ERP migration

Migrate from BizeeBuy to Epicor Prophet 21

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between BizeeBuy and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.

BizeeBuy logo

BizeeBuy

Source

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Compatibility

69%

9 of 13

objects map 1:1 between BizeeBuy and Epicor Prophet 21.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

8-14 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from BizeeBuy to Epicor ERP is a cross-model migration from an e-procurement platform to a manufacturing-focused ERP. BizeeBuy organizes commercial operations around Vendors, Items, Cost Centers, and multi-level procurement approvals; Epicor ERP organizes around Parts, BOMs, Jobs, Plants, and work order scheduling for discrete and make-to-order production. BizeeBuy exposes no published bulk-export endpoint, no documented rate limits, and no clear authentication method, which requires a discovery-first approach to extraction. We sequence the migration with master data (Suppliers, Parts, BOMs) before transactional records (POs, Jobs, AP Invoices), flatten multi-level BOMs for Epicor's indented structure, and resolve Part-BOM-Job linkages at migration time so that work orders in Epicor reference the correct product structure. Workflows, approval rules, and purchasing automation in BizeeBuy do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of every configured workflow and approval chain for the customer's Epicor admin to rebuild in Epicor Kinetic or Prophet 21. Historical production batch records migrate as Job records with the original batch metadata preserved in Epicor UD fields.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

BizeeBuy logo

BizeeBuy

What's pushing teams away

  • Pricing is not publicly disclosed, making it difficult to budget and compare against alternatives before committing.
  • Very limited external review presence and low public rating count make independent quality assessment difficult.
  • Small team size (under 10 employees) raises concerns about long-term support capacity and platform longevity.
  • No publicly documented API rate limits or bulk-export endpoints complicate automated data extraction and migration planning.
  • Competition from established ERPs like NetSuite, Acumatica, and Sage Intacct offers buyers more documented migration paths.

Choosing

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-specific design for wholesale distributors, not a general-purpose ERP repurposed for distribution — distributors choose P21 because it matches their replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Strong inventory control with automated replenishment, lot and serial tracking, and multi-warehouse management appeals to distributors with complex stock requirements and tight margin pressure.
  • Responsive customer support cited across G2 and Gartner reviews, with Epicor's 90% retention rate reflecting long-term customer satisfaction in a market where switching costs are high.
  • Cloud deployment on Microsoft Azure provides the flexibility to scale user counts and warehouse locations without on-premise infrastructure investment.
  • The Software Development Kit lets distributors personalize P21 to their specific business processes without modifying the application source code, preserving upgrade paths.

Object mapping

How BizeeBuy objects map to Epicor Prophet 21

Each row shows how a BizeeBuy object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

BizeeBuy

Supplier / Vendor

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Vendor

1:1
Fully supported

BizeeBuy Suppliers map to Epicor Vendor records. We extract Supplier headers (name, contact details, sourcing category, performance metadata) and load them into Epicor's Vendor table. Epicor supports multi-site vendor records via VendorPP (payment and bank details) and VendorContact records, which we populate from BizeeBuy's contact objects. If the customer uses BizeeBuy's vendor rating or performance score fields, we preserve those as UD fields on the Vendor record. Vendor is a prerequisite object — it must exist in Epicor before any PO or AP invoice records that reference it.

BizeeBuy

Purchase Order

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

PurAgent (PO Header) + PODetail (PO Lines)

1:1
Fully supported

BizeeBuy POs map to Epicor Purchase Order records (PurAgent/PoHeader + PODetail). PO header fields (PO number, status, approval state, cost-centre assignment) map to PoHeader and its UD fields. Line items map to PODetail with PartNum resolved to Epicor Part, UnitCost carried from BizeeBuy's PO line cost, and VendorNum resolved from the Supplier mapping. BizeeBuy's multi-level approval workflow status migrates as a UD field on PoHeader; Epicor's approval is handled separately through its own approval engine and is not migrated as code.

