Project Management migration

Migrate from Taskworld to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Taskworld and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Taskworld logo

Taskworld

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

64%

7 of 11

objects map 1:1 between Taskworld and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Taskworld and Microsoft Project take opposite approaches to project planning. Taskworld organizes work around task accountability with assignees, followers, checklists, and Kanban or Timeline views. Microsoft Project organizes work around Gantt scheduling with WBS hierarchy, resource assignment, and predecessor-driven date propagation. The migration is a structural re-model, not a record copy. We extract Taskworld's task hierarchy and map it to a flat WBS structure inside MS Project tasks, convert Taskworld's dependency links to predecessor fields, and preserve checklist completion percentages as sub-task or flag fields. GraphQL-only API access on Taskworld means we paginate extraction across sessions for large workspaces. File attachments and project chat do not migrate and require a separate file manifest and communication-log rebuild. Automations in Taskworld have no MS Project equivalent; we deliver a written inventory of automation rules for the customer's admin to rebuild as task constraints or baseline schedules.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Taskworld logo

Taskworld

What's pushing teams away

  • Performance degrades during large projects with many tasks and team members, causing slow loading of views and delayed updates that disrupt daily workflows.
  • The mobile application is significantly less responsive than the web interface, frustrating team members who need to update or review work on the go.
  • As teams scale beyond 30 users, organizations find the feature set insufficient compared to enterprise alternatives and migrate to platforms with stronger automation and reporting depth.
  • Confusion over plan tier capabilities and what features unlock at Business versus Enterprise creates friction, especially around custom fields, automations, and guest limits.
  • Limited API documentation and GraphQL-only access makes programmatic data extraction and integration difficult, pushing technical teams toward more API-friendly alternatives.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Taskworld objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Taskworld object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Taskworld

Workspace

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Plan or Project Online Project Site

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld Workspace maps to a single MS Project plan file (.mpp) for desktop or a Project Online project entry for cloud. We extract workspace-level member lists and map them to the destination resource pool or project team. Workspace-level settings (e.g., guest limits) have no direct MS Project equivalent; we document these in the post-migration handoff as configuration reminders for the customer's admin.

Taskworld

Project

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Project

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld Projects map directly to MS Project projects. Project name, description, start date, and target end date migrate to the project-level fields. Taskworld's view type selection (Kanban, Timeline/Gantt, Calendar) does not control anything at the destination; we set the destination to Gantt view by default since that is MS Project's native scheduling mode.

Taskworld

Task (top-level)

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Task (WBS level 1)

1:1
Fully supported

Top-level Taskworld tasks map to summary tasks (WBS level 1) in MS Project. Task name, description (mapped to Notes field), due date (mapped to Finish), start date (mapped to Start), priority, and percent complete transfer directly. The Taskworld percent-complete value becomes the MS Project Percent Complete field at the summary level.

Taskworld

Subtask

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Task (WBS sub-level)

1:many
Fully supported

Taskworld nested subtasks map to MS Project sub-tasks within the same WBS hierarchy. We preserve the nesting depth up to MS Project's practical limit of 65,000 tasks per project. Checklist completion percentage from the parent task does not map to a standard MS Project field; we create a custom number field checklist_pct__c to carry this value if the customer's admin requires it for reporting.

Taskworld

Checklist

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Sub-tasks or Text Flag Field

1:many
Fully supported

Taskworld checklist items (with their completed/pending status) map to MS Project sub-tasks under the parent task. Each checklist item becomes a sub-task with the checklist item text as the task name, and the completion state maps to a flag field or percent complete value. For checklist-heavy workflows, we recommend the sub-task approach; for simple checklists, a text field listing completed items is a lighter alternative.

Taskworld

Task Dependency

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Predecessor

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld dependency links (blocks/blocked by) map directly to MS Project predecessor fields. We extract the directionality of each Taskworld dependency and map it to the appropriate predecessor type: Finish-to-Start is the default since Taskworld's blocking model maps most naturally to this relationship. Finish-to-Finish and Start-to-Start predecessors migrate when the source dependency type supports it.

Taskworld

Custom Fields (per-project)

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Enterprise Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Taskworld per-project custom fields have no direct migration path. We extract every custom field definition (field name, data type, and all values per task) and deliver it as a custom field creation guide for MS Project Enterprise fields. The customer's admin creates the corresponding custom fields in MS Project's Organizer before migration; we then populate the values during import. Custom fields scoped to multiple projects consolidate to a single MS Project enterprise field definition.

