Project Management migration

Migrate from Edison 365 to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Edison 365 and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

Edison 365 logo

Edison 365

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

55%

6 of 11

objects map 1:1 between Edison 365 and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Edison 365 to Jira is a structural migration that requires careful translation of Edison 365's portfolio-object model into Jira's issue-centric hierarchy. Edison 365 separates Ideas, Projects, Business Cases, Benefits, and Resources as distinct record types; Jira collapses these concepts into Projects containing Issues, with custom fields and issue types providing the differentiation. We resolve the Business Case gap by designing a custom issue type or Epic-based representation during scoping, preserve the per-entity Benefits records as typed custom fields, and handle the SharePoint document attachment references through a parallel file-migration track. Edison 365 pipeline stages and approval gates map to Jira workflow statuses and transition rules. We do not migrate automations, Power BI reports, or SharePoint permissions as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Jira.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Edison 365 logo

Edison 365

What's pushing teams away

  • Reporting setup requires Power BI expertise that many in-house teams lack, leading to delays before the platform delivers its promised visibility gains.
  • The out-of-the-box templates can require significant customization to fit non-standard stage gates, causing frustration during initial configuration.
  • Some customers find that the platform's feature depth creates a steeper learning curve for occasional users compared to lighter-weight task tools.
  • Advanced automation and API-driven workflows are available but not always well-documented, which limits adoption for technically savvy teams wanting programmatic control.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How Edison 365 objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a Edison 365 object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Edison 365

Ideas

maps to

Jira

Issue (custom type: Idea)

1:1
Fully supported

Edison 365 Ideas migrate as Jira Issues under a designated Ideas project using a custom issue type. Title, description, category, submitter email, submission date, and status all map directly. Edison 365's category taxonomy becomes Jira labels or a custom select field depending on the customer's preference. Submitter resolves to Jira assignee or reporter by email lookup.

Edison 365

Projects

maps to

Jira

Project or Epic

1:1
Fully supported

Edison 365 Projects with standard delivery scope map to Jira Projects or to Epic-type Issues within a designated Jira project, depending on the customer's chosen portfolio structure. Name, description, owner, start date, end date, and budget all migrate. Edison 365's project-level budget becomes a custom currency field in Jira. Owner resolves to Jira User by email for assignment.

Edison 365

Business Cases

maps to

Jira

Epic or Custom Issue Type (Business Case)

lossy
Mapping required

Edison 365 Business Cases have no direct Jira equivalent. During scoping, we design either a custom Business Case issue type in Jira or an Epic with custom fields capturing cost, benefit, and approval status. Custom financial fields in Edison 365 map to typed Jira custom fields (number, currency, date). Approval status from Edison 365 becomes a custom select field in Jira. We document the chosen representation in the schema design deliverable before migration begins.

Edison 365

Resources

maps to

Jira

Issue Assignee and Custom Fields

1:many
Mapping required

Edison 365 Resources associate a person with a Project or Portfolio with allocation percentage and date range. Jira's Issue assignee field is single-value. We extract the primary allocation (highest percentage per person per project) and set it as the Jira Issue assignee. Secondary allocations and percentage details migrate as custom fields (e.g., allocation_pct__c and allocation_start__c). Portfolio-level rollup cannot be automatically recalculated in Jira; we note the requirement for manual portfolio-level rollup reporting.

Edison 365

Portfolios

maps to

Jira

Jira Projects (grouped)

1:1
Fully supported

Edison 365 Portfolios aggregate Projects and track KPIs and budget rollups. Jira does not have a native portfolio object at the free or standard tiers. We migrate portfolio metadata as a custom Jira project named with the Portfolio label and document the portfolio hierarchy for the customer's admin to configure through a Jira portfolio app or manual project grouping post-migration. Total cost and benefit rollup fields are preserved as custom fields on the portfolio project metadata issue.

Edison 365

Pipeline Stages

maps to

Jira

Jira Status and Workflow Transitions

lossy
Fully supported

Edison 365 pipeline stage names, ordering, and transition rules export from the workflow configuration and map to Jira Status values and workflow transition rules. Each Edison 365 pipeline maps to a Jira workflow. Stage probabilities migrate to a custom field for reference. We capture the full stage gate sequence so the customer's Jira admin can assign a corresponding workflow to each imported project.

