Project Management migration

Migrate from Redmine 3.3 to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Redmine 3.3 and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Redmine 3.3 logo

Redmine 3.3

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Redmine 3.3 and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Redmine 3.3 to Trello is a structural migration that flattens a deeply hierarchical issue tracker into a visual Kanban board system. Redmine 3.3 organizes work as Projects containing Issues with Trackers, Versions, custom fields, time entries, and typed relations; Trello organizes work as Workspaces containing Boards with Lists of Cards and optional Power-Up extensions. We read Redmine at the database level to bypass the read-only REST API surface, reconstruct the project-subproject tree as nested board structures, and map each issue's status, priority, tracker, assignee, due date, and time entries into the corresponding Trello card fields and checklists. Custom fields that use list-format values with internal numeric IDs are resolved to their human-readable labels before writing to Trello. We do not migrate Redmine Workflow rules, Wiki pages, or Forums as functional equivalents do not exist in Trello; we deliver a written inventory of these objects for the customer's admin to assess for manual rebuild or replacement via Trello Power-Ups.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Redmine 3.3 logo

Redmine 3.3

What's pushing teams away

  • No native Agile experience — Kanban boards and sprint planning require third-party plugins (Backlogs, Agile plugin from RedmineUP, etc.), which is a hard adoption blocker for teams that want Scrum or Kanban out of the box.
  • Stuck on an old release — Redmine 3.3 specifically is years behind the latest 5.x line, missing modern Ruby version support, security patches, and recent UX work; remaining on 3.3 is now a security and supportability risk.
  • Initial setup and ongoing upgrades require real Rails sysadmin skills (Ruby version, database, migrations, plugins, ERB templates), which is beyond what most project managers can handle without IT support.
  • Ecosystem is smaller than Jira — fewer modern SaaS integrations (Slack, GitHub, Bitbucket connectors exist but lag) and no built-in marketplace UX, so connectivity to current toolchains often needs custom work.
  • Self-hosted means the customer also owns backup, uptime, scaling, and security — costs that look invisible on paper but become significant for larger teams, often pushing them to migrate to Jira Cloud, GitLab, or Linear.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Redmine 3.3 objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Redmine 3.3 object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Redmine 3.3

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Projects map to Trello Boards with the project name as the board name. Public and private flags from Redmine map to Trello's board visibility (public vs private). We export the full project-subproject tree and create each subproject as a separate Board, then document the parent-child relationship in the board description for manual workspace organization. If the Redmine project has modules enabled (wiki, issue tracking, repository), we add a board description note flagging the modules for manual activation in Trello.

Redmine 3.3

Subproject

maps to

Trello

Board (nested within parent board workspace)

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine subprojects map to Trello Boards under the same Workspace. There is no native subproject concept in Trello, so we create each subproject as a standalone Board and record the parent project identifier in the board description. The customer manually organizes boards within the Workspace sidebar after migration.

Redmine 3.3

Issue

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Issues map to Trello Cards. The issue subject becomes the card title, the description maps to the card description with markdown formatting preserved. Issue status New, In Progress, Resolved, Feedback, Closed maps to Trello list positions (e.g., To Do, In Review, Done). The assignee from Redmine is added as a card member in Trello. Due dates, start dates, estimated hours, and done ratio migrate as card metadata. We resolve assignee email addresses against the target Trello workspace members and add matching users as card members.

Redmine 3.3

Tracker

maps to

Trello

Label

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine Trackers (Bug, Feature, Support, custom) map to Trello Labels with the tracker name as the label name and a consistent color assignment per tracker type. If the destination workspace already has labels defined, we map the Redmine tracker names to existing label names or create new labels. The label mapping configuration is documented in the mapping spec before migration begins.

Redmine 3.3

Issue Status

maps to

Trello

List

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine issue statuses (New, In Progress, Resolved, Feedback, Closed, plus any custom statuses defined in the workflow) map to Trello List names. We export the full workflow status set from the Redmine database, deduplicate, and create one Trello List per distinct status value in each board. Custom status labels are preserved in the list name for admin review and renaming post-migration.

Redmine 3.3

Custom Field

maps to

Trello

Card Description (section) or Custom Fields Power-Up

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine custom fields (string, integer, list, date, boolean, user references) present a mapping challenge because Trello has no native custom field objects on the Free tier. On Standard and Premium tiers, the Custom Fields Power-Up provides typed custom fields. We read the custom_field_definitions table, resolve list-format internal IDs to display labels using the possible_values lookup, and write field values into a structured section of the card description for all tiers. On Business Class Standard+ we use the Custom Fields Power-Up API to create typed fields before card import.

