HRMS migration

Migrate from Rival to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Rival and Bullhorn ATS & CRM. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Rival logo

Rival

Source

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Compatibility

58%

7 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Rival and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Rival to Bullhorn is a cross-category migration from an all-in-one HRMS into a staffing-specific ATS and CRM. Rival does not publish API documentation or a self-serve export endpoint, so every migration requires coordinated access through Rival's internal tools and support team. We request a structured data export during scoping, validate the schema against Rival's live customer instance, then transform and load into Bullhorn's Candidate, ClientCorporation, JobOrder, and Placement objects via the REST API. Bullhorn stores placement chains as a deeply relational set of records (Candidate → JobSubmission → Placement) connected through foreign keys, which requires strict dependency ordering during import. Custom Objects on Bullhorn must be provisioned by Bullhorn Support using a setup spreadsheet before the API can write to them. We do not migrate Rival workflows, onboarding task sequences, or learning module content as code; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Bullhorn or a complementary tool.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Rival logo

Rival

What's pushing teams away

  • Some users report that the extensive feature set feels overwhelming for smaller teams, leading to underutilization of the platform's capabilities.
  • Advanced features require a steeper learning curve, and new users report taking significant time to fully understand and use all available functionality.
  • A subset of users note that mobile functionality is lacking compared to the desktop experience, limiting usability for field or remote workers.
  • Pricing is described as slightly higher compared to alternatives, which becomes a friction point for cost-sensitive small businesses during renewal discussions.

Choosing

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

What's pulling them in

  • Agencies choose Bullhorn because it combines ATS and CRM in one platform, eliminating the need to switch between separate tools for candidate management and client relationship tracking.
  • The resume parser extracts contact details, work history, and skills into structured, searchable candidate profiles automatically without manual data entry, reportedly driving 24% more placements per recruiter.
  • Bullhorn's placement and split-billing model natively supports contract staffing workflows, handling start/end dates, overtime rules, and multi-party pay/charge rates in a single record.
  • The platform offers extensive third-party integrations through its Recruitment Cloud Marketplace, connecting with back-office, onboarding, and payroll systems used by staffing agencies.
  • 72% of Bullhorn customers are teams with fewer than 10 users, and Bullhorn's implementation team handles setup and data migration for small agencies going live within weeks.

Object mapping

How Rival objects map to Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Each row shows how a Rival object lands in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Rival

Employee

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate

1:1
Fully supported

Rival employee records map to Bullhorn Candidate. Core fields (firstName, lastName, email, title, department, hireDate) translate directly. Rival custom fields discovered during schema discovery phase require per-migration field-mapping to Bullhorn Candidate customObject fields. Candidate is the primary person record in Bullhorn and must be loaded before any JobSubmission or Placement records because Placement references Candidate via foreign key. We preserve Rival employee IDs in a custom field rival_employee_id__c on Candidate for audit traceability.

Rival

Organizational Structure (Departments)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ClientCorporation + Department

1:many
Fully supported

Rival's department and reporting-line hierarchy is decomposed into Bullhorn ClientCorporation (for organizational units with client or company relationships) and Bullhorn Department (for internal org structure). Reporting relationships stored as manager-employee links in Rival are preserved as a custom field rival_manager_id__c on Candidate, with a post-migration script that resolves the reference to the manager's Bullhorn Candidate record.

Rival

Compensation History

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Object (customObject1s through customObject10s)

1:many
Mapping required

Rival effective-dated compensation rows (salary, bonus, equity, benefits plan) map to Bullhorn Custom Objects attached to Candidate. Each effective_date row becomes a separate Custom Object record with compensation_effective_date__c, base_salary__c, bonus_target__c, and benefits_tier__c fields. Bullhorn Support must provision the Custom Object via the setup spreadsheet before we can write to it; this adds 5-10 business days to the project timeline and is done before migration execution begins.

Rival

PTO Balances

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Object or Note

lossy
Mapping required

Rival PTO balances are current-state snapshots at migration time. We write these as a single Custom Object record per Candidate with fields pto_balance_hours__c, pto_accrual_rate__c, and pto_snapshot_date__c. Ongoing accruals after migration are handled manually or through Bullhorn's third-party payroll integrations post-migration. Bullhorn does not have a native PTO accrual engine; this is an HR-administration gap that Bullhorn expects to be filled by external HRIS or payroll tools.

