HRMS migration

Migrate from WebHR to Recruit CRM & ATS

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between WebHR and Recruit CRM & ATS. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Recruit CRM & ATS.

WebHR logo

WebHR

Source

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Compatibility

55%

6 of 11

objects map 1:1 between WebHR and Recruit CRM & ATS.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

WebHR and Recruit CRM serve different primary personas. WebHR is an all-in-one HRMS built for small-to-mid businesses covering the full hire-to-retire lifecycle at per-employee pricing. Recruit CRM is a purpose-built recruitment ATS and CRM for staffing agencies and in-house recruiting teams, with candidate database management, job posting, and pipeline tracking as its core functions. Migrating from WebHR to Recruit CRM is primarily a recruitment data migration — candidates, job openings, applications, and application stage history move into Recruit CRM's Candidate, Job, and Application objects, while core employee records (compensation, PTO balances, performance reviews) move as candidate-linked contact records or are archived. WebHR's lack of bulk export endpoints means we enumerate records via paginated REST calls per object type, which extends timelines for large databases. We also flag any add-on modules (Payroll, Performance, Scheduler) that require manual handling if the customer's WebHR tier does not include them.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

WebHR logo

WebHR

What's pushing teams away

  • Frequent slowdowns and lags reported in G2 reviews frustrate users during peak times like payroll runs, with some noting the platform becomes unusable during high-activity windows.
  • Reporting and analytics are described as limited and shallow compared to competitors, making it difficult to generate the detailed HR reports that growing companies require.
  • Support responsiveness is inconsistent according to some reviewers, with critical issues taking too long to resolve during urgent payroll or compliance situations.
  • The platform lacks the advanced automation, AI features, and compliance depth that companies scaling beyond 200 employees typically need from enterprise HRMS vendors.

Choosing

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Recruit CRM for its full customizability — pipelines, stages, and fields can be tailored to any recruitment workflow without developer involvement.
  • Small teams value the built-in CRM and ATS combined in one subscription, eliminating the need to purchase and sync separate systems.
  • The Chrome extension for one-click LinkedIn profile collection streamlines candidate sourcing and reduces manual data entry for recruiters.
  • Responsive customer support with fast issue resolution is consistently cited as a reason teams stick with the platform long-term.
  • Automation options including email sequences and workflow triggers allow recruitment agencies to reduce repetitive manual outreach tasks.

Object mapping

How WebHR objects map to Recruit CRM & ATS

Each row shows how a WebHR object lands in Recruit CRM & ATS, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

WebHR

Employee

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (contact-level)

1:1
Fully supported

WebHR employee records map to Recruit CRM Candidates as contact records. The employee's first name, last name, email, phone, job title, department, and hire date migrate to the Candidate object fields. The WebHR employee ID is preserved as a custom field webhr_employee_id__c for audit and cross-reference. Active employment status from WebHR (current employee) maps to a Candidate status value; terminated employees migrate with their termination date retained.

WebHR

CompaniesList (Organization)

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Organization

1:1
Fully supported

WebHR exposes the parent organization record via GET /v3 CompaniesList. This maps to Recruit CRM's Organization field on the Candidate record. For multi-entity WebHR deployments, each company extracted from CompaniesList becomes a separate Organization value in Recruit CRM, preserving the hierarchical structure. The WebHR company name, address, and industry fields map to the corresponding Candidate organization fields.

WebHR

Recruitment Candidates

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate

1:1
Mapping required

WebHR ATS candidates are the primary migration payload for this pair. Each WebHR candidate record — including name, email, phone, resume/CV, source, screening notes, and application status — maps to a Recruit CRM Candidate record. The candidate's application pipeline stage from WebHR maps to the corresponding Recruit CRM pipeline stage; custom stage names require discovery-phase extraction before mapping because they are customer-defined rather than canonical.

