Project Management migration

Migrate from Planview PPM Pro to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Planview PPM Pro and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Planview PPM Pro logo

Planview PPM Pro

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

50%

6 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Planview PPM Pro and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from Planview PPM Pro to Asana is a deliberate organizational choice: moving from a portfolio-first PPM tool to a task-centric work management platform. Planview PPM Pro structures work in a hierarchy of Portfolios, Programs, Projects, Tasks, Resources, and Time Entries with financial tracking and demand management gates. Asana organizes work in Workspaces, Projects, Sections, and Tasks with dependency tracking but no native resource management, time-entry objects, or financial fields. We resolve the structural gap by mapping Portfolios and Programs to Asana Portfolios and Projects, flattening Programs into Projects where the destination workspace has no program-level container, and preserving WBS task hierarchy as nested Tasks and Subtasks. Gantt-style dependencies reconstruct using Asana's dependency API. Resource capacity and utilization data map to Asana custom fields on User records since Asana has no native resource pool object. Time entries and budget records do not migrate through API; we document them for manual handoff or spreadsheet re-import.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Planview PPM Pro logo

Planview PPM Pro

What's pushing teams away

  • Stalled product development and vague roadmap have customers worried the platform is being sunset, with no clear commitment from Planview on future investment.
  • Steep learning curve on the costing and financial modules — users report needing significant training before those features become usable.
  • Performance degrades noticeably for organizations with large portfolios or users in non-US regions, making day-to-day usage frustrating.
  • Outdated and unintuitive user interface compared to modern PM tools, creating friction for new user adoption and reducing team satisfaction scores.
  • Pricing opacity — no public per-user or tier pricing — forces lengthy sales cycles that smaller teams cannot justify.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Planview PPM Pro objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Planview PPM Pro object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Planview PPM Pro

Portfolio

maps to

Asana

Portfolio (Asana Business+)

1:1
Fully supported

Planview PPM Pro Portfolios map to Asana Portfolios (available from Asana Business tier). We preserve the portfolio name, description, and strategic alignment scores as custom fields on the portfolio record. Portfolio-level financial summaries (aggregate budget totals) are documented separately as Asana does not support rollup financial fields. If the customer is on Asana Premium, Portfolios are not available and we map to a top-level Project tagged with a portfolio identifier custom field.

Planview PPM Pro

Program

maps to

Asana

Project or Section

1:many
Fully supported

Programs in PPM Pro sit between Portfolios and Projects. Asana has no native Program object. We map Programs to Asana Projects within the target Portfolio, or to top-level Sections within a Projects-within-Projects structure depending on the destination workspace configuration. Program-level budgets and owner assignments become custom fields on the mapped Asana Project.

Planview PPM Pro

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Planview PPM Pro Projects map directly to Asana Projects. The Project name, description, start and end dates, status (Draft/Active/On Hold/Completed), priority, and owner map to standard Asana Project fields or custom fields. Gantt-style timeline data migrates as the Asana Project timeline (start date and due date fields). Milestones in PPM Pro map to Milestones in Asana.

Planview PPM Pro

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Planview PPM Pro Tasks map to Asana Tasks with WBS hierarchy preserved as parent-task and subtask relationships. Task fields including start date, due date, percent complete, and effort hours migrate to Asana fields. Dependencies (Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start) reconstruct using Asana's dependency API (dependencies add endpoint). Task assignees resolve by email match to Asana workspace members.

Planview PPM Pro

Resource

maps to

Asana

Workspace Member (custom fields)

1:1
Fully supported

Planview PPM Pro Resources (people and roles with capacity, skills, and availability calendars) have no native Asana equivalent. Asana organizes work by team membership, not a structured resource pool. We map Resources to Asana workspace members and store capacity, skills, and department as custom fields on each user's profile. Utilization heatmaps do not migrate; we deliver a written specification for rebuilding utilization views in Asana Business custom reporting.

Planview PPM Pro

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (manual handoff)

lossy
Fully supported

Time entries in PPM Pro record hours logged against Projects and Tasks with dates, hours, and cost codes. Asana has no time-entry object. We export the full timesheet history as a CSV manifest and provide a mapping to Asana custom numeric fields (hours_logged, cost_code) on Tasks if the customer wants to re-enter data manually. We do not programmatically import time entries into Asana as no supported object or API endpoint exists.