BizeeBuy

Goods Receipt Note (GRN)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Receipt and ReceiptDtl

1:1
Fully supported

BizeeBuy GRNs are the three-way match anchor in the payable workflow. We map GRN headers to Epicor Receipt records, linking to the matched PO via PONum. Line-level GRN data maps to ReceiptDtl with PartNum, ReceivedQty, and UOM resolved. The GRN's match state (matched to PO and invoice, partially matched, or unmatched) migrates as a UD field since Epicor's three-way matching logic is a payable configuration rather than a record field. If BizeeBuy stores receipt dates and inspector references, those land in ReceiptDtl CommentText and the UD field on Receipt.

BizeeBuy

Item / Product

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Part

1:1
Fully supported

BizeeBuy Items (SKU, unit of measure, cost, category, variant or bundle structure) map to Epicor Part records. We flatten BizeeBuy bundle or kit structures into Epicor Part and its PartCmdb (if the bundle is configurable) or into a flat structure with BOM relationships created separately. The BizeeBuy unit of measure maps to Epicor UOM. If BizeeBuy stores cost as a purchase cost, that value goes into Part.PurchasingFactor or a UD field for the customer's sourcing team. Part must be loaded before any PO lines, BOMs, or Jobs that reference it.

BizeeBuy

Warehouse

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Plant + Warehouse

1:1
Fully supported

BizeeBuy Warehouses map to Epicor Plant and Warehouse records. We export warehouse definitions, addresses, and assigned roles (receiving, storage, shipping) from BizeeBuy's warehouse list endpoint. Each BizeeBuy warehouse becomes an Epicor Plant (the operational site) with a corresponding Warehouse record. If the customer uses BizeeBuy's warehouse-level approval or role assignments, those map to Epicor Plant security groups. Multi-warehouse accounts in BizeeBuy map to multiple Plant records in Epicor, and PartBin records are created per Part-Warehouse combination.

BizeeBuy

Stock Level / Inventory

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

PartBin

1:1
Fully supported

BizeeBuy stock levels (quantities, status classifications, FIFO-based pricing per item per warehouse) map to Epicor PartBin records. We export the latest stock snapshot and any movement logs available through the BizeeBuy API and write them as PartBin rows linked to the corresponding Part and Warehouse. FIFO-based pricing from BizeeBuy is stored in a UD field on PartBin because Epicor's standard inventory valuation runs through the costing engine (PartLot, PartTran) rather than a stored unit cost on the bin record. Open PartBin records are a prerequisite for any Job that consumes materials from stock.

BizeeBuy

Production Batch

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

JobHead + JobMtl + JobOper

1:many
Fully supported

BizeeBuy Production Batch records map to Epicor Job records (JobHead for the work order, JobMtl for material consumption, JobOper for operations). Each batch maps to one JobHead with JobNum generated during migration. The batch's linked BOM reference becomes the JobMtl rows with the BOM-level component quantities. Finished-goods output from the batch maps to the JobHead's primary part number and target quantity. Production-linked inventory adjustments (raw material consumption and FG receipt) migrate as PartTran records linked to the JobNum. If BizeeBuy stores batch-specific metadata (batch number, inspector, shift), those land in JobHead UD fields.

BizeeBuy

Bill of Materials (BoM)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

PartBOM

lossy
Fully supported

BizeeBuy BOMs define multi-level component structures for production. We export the BOM hierarchy, component quantities, and scrap rates from BizeeBuy and translate them into Epicor PartBOM records linked to the finished-goods Part. Nested BizeeBuy BOM levels are flattened into a single PartBOM with multiple PartMtl rows; Epicor's PartBOM structure natively supports one level of materials per assembly, so multi-level BizeeBuy BOMs are decomposed into a set of PartBOM records with the top-level assembly at the top. Scrap rates from BizeeBuy migrate to PartBOM.ShrinkFactor.