Redmine 3.3

Time Entry

maps to

Trello

Checklist item or Card Description (time log section)

1:many
Fully supported

Redmine time entries linked to an issue merge into a time log section on the corresponding Trello Card. Each time entry contributes a checklist item in the format '[hours]h - [activity] - [comments]' or a structured description block. Activity categories from Redmine (e.g., Design, Development, Testing) are written as text labels in the time log entry. We export the full time entry set per issue and consolidate into the card during migration. Trello's native time-tracking Power-Up can be activated post-migration to surface these as formal time records.

Redmine 3.3

Version

maps to

Trello

Due Date or Card Label

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine Versions (milestones or targets) within a project are documented as Trello Labels named after the version with a milestone color code, or as card due dates where the version has an effective date. Versions without a due date are preserved as labels only. We export the version name, effective date, description, and status (open, locked, closed) and map accordingly.

Redmine 3.3

Issue Relation

maps to

Trello

Label or Checklist item (dependency note)

lossy
Fully supported

Redmine typed relations (blocks, blocked by, relates to, duplicates, follows, copied from) have no native Trello equivalent. We export the full relation graph and for each relation type we create a label on the related card (e.g., a 'blocks:#123' label) or a checklist item noting the dependency. The customer reviews these post-migration and uses Trello's Card Aging Power-Up or manual checklist grouping to manage dependencies.

Redmine 3.3

User

maps to

Trello

Workspace Member

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine user accounts (login, firstname, lastname, email, admin flag) map to Trello Workspace members. We match by email address during migration and add matched users as board members with the same role scope as their Redmine membership roles. Any Redmine user without a matching Trello account goes to a reconciliation queue for the admin to provision before the final migration run.

Redmine 3.3

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine attachments are files stored on the server filesystem with metadata in the attachments table (filename, content_type, disk_filename, created_on). We extract the file path from disk_filename, verify file accessibility, download each file, and re-upload as a Trello card attachment using the Trello Attachment API. We preserve the original filename and content-type. File links from migrated issues remain valid post-migration.

Redmine 3.3

Wiki Page

maps to

Trello

Card Description (partial) or external document link

1:1
Fully supported

Redmine wiki pages are project-scoped with hierarchical page structures and HTML or textile formatting. Trello has no native wiki feature. We export wiki page content as markdown text and append it to the project board description or a designated 'Project Documentation' card. If wiki pages are critical, we recommend the customer migrate them to Confluence as a parallel step. Page-level permissions do not transfer.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Redmine 3.3 logo

Redmine 3.3 gotchas

High

Database migrations are required between major Redmine versions

High

CSV export has no native import counterpart

Medium

Custom field list values store internal IDs, not display labels

Medium

Plugin-specific data is not accessible via the REST API

Medium

Attachment files live on the server filesystem, not the database

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • No native subproject concept in Trello

    Redmine's multi-level project-subproject hierarchy has no direct Trello equivalent. Trello organizes boards at the Workspace level without a native subproject nesting structure. We flatten subprojects to standalone boards and record the parent relationship in the board description for manual workspace sidebar grouping. Teams with deep project trees (four or more levels) need to decide on a Trello board grouping strategy (by Workspace, by label, or by board naming convention) before migration begins, as this affects how many boards are created and how the customer's team navigates them post-migration.

  • Custom field data requires ID-to-label resolution and Power-Up on Free tier

    Redmine 3.3 stores list-format custom field values as numeric internal IDs in the issue record while the human-readable label lives in the possible_values table. Exporting issues as CSV shows the numeric ID, not the label text. If those IDs are bulk-imported into Trello without resolution, every record ends up with raw integers instead of meaningful values. We query the custom_field definitions before processing any issue export, build an ID-to-label lookup table, and substitute display values. On Trello Free tier we write resolved values into card descriptions; on Standard and Premium we use the Custom Fields Power-Up API to create typed fields.

  • Workflow transition rules do not migrate to Trello lists

    Redmine 3.3 enforces role-based workflow transition rules that restrict which status transitions are permitted per tracker and role. Trello has no native workflow transition enforcement; any card can be moved between any lists by any member. We export the full workflow status and transition set from Redmine as a written workflow map document, but the enforcement logic does not transfer. The customer's admin reviews the workflow map post-migration and implements any required guardrails via Trello Butler rules or a third-party automation Power-Up if the team requires status-transition controls.