Taskworld

Attachments and Files

maps to

Microsoft Project

SharePoint / OneDrive (manual re-upload)

1:1
Mapping required

Taskworld file attachments do not migrate. MS Project has no native attachment migration path. We extract the list of all file references (file name, URL, attached-to task) from Taskworld and produce a file manifest. The customer's admin uploads files to SharePoint or OneDrive and re-attaches them to the relevant MS Project tasks post-migration. We flag any files exceeding 250 MB or non-standard formats for manual handling.

Taskworld

Time Entries

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Assignment Hours or Task Notes

1:1
Mapping required

Taskworld time entries per task migrate as notes on the relevant MS Project task if the destination is MS Project desktop, or as assignment hours if migrating to Project Online with resource management enabled. Planned hours do not map from Taskworld time tracking since Taskworld records actual time worked rather than estimated effort. We preserve the logged duration and author attribution as a task note for reference during post-migration billing or audit.

Taskworld

Users and Guests

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Resources (without Enterprise Resource Pool)

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld workspace members and guest collaborators map to MS Project resources. We extract user name, email, and role (admin, member, guest). Resource type defaults to Material for Taskworld users without specific resource cost rates; the customer's admin sets resource rates in MS Project if cost tracking is required. MS Project desktop has no global user directory, so this mapping is project-scoped. For Project Online, we map users to the PWA Resource Center.

Taskworld

Tags and Labels

maps to

Microsoft Project

MS Project Text Field

lossy
Mapping required

Taskworld tags (string labels on tasks and projects) migrate to an MS Project Text field tag__c. We preserve the tag string and map it as a comma-separated value in the text field. Tag hierarchy (if present in Taskworld) flattens to a single-level string. The customer's admin applies outline codes or enterprise text custom fields if hierarchical tag taxonomy matters at the portfolio level.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Taskworld logo

Taskworld gotchas

High

GraphQL API is the sole programmatic extraction method

Medium

Custom fields scoped per-project not globally

Low

Completed task visibility state transfers as a setting

Medium

Storage limits by plan tier affect file migration completeness

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • File attachments do not migrate to MS Project

    MS Project has no native attachment migration pathway. Taskworld files attached to tasks and projects are not exported through any API mechanism equivalent to the Taskworld GraphQL endpoint. We produce a file manifest listing every file reference (name, URL, attached object, size) for the customer's admin to re-upload to SharePoint or OneDrive and re-link manually. For workspaces approaching the 1TB Business plan cap, we flag total file volume during scoping so that storage planning at the destination is accounted for before migration begins.

  • Taskworld's GraphQL-only API limits extraction speed

    Taskworld exposes only a GraphQL API at us.taskworld.com/api/public/v1 with no bulk export endpoint and no publicly documented rate limits. For workspaces with more than 5,000 tasks or multiple projects, we paginate extraction using cursor-based pagination across multiple sessions. Large workspaces may require two to three extraction passes. We implement adaptive throttling and exponential backoff to avoid triggering undocumented rate limits. The customer should expect extraction scoping to take longer than a REST-based platform of equivalent record volume.

  • MS Project does not support task-level comments or project chat

    Taskworld project chat and task-level comments are separate objects that have no MS Project equivalent. MS Project's Notes field is a single text field per task, not a threaded discussion thread. We extract comment text, author attribution, and timestamp into a JSON manifest and recommend the customer adopt Microsoft Teams channels linked to the project site for ongoing collaboration. Archived comment history is preserved as a flat text export; threaded context is lost.

  • Resource pool design requires manual configuration

    MS Project's resource management requires a resource pool with named resources and cost rates. Taskworld does not expose resource cost or capacity data through its API, so we can only migrate user identity without compensation rates, calendar availability, or material resource definitions. The customer's admin must build the resource pool in MS Project manually before or immediately after migration. Without a resource pool, task assignments in MS Project show resource names but no capacity or cost calculations.