WebHR

Recruitment Job Postings

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Job

1:1
Fully supported

WebHR job postings (created in the Recruitment module) map to Recruit CRM Job records. Fields include job title, job type (permanent/contract/intern), description, required qualifications, experience level, number of positions, and opening/closing dates. WebHR job post status (open/closed/draft) maps to Recruit CRM job status. Job postings linked to candidates via the application relationship preserve the linkage through Recruit CRM's candidate-job association.

WebHR

Recruitment Application

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Application

1:1
Fully supported

Each WebHR candidate applying to a job opening generates an application record. This maps to Recruit CRM Application records linking the Candidate and Job. The application stage in WebHR (e.g., Screening, Technical Interview, Offer) maps to the Recruit CRM application stage field, and the stage transition timestamps migrate to the Application object for pipeline analytics. Custom stage names require per-account discovery.

WebHR

Leaves and PTO

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (leave note)

1:many
Fully supported

WebHR leave records (approved, pending, denied) include leave type, start/end dates, status, and balance consumed. These do not map to a native Recruit CRM object because Recruit CRM is an ATS/recruitment CRM, not an HRMS. We migrate leave history as note attachments on the Candidate record with a typed note category, preserving the leave type, dates, and status for HR audit purposes. Leave balance data migrates as a formatted text note or custom field if the customer configures one in Recruit CRM.

WebHR

Performance Reviews

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (review note)

1:many
Mapping required

WebHR performance review records — including review period, rating, goals, and feedback text — migrate as typed notes on the Candidate record. Custom review templates and non-standard rating scales are customer-defined and must be extracted during discovery; we build a per-account field map before migration. The structured rating score migrates to a numeric custom field if Recruit CRM has one configured, otherwise it appears in the review note body.

WebHR

Documents and Files

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (attachments)

1:1
Mapping required

WebHR files module stores employee documents (contracts, IDs, certifications, CVs) as binary blobs. We enumerate all file metadata via the WebHR API and download each blob for re-upload to Recruit CRM as a Candidate attachment. The original filename, MIME type, upload date, and file content migrate. Resume and CV files associated with recruitment candidates map to Recruit CRM's resume attachment field on the Candidate record, preserving parseability for candidate parsing features.

WebHR

Payroll Records

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Not migrated (manual handling recommended)

lossy
Mapping required

WebHR payroll is a paid add-on at $2/employee/month. Historical payslips, year-to-date earnings, and deduction records are not part of a standard ATS data model and Recruit CRM does not have payroll objects. We scope payroll data availability during discovery by checking whether the customer's WebHR subscription includes the payroll module. If payroll is active, we extract payslip records as PDF attachments on the Candidate (or as a separate archive) and advise the customer to maintain payroll records in a dedicated payroll system post-migration.

WebHR

Time & Attendance

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Not migrated (out of scope)

lossy
Mapping required

Clock-in/clock-out timestamps and approved timesheet records are HRMS-specific data with no equivalent in Recruit CRM's ATS/recruitment model. We extract approved timesheet records as a CSV report during migration for the customer's HR admin to archive, and flag any unprocessed or pending entries requiring manual resolution. Recruit CRM is not designed to store time-and-attendance data; it is not migrated as live records.

WebHR

Benefits Enrollment

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate (benefit note)

1:many
Fully supported

WebHR benefit enrollment records — benefit type, coverage level, enrollment dates, and dependent/beneficiary details — migrate as typed notes on the Candidate record. Benefit type maps to a custom field if Recruit CRM has one; otherwise the enrollment detail appears in the note body. This data is retained for HR audit continuity rather than for active recruiting use in Recruit CRM.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

