Project Management migration

Migrate from SP Project Tracker to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between SP Project Tracker and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

SP Project Tracker logo

SP Project Tracker

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

54%

7 of 13

objects map 1:1 between SP Project Tracker and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

SP Project Tracker has no documented public API, so every migration begins with a CSV export of each object type. The CSV export renders subtasks as a flat list with a parent_task_id column rather than a nested structure, which means we reconstruct the hierarchy in the destination during migration. We map Projects to Asana Projects, Tasks to Asana Tasks with subtask relationships rebuilt from parent_task_id, Time Entries to time-tracked subtasks or tasks with custom fields, and Attachments by downloading from SP Project Tracker's file store and re-uploading to the corresponding Asana task. Owner assignments in SP Project Tracker sometimes export as display names without email addresses; we resolve these against the Team Members export and flag any unresolved names for manual confirmation before cutover. We do not migrate SP Project Tracker automations or reports as code; we deliver a written inventory of each for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

SP Project Tracker logo

SP Project Tracker

What's pushing teams away

  • No documented public API, which blocks automation and forces teams to manually export and re-enter data as the organization scales.
  • Lacks advanced project management features such as Gantt charts, resource management, or dependency tracking that growing teams eventually require.
  • Limited collaboration features compared to modern alternatives, leading teams to outgrow the platform as remote and distributed work becomes standard.
  • Performance or reliability concerns emerge at scale, with some users reporting the platform becomes sluggish with larger project portfolios.
  • Support responsiveness and product development pace lag behind faster-moving competitors, leaving customers without critical updates or fixes.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How SP Project Tracker objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a SP Project Tracker object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

SP Project Tracker

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker Projects map to Asana Projects. Project name, description, start date, end date, and status migrate directly. Any custom fields on the SP Project Tracker project become Asana custom fields scoped to that project. We create the Asana project in the designated Workspace or Team before any task import so that the project_gid is available for task assignment.

SP Project Tracker

Task

maps to

Asana

Task (with Subtasks)

1:many
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker tasks map to Asana tasks. We detect subtasks in the CSV export by checking for non-null parent_task_id values, then create parent tasks first, capture the resulting Asana task_gid, and link child tasks as Asana subtasks in a second pass. Task name, assignee, due date, priority, and completion status migrate directly. The completion percentage from SP Project Tracker maps to the task's completed flag in Asana. We validate the reconstructed hierarchy against the source row count before closing migration.

SP Project Tracker

Subtask (flat CSV row)

maps to

Asana

Subtask

lossy
Fully supported

Subtasks in SP Project Tracker's CSV export appear as flat rows with a parent_task_id column rather than a nested structure. We identify subtask rows by non-null parent_task_id, then create them in Asana as native subtask objects linked to the parent Asana task_gid. The sequence of parent creation before child creation ensures the lookup relationship is satisfied. We validate that the number of subtask rows in Asana matches the source count within a tolerance of zero.

SP Project Tracker

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Task (time-tracked) or Custom Fields

1:many
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker time entries attach to tasks and record hours worked. Asana does not have a native billable time-entry object on its task record. We present two options during scoping: log total hours as a numeric custom field on the mapped Asana task (simpler, no additional setup), or recreate each time entry as a separate Asana task with a time-tracked flag and hours logged in a custom field (preserves per-session granularity). The customer selects the strategy before migration begins. SP Project Tracker does not consistently enforce a billable/non-billable flag, so we carry forward whatever flag value exists or default to non-billable.

SP Project Tracker

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment (on Task)

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker attachments are stored as internal URLs valid only within an active platform session. We request temporary elevated access credentials during the attachment phase, validate each URL resolves to a downloadable file, and re-upload each file as an Asana attachment on the corresponding task. Files exceeding Asana's 100MB per-file limit are flagged and escalated to the customer for resolution (either splitting the file or storing externally with a link). We log any URLs that resolve to 404 or permission-denied responses for manual follow-up.

SP Project Tracker

Team Member

maps to

Asana

User (in Asana Workspace)

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker team members are referenced by display name and email in tasks and time entries. We resolve each to an Asana Workspace User by email match. Any team member whose email does not resolve to an existing Asana User is placed in a reconciliation queue, and the customer's admin provisions the user in Asana before record import resumes. Unresolved names (display name only, no email in the export) are flagged separately for manual assignment by the customer's admin.

SP Project Tracker

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment (on Task)

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker task-level comments migrate to Asana task comments. We preserve the author name and original timestamp. Threaded nesting in SP Project Tracker is not preserved if Asana's comment model does not support nested replies; comments import as a flat chronological list on the task. Rich text in comments migrates as plain text where HTML parsing is not available in the destination.

