Project Management migration

Migrate from Breeze to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Breeze and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Breeze logo

Breeze

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Breeze and Asana.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Breeze to Asana is a schema-normalization migration. Breeze allows each project to define its own custom field set, so a field named Priority might be a text field in one project and a dropdown in another. Asana uses a global custom field model where fields are defined once per workspace and applied to projects. We inspect each Breeze project's field schema during export scoping, detect type collisions across projects, resolve them into a unified Asana field map, and write that map before any task data moves. Breeze's public REST API does not expose task-level comments, so we cannot include comment history in the API export; we flag this gap at scoping and advise customers to use Breeze's in-app CSV export or screenshots for comment recovery. Time tracking entries migrate as a linked object attached to tasks. Tags map to Asana tags. We do not migrate Automations or Breeze Workflows; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana's Workflow Builder.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Breeze logo

Breeze

What's pushing teams away

  • Setup takes longer than expected—some users report it takes several days to fully configure workflows and migrate existing data before the team can work productively.
  • The lack of a permanent free plan frustrates users evaluating Breeze against Trello, which offers unlimited free boards and power-ups.
  • Redirect management for web-based access requires contacting support rather than giving admins direct control, creating friction for IT-managed environments.
  • No plugin or marketplace ecosystem means teams cannot extend functionality, unlike Trello which has a rich power-up ecosystem via Atlassian.
  • Occasional app instability causes task ordering to shuffle or tasks to disappear temporarily, eroding trust in data reliability.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Breeze objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Breeze object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Breeze

Project

maps to

Asana

Project (Workspace Project)

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Projects map directly to Asana Projects. We preserve the project name, description, start date, due date, status, and owner. Breeze's project-level status field maps to Asana's project privacy setting and color label since Asana does not have a project-level status enum beyond Archived. If Breeze projects are set to Archived, we map them to Asana's Archived status on the project. Owner is resolved by email match against the destination Asana workspace members.

Breeze

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Tasks map to Asana Tasks. We preserve task name, description (rich text), due date, start date, priority, assignee, and status. Breeze task IDs are stored as external references on the Asana task for traceability. Breeze's To Do, In Progress, and Done statuses map to Asana's default section or to Custom Fields for status if the customer requires a named status column in List view.

Breeze

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze supports one level of Subtasks under Tasks. We export the full parent-child relationship and recreate it as Asana Subtasks under the parent Task. Breeze task IDs are preserved in the Asana task notes or as a custom field for reconciliation. If any Breeze subtask contains nested subtasks, we flag those records for the customer to restructure post-migration since Asana supports infinite nesting but the source data had a non-standard depth.

Breeze

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (Workspace)

lossy
Fully supported

This is the most complex mapping in a Breeze-to-Asana migration. Breeze allows each project to define its own custom field set, so the same field name can be a text field in one project and a dropdown in another. We inspect every Breeze project's field schema during export scoping, detect all unique field names across projects, resolve type collisions (for example, Priority as text in Project A and dropdown in Project B), and build a unified Asana global Custom Field set. We then apply each field to the relevant Asana projects via Custom Field Settings. Customers are advised during scoping if significant type collisions exist and must confirm the resolution strategy before migration begins.

Breeze

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Tags are flat, label-style identifiers attached to Tasks. Asana Tags are also flat. We export tags as an array per task and create corresponding Tag records in the destination workspace, then apply them to each migrated task. Asana's Topics feature provides cross-project classification beyond flat tags, but since Breeze has no hierarchical taxonomy, we map tags 1:1 to Asana tags and flag Topics as a post-migration organizational option.

Breeze

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Task (Time Log or Custom Fields)

1:many
Fully supported

Breeze Time Tracking entries contain billable hours, duration, date, and optional description. Asana's native time tracking is available on Premium and above plans and stores time logs against tasks. We migrate time entries as a series of time logs against the corresponding Asana task with the original duration, date, and description preserved. If the destination Asana workspace is on the Free or Standard plan without time tracking enabled, we write billable hours and duration as a number Custom Field plus a text Custom Field for description against the task, and flag the Premium time tracking upgrade as an option.

Breeze

User / Assignee

maps to

Asana

User (Workspace Member)

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Users are referenced by email, name, and role. We export the full user roster and map each task assignee by email against the destination Asana workspace members list. If the destination workspace does not yet have all Breeze users provisioned as members, we hold those tasks in a reconciliation queue pending user provisioning. SSO or domain-based user provisioning is outside migration scope and requires admin action before those users can be assigned in Asana.

