GitHub means minimal login friction for technical teams already in those identity ecosystems.
  • ISO 27001, ISO 27701, and PCI DSS compliance provides enterprise security credibility that smaller PM tools lack.
  • Unlimited storage and unlimited boards on Standard and Enterprise remove arbitrary caps that frustrate teams as they scale.

Weaknesses

  • User-bucket billing charges teams for headcount tiers rather than actual seats, creating predictable billing surprises for growing teams that cross bucket thresholds.
  • Standard plan's 1,000 API calls/month is a hard ceiling that makes programmatic exports and integrations impractical without upgrading to Enterprise.
  • No bulk API is publicly documented, meaning large workspace migrations require pagination engineering and careful rate-limit management to avoid 429 errors.
  • Dashboards are feature-capped on Standard — teams expecting full reporting discover that not all widgets are available until they pay for Enterprise pricing.
  • No single-user plan and the 2-user minimum make Favro inaccessible to solo practitioners or micro-teams evaluating fit.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Favro and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Favro: 50 calls per hour at the user level. Organization-level routes are limited based on the organization's payment plan, enforced via a token-bucket algorithm. Requests that would exceed a 10-second back-off fail with HTTP 429..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Favro doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Favro to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Favro to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Favro to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Favro to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 200 Cards, 20 Boards, and no heavy cross-board card usage land between three and five weeks. Migrations with extensive cross-board card instances, multiple Collections, active Relations between Cards and Boards, or timesheet data (Enterprise-to-Business-plan time tracking) extend to eight to twelve weeks because of the cross-board resolution pass, Collection-to-Portfolio schema design, and Relation-to-dependency mapping work.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Favro.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day