  • Issue relations and typed dependencies have no Trello equivalent

    Redmine typed issue relations (blocks, blocked by, relates to, duplicates, follows) carry structural meaning about work dependencies. Trello has no typed relation feature and only supports card-to-card links as URL references. We export the full relation graph and write relation types as labels (e.g., 'blocks:#234') or checklist items on the related card. The customer needs to validate the dependency labels post-migration and implement a Trello Card Links Power-Up or manual linking convention if cross-card dependencies are mission-critical.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Redmine 3.3 to Trello data migration

  1. Database audit and schema extraction

    We connect to the Redmine 3.3 database directly (MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQLite depending on the installation) to extract the full schema including plugin tables. We export projects and subprojects, issues with full field sets, trackers, workflow statuses, custom field definitions with possible_values, time entries, versions, attachments, users, and memberships. This bypasses Redmine 3.3's read-only REST API surface and captures all data including plugin-specific records. We generate a data volume report (record counts per object) to scope the migration timeline and flag any plugin-isolated data that cannot safely migrate without manual intervention.

  2. Custom field resolution and ID-to-label lookup

    Before any issue export, we query the custom_field definitions table to build an ID-to-label lookup for every list-format custom field. We cross-reference this lookup against every issue record to resolve internal IDs to display values. This prevents raw numeric integers from appearing in migrated Trello cards. We generate a custom field mapping spec that documents which Redmine fields map to card description sections (Free tier) or Custom Fields Power-Up fields (Standard and Premium tiers), and the customer approves the spec before card creation begins.

  3. Trello workspace and board structure setup

    We create Trello Workspaces and Boards matching the Redmine project hierarchy. Each top-level Redmine project becomes a Trello Board; each subproject becomes a separate Board under the same Workspace. We create Trello Lists on each board matching the distinct Redmine issue status values (e.g., New, In Progress, Resolved, Closed). We create Labels matching the Redmine tracker names with consistent color assignments. Board visibility (public or private) matches the Redmine project public flag. This structure is validated by the customer admin before any card migration begins.

  4. Member reconciliation and user provisioning

    We extract every distinct Redmine user referenced on issues, time entries, and memberships and match by email against the target Trello Workspace members. Users without a matching Trello account enter a reconciliation queue for the customer admin to provision. Board member roles are assigned based on Redmine project membership roles (Member, Reporter, Non-member). Migration cannot proceed past card creation until member reconciliation is complete because Trello requires member email addresses for card assignment.

  5. Card migration with attachment handling

    We create Trello Cards in dependency order: boards first, then lists, then cards. Each card receives the issue subject as the title, description with resolved custom field values, due date from the issue due_date field, assignee as a card member, and labels from the tracker mapping. Time entries merge into a card checklist or description section. We extract file paths from the Redmine attachments table, download each file from the server filesystem, and upload to Trello as a card attachment using the Trello Attachment API with original filename and content-type preserved. We batch card creation with rate-limit handling and exponential backoff on the Trello API.

  6. Cutover, delta validation, and workflow handoff

    We freeze Redmine 3.3 write access during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified since the initial extraction, then enable Trello as the system of record. We deliver a migration summary report with record counts per object, a custom field mapping log, an issue-relation label inventory, and a workflow transition map documenting the Redmine workflow rules for the admin to assess for Butler rebuild. We do not rebuild Redmine workflows or automations in Trello Butler; that is documented separately for the customer's admin to configure post-migration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Redmine 3.3 logo

Redmine 3.3

Source

Strengths

  • Zero licensing cost — fully open-source with no per-user or per-project fees regardless of team size
  • Flexible role-based access control with per-role, per-tracker permission restrictions introduced in 3.3
  • Multi-database support (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, SQL Server) for on-premises deployment flexibility
  • Integrated time tracking with activity categories and per-user, per-issue reporting
  • Native Gantt chart and calendar views built on issue start and due dates without plugins

Weaknesses

  • No built-in bulk import tool — data movement relies on CSV exports with manual sequencing or third-party plugins
  • REST API in 3.3 is read-oriented for most objects; write operations and bulk endpoints are limited or absent
  • Upgrading Redmine between major versions requires running database migrations that are not always reversible
  • The web UI is considered dated and unpolished compared to modern SaaS alternatives, increasing user onboarding friction
  • Plugin ecosystem is fragmented — many popular plugins are not compatible with newer Redmine major versions
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Redmine 3.3 and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Redmine 3.3: Not publicly documented — no published rate limit for self-hosted instances.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Redmine 3.3 doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Redmine 3.3 to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Redmine 3.3 to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Redmine 3.3 to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Redmine 3.3 to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations of up to 15 projects and 10,000 issues with no custom fields or complex subproject hierarchies land between three and five weeks. Migrations with multiple nested subproject levels, list-format custom fields requiring ID-to-label resolution, large time-entry histories (over 50,000 entries), or extensive attachment sets requiring server filesystem extraction move into eight to fourteen weeks. The timeline also depends on how quickly the customer admin resolves the user reconciliation queue and approves the board structure and label mapping during the scoping phase.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Redmine 3.3.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day