Breeze

Statuses (per project)

maps to

Asana

Section or Custom Field (Status)

lossy
Fully supported

Breeze uses customizable task statuses per project. Asana does not have a native per-project status enum equivalent to Breeze's model. We offer two migration strategies: map Breeze statuses to Asana Sections in List view (Section per Breeze status value, tasks grouped accordingly), or create a single-select Custom Field named Status with the Breeze status values as options and apply it to tasks. The customer chooses the strategy during scoping. We do not recommend mapping Breeze statuses directly to Asana's task completion checkbox since that loses the intermediate status values.

Breeze

Attachment (URL metadata)

maps to

Asana

Attachment (URL)

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze attachments are stored in Breeze's file system and referenced by URL in the API. We export attachment metadata (filename, URL, size, upload date) but not the binary file content. We write the attachment URL as a link on the Asana task. Actual files must be downloaded separately from Breeze's storage and re-uploaded to Asana or a linked cloud storage provider (Google Drive, Dropbox). For migrations with hundreds of attachments, we coordinate a file export session in parallel with the API export to minimize the overall migration window.

Breeze

Comment

maps to

Asana

(none)

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze's public REST API does not expose task-level comments. We cannot programmatically include comment history in a migration export. This is a platform-level limitation of Breeze's API, not a mapping gap. We flag this gap during scoping and advise customers to use Breeze's in-app CSV export or take screenshots of comment threads before the migration window opens. Comment recovery is a manual step that sits outside the automated migration scope.

Breeze

Budget and Estimate

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (Number or Currency)

lossy
Fully supported

Breeze includes budget and estimate fields at the project level. Asana does not have native budget fields. We create number and currency Custom Fields on the project record (using Asana's custom fields on projects feature) and map the budget and estimate values. If the customer requires budget tracking against individual tasks, we discuss creating a project-level budget Custom Field and task-level allocation tracking as a separate configuration post-migration.

Breeze

Workflow / Automation

maps to

Asana

(none)

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Workflows are property-triggered automations with conditions and actions. Asana's Workflow Builder and Rules use a different trigger and action model. We do not migrate automations as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active Breeze Workflow with its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Asana Workflow Builder equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds them post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Breeze logo

Breeze gotchas

High

Comments are not exported via Breeze API

Medium

Attachment files require separate file-system export

Medium

Custom field schemas differ per project

Low

No permanent free tier limits evaluation

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Breeze API does not expose task comments

    Breeze's public REST API does not include a comments endpoint. We cannot programmatically include task-level comment history in the migration export. This is a platform-level constraint of Breeze's API, not a mapping issue we can resolve. We flag this gap during scoping and advise customers to export comments manually via Breeze's in-app CSV export or screenshot workflow before the migration window opens. Comment recovery is a manual step; teams that rely on comment history for project context should budget two to four hours per project for manual export.

  • Per-project custom field schemas require collision resolution before migration

    Breeze allows each project to define its own custom field set, meaning the same field name can have different types across projects. For example, a field named Priority might be a text field in Project A and a dropdown in Project B. Asana's global custom field model requires a single type per field. We detect all type collisions during export scoping and present the customer with a resolution plan: choose the dominant type, convert all instances to that type, or rename conflicting fields. Migration does not proceed until the customer confirms the collision resolution strategy. Skipping this step results in import failures or silent type coercion in Asana.

  • Attachment files require separate file-system export from Breeze storage

    The Breeze API returns attachment URLs rather than streaming binary file content. We export attachment metadata (filename, URL, size, upload date) and preserve the URL as a link on the Asana task, but the actual files remain in Breeze's storage. For migrations with more than 50 attachments, we coordinate a parallel file export session to download files from Breeze's storage and either upload them to Asana directly or to a linked cloud storage provider (Google Drive, Dropbox). Without a coordinated file export, attachment links in Asana will point to inaccessible Breeze URLs after account deactivation.

  • Asana does not have native budget or estimate tracking

    Breeze includes project-level budget and estimate fields. Asana has no native budget fields. We map budget and estimate values to number and currency Custom Fields on the project, but the customer should understand that these fields will not trigger alerts, track spent versus estimated, or integrate with financial systems without additional configuration or a third-party app from Asana's marketplace. Teams relying on Breeze's native budget tracking should evaluate Asana Premium's resource management features or a dedicated financial integration post-migration.