BizeeBuy

Accounts Payable / Supplier Invoice

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

APInvoiceHed + APInvoiceDtl

1:1
Fully supported

BizeeBuy AP records (supplier invoices, payment status, two-way or three-way match results) map to Epicor APInvoiceHed (header) and APInvoiceDtl (lines). Invoice headers carry VendorNum (resolved from Supplier mapping), invoice number, date, total, and match state as a UD field. Lines carry PartNum or description, quantity, unit cost, and extension. The BizeeBuy three-way match outcome (matched, partially matched, unmatched) is preserved in a UD field on APInvoiceHed since Epicor's matching logic is a payable configuration rather than a record attribute. We do not migrate payment history or closed invoices unless required for reporting continuity.

BizeeBuy

Cost Center and Budget

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor Company or Department

lossy
Fully supported

BizeeBuy Cost Centers and budget allocations drive procurement approval routing. We export the cost-center hierarchy and active budget balances from BizeeBuy. These map to Epicor Department (financial reporting dimension) and Company (org-level) structures, or to a custom UD field on PoHeader if the customer uses BizeeBuy's cost-centre approval routing to control purchasing limits. The mapping is customer-specific because Epicor does not have a native cost-centre object at the level of granularity BizeeBuy uses for procurement controls. We document the cost-centre structure and recommend whether to use Epicor's native Department or a custom UD-based approach.

BizeeBuy

Sales Order

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

OrderHed + OrderDtl

1:1
Fully supported

If BizeeBuy holds Sales Order records, they map to Epicor OrderHed (order header) and OrderDtl (order lines). OrderHed fields (order number, customer reference, date, status) map directly. OrderDtl carries PartNum (resolved from the Part mapping), OrderQty, UnitPrice, and extension. BizeeBuy orders linked to Production Batches map their linked batch number to a UD field on OrderDtl for traceability. If BizeeBuy tracks sales order approvals, those migrate as UD fields rather than Epicor native workflow rules.

BizeeBuy

Custom Fields / Extensions

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

UD Fields (UD101, PartUD, etc.)

lossy
Mapping required

BizeeBuy supports custom fields on core entities but does not expose a dedicated custom-field schema endpoint. We infer custom field presence from record payloads during discovery and map them to Epicor UD fields on the corresponding table (e.g., PartUD for Part-level custom fields, JobHead_c for Job-level custom fields). Epicor UD fields are free-form columns added to the base table. The customer defines the field names and data types in Epicor during schema design, and we map BizeeBuy's inferred custom values into those columns. If BizeeBuy custom fields use picklist or enumeration values, we create Epicor combo-box or list-type UD fields and map the values explicitly.

BizeeBuy

User and Role

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor User (Identity Manager)

1:1
Fully supported

BizeeBuy does not expose a public user management API. User accounts, role-based permissions, and approval-chain assignments cannot be extracted programmatically and must be recreated manually in Epicor Kinetic or Prophet 21 using Epicor Identity Manager. We deliver a written role matrix template that maps BizeeBuy user roles and permission levels to Epicor security groups, Plant access scopes, and module-level permissions so the customer's admin has a checklist for provisioning.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

BizeeBuy logo

BizeeBuy gotchas

High

No public API rate limit documentation

High

No documented bulk export or data dump endpoint

Medium

Authentication mechanism not publicly documented

Medium

Vendor lock-in through marketplace integrations

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas

High

Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope

High

Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk

Medium

SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades

Medium

Report-based export only for non-technical users

Low

Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning

Pair-specific challenges

  • No bulk-export endpoint extends the extraction timeline

    BizeeBuy exposes individual endpoints for Warehouse List, Stock Status, Production Batches, and Material Consumption, but there is no documented bulk-export or full-dataset dump endpoint. We must iterate object-by-object across paginated endpoints for each record type. For data-heavy accounts with thousands of SKUs, thousands of POs, and deep production histories, this extends the extraction phase significantly beyond what a single bulk-export call would achieve. We communicate revised timeline estimates during the discovery phase once pagination volumes are confirmed.

