Project Management migration

Migrate from Breeze to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Breeze and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Breeze logo

Breeze

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Breeze and Trello.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Breeze to Trello is a structural simplification. Breeze organizes work around Projects with a formal task hierarchy, built-in time tracking, and per-project custom field schemas. Trello centers on Boards and Lists with Cards as the primary task unit, delegating time tracking, reporting, and custom field types to the Power-Up ecosystem. We map Breeze Projects to Trello Boards, Breeze Tasks to Trello Cards with Labels substituted for flat Tags, and Breeze Subtasks to Card-level Checklists. Breeze Custom Fields require special handling because Breeze allows the same field name to be a different type (text, dropdown, number) per project—we reconcile these per-project schemas before writing to Trello's Custom Fields Power-Up. Time Entries from Breeze's built-in tracker have no native Trello equivalent; we convert them to Checklist items with duration notes unless a time-tracking Power-Up exists in the destination. Breeze Comments do not expose via API, so comment history requires manual recovery before cutover. Trello's Free tier limits Power-Up usage per Board, which we surface during scoping so the customer selects the correct Trello plan before migration begins. Butler automations and Board-level Power-Up configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the admin to rebuild.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Breeze logo

Breeze

What's pushing teams away

  • Setup takes longer than expected—some users report it takes several days to fully configure workflows and migrate existing data before the team can work productively.
  • The lack of a permanent free plan frustrates users evaluating Breeze against Trello, which offers unlimited free boards and power-ups.
  • Redirect management for web-based access requires contacting support rather than giving admins direct control, creating friction for IT-managed environments.
  • No plugin or marketplace ecosystem means teams cannot extend functionality, unlike Trello which has a rich power-up ecosystem via Atlassian.
  • Occasional app instability causes task ordering to shuffle or tasks to disappear temporarily, eroding trust in data reliability.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Breeze objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Breeze object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Breeze

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Projects map directly to Trello Boards. We export project name, description, start/due dates, status, and owner. Trello Boards have no native start/due date fields at the board level, so we preserve these as the first Card in a designated 'Project Metadata' List with dates in the card description, or as Custom Fields on the board if the Custom Fields Power-Up is active. Project status (active, archived) maps to Trello's open vs archived Board state.

Breeze

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Tasks map to Trello Cards with the task name as Card title and the task description as Card description. Breeze status (To Do, In Progress, Done) maps to Trello Lists (we create Lists named after each Breeze status value present in the source project). Assignee, priority, and due date migrate to Card members and due date fields. Breeze Task IDs are preserved as an external reference in the Card description for audit trail.

Breeze

Subtask

maps to

Trello

Checklist Item

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Subtasks map to Trello Checklist items on the parent Card. Breeze supports one level of subtasks; Trello Checklists are a flat list, so the hierarchy depth maps cleanly. Completed subtask status in Breeze maps to the checked state of the Checklist item. If the destination uses a dedicated Power-Up for hierarchical checklists, we flag that option during scoping.

Breeze

Custom Field

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Breeze Custom Fields require per-project reconciliation before mapping to Trello. Breeze allows the same field name (e.g., 'Priority') to be a text field in one project and a dropdown in another. We detect each project's field schema during scoping, resolve type collisions where the same name has different types across projects (by appending a project-scoped suffix or flattening to text), then create matching Trello Custom Field definitions on each destination Board before Card import. This is the most labor-intensive object in a Breeze-to-Trello migration.

Breeze

Tag

maps to

Trello

Label

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Tags are flat label-style identifiers attached to Tasks. We map them to Trello Labels on Cards. Trello Labels have a name and color; if Breeze Tags carry no color data, we assign a default color or cycle through the available palette. Trello Labels are board-level (one label set per Board), so if a Breeze workspace has cross-project tag consistency, we replicate the label set on each destination Board. If the customer used Tags as a taxonomy with implicit hierarchy, we flatten them to flat labels with a post-migration cleanup recommendation.

Breeze

Time Entry

maps to

Trello

Checklist Item (converted)

1:many
Fully supported

Breeze Time Entries (billable hours, duration, date, and description) have no native Trello equivalent. We convert each Time Entry to a Checklist item on the parent Card with the format '[HH:MM] Description - Date'. If the destination Trello workspace has a time-tracking Power-Up active (e.g.,, Time Tracking by Cor vena or Tempo), we preserve time entries as Power-Up records linked by Card ID. Without a Power-Up, the checklist conversion is the functional equivalent and is the most honest representation of the data in Trello's native structure.