Planview PPM Pro

Demand Request

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields or Inbox tasks

lossy
Fully supported

PPM Pro Demand Requests capture project intake before formal approval with requester, estimated effort, priority, and status. Asana has no demand-management object. We map Demand Requests to Asana tasks in a dedicated intake project, preserving requester, priority, estimated hours, and approval status as custom fields. The structured scoring and workflow gates of PPM Pro's demand module do not migrate; we document them for the customer to rebuild using Asana Forms and Rules.

Planview PPM Pro

Custom User-Defined Fields (Text, Number, Date)

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

PPM Pro User-Defined Fields of type Text, Number, and Date map to Asana custom fields of equivalent type. We handle attribute-level data type mapping during the transform step. Custom field definitions are created in Asana before data import using the Asana custom fields API.

Planview PPM Pro

Custom User-Defined Fields (Dropdown)

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (Enum)

lossy
Fully supported

PPM Pro Dropdown User-Defined Fields map to Asana Enum (single-value or multi-value) custom fields. Asana requires dropdown options to be predefined before data import; we extract all distinct PPM Pro dropdown values during scoping, pre-create the Asana enum options, then import records with the matching enum key. Active dropdown values that are created after migration in PPM Pro will require manual option creation in Asana if both systems remain live during cutover.

Planview PPM Pro

Financials / Budget

maps to

Asana

Custom Fields (manual handoff)

lossy
Fully supported

PPM Pro project-level budget records include planned cost, actual cost, labor cost, and expense line items. Asana has no financial fields. We export budget data as a structured CSV and provide a mapping to Asana custom numeric and currency fields on Projects if the customer wants to re-enter the data manually. Multi-level budget hierarchies and rollup totals do not migrate. Currency mismatches are flagged during scoping with the customer's base currency noted.

Planview PPM Pro

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Manual manifest

lossy
Fully supported

PPM Pro stores file attachments against Projects and Tasks but does not expose a public attachment download API. We cannot programmatically retrieve attachment binary content. We produce a detailed manifest listing all attachment-bearing records with file names, file sizes, and record references so the customer's team can manually download from PPM Pro and re-upload to the corresponding Asana Task. We do not automate this step.

Planview PPM Pro

User

maps to

Asana

Workspace Member

1:1
Fully supported

Planview PPM Pro User records (name, email, role, active/inactive status) map to Asana Workspace Members. We resolve users by email match. Active/inactive status maps to Asana member active status. Role-to-permission translation is scoped to Workspace-level roles; Asana does not have a granular role permission model comparable to PPM Pro's project-level role assignments.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Planview PPM Pro logo

Planview PPM Pro gotchas

Medium

Custom field changes require a system restart

High

Attachment export is not supported via API

Medium

Request batch limit of 100 records per API call

Low

AWS server migration may change data residency

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Attachment export is not supported via API

    PPM Pro does not expose a public API endpoint for downloading file attachments. Every Project and Task record with an attachment is flagged during scoping, and we produce a manifest listing the file names, file sizes, and parent record references. The customer's team must manually download attachments from PPM Pro and re-upload them to the corresponding Asana Tasks. We cannot automate this step. Any attachments that are added to PPM Pro after scoping but before cutover also appear on the manifest for manual handling.

  • Custom field changes in PPM Pro require a system restart

    PPM Pro documentation specifies that adding, modifying, or removing a User-Defined Field triggers a system restart requirement. If the customer has active custom field work in progress during migration scoping, we coordinate timing to avoid a restart mid-migration. After migration, any new custom fields added to PPM Pro (if the system remains live during cutover) will require their own restart cycle. This constraint applies to any migration from PPM Pro regardless of destination.

  • PPM Pro API batch limit of 100 records per call

    The Planview AdaptiveWork REST API (covering PPM Pro) enforces a 100-record batch limit per single web service call. For organizations with thousands of Projects, Tasks, and Time Entries, this means we paginate aggressively with checkpointing and retry logic. We chunk large object queries into 100-record pages and resume from the last checkpoint on transient failures. This affects scoping speed but not data integrity for a well-engineered migration.

  • Asana has no native resource management or time-entry object

    Resource capacity, utilization heatmaps, availability calendars, and skills-based resource pools from PPM Pro have no Asana equivalent. We map Resources to Asana workspace members with capacity stored as custom fields, but Asana's task-assignment model does not include capacity checking or overload alerts. Time entries similarly have no home in Asana's object model. We handle this gap by exporting historical time data as a structured CSV manifest for manual re-entry and documenting the resource management gap in the handoff report.