  • Breeze subtask depth is one level; Asana supports infinite nesting

    Breeze supports exactly one level of subtasks under a task. Asana supports infinite nested subtask depth. We preserve the Breeze subtask hierarchy directly. If any Breeze task contains subtasks that themselves contain subtasks in a non-standard pattern, we flag those records during scoping. Most Breeze subtask trees migrate cleanly as single-level children. Any restructuring for deeper nesting in Asana is a post-migration task for the customer's project manager.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Breeze to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and schema audit

    We audit the source Breeze workspace across all projects. We extract the full project list, task counts per project, subtask presence and depth, user roster, and per-project custom field schemas including field names, field types, and which projects use which fields. We identify type collisions where the same field name has different types across projects and document them as a collision resolution worksheet for customer sign-off. We also extract tag names, time entry counts, attachment URLs, and any active Workflow names for the automation inventory.

  2. Custom field collision resolution

    Before any data moves, we present the customer with the collision resolution worksheet. For each field name with multiple types across projects, the customer chooses: adopt the most common type and convert all instances, split into separate fields (for example, Priority_Text and Priority_Dropdown), or rename conflicting fields to make them distinct. We update the Asana workspace global Custom Fields based on the resolved schema. This step gates the migration start date because Asana's custom fields are created before tasks are imported and cannot be bulk-edited after import without additional tooling.

  3. Asana workspace preparation

    We create the destination Asana workspace with the agreed custom field schema. We configure project structure (projects, sections, default fields), user provisioning requirements, and tag taxonomy. If the customer chose Section-based status mapping, we create sections per Breeze status value within each project. If the customer chose Custom Field status mapping, we apply the status Custom Field to the relevant projects. We run a dry-run import of a sample project to validate field mapping before processing the full dataset.

  4. Migration in dependency order

    We run the migration in this order: Users (validated against Asana workspace members), Projects (with start dates, due dates, and descriptions), Tags (created globally before task import), Tasks with Custom Field values, Subtasks, Time Entries (as time logs or custom fields depending on Asana plan), and Attachment metadata. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Tasks reference their parent task by Asana GID, resolved during the subtask phase. Owner and assignee resolution uses email matching against the workspace member list.

  5. File export coordination

    In parallel with the API export, we coordinate a file export session for Breeze attachment downloads. We provide the customer with a file-export checklist and a mapping of attachment URLs to Asana task GIDs so files can be re-uploaded to Asana or a linked storage provider. For small attachment sets, we can assist with a bulk URL download script. For large sets (hundreds of files), we recommend a dedicated file-export session with the customer acting as the data custodian for the downloaded files.

  6. Comment recovery handoff

    We cannot export comments via the Breeze API. We deliver a comment recovery guide that walks the customer's admin through Breeze's in-app CSV export for comments and a recommended screenshot workflow for any comment threads with file attachments or inline images. The guide includes per-project export steps and estimated time per project based on comment volume observed during scoping. This is a manual step the customer's team executes before or after the migration window.

  7. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze writes to Breeze during cutover and run a delta migration of any tasks modified during the migration window. We deliver the full automation inventory: every Breeze Workflow with its trigger, conditions, and actions mapped to a recommended Asana Workflow Builder or Rule equivalent. We do not rebuild automations as part of the migration scope. We support a five-business-day post-cutover window to resolve any data quality issues raised by the customer's team. Asana Workflows and Breeze Workflows are separate rebuild engagements.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Breeze logo

Breeze

Source

Strengths

  • Per-user flat pricing at $9/month provides transparent cost predictability for small teams.
  • Built-in Kanban boards, Gantt charts, and time tracking in a single tool without requiring third-party integrations.
  • Strong customer support with quick response times and guided migration assistance.
  • Cross-platform availability via web, iOS, and Android with real-time sync across devices.
  • Integrations with Slack, Google Drive, Dropbox, Toggl, Harvest, Zapier, QuickBooks, and GitHub cover common agency stacks.

Weaknesses

  • No plugin or marketplace ecosystem limits extensibility beyond built-in integrations.
  • Comments are not accessible via the public API, blocking programmatic export of discussion history.
  • Custom field schemas vary per project, requiring per-project field mapping during migration.
  • No permanent free tier—only a 14-day trial with no credit card required.
  • Attachment files must be downloaded separately from the Breeze file system; the API provides URLs only, not binary data.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Breeze and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Breeze: Not publicly documented by Breeze.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Breeze doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Breeze to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Breeze to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Breeze to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Breeze to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces with fewer than 500 tasks across two or fewer projects, no field collision across projects, and straightforward subtask nesting. Migrations with many projects each carrying unique custom field sets, significant field type collisions requiring resolution, or time entry histories above 5,000 records move to seven to twelve weeks because of the per-project field schema inspection and collision resolution work. The comment recovery step is manual and runs parallel to the automated migration.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Breeze.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day