Migrate your Breeze data
Lightweight web-based project management tool with Kanban boards, Gantt charts, and time tracking for small teams and agencies managing project workflows.
In its favor
Why people choose Breeze
The signal that keeps Breeze on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.
Users praise Breeze for its fast learning curve—teams can be productive within the first session with minimal onboarding, especially compared to heavyweight tools like Asana or Monday.
The Gantt chart and Kanban board tools are frequently cited as intuitive and responsive, with drag-and-drop task rescheduling that updates timelines automatically.
Mobile apps for iOS and Android receive consistent positive mentions, with users valuing real-time project visibility from any location.
Time tracking built into tasks helps agencies evaluate profitability per project and manage deadlines without a separate tool.
The flat-rate per-user pricing model at $9/month is seen as transparent and affordable for small teams, particularly compared to per-seat enterprise CRMs.
Setup takes longer than expected—some users report it takes several days to fully configure workflows and migrate existing data before the team can work productively.
The lack of a permanent free plan frustrates users evaluating Breeze against Trello, which offers unlimited free boards and power-ups.
Redirect management for web-based access requires contacting support rather than giving admins direct control, creating friction for IT-managed environments.
No plugin or marketplace ecosystem means teams cannot extend functionality, unlike Trello which has a rich power-up ecosystem via Atlassian.
Occasional app instability causes task ordering to shuffle or tasks to disappear temporarily, eroding trust in data reliability.
Reasons to switch
Why people leave Breeze
The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing Breeze. Presented as facts, not knocks.
Platform scorecard
Strengths, weaknesses, and where Breeze fits
Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.
SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit
Strengths
Weaknesses
Where it works
Where it struggles
Pricing tiers
Breeze pricing overview
Breeze uses a per-user flat-rate pricing model starting at $9/user/month for the Basic tier, stepping up to $14/user/month for Standard with automation and advanced integrations. Enterprise pricing is custom. There is no permanent free tier—only a 14-day trial with all features enabled.
Basic
Tier 1 of 3
$9.00 per user/month
What's included
Need help selecting your Project Management?
Book a free 30 minute consultationPricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on Breeze's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →
What gets migrated
Breeze object support
Object-by-object support for Breeze migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.
Projects
Fully supportedProjects map 1:1 between Breeze and most destination PM tools. Breeze Projects carry name, description, start/due dates, status, and owner. We preserve the full project record and link any associated custom fields.
Tasks
Fully supportedTasks are the core Breeze object. We export task name, description, status, priority, assignee, due date, and custom fields. Breeze task IDs are preserved as external references so linked objects like Subtasks and Time Entries can be re-associated in the destination.
Subtasks
Fully supportedBreeze supports one level of subtasks under Tasks. We export the full parent-child relationship. If the destination uses a nested hierarchy deeper than one level, we flatten and flag for review.
Custom Fields
Mapping requiredBreeze allows per-project custom fields with no enforced type schema—text, number, date, and dropdown fields all coexist. We inspect each project's field schema at export time and build a field map per project before writing to the destination, warning on type mismatches.
Tags
Mapping requiredBreeze Tags are flat, label-style identifiers attached to Tasks. There is no hierarchical taxonomy. We export tags as an array per task. Where the destination uses a hierarchical tagging system, we create flat root-level tags and note the flattening.
Time Entries
Fully supportedBreeze Time Tracking produces time entries linked to Tasks. We export billable hours, duration, and date. Entries are written as a separate object linked by task ID in the destination.
Attachments
Mapping requiredBreeze attachments are stored in its own file system and referenced by URL in the API. We export the attachment URL and metadata. Files must be downloaded separately via Breeze's file export process before migration, as the API does not stream binary content.
Users / Assignees
Mapping requiredBreeze Users are referenced by email, name, and role. We export the user roster and map each task assignee by email. If the destination uses a different user identity system (SSO, directory), we flag for manual reassignment after migration.
Statuses and Pipelines
Mapping requiredBreeze uses a fixed set of task statuses (To Do, In Progress, Done, Archived) that can be customized per project. We extract the per-project status schema and map it to the destination's pipeline stages, warning on schema mismatches.
Comments
Not in this platformBreeze does not expose Comments via its public REST API. We cannot export task-level comments programmatically. If comments are critical, customers must use Breeze's manual CSV export or screenshot workflow before migration.
| Object | Support | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Projects | Fully supported | Projects map 1:1 between Breeze and most destination PM tools. Breeze Projects carry name, description, start/due dates, status, and owner. We preserve the full project record and link any associated custom fields. |
| Tasks | Fully supported | Tasks are the core Breeze object. We export task name, description, status, priority, assignee, due date, and custom fields. Breeze task IDs are preserved as external references so linked objects like Subtasks and Time Entries can be re-associated in the destination. |
| Subtasks | Fully supported | Breeze supports one level of subtasks under Tasks. We export the full parent-child relationship. If the destination uses a nested hierarchy deeper than one level, we flatten and flag for review. |
| Custom Fields | Mapping required | Breeze allows per-project custom fields with no enforced type schema—text, number, date, and dropdown fields all coexist. We inspect each project's field schema at export time and build a field map per project before writing to the destination, warning on type mismatches. |
| Tags | Mapping required | Breeze Tags are flat, label-style identifiers attached to Tasks. There is no hierarchical taxonomy. We export tags as an array per task. Where the destination uses a hierarchical tagging system, we create flat root-level tags and note the flattening. |
| Time Entries | Fully supported | Breeze Time Tracking produces time entries linked to Tasks. We export billable hours, duration, and date. Entries are written as a separate object linked by task ID in the destination. |
| Attachments | Mapping required | Breeze attachments are stored in its own file system and referenced by URL in the API. We export the attachment URL and metadata. Files must be downloaded separately via Breeze's file export process before migration, as the API does not stream binary content. |
| Users / Assignees | Mapping required | Breeze Users are referenced by email, name, and role. We export the user roster and map each task assignee by email. If the destination uses a different user identity system (SSO, directory), we flag for manual reassignment after migration. |
| Statuses and Pipelines | Mapping required | Breeze uses a fixed set of task statuses (To Do, In Progress, Done, Archived) that can be customized per project. We extract the per-project status schema and map it to the destination's pipeline stages, warning on schema mismatches. |
| Comments | Not in this platform | Breeze does not expose Comments via its public REST API. We cannot export task-level comments programmatically. If comments are critical, customers must use Breeze's manual CSV export or screenshot workflow before migration. |
Gotchas
What to watch for in Breeze migrations
Issues we've hit on past Breeze migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.
Comments are not exported via Breeze API
Attachment files require separate file-system export
Custom field schemas differ per project
No permanent free tier limits evaluation
| Severity | Issue |
|---|---|
| High | Comments are not exported via Breeze API |
| Medium | Attachment files require separate file-system export |
| Medium | Custom field schemas differ per project |
| Low | No permanent free tier limits evaluation |
Leaving Breeze?
Where Breeze customers move next
5 destinations Breeze can migrate to.
How a Breeze migration works
Four steps, Breeze-specific
Connect
API key (per-organization token) into Breeze. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.
Map
We translate Breeze-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.
Sample
Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate Breeze quirks before production.
Migrate
Full migration with Breeze rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.
FAQ
Breeze migration FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Breeze migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Can't find your answer?
Walk through your Breeze migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationOther project management tools we support
Ready when you are
Migrate Breeze.
Without the rebuild.
Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your Breeze setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.