  • Authentication and rate-limit discovery required before export

    BizeeBuy's API docs reference REST access but do not specify the authentication method (API key, Bearer token, OAuth) and do not publish any rate limits or quota thresholds. During migration onboarding we request the customer's API credentials and test connectivity against the base URL to confirm the auth pattern, then run a low-and-slow discovery cadence to establish the platform's informal throttle ceiling before launching full batch extraction. This discovery phase adds one to two weeks to the project schedule and is scoped separately before the main migration begins.

  • Production batch history requires Epicor UD-field design

    Epicor ERP's Job records are optimized for manufacturing work orders, not BizeeBuy's production batch model. BizeeBuy batch records carry metadata (batch number, inspector, shift, raw-material lot traceability, finished-goods output quantity) that does not map directly to any standard Epicor Job field. We store this metadata in JobHead UD fields and JobMtl UD fields, which requires upfront schema design in Epicor's UD table configuration before any production data is loaded. If the customer has used BizeeBuy batch-level cost tracking, those values map to UD fields on JobProd and are not calculated by Epicor's native costing engine.

  • BOM flattening changes material explosion behavior

    BizeeBuy's multi-level BOM structures (nested assemblies with sub-components) do not map directly to Epicor's PartBOM, which supports one level of materials per assembly. We decompose nested BizeeBuy BOMs into a set of Epicor PartBOM records, one per top-level assembly, with all sub-components listed as direct JobMtl rows when a Job is created. This flattening changes the material explosion behavior: Epicor will not automatically roll up sub-sub-assembly costs unless the customer implements a custom MRP or cost roll-up routine. We document this change during scoping and recommend whether to use Epicor's BOM-as-designed approach or to re-model the BOM structure in Epicor.

  • BizeeBuy approval workflows have no Epicor analog to migrate

    BizeeBuy's multi-level procurement approval workflows (RFQ, reverse auction, cost-centre budget gating) are platform-specific configurations with no direct Epicor ERP equivalent. Epicor's approval engine handles different object types (PO, Invoice, Expense Report) with its own workflow designer. We do not migrate approval logic as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active BizeeBuy approval chain (trigger condition, approver levels, budget threshold, escalation path) with a recommended Epicor approval configuration. The customer's Epicor admin or implementation partner rebuilds these in Epicor's native workflow designer post-migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful BizeeBuy to Epicor Prophet 21 data migration

  1. API discovery and authentication validation

    We begin with a discovery-first extraction against BizeeBuy's undocumented API. We request the customer's API credentials, test connectivity to the base URL, confirm the authentication pattern (API key, Bearer token, or otherwise), and run low-volume probe requests against the Supplier, Item, PO, GRN, Warehouse, Stock, Production Batch, and BOM endpoints. This establishes the informal throttle ceiling and confirms which endpoints return paginated results versus flat responses. The discovery output is a confirmed extraction pipeline specification and a revised timeline estimate for the extraction phase.

  2. Schema design in Epicor

    We design the destination Epicor schema based on the discovery findings. This includes provisioning Part records (with PartBin per warehouse), Vendor records (with VendorPP and VendorContact), PartBOM records from the BOM flattening exercise, Plant and Warehouse configuration, and UD fields on JobHead, PoHeader, and APInvoiceHed for any BizeeBuy metadata that has no native Epicor equivalent. Schema design is validated in an Epicor Sandbox or test company before any production data is loaded. We coordinate with the customer's Epicor admin to ensure the migration user has sufficient API and data access permissions in Epicor.

  3. Master data migration (dependency-ordered)

    We migrate master data first in strict dependency order: Vendor records, Part records, PartBin inventory snapshots, PartBOM records (from BOM flattening), Plant and Warehouse configuration, and UD field schema. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Vendor must be confirmed complete before any PO or AP invoice records referencing it are loaded. Part must be confirmed complete before BOMs, Jobs, and any PO lines that reference PartNum are loaded. PartBin must reflect current stock before any Job that consumes materials from stock is initiated.