  • Task Constraints do not map bidirectionally

    Taskworld automations that trigger on due date or status change have no direct MS Project equivalent. MS Project uses task constraints (Must Start On, As Soon As Possible, Finish No Later Than) to control scheduling behavior. We deliver a written inventory of every Taskworld automation rule with its trigger, conditions, and actions, and we recommend the most applicable MS Project constraint type for each. The customer's project manager applies the recommended constraint in MS Project manually after reviewing the automation map.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Taskworld to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Workspace inventory and extraction scoping

    We run an initial GraphQL extraction pass against the Taskworld workspace to inventory all projects, tasks, subtasks, checklists, dependencies, custom fields, time entries, user accounts, and file references. We paginate across the workspace using cursor-based queries and flag workspaces with more than 5,000 task records for multi-session extraction. We produce a record-count breakdown by project and object type, and we identify any tasks with circular dependency chains that require manual resolution before import into MS Project.

  2. Destination environment preparation

    We confirm the destination MS Project environment: Project desktop (.mpp file) or Project Online (PWA). For Project Online, we validate the user's Project Plan 3 or Plan 5 license and SharePoint site connectivity. For desktop, we confirm MS Project version compatibility. We deliver a pre-migration checklist for the customer's admin: create the resource pool with named resources, define enterprise custom fields using the Taskworld field inventory, and configure baseline calendars for non-standard work weeks.

  3. Custom field extraction and mapping document

    We extract all per-project custom field definitions from Taskworld, including field name, data type, and every value assigned to any task. We produce a Custom Field Mapping Document that maps each Taskworld field to an MS Project enterprise custom field (Text, Number, Date, or Flag) and lists all values requiring population. The customer's admin creates the destination fields in MS Project's Organizer before data migration begins.

  4. Task hierarchy and dependency transformation

    We transform the Taskworld task hierarchy into MS Project WBS structure. Top-level tasks become summary tasks; nested subtasks become indented child tasks. Checklist items become sub-tasks under their parent task. Taskworld dependency links (blocks/blocked by) convert to predecessor fields with Finish-to-Start as the default relationship type. We resolve circular dependencies by removing the newest link in the cycle and documenting the removal in the handoff report.

  5. Data import and dependency validation

    We import the transformed task hierarchy into MS Project using the native .mpp file format or Project Online's REST API, depending on the destination. We validate that predecessor chains resolve correctly (no #ERROR values in predecessor fields), that start and finish dates propagate from dependencies as expected, and that custom field values populate across the full task set. We run a reconciliation pass comparing task count and dependency count against the source extraction.

  6. File manifest delivery and automation handoff

    We deliver the file attachment manifest listing every Taskworld file with its name, size, and parent task for the customer's admin to re-upload to SharePoint or OneDrive. We deliver the automation inventory documenting every Taskworld automation rule with trigger, conditions, and recommended MS Project constraint or baseline equivalent. We conduct a one-week post-migration hypercare window to resolve import errors, missing custom field values, and predecessor validation issues reported by the project team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Taskworld logo

Taskworld

Source

Strengths

  • Built-in audit and inspection features with checklist-driven compliance scoring and photo evidence capture for regulated industries.
  • Evidence-based management reporting generates activity trails, ownership logs, and performance metrics for team evaluations.
  • Flexible deployment options include cloud, dedicated cloud (DC), and on-premise for enterprises with strict data residency requirements.
  • Unified collaboration combines task management, project chat, file sharing, and workload tracking in one interface without tool switching.
  • Trello import wizard provides a built-in migration path for teams switching from Trello with JSON-based data transfer.

Weaknesses

  • GraphQL-only API with limited public documentation makes programmatic data extraction and integration challenging for technical teams.
  • Mobile application significantly underperforms the web interface, causing friction for field workers and remote team members.
  • Custom fields are scoped per-project rather than globally, requiring repetitive field definition across projects.
  • Performance degrades on workspaces with large numbers of tasks and active collaborators, slowing view loading.
  • Storage capped at 1TB on Business plan with unlimited storage only on Enterprise, creating a migration trigger for data-heavy teams.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Taskworld and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    1 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Taskworld: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Taskworld doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Taskworld to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Taskworld to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Taskworld to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Taskworld to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 50 projects and 5,000 tasks complete in three to five weeks. Migrations with complex nested task hierarchies, many cross-project dependencies, time entry history, or large file attachment manifests move to eight to twelve weeks. GraphQL extraction speed on the Taskworld side is the primary variable; large workspaces require multiple extraction sessions which extends scoping by one to two weeks.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Taskworld.
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day