  • Asana dropdown options must be created before data import

    When migrating PPM Pro Dropdown User-Defined Fields to Asana Enum custom fields, Asana requires all enum options to exist before data import begins. We extract all distinct PPM Pro dropdown values during scoping, pre-create the corresponding Asana enum options, then import records with matching enum keys. Any new dropdown values added in PPM Pro after scoping (if both systems remain live) will require manual option creation in Asana before the corresponding records can be migrated.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Planview PPM Pro to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and data audit

    We audit the source PPM Pro instance across all objects: Portfolio count and hierarchy depth, Program count, Project count and status distribution, Task count and WBS nesting depth, Resource roster size and availability data, time-entry volume and date range, custom field count and data types, and attachment manifest. We pair this with an Asana workspace audit (existing projects, team structure, custom field usage) and verify the Asana plan tier since Portfolio views and advanced custom fields require Business. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts per object and a pre-migration checklist for the customer's PPM Pro admin.

  2. Dependency and hierarchy mapping design

    We design the object mapping for this specific pair: which PPM Pro Portfolios map to Asana Portfolios (or Projects with portfolio tagging if on Premium), how Programs flatten into Projects or Sections, how task WBS hierarchy reconstructs as parent-task relationships in Asana, how Gantt dependencies convert to Asana dependency links, and how Resources map to workspace members with custom capacity fields. We also define the time-entry manifest format and the budget CSV export structure for manual re-import. This mapping document is reviewed with the customer before any data moves.

  3. Asana workspace preparation

    We create the target Asana Projects, Sections, custom fields (with pre-populated enum options for dropdowns), and user records before any record import. Workspace members are provisioned or matched by email. If the customer is on Asana Business, we configure Portfolio structures that mirror the PPM Pro portfolio hierarchy. If Asana Premium is in use, we apply a project-tagging convention for portfolio-equivalent grouping.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a test Asana workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's PMO lead reconciles record counts, spot-checks 25-50 records against the PPM Pro source (project names, task hierarchy depth, custom field values, dependency links), and validates that the task timeline reconstructs correctly in Asana's Calendar and Timeline views. The customer signs off the sandbox migration before production cutover begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Workspace Members (validated), Portfolios (if Business tier), Programs (flattened to Projects or Sections), Projects (with timeline dates and milestones), Tasks and Subtasks (with WBS hierarchy and dependencies), Resource custom fields (capacity and department), custom field values on all records, and the time-entry and budget CSV manifests exported for manual re-import. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Attachments are listed on the manifest for manual handling throughout.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff documentation

    We freeze PPM Pro writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the window, then enable Asana as the system of record. We deliver the full attachment manifest for manual re-upload, the time-entry and budget CSV files, and a written specification for rebuilding resource utilization views and PPM Pro workflow gates in Asana Rules. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild PPM Pro automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Planview PPM Pro logo

Planview PPM Pro

Source

Strengths

  • Portfolio-level project prioritization aligned to strategic business goals
  • Gantt charting with configurable views for executive and PM-level reporting
  • Demand management intake module gives PMOs a structured gate before projects enter the pipeline
  • Resource capacity planning with utilization heatmaps and allocation views
  • Time tracking integrated with project budgets and resource cost rates

Weaknesses

  • Slow product innovation and unclear roadmap cause long-term customer uncertainty
  • Confusing, dated UI that frustrates new users and requires formal training investment
  • Costing and financial modules carry a steep learning curve before teams can use them productively
  • Performance issues for large portfolios or non-US users on the default server region
  • No public pricing or transparent tier structure — sales-driven quoting creates friction
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Planview PPM Pro and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Planview PPM Pro: Not publicly documented for PPM Pro specifically; the AdaptiveWork API enforces a 100-record batch limit per call with no publicly stated per-minute ceiling.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Planview PPM Pro doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Planview PPM Pro to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Planview PPM Pro to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Planview PPM Pro to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Planview PPM Pro to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 5,000 tasks, 50 projects, and no active Programs or resource-capacity history land between four and six weeks. Migrations with active Program hierarchies requiring flattening logic, large historical time-entry records, resource utilization data needing custom-field mapping, or dependency chains exceeding 10,000 links move to eight to twelve weeks because of the dependency reconstruction work and manual attachment handling.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Planview PPM Pro.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day