SP Project Tracker

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag (on Task)

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker tags are flat labels applied to tasks. We map them to Asana task tags. Tags containing special characters are converted to a slug-safe format during import. If Asana's tag count per task exceeds any active limits during migration, we consolidate tags into a single combined tag label and document the mapping for the customer's admin to refine post-migration.

SP Project Tracker

Custom Field (Project Level)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (Project Level)

lossy
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker stores project-level custom fields as property bags (key-value pairs). We extract all key-value pairs, match them against Asana's custom field schema, and create Asana custom fields of the matching type (text, number, date, dropdown) scoped to the destination project. Any custom field type that cannot be matched (e.g., a complex relational field) is created as a text custom field with the original value preserved, and the discrepancy is documented in the migration report.

SP Project Tracker

Custom Field (Task Level)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (Task Level)

lossy
Fully supported

Task-level custom fields in SP Project Tracker migrate to Asana custom fields on the corresponding task. We detect field types from the source data (string, numeric, date, picklist) and map to the equivalent Asana custom field type. Dropdown options in SP Project Tracker map to Asana enum options. We pre-create custom fields in Asana before any task import so that field_gid references are available during the task insert phase.

SP Project Tracker

Project Status

maps to

Asana

Project Status (or Milestone)

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker project-level status values (active, on-hold, completed) map to Asana project status updates or to milestone tasks within the project. We preserve the original status and timestamp as a custom field if the destination Asana project's status field does not support the full range of source values.

SP Project Tracker

Priority

maps to

Asana

Custom Field or Tag

lossy
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker task priority values (e.g., low, medium, high, urgent) migrate to an Asana custom field of type enum. If the customer does not want a dedicated custom field, we map priority values to task tags using a priority-{value} tag convention. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping, and we document the mapping for post-migration reference.

SP Project Tracker

Task Description

maps to

Asana

Task Notes (HTML)

1:1
Fully supported

SP Project Tracker task descriptions migrate to Asana task notes. HTML formatting in the source description is preserved where Asana's rich text model supports it. Inline images referenced in task descriptions that point to SP Project Tracker's internal file store are treated as attachments and downloaded, re-uploaded, and linked in the Asana task notes as separate attachment records.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

SP Project Tracker logo

SP Project Tracker gotchas

High

No public API requires export-first migration

High

Owner assignment drops during bulk CSV export

Medium

Attachment URLs become inaccessible after export

Medium

Subtask hierarchy flattened in CSV output

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • CSV export has no authenticated API path

    SP Project Tracker does not publish a public REST API or documented export endpoints. All migration begins with a browser-initiated CSV export of each object type (Projects, Tasks, Time Entries, Attachments, Team Members). We pull each export separately, reconcile cross-references in our staging environment, and validate row counts before loading into Asana. If the customer's SP Project Tracker instance uses session-based attachment URLs, we request temporary elevated access credentials and validate each URL resolves to a downloadable file before queuing it for re-upload.

  • Owner assignments may export as display name only

    When exporting tasks via CSV, the owner/assignee field sometimes returns a display name without an associated email address or user ID. We detect this by comparing the exported assignee against the Team Members export and flag any unresolved names for manual confirmation before we commit assignments in Asana. This prevents tasks from landing in Asana with unresolvable owner references. The customer's admin must confirm the mapping for each unresolved name before the task import phase proceeds.

  • Asana project CSV export is capped at 140k rows per project

    Asana enforces a limit of 140,000 rows when exporting a project to CSV (documented in Asana's May 2022 release notes). The search results export is capped at 2,000 rows. For migrations from SP Project Tracker where the customer's Asana workspace already contains data or where the imported task count approaches these limits, we chunk the load into batches of 500 to 1,000 records per API call and apply rate-limit handling with exponential backoff. We flag any projects that appear to exceed these thresholds during scoping and split the load across multiple Asana projects or workspaces.

  • Attachment URLs become inaccessible after account closure

    SP Project Tracker stores some attachments as internal URLs that are valid only within the active session or account. Downloading these during migration requires authenticated access to the platform's file store. We request temporary elevated access credentials during the attachment phase and validate each URL resolves to a downloadable file before queueing it for re-upload to Asana. Files that resolve to 404 or permission-denied responses are logged for manual follow-up. We recommend running the attachment phase before any account closure or subscription cancellation of the SP Project Tracker instance.