WebHR logo

WebHR gotchas

High

Payroll module is a paid add-on not included in base plan

High

Free tier limited to 5 employees with restricted module access

Medium

API lacks documented bulk export or batch endpoints

Medium

Custom review templates and pipeline stages vary by account configuration

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS gotchas

High

API rate limits are license-scaled and can throttle bulk migration

Medium

Custom field schemas vary per organization and require field-level mapping

Medium

Files and email attachments require separate extraction and re-upload

Low

Email sequences and automation logic do not transfer between platforms

Pair-specific challenges

  • WebHR API lacks bulk export and batch endpoints

    WebHR's REST API v3 exposes individual record GET endpoints using module and submodule query parameters but does not document a bulk export, CSV download, or batch read capability. Large migrations requiring extraction of thousands of candidates or employee records depend on paginated enumeration per object type. We mitigate this by implementing parallel paginated reads across independent object types (Employees, Candidates, Jobs, Applications) with throttling to avoid server-side 429 errors. Migration timelines for accounts with more than 5,000 total records should account for sequential API enumeration rather than parallel bulk extraction.

  • Recruitment pipeline stages are customer-defined, not canonical

    WebHR customers configure their own recruitment pipeline stage names (e.g., Resume Received, Phone Screen, Technical Interview, Culture Fit, Offer, Hired). There is no stable canonical stage schema across accounts. We extract the customer's actual stage configuration during the discovery phase before building the field map. This adds one to two days to scoping. Without this discovery step, stage mapping defaults to generic labels that do not match the customer's actual recruiting process, causing misalignment in Recruit CRM's pipeline view.

  • WebHR free and base tiers restrict module access for extraction

    WebHR's free tier is limited to 5 employees with access to core HR only — the Recruitment module, Performance module, Payroll add-on, Scheduler, Benefits, and eSignature are not available on free accounts. If the customer's WebHR subscription does not include the Recruitment module, candidate and job posting data is not accessible via the API. We check active module availability during scoping before committing to data completeness. Customers on free or base-only tiers who need candidate migration must upgrade before extraction begins.

  • Performance review templates and rating scales vary by account

    WebHR performance reviews use customer-configured templates with custom field names and non-standard rating scales (numeric, letter grade, text-based, competency matrix). There is no stable schema for extracting these records. We handle this by extracting the actual template configuration during discovery and building a custom field map before writing to Recruit CRM. Review records with unstructured feedback text migrate as typed candidate notes; structured scores migrate to custom fields where Recruit CRM has been configured to receive them.

  • Recruit CRM does not have native HRMS objects for payroll, PTO, or time-and-attendance

    Recruit CRM is an ATS and recruitment CRM, not a human resources management system. Employee records (compensation, PTO balances, benefits enrollment, timesheets, performance reviews) do not map to native Recruit CRM objects and must be handled as candidate-attached notes, custom fields, or separate archives. Customers migrating from WebHR who rely on WebHR's HRMS breadth will need to maintain payroll and PTO in a separate HR system post-migration; Recruit CRM will hold recruitment data only.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful WebHR to Recruit CRM & ATS data migration

  1. Discovery and module availability audit

    We authenticate to WebHR via OAuth 2.0 using the customer's API credentials and enumerate active modules (core HR, Recruitment, Performance, Payroll, Scheduler, Benefits, Files) to confirm what data is accessible for extraction. We extract a sample of each object type (Employees, Candidates, Jobs, Applications, Leave records, Performance Reviews, Files) to validate record counts, field presence, and pagination behavior. This phase identifies any module-gated data (Payroll, Performance, Scheduler) that requires a paid tier or manual handling, and surfaces the customer's custom pipeline stage names and review template configurations.

  2. Candidate and job extraction via paginated REST API

    We extract recruitment data in dependency order using WebHR's REST API v3. Candidates are extracted first, followed by Job postings and Application records. Each object type uses independent paginated reads with configurable page sizes (typically 50-100 records per page) and exponential backoff on 429 responses. All file attachments (CVs, resumes, certifications) are enumerated by metadata and downloaded as binary blobs with original filenames and MIME types preserved. We run this extraction in parallel across object types to reduce total enumeration time.

  3. Field mapping and custom stage configuration

    We build a custom field map for the destination Recruit CRM account based on the discovery-phase field extraction. Recruitment pipeline stage names from WebHR are mapped to the customer's Recruit CRM stage configuration (or created if the destination account does not yet have matching stages). Custom review template fields and non-standard rating scales are mapped to typed candidate notes or to Recruit CRM custom fields if pre-configured. The mapping document is reviewed and signed off by the customer's admin before production migration begins.