Breeze

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze stores attachments in its file system and exposes them via URL in the API. We export the attachment metadata (filename, URL, size, upload date). We write the attachment URL as a Trello Card attachment link. Actual binary files require a separate file-system export session from Breeze that we coordinate in parallel with the API export to minimize the migration window. Trello accepts URL attachments natively, so the reference migrates without transformation; the customer must ensure the Breeze storage account remains accessible for the file download phase.

Breeze

User / Assignee

maps to

Trello

Board Member / Card Member

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Users (email, name, role) map to Trello Board Members. We export the user roster and map task assignees by email match against Trello member accounts. Trello permissions operate at the Board level (admin, normal, observer) with Card-level member assignment; Breeze role-based permissions map to Trello Board roles and do not enforce at the task level. If the destination uses a different identity system (Google Workspace, Atlassian account), we flag the SSO configuration requirement during scoping.

Breeze

Status and Pipeline

maps to

Trello

List

lossy
Fully supported

Breeze task statuses (To Do, In Progress, Done, Archived, plus any custom per-project statuses) map to Trello Lists within each Board. We extract the per-project status schema, create one Trello List per unique status value, and map card placement to the corresponding List. If Breeze uses multiple pipelines per project, we create separate Boards per pipeline to preserve pipeline context, which Trello natively supports.

Breeze

Priority

maps to

Trello

Label or Card Cover

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze task priority (Low, Normal, High, Urgent) has no direct Trello native field. We map priority to Trello Labels with a reserved naming convention (e.g., label name 'Priority: High') applied to Cards. Alternatively, for workspaces using Trello Card Covers, we assign cover colors by priority level. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping.

Breeze

Comment

maps to

Trello

None (manual export required)

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze does not expose task-level Comments via its public REST API. We cannot export comment history programmatically. If comment data is required in Trello, customers must use Breeze's in-app CSV export to extract comments manually before migration, or take screenshots of comment threads. We flag this gap during scoping and advise customers to budget time for manual comment recovery. Trello Card comments are not generated from this source data.

Breeze

Project Workspace Settings

maps to

Trello

Board Settings

lossy
Fully supported

Breeze workspace settings (notification preferences, default views, working days) have no direct Trello equivalent. These are organizational preferences that require manual reconfiguration in Trello's Board settings post-migration. We document the source settings in the migration inventory so the admin can apply them to each destination Board.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Breeze logo

Breeze gotchas

High

Comments are not exported via Breeze API

Medium

Attachment files require separate file-system export

Medium

Custom field schemas differ per project

Low

No permanent free tier limits evaluation

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Breeze Comments are not accessible via API

    Breeze's public REST API does not expose task-level comments. We cannot programmatically export discussion history from Breeze. This is a platform-level limitation, not a pair-specific one, but it directly affects the migration because teams often rely on task comments for project context. We flag this gap during scoping. Customers who need comment history must use Breeze's in-app CSV export manually before the migration window, or take screenshots of comment threads per task. We include a comment recovery checklist in the migration inventory. Trello Card comments will not be populated from Breeze source data unless manual export is completed before cutover.

  • Per-project custom field type conflicts require manual reconciliation

    Breeze allows each project to define its own custom field schema, meaning the same field name can be a text field in one project and a dropdown or number field in another. Trello's Custom Fields Power-Up enforces a single type per label per board with no type flexibility at the card level. We detect all per-project field schemas during scoping and resolve type collisions by either flattening to text, splitting into separate named fields, or mapping to Trello's nearest equivalent type (date fields become Trello date Custom Fields, dropdowns map to Trello dropdown Custom Fields). This reconciliation work is the primary driver of timeline and cost variation in Breeze-to-Trello migrations.

  • Breeze attachment files require a separate file-system export

    The Breeze API returns attachment URLs rather than streaming binary file content. We export attachment metadata (filename, URL, size, upload date, associated task ID) and write the URL as a Trello Card attachment. The actual files stored in Breeze's file system must be downloaded separately through Breeze's file export process. For migrations with hundreds of attachments, we coordinate a parallel file-system export session to complete within the migration window. If Breeze's storage subscription is cancelled before the export completes, URLs in Trello will break. We advise customers to complete the file export before canceling the Breeze account.

  • Trello Free tier limits Power-Up usage per Board

    Trello's Free tier allows one Power-Up per Board, which constrains what we can natively map from Breeze. Custom Fields (a Power-Up) and time tracking (a Power-Up) both require slots on the Free tier. Teams migrating to Trello Free will need to choose which Power-Up to activate per Board or upgrade to Standard ($5/user) for unlimited Power-Ups. We surface this constraint during scoping and align the migration plan with the customer's Trello plan. If the destination uses Free, we default to Custom Fields as the active Power-Up and flag that time entries become checklist notes.