  4. Transactional record migration

    We load transactional records after master data is validated: Purchase Orders (PoHeader + PODetail), Production Batches as Job records (JobHead + JobMtl + JobOper), GRNs as Receipt records (Receipt + ReceiptDtl), Accounts Payable invoices (APInvoiceHed + APInvoiceDtl), Sales Orders (OrderHed + OrderDtl), and PartTran movement history for inventory traceability. Each transactional object is loaded in Epicor using bulk API calls with Epicor's documented rate limits and batch sizes, with retry logic on throttle responses. Validation rules and field-level security on Epicor objects are temporarily relaxed or bypassed during bulk load to prevent record rejection.

  5. Sandbox reconciliation and sign-off

    We run a full migration into an Epicor Sandbox company using production-like data volumes before touching the production company. The customer's Epicor admin and operations lead reconcile record counts, spot-check 25-50 records per object against the BizeeBuy source, verify BOM material explosion accuracy on sampled Jobs, and confirm that BizeeBuy custom field values landed in the correct UD fields. The customer signs off the sandbox migration before the production company is targeted. Any mapping corrections, BOM decomposition errors, or UD field misalignments are corrected in schema design before the production run.

  6. Production cutover and approval workflow handoff

    We freeze BizeeBuy writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records created or modified during the migration window, then hand off Epicor as the system of record. We deliver the BizeeBuy approval chain inventory document, the BOM decomposition reference, the cost-centre mapping memo, and the user provisioning checklist to the customer's Epicor admin. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild BizeeBuy approval workflows as Epicor approval configurations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

BizeeBuy logo

BizeeBuy

Source

Strengths

  • End-to-end B2B commerce covering procurement, inventory, production, and payable on a single platform.
  • Native integrations with major Indian marketplace seller accounts and e-commerce platforms.
  • Multi-level approval workflows and RFQ/reverse auction capabilities for controlled purchasing.
  • Cloud-based deployment with no on-premise infrastructure requirements.
  • FIFO-based inventory valuation and batch-wise production reporting for manufacturing traceability.

Weaknesses

  • No publicly documented pricing tiers, making cost-of-ownership planning opaque.
  • Extremely limited public review presence and third-party validation.
  • Small company footprint raises vendor-risk concerns for mid-to-large enterprises.
  • API documentation is sparse; no published rate limits, auth mechanism, or bulk-export endpoint.
  • Export capabilities are unknown — there is no documented customer-facing data export or backup feature.
Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for wholesale distribution with industry-specific replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Multi-warehouse management with bin locations, cross-docking, and real-time inventory visibility across all warehouse locations.
  • Automated replenishment engine with demand-based and min-max planning reduces stockouts and overstock carrying costs.
  • AI-infused reporting via Epicor Prism provides Gen AI-driven insights into ERP data without requiring a BI team.
  • Strong customer retention at 90% and a 50-year track record in the distribution vertical provides long-term vendor stability.

Weaknesses

  • High total cost of ownership — per-user pricing of $150-200/month plus $10K-$500K implementation creates significant budget commitment for small and mid-market distributors.
  • Customization via SDK requires technical expertise and introduces upgrade risk when custom code conflicts with new P21 releases.
  • Report generation performance is a known pain point — multiple users report system freezes during large or complex report exports.
  • Third-party bolt-on reliance for functionality that competitors include natively increases integration complexity and total solution cost.
  • Limited public API documentation — developers building custom integrations report difficulty finding P21 API authentication methods and endpoint specifications.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across BizeeBuy and Epicor Prophet 21.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    BizeeBuy: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    BizeeBuy doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your BizeeBuy to Epicor Prophet 21 migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about BizeeBuy to Epicor Prophet 21 data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during BizeeBuy to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your BizeeBuy to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between eight and fourteen weeks for accounts with under 5,000 Suppliers, 10,000 POs, 20,000 Parts, and straightforward BOM structures. Migrations with multi-level BOM hierarchies requiring decomposition, large production batch histories (over 1,000 Job records), multi-site Epicor deployments, or BizeeBuy accounts with extensive custom fields and cost-centre approval routing extend to fourteen to twenty-two weeks because of BOM flattening, Job-number sequencing, and cross-site Plant configuration work.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from BizeeBuy.
Land in Epicor Prophet 21, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day