  4. Staging migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Recruit CRM staging or sandbox environment using production-like data volume. The customer's recruiting lead reconciles record counts (Candidates in, Jobs in, Applications in, Attachments in), spot-checks 25-50 records against the WebHR source for field accuracy and attachment completeness, and confirms stage mapping alignment. Any mapping corrections, missing fields, or stage misalignments are resolved here before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration and document re-upload

    We run production migration in dependency order: Job postings first (as the parent records for applications), then Candidates, then Applications linking to Jobs and Candidates, then typed notes for Leaves, Performance Reviews, and Benefits. File attachments are re-uploaded to Recruit CRM as Candidate attachments, with CV and resume files mapped to Recruit CRM's resume field. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Any records rejected due to required field mismatches are queued for correction and retried in a follow-up pass.

  6. Cutover, validation, and non-migrated data handoff

    We freeze WebHR writes during cutover, run a final delta extraction of any records modified during the migration window, and import the delta into Recruit CRM. We validate candidate-record completeness against the WebHR source record count. We deliver a written inventory of non-migrated data — Payroll records, pending timesheets, active workflow configurations — with recommendations for manual entry or separate system handling. We support a one-week post-cutover window to resolve any data quality issues raised by the recruiting team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

WebHR logo

WebHR

Source

Strengths

  • Per-employee pricing starts at $2/month with a free 5-seat tier for evaluation before commitment
  • All-in-one HRMS covers employee management, payroll, recruitment, performance, time, benefits, and e-signature under one subscription
  • Cloud-only deployment eliminates on-premise IT requirements and enables 24/7 access from any browser
  • Social HR and internal communication tools reduce reliance on separate collaboration platforms for day-to-day HR tasks
  • 30%+ annual pre-pay discount makes the per-employee cost highly competitive for small businesses on annual budgets

Weaknesses

  • Frequent performance slowdowns and lag reported during peak usage periods like payroll processing
  • Reporting and analytics capabilities are shallow compared to enterprise HRMS competitors, limiting insight generation
  • Support responsiveness is inconsistent, with critical issues sometimes taking extended time to resolve
  • Limited advanced automation and AI features compared to Rippling, BambooHR, or UKG Pro
  • No documented public API rate limits or bulk export endpoints for programmatic large-scale data extraction
Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Strengths

  • Fully customizable pipelines, stages, and fields without requiring developer involvement
  • Combines recruitment CRM and ATS in one subscription for staffing agencies and small teams
  • Built-in email sequences and automation reduce manual outreach work
  • Chrome extension enables one-click LinkedIn profile collection directly into the CRM
  • Responsive customer support cited across multiple reviews with fast resolution times

Weaknesses

  • Several features are gated as paid add-ons rather than included in the base subscription
  • Email functionality has been reported as unreliable by multiple users
  • Interface occasionally lags during high-activity periods in large pipelines
  • Pricing is considered higher than comparable recruitment CRMs by some customers
  • Limited native reporting — users request pre-made report exports rather than manual data pulls

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across WebHR and Recruit CRM & ATS.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    WebHR: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    WebHR doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your WebHR to Recruit CRM & ATS migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about WebHR to Recruit CRM & ATS data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during WebHR to Recruit CRM & ATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your WebHR to Recruit CRM & ATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for accounts with fewer than 1,000 candidates and 50 job openings. Accounts with large employee databases (hundreds of records), multiple WebHR add-on modules, or extensive document repositories requiring binary blob transfer move to six to ten weeks because of sequential paginated API extraction and custom stage discovery. The primary timeline driver is WebHR's lack of bulk export endpoints, which requires per-object paginated enumeration rather than parallel batch extraction.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from WebHR.
Land in Recruit CRM & ATS, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day