  • Time Entries from Breeze have no native Trello representation

    Breeze's built-in task-level time tracking (with timer, manual entry, estimates, budgets, and reports) has no equivalent native field in Trello. Without a time-tracking Power-Up active in the destination workspace, we convert time entries to Checklist items on the parent Card. This preserves the data as readable text but removes the sum, duration, and reporting capabilities that Breeze provides natively. Teams that rely on time tracking for billing or capacity planning should activate a Trello time-tracking Power-Up before migration so we can write entries in a structured format rather than checklist text.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Breeze to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and Trello plan selection

    We audit the source Breeze workspace across all projects, extracting task counts, subtask hierarchy depth, per-project custom field schemas (field name, type, and which projects use each field), tag taxonomy, time entry volume, and attachment count. We pair this with a Trello plan assessment: Free tier constrains Power-Up usage to one per Board, which affects whether Custom Fields and time-tracking Power-Ups can coexist on the same destination Board. Standard ($5/user) or Premium ($10/user) resolves this. The discovery output is a written migration scope with per-project field conflict inventory and a Trello plan recommendation.

  2. Schema reconciliation and Trello Board provisioning

    We build the destination schema in Trello before any data moves. For each Breeze project, we create a Trello Board, extract the project's unique status values as Lists, reconcile custom field schemas (resolving type collisions where the same field name has different types across projects), and create matching Custom Field definitions on each Board. If time entries require a Power-Up, we coordinate activation before Board provisioning. We provision Boards in a staging workspace first for customer validation.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Trello staging workspace using a representative subset of Breeze projects. The customer reviews Card placement, Label mapping, Checklist formatting from subtasks and time entries, and Custom Field data in the Cards. We reconcile record counts per project, spot-check 20-30 Cards against the Breeze source for field accuracy, and confirm the per-project custom field reconciliation decisions. Any mapping corrections—particularly around custom field type resolution—happen here before production migration.

  4. Attachment file-system export coordination

    We initiate the Breeze file-system export in parallel with the API export to retrieve actual attachment binary files. We export attachment metadata (filename, URL, associated task ID, upload date) via the Breeze API and write URLs as Trello Card attachment links. The parallel file export ensures the Breeze storage remains accessible during the migration window. If the customer has more than 200 attachments, we coordinate the file download in batches and confirm each batch's URL integrity before the source subscription ends.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Board creation (with Lists and Custom Field definitions deployed), Card import (with Breeze Task fields mapped to Card title, description, members, due date, and Labels), Checklist generation from Breeze Subtasks and Time Entries, and attachment links written to Cards. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We process Boards in batches of 10-20 to stay within Trello's API rate limits and avoid workspace-level throttling.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze Breeze writes during cutover and run a final delta migration of any tasks modified during the migration window. We validate Card count, Label completeness, Checklist item count from subtasks, and attachment link coverage. We deliver the comment recovery checklist to the customer for any manual comment export they wish to perform in Trello. We deliver a written Butler automation inventory (board-level automations requiring manual rebuild) and a Trello Power-Up activation guide. We do not rebuild Butler automations or configure Power-Ups as part of the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Breeze logo

Breeze

Source

Strengths

  • Per-user flat pricing at $9/month provides transparent cost predictability for small teams.
  • Built-in Kanban boards, Gantt charts, and time tracking in a single tool without requiring third-party integrations.
  • Strong customer support with quick response times and guided migration assistance.
  • Cross-platform availability via web, iOS, and Android with real-time sync across devices.
  • Integrations with Slack, Google Drive, Dropbox, Toggl, Harvest, Zapier, QuickBooks, and GitHub cover common agency stacks.

Weaknesses

  • No plugin or marketplace ecosystem limits extensibility beyond built-in integrations.
  • Comments are not accessible via the public API, blocking programmatic export of discussion history.
  • Custom field schemas vary per project, requiring per-project field mapping during migration.
  • No permanent free tier—only a 14-day trial with no credit card required.
  • Attachment files must be downloaded separately from the Breeze file system; the API provides URLs only, not binary data.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Breeze and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Breeze: Not publicly documented by Breeze.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Breeze doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Breeze to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Breeze to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Breeze to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Breeze to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for workspaces under 20 projects and 5,000 tasks with no per-project custom field type conflicts. Migrations with significant custom field type collisions (same field name with different types across many projects), large attachment sets (over 200 files), or high time-entry volume that requires checklist conversion at scale move to five to eight weeks because of the per-project schema reconciliation work. We scope each migration individually and give a timeline estimate after discovery.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Breeze.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day