Edison 365

Benefits Tracking

maps to

Jira

Custom Fields on Issue (Business Case or Epic)

1:1
Mapping required

Edison 365 Benefits attach financial or KPI targets to Projects or Business Cases as entity-specific records. We preserve each benefit row as a custom field value on the parent Business Case or Epic issue. Benefit types and names migrate as typed custom fields. Because Edison 365 stores benefits per-entity rather than globally, cross-project benefit rollup requires recalculation in Jira; we flag this as a post-migration reporting task.

Edison 365

Custom Fields

maps to

Jira

Custom Fields (Jira)

1:1
Mapping required

Edison 365 custom fields on Ideas, Projects, and Business Cases are enumerated per entity type during discovery and created in Jira as typed custom fields before data import. Edison 365 key-value pairs with type metadata map to Jira field types: text fields, select, multi-select, number, date, and URL. Dropdown and multi-select custom fields in Edison 365 become Jira select and multi-select fields. Custom field options are bulk-created before the first record import.

Edison 365

Documents / Attachments

maps to

Jira

File Transfer + Jira Attachments or Confluence

lossy
Mapping required

Edison 365 documents are stored in SharePoint and referenced by URL. We export the full file inventory (URLs, filenames, file types, modified dates, and parent record associations) and offer a parallel file-migration track that transfers files to a designated Jira-connected storage location or Confluence Space. We do not automatically re-link the documents inside Jira; we deliver a mapping table of original SharePoint URLs to destination file locations for the customer's admin to update or we include the re-link step as an add-on scope item.

Edison 365

Users / Assignees

maps to

Jira

Jira User (by email)

1:1
Fully supported

Edison 365 user records (display name, email, role, department) export in full. We match users by email address to Jira accounts. Inactive Edison 365 users are included but flagged for deactivation review in Jira. Any Edison 365 user without a matching Jira account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record migration proceeds.

Edison 365

Pipeline Stages (transition rules)

maps to

Jira

Jira Workflows

lossy
Fully supported

Edison 365 workflow transition rules (e.g., which roles can advance a stage, required approvals) do not have a direct Jira workflow equivalent at the rule level. We capture the transition configuration as a written workflow specification document. The customer's Jira admin rebuilds these as Jira workflow conditions, validators, or post-functions using Jira's workflow designer post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Edison 365 logo

Edison 365 gotchas

Medium

Power BI is the default reporting engine

Medium

Custom fields have no unified schema export

High

SharePoint document linkage breaks on export

Low

Benefits tracking is entity-specific not global

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • Business Cases have no native Jira equivalent

    Edison 365 treats Business Cases as first-class entities with independent cost, benefit, and approval fields. Jira has no Business Case object. During scoping we design either a custom Business Case issue type with typed custom fields, or we map Business Cases to Epic-type Issues with financial fields. The chosen representation must be confirmed before migration begins, because changing the issue type after data is imported requires manual re-linking of child Ideas and Projects. We deliver a written schema specification with the chosen approach and the full field map for customer sign-off.

  • SharePoint document links become orphaned after export

    Edison 365 stores documents in SharePoint and exports only the URL reference, not the file content. Those URLs point to the source Microsoft 365 tenant and break after cutover. We flag all document-linked records during discovery, export the file inventory, and offer a parallel file transfer to a Jira-connected storage location or Confluence. Without this parallel track, every Edison 365 record with a document attachment becomes a dead link in Jira. We treat document transfer as a scoped add-on because it requires SharePoint access credentials and destination storage provisioning.

  • Edison 365 custom fields require per-entity enumeration

    Edison 365 stores custom field definitions separately per entity type (Ideas, Projects, Business Cases). There is no consolidated schema export. We must query each entity type individually during discovery. If a customer has added dozens of custom fields across multiple entities, this multi-pass enumeration extends the scoping timeline. We complete the full field enumeration before presenting the field map and do not begin schema creation in Jira until the customer has reviewed and approved the complete custom field list.

  • Jira workflow rules do not carry over as automation logic

    Edison 365 pipeline transition rules (role-based stage advancement, required approvals, conditional gate logic) do not map to Jira workflow post-functions or Jira Automation rules without redesign. We capture the full transition rule specification in a written deliverable and recommend that the customer's Jira admin rebuilds these as Jira workflow conditions and Jira Automation rules post-migration. Migration of data does not include the automation rebuild; this is documented as a separate task for the admin team.

