HRMS migration

Migrate from Rival to Recruit CRM & ATS

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Rival and Recruit CRM & ATS. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Recruit CRM & ATS.

Rival logo

Rival

Source

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Compatibility

70%

7 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Rival and Recruit CRM & ATS.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Switching from Rival to Recruit CRM is a category shift from an all-in-one HRMS to a recruitment-agency-focused ATS/CRM. Rival does not publish API documentation or data export endpoints, so every migration requires coordinated access through Rival's internal tools and support team. We handle this by requesting a platform-assisted export during scoping, receiving structured data in CSV or JSON, then transforming and validating before writing to Recruit CRM's API. Candidate profiles, company records, job orders, and activity history migrate with field-by-field alignment. Documents (offer letters, contracts, ID scans) are stored as binary blobs in Rival with no documented export endpoint; we flag these during scoping and recommend manual re-upload post-migration. Workflows, automations, and onboarding sequences do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Recruit CRM's automation builder.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Rival logo

Rival

What's pushing teams away

  • Some users report that the extensive feature set feels overwhelming for smaller teams, leading to underutilization of the platform's capabilities.
  • Advanced features require a steeper learning curve, and new users report taking significant time to fully understand and use all available functionality.
  • A subset of users note that mobile functionality is lacking compared to the desktop experience, limiting usability for field or remote workers.
  • Pricing is described as slightly higher compared to alternatives, which becomes a friction point for cost-sensitive small businesses during renewal discussions.

Choosing

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Recruit CRM for its full customizability — pipelines, stages, and fields can be tailored to any recruitment workflow without developer involvement.
  • Small teams value the built-in CRM and ATS combined in one subscription, eliminating the need to purchase and sync separate systems.
  • The Chrome extension for one-click LinkedIn profile collection streamlines candidate sourcing and reduces manual data entry for recruiters.
  • Responsive customer support with fast issue resolution is consistently cited as a reason teams stick with the platform long-term.
  • Automation options including email sequences and workflow triggers allow recruitment agencies to reduce repetitive manual outreach tasks.

Object mapping

How Rival objects map to Recruit CRM & ATS

Each row shows how a Rival object lands in Recruit CRM & ATS, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Rival

Employee

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Rival Employee records map to Recruit CRM Candidate records. Core fields (name, email, phone, title, department, hire date) migrate directly. We resolve the mapping from Rival's employee field schema to Recruit CRM's candidate object fields during discovery by coordinating with the Rival administrator to extract the live field list. Any Rival custom fields on employee records are mapped individually and written to Recruit CRM's custom candidate fields.

Rival

Organizational Structure

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Department + Hierarchy

lossy
Mapping required

Rival's department and reporting-line relationships migrate as Recruit CRM organizational units. We extract the node graph (manager IDs, department IDs, hierarchy depth) and re-attach candidates to the correct department assignments in Recruit CRM. If Recruit CRM does not support nested hierarchies natively, we denormalize the reporting chain into flat department assignments and preserve the manager relationship as a custom field on the candidate record.

Rival

Locations

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate Location Fields

1:1
Fully supported

Rival location data (office addresses, remote designations) stored as flat fields on employee records migrates to Recruit CRM's candidate address and location fields. Remote or work-from-home designations migrate as a custom picklist value to preserve the original classification.

Rival

Job Titles and Departments

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Job Orders + Skills

1:many
Fully supported

Rival job title and department assignments on employee records map to Recruit CRM Job Orders and candidate skill tags. We extract unique job title strings from Rival employee records, deduplicate them, and create Recruit CRM Job Order records for each distinct role. Candidate records receive skill tags aligned to their Rival job title and department for searchability in the destination system.

Rival

Compensation History

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Rival salary and compensation records with effective dates migrate as structured custom fields on the corresponding Recruit CRM Candidate record. We preserve the effective_date sequence by writing the most recent compensation row to the primary compensation field and storing historical rows as a JSON blob in a custom notes field. Compensation carrier IDs and plan-specific identifiers may not map 1:1 and are flagged for manual verification post-migration.

Rival

PTO Balances

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Rival PTO balance snapshots migrate as opening balance values in Recruit CRM custom fields on the candidate record. Ongoing accruals are not carried forward; the customer's Recruit CRM administrator sets accrual rates post-migration. We flag this as a manual post-migration step during scoping.

Rival

Benefits Enrollment

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate Custom Fields

1:1
Mapping required

Rival benefits enrollment data (plan names, coverage tiers, enrollment dates) migrates as structured custom fields per candidate in Recruit CRM. Carrier-specific enrollment IDs are preserved in a custom field but flagged as non-guaranteed 1:1 mappings because benefit carrier identifiers vary across platforms.

Rival

Users and Roles

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Users

1:1
Mapping required

Rival user accounts (admin, manager, employee role types) map to Recruit CRM user accounts. Role names and permission sets differ across platforms and require explicit mapping during scoping. We extract distinct user records from Rival, match by email to Recruit CRM users, and flag any roles without a direct Recruit CRM equivalent for the administrator to configure post-migration.

Rival

Documents

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Candidate Attachments (manual re-upload)

1:1
Not supported

Rival employee documents (offer letters, contracts, ID scans) are stored as binary blobs with no documented export API. We cannot guarantee document fidelity in an automated migration. We flag document-heavy migrations during scoping, extract document filenames and associated employee IDs, and provide a mapping table for manual re-upload to Recruit CRM candidate records post-migration. This is a manual step that adds to the project timeline.

Rival

Custom Fields

maps to

Recruit CRM & ATS

Custom Candidate Fields

lossy
Mapping required

Rival custom fields are customer-defined and discovered only through coordinated access with the Rival administrator. We extract the live schema during scoping, build a per-migration field-mapping table, then pre-create equivalent custom fields in Recruit CRM before executing any candidate record writes. This discovery step adds one to two weeks to the project timeline and is required because Rival has no published schema registry.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Rival logo

Rival gotchas

High

No publicly documented export API for self-serve data extraction

High

Documents and binary attachments are not exportable via standard means

Medium

Custom fields have no stable schema for automated mapping

Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS gotchas

High

API rate limits are license-scaled and can throttle bulk migration

Medium

Custom field schemas vary per organization and require field-level mapping

Medium

Files and email attachments require separate extraction and re-upload

Low

Email sequences and automation logic do not transfer between platforms

Pair-specific challenges

  • Rival has no publicly documented export API

    Rival HRMS does not publish API documentation or export endpoints. Unlike platforms with public REST APIs, migration requires coordinated access through Rival's internal tools and support team. We handle this by requesting a platform-assisted export during scoping, receiving data in structured CSV or JSON, then validating and transforming before writing to Recruit CRM. If Rival cannot provide an export within the customer's timeline, we escalate this as a migration blocker upfront and explore alternative data retrieval methods with the customer's Rival administrator.

  • Documents and binary attachments cannot be exported automatically

    Employee documents such as offer letters, contracts, and ID scans are stored as binary blobs within Rival's document management module with no documented export endpoint. We cannot guarantee document fidelity in an automated migration. We flag document-heavy migrations during scoping, provide a filename-to-candidate-ID mapping table, and recommend either a platform-assisted document export or manual re-upload to Recruit CRM candidate records post-migration. This manual step must be accounted for in the project timeline.

  • Custom field schema requires discovery before mapping

    Rival allows organizations to define custom fields on employee records without a public schema registry. We discover the live schema by coordinating with the customer's Rival administrator, which adds a discovery phase to the project timeline. We then build a per-migration field-mapping table and pre-create Recruit CRM custom fields before any data writes. This discovery step is not required on platforms with published schemas and adds one to two weeks to the overall timeline.

  • Org hierarchy and reporting lines require structural transformation

    Rival's org hierarchy is stored as a related set of department and reporting-line relationships. Recruit CRM's organizational model is candidate-centric rather than employee-hierarchy-centric. We denormalize the reporting chain into flat department assignments and preserve manager relationships as custom fields on candidate records. If the customer requires a full org chart visualization in Recruit CRM, we recommend a third-party org chart integration as a post-migration configuration step.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Rival to Recruit CRM & ATS data migration

  1. Scoped discovery and Rival data access request

    We audit the customer's Rival instance with the administrator's support, extracting record counts across employees, departments, locations, compensation history, PTO balances, benefits enrollment, and custom fields. We simultaneously submit a data access request to Rival's support team to obtain a structured export. If Rival cannot provide an export within the project's timeline, we escalate this as a blocker and discuss manual extraction options with the customer's administrator. The discovery output is a written scope document with object counts, custom field inventory, and document volume estimate.

  2. Schema discovery and Recruit CRM field pre-creation

    We coordinate with the customer's Rival administrator to extract the live custom field schema. We then map each Rival custom field to a Recruit CRM custom candidate field, pre-creating the destination fields before any data writes. We configure Recruit CRM organizational units and department structures to receive the Rival org hierarchy. If Rival compensation or benefits data is present, we design the custom field structure to store effective-date sequences and enrollment records.

  3. Candidate and organization data migration

    We migrate candidate records (from Rival employees) in dependency order: locations and departments first, then candidate records with all mapped core and custom fields, then organizational assignments. We resolve any required lookups at migration time (department, reporting manager). Owner and user mapping resolves by email match to Recruit CRM users, with unresolved owners flagged in a reconciliation queue for the administrator to provision before proceeding.

  4. Compensation history and benefits enrollment migration

    We migrate compensation history rows as structured custom fields on candidate records, preserving the effective_date sequence. The most recent compensation record writes to the primary compensation field; historical rows store in a JSON-formatted custom notes field. Benefits enrollment data writes as a structured record per candidate. Carrier-specific IDs are preserved but flagged as requiring manual verification against carrier portals post-migration.

  5. Document mapping and manual re-upload handoff

    We extract document filenames and associated employee IDs from Rival's document module. We produce a mapping table pairing each document filename to its corresponding Recruit CRM candidate record. Documents themselves require manual re-upload because no automated export endpoint exists. We deliver the mapping table and a step-by-step re-upload guide to the customer's administrator. This step extends the timeline but ensures document fidelity is maintained.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We coordinate a cutover window where Rival writes are frozen and a final delta migration captures any records modified during the migration period. We validate record counts, spot-check field mappings, and confirm organizational assignments in Recruit CRM. We deliver a written inventory of Rival workflows, automations, and onboarding sequences that require rebuild in Recruit CRM's workflow automation builder. We support a one-week post-cutover window to resolve reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Rival workflows as Recruit CRM automations inside the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Rival logo

Rival

Source

Strengths

  • Unified rebrand of SilkRoad Technology's talent suite — Recruit, Onboard, Perform under one Rival umbrella.
  • Rich embedded analytics across recruiting, onboarding, and retention workflows.
  • Rival Recruit cites access to 700M+ passive candidate profiles plus AI-powered functionality.
  • Rival Onboard automates provisioning, forms, tasks, and content delivery across HR, Finance, IT, and Security systems.
  • Long list of native integrations: Workday HCM, JobVite, iCIMS Talent Cloud, ADP, Oracle, Jira, SAP.

Weaknesses

  • Vendor confirms no public API per G2/SoftwareWorld listings — customer integrations rely on the prebuilt connector catalog.
  • Pricing is sales-led with no public rate card.
  • Smaller customer profile post-rebrand than mainstream enterprise HCMs (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors).
  • Reviewer feedback notes complexity managing the breadth of integrations across HR/IT/Finance/Security.
  • Multi-module pricing can drive total cost above lighter talent suites for mid-market buyers.
Recruit CRM & ATS logo

Recruit CRM & ATS

Destination

Strengths

  • Fully customizable pipelines, stages, and fields without requiring developer involvement
  • Combines recruitment CRM and ATS in one subscription for staffing agencies and small teams
  • Built-in email sequences and automation reduce manual outreach work
  • Chrome extension enables one-click LinkedIn profile collection directly into the CRM
  • Responsive customer support cited across multiple reviews with fast resolution times

Weaknesses

  • Several features are gated as paid add-ons rather than included in the base subscription
  • Email functionality has been reported as unreliable by multiple users
  • Interface occasionally lags during high-activity periods in large pipelines
  • Pricing is considered higher than comparable recruitment CRMs by some customers
  • Limited native reporting — users request pre-made report exports rather than manual data pulls

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Rival and Recruit CRM & ATS.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Rival: N/A — no public API.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Rival doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Rival to Recruit CRM & ATS migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Rival to Recruit CRM & ATS data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Rival to Recruit CRM & ATS migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Rival to Recruit CRM & ATS migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts under 5,000 employee/candidate records with no document re-upload scope. Migrations requiring coordinated Rival-assisted data extraction, large organizational hierarchies, compensation history sequences, benefits enrollment data, or document re-upload move to seven to twelve weeks. The Rival custom field schema discovery step adds one to two weeks regardless of record count because no public schema registry exists.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Rival.
Land in Recruit CRM & ATS, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day