  • Automations and reports do not migrate

    SP Project Tracker's automations (if any exist in the customer's configuration) and all reports are not migratable to Asana as functional code. Asana Rules (Premium and above) are a different automation model with distinct triggers, conditions, and actions. We deliver a written inventory of every active SP Project Tracker report and any automation configuration, with the recommended Asana equivalent, for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration. This inventory is delivered at the close of the migration engagement and is not part of the data-migration scope.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful SP Project Tracker to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and export sequencing

    We audit the SP Project Tracker instance by running CSV exports for each object type in dependency order: Team Members first (to build the owner resolution map), then Projects, then Tasks (including subtask rows identified by non-null parent_task_id), then Time Entries, then Attachments (URL list), then Comments, and finally Tags. We validate row counts and cross-reference integrity in our staging environment before designing the Asana destination schema.

  2. Schema design and field mapping

    We design the Asana destination structure: Workspace or Team selection, Project creation per SP Project Tracker project, custom field creation for any task-level or project-level custom fields from SP Project Tracker, and priority or status mapping rules. We decide whether time entries migrate as custom fields on tasks or as separate time-logged tasks, and whether priority maps to a custom field or to tags. All custom fields are pre-created in Asana before any task import so that field_gid references are available during the load phase.

  3. Owner reconciliation and user provisioning

    We extract every distinct owner referenced on SP Project Tracker tasks and time entries and match by email against the Asana Workspace's user list. Owners with unresolved display names (no email match) are flagged and escalated to the customer's admin for manual mapping before task import begins. The customer's admin provisions any missing Asana users during this window.

  4. Sandbox migration and hierarchy reconstruction

    We run a full migration into an Asana sandbox project or a dedicated test Workspace using production-like data volume. We validate subtask hierarchy reconstruction by comparing the number of parent-child relationships in Asana against the parent_task_id count in the source CSV. We reconcile record counts for all object types and spot-check a random sample of 25-50 records against the source export. The customer signs off the sandbox migration before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Team Members (reconciled), then Projects, then Tasks (parent tasks first, subtasks second, with parent_task_id resolved to Asana task_gid), then Comments, then Tags, then Time Entries (as custom fields or separate tasks per the agreed strategy), then Attachments (downloaded from SP Project Tracker and re-uploaded to Asana). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze SP Project Tracker writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the automation and report inventory document to the customer's admin team. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild SP Project Tracker automations or reports as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

SP Project Tracker logo

SP Project Tracker

Source

Strengths

  • Native SharePoint/Office 365 deployment means data lives inside the customer tenant — backups, security, and compliance inherit from Microsoft 365 rather than a separate SaaS vendor.
  • No-code, fully customisable by SharePoint power users — lists, views, and templates are SharePoint primitives so admins can extend the data model without buying developer time.
  • Perpetual licence option ($1,500 for a single site with unlimited users) is cheaper at scale than per-user SaaS PMs for organisations already running SharePoint on-premise.
  • Multiple views (Gantt, Task, Activities, Status, Super View) and reusable project templates support both rollup and drill-down without switching tools.
  • Collaboration artefacts (documents, discussions, email correspondence) attach directly to projects through standard SharePoint integrations, leveraging Outlook and Teams that the org already runs.

Weaknesses

  • Tied to SharePoint — customers on Google Workspace, Notion, or pure-SaaS PM stacks cannot adopt it.
  • Feature ceiling is the SharePoint list model; teams needing complex dependencies, resource levelling, or portfolio-grade reporting outgrow it.
  • No public REST API beyond what SharePoint itself exposes; integrations rely on Microsoft Graph / SharePoint REST against the underlying lists, not a SP-Project-Tracker-specific endpoint.
  • Limited public review footprint compared with Microsoft Project, Smartsheet, Asana, or Monday.
  • Power-user customisation power cuts both ways — without governance, each project site drifts to its own field set, complicating cross-project reporting and migrations.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 5 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across SP Project Tracker and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    5 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    SP Project Tracker: Bounded by SharePoint and Microsoft Graph throttling policies (per-tenant resource units; documented by Microsoft). SP Project Tracker itself imposes no separate quota..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    SP Project Tracker exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your SP Project Tracker to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about SP Project Tracker to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during SP Project Tracker to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your SP Project Tracker to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts with fewer than 5,000 tasks, 20 projects, and 500 attachments with no complex custom field schemas. Migrations with 5,000 to 15,000 tasks, deep subtask nesting requiring multi-pass hierarchy reconstruction, large attachment sets, or multi-workspace Asana destinations requiring separate project and field setup per workspace extend to four to eight weeks. The CSV export and owner reconciliation phases typically add three to five days of scoping work before migration begins.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from SP Project Tracker.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day