  • Benefits rollup across the portfolio requires post-migration recalculation

    Edison 365 Benefits are stored per-entity (attached to a Business Case or Project) rather than as globally reusable metric objects. If the same benefit metric appears across multiple Business Cases, those are duplicate instances. We preserve the per-entity benefit records as-is in Jira. Portfolio-level benefit rollup across Edison 365 Projects is not a native Jira calculation and must be reconstructed in Jira's native reporting or an external dashboard. We note this as a post-migration reporting task in the handoff documentation.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Edison 365 to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and data audit

    We enumerate all Edison 365 entity types in scope (Ideas, Projects, Business Cases, Resources, Benefits, Portfolios) and extract record counts per type, custom field definitions per entity, pipeline and stage configurations, SharePoint document references, user roster, and active/inactive status. We run a parallel API call against the destination Jira Cloud instance to capture existing projects, issue types, workflows, and custom field definitions. The discovery output is a written scope document with record counts, custom field map, and a Jira schema design recommendation for Business Case representation.

  2. Schema design and Business Case translation

    We design the destination Jira schema based on the discovery output. This includes creating a custom Business Case issue type (or Epic-based design) with all Edison 365 financial and benefit fields mapped to typed Jira custom fields, configuring Jira projects and issue type schemes, mapping Edison 365 pipeline stages to Jira Status values, and designing the Jira workflow transitions. Schema deploys to a Jira Sandbox or the production instance in read-only validation mode before any data moves. The customer reviews and approves the schema design and the Business Case translation approach before we proceed.

  3. Document inventory export and file-migration track setup

    We extract all SharePoint document references linked from Edison 365 records, capture the full file inventory (URL, filename, file type, modified date, parent record ID), and provision the destination storage location (Jira attachments storage, Confluence Space, or designated SharePoint). The file migration runs as a parallel track to data migration so that file transfers complete before cutover and document re-linking can be verified in the same window. We deliver a URL-replacement mapping table for the customer's admin to use in post-migration link updates.

  4. User and assignee reconciliation

    We extract every Edison 365 user and owner referenced on Ideas, Projects, Business Cases, Resources, and Benefits records. Users resolve by email match against the Jira destination instance. Any Edison 365 user without a matching Jira account is flagged in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import. Owner resolution must complete before the Projects and Issues migration phase because OwnerId (assignee and reporter) references are required on most issue types.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira users validated, Jira projects and issue type schemes deployed, Edison 365 Ideas imported as Jira Issues, Edison 365 Projects imported as Jira Projects or Epic-type Issues, Edison 365 Business Cases imported as the designed Business Case issue type with all financial custom fields, Edison 365 Resources extracted as assignee assignments with allocation details in custom fields, Edison 365 Benefits migrated as typed custom fields on their parent Business Case or Epic, Edison 365 Portfolios documented with metadata migrated as custom fields on the portfolio project, and custom fields populated across all entity types. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, delta sync, and automation handoff

    We freeze Edison 365 writes during the cutover window, run a delta migration for any records modified during migration, verify the document re-link mapping is applied, and switch Jira to the system of record. We deliver the automation and workflow specification document listing every Edison 365 pipeline transition rule for the customer's Jira admin to rebuild in Jira Automation or workflow designer. We provide a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the team. We do not rebuild Edison 365 workflows as Jira Automation rules within the migration scope; that is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Edison 365 logo

Edison 365

Source

Strengths

  • Modern, user-friendly interface that encourages broad adoption across idea submitters and project managers.
  • End-to-end coverage from idea intake through project delivery in a single platform.
  • Native Microsoft 365 integration — Azure AD, Teams, SharePoint, and Power BI work without middleware.
  • Configurable Pipelines and stage-gate workflows adapt to non-standard innovation and project processes.
  • Responsive customer support team with G2 praise for human-centric service.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting relies on Power BI — organizations without Power BI expertise may struggle to build dashboards quickly.
  • Out-of-the-box templates require customization for organizations with non-standard stage gates or approval workflows.
  • Advanced API capabilities exist but are not prominently documented, limiting programmatic automation adoption.
  • The feature depth that attracts enterprise buyers can overwhelm occasional users who only interact with one module.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Edison 365 and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Edison 365: Governed by Azure API Management policies — not publicly published..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Edison 365 exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Edison 365 to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Edison 365 to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Edison 365 to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Edison 365 to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations with fewer than 2,000 Ideas, 500 Projects, and 200 Business Cases typically land in four to eight weeks. Migrations with high document attachment volume, complex multi-entity custom field schemas, or organizations that require a full Business Case translation design and validation move to ten to sixteen weeks. The Business Case translation design is the most time-sensitive pre-migration task because it must be confirmed before the Jira schema is deployed.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Edison 365.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day