Rival

Benefits Enrollment

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate Custom Object

1:1
Mapping required

Rival benefits data (plan name, coverage tier, enrollment date, carrier) migrates to Bullhorn Custom Object fields on Candidate. Carrier-specific plan IDs do not map 1:1 to Bullhorn because Bullhorn is a staffing ATS, not an HRIS, and has no native benefits administration module. We map what exists (plan name, tier, enrollment date) and flag carrier-specific IDs for manual reconciliation post-migration.

Rival

Job Titles and Departments

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate title + Department

1:1
Fully supported

Job title and department assignments on Rival employee records map directly to Candidate.title and the Bullhorn Department lookup. Title history in Rival is preserved as a Note on the Candidate record if the customer requires the full history; the current title is the primary field.

Rival

Locations

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Candidate address + ClientCorporation address

1:1
Fully supported

Rival location fields (office address, city, state, remote designation) map to Candidate address fields in Bullhorn. If Rival stores company-wide office locations separate from employee assignments, we map those to ClientCorporation addresses. Remote or work-from-home designations migrate as a text field rather than a structured picklist unless Bullhorn's schema includes a remote-friendly designation field.

Rival

Users and Roles

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

User

1:1
Mapping required

Rival user accounts with admin, manager, and employee role types map to Bullhorn User records. Rival role names (Admin, Manager, Employee) map to Bullhorn permission sets or profile assignments. We extract distinct user records referenced on employee profiles and match by email against Bullhorn Users. Any Rival user without a Bullhorn User counterpart goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's Bullhorn admin to provision.

Rival

Documents (flagged for manual handling)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

ContentDocument

1:1
Fully supported

Rival employee documents (offer letters, contracts, ID scans) are binary blobs with no documented export endpoint. We cannot guarantee document fidelity in a self-serve migration. We export document filenames and associate them with employee IDs in a mapping file for the customer's admin to re-upload manually post-migration. This is documented as a separate workstream with an estimated manual effort based on document count.

Rival

Custom Fields (discovered per-migration)

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Objects on Candidate

lossy
Fully supported

Rival custom fields vary by customer organization and have no stable public schema. We discover the live schema during scoping by coordinating with the customer's Rival administrator, building a per-migration field-mapping table before executing any writes. Bullhorn custom fields live on Custom Objects (customObject1s through customObject10s) that must be provisioned by Bullhorn Support via the setup spreadsheet. Each Custom Object supports up to 55 fields with limits on checkbox, dropdown, and text field counts per Bullhorn KB.

Rival

Effective-Dated Changes

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Custom Object historical records

1:many
Fully supported

Rival stores salary changes, title changes, and org moves as effective-dated events rather than immutable snapshots. We extract the full effective-dated history and write each row as a separate Custom Object record on the Candidate with an effective_date field, preserving the sequence. This is distinct from Bullhorn's standard Audit History, which tracks field changes after they occur in Bullhorn rather than importing historical changes.

Rival

Onboarding Task Sequences

maps to

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Inventory document (not migrated)

1:1
Fully supported

Rival onboarding task automation sequences are not migrated as code. We extract a list of active onboarding workflows, the tasks within each, the stagger logic (start date offset, completion dependencies), and any conditional rules. This is delivered as a written inventory for the customer's Bullhorn admin or implementation partner to rebuild using Bullhorn Automation (Herefish) or a third-party onboarding tool. Bullhorn's native task management does not include the staggered start-date logic that Rival's automation provides.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Rival logo

Rival gotchas

High

No publicly documented export API for self-serve data extraction

High

Documents and binary attachments are not exportable via standard means

Medium

Custom fields have no stable schema for automated mapping

Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM gotchas

High

ATS Growth edition has no API access

High

Attachments excluded from CSV bulk exports

Medium

Custom Object limits vary sharply by edition

Medium

Opportunity pipeline stages are recruitment-specific

Low

Resume parse quality varies by document format

Pair-specific challenges

  • Rival has no publicly documented export API

    Rival HRMS does not publish API documentation or self-serve data export endpoints. Unlike platforms with public REST APIs, migration requires coordinated access through Rival's internal tools and support team. We request a structured export (CSV or JSON) during scoping and validate the schema against Rival's live customer instance. If Rival cannot provide an export within the customer's timeline, we escalate this as a migration blocker upfront. This is not a Bullhorn limitation; it is a Rival constraint that shapes the entire source-side approach.

  • Bullhorn Custom Objects require Support provisioning before API writes

    Bullhorn Custom Objects must be set up by Bullhorn Support using a setup spreadsheet submitted via ticket before the REST API can create records on them. Custom Objects extend Candidate, ClientCorporation, JobOrder, and Placement entities with up to 55 fields each, with edition limits (10 on Enterprise/Growth, 2 on Bullhorn ATS, none on ATS Growth). We initiate the Support ticket during discovery, waiting 5-10 business days for provisioning, before writing any compensation history, PTO balances, or custom employee fields. Skipping this step results in API write failures with opaque 400 errors on the custom object entity.

  • Bullhorn placement chains require strict load-order dependency

    Bullhorn stores placement as a relational chain: Candidate → JobSubmission → JobOrder → Placement, connected through foreign keys (candidateID, jobOrderID, clientCorporationID, clientContactID). We must load Candidate first (no dependencies), then ClientCorporation, then JobOrder, then ClientContact, then JobSubmission, then Placement last. Any deviation—loading Placement before JobSubmission, for example—causes foreign-key violations and silently drops records. We use a phased import pipeline with row-count reconciliation between each phase and explicit dependency resolution for each record's foreign key references.

  • Bullhorn API rate limit of 1,500 requests per minute constrains import throughput

    Bullhorn's REST API enforces a 1,500 requests per minute rate limit. For migrations with tens of thousands of employee records and their associated custom object rows, compensation histories, and engagement notes, naive sequential API calls time out. We implement batch chunking, exponential backoff on 429 responses, and pagination on query endpoints. For large migrations (over 5,000 candidates), we recommend Bullhorn's Bulk API with parallel chunk processing to maintain throughput within rate-limit constraints.

  • Rival custom fields have no stable schema for automated mapping

    Rival HRMS allows organizations to define custom fields on employee records that vary by customer and are not documented in any public schema registry. We discover the live schema during migration scoping by coordinating with the customer's Rival administrator, then build a per-migration field-mapping table before executing any writes. This adds a discovery step to the project timeline that is not required on platforms with published schemas. Custom fields also do not migrate automatically to Bullhorn's equivalent custom objects; each field requires explicit mapping and field-type translation (Rival text to Bullhorn text1, Rival date to Bullhorn date1, and so on).

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Rival to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migration

  1. Discovery and export coordination

    We audit the Rival customer instance through coordinated access with Rival's support team, extracting the full employee record schema including any custom fields, department structure, compensation history rows, PTO balances, benefits enrollment data, and document filenames. We simultaneously audit the Bullhorn destination instance: edition tier (ATS, ATS Growth, Front Office Growth, or Enterprise), existing Custom Object configuration, Department structure, and User roster. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a field-mapping table for every Rival source field, and confirmation of the Rival export format (CSV or JSON) and timeline.

  2. Bullhorn Custom Object provisioning

    We submit a Bullhorn Support ticket with the Custom Object Setup Spreadsheet for each Custom Object required by the migration scope. This includes compensation history (salary, bonus, equity), PTO snapshot, and any Rival custom fields requiring a Bullhorn custom object target. Bullhorn Support typically takes 5-10 business days to provision the custom objects. We do not begin migration execution until custom objects are confirmed active in the Bullhorn instance, because API writes to non-provisioned custom objects fail silently or return opaque errors.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Bullhorn sandbox or a dev scratch org using a representative data subset (typically 10% of total volume). The customer's Bullhorn admin reviews record counts, spot-checks field values against the Rival source, and validates that Candidate records are correctly linked to their department and user assignments. Schema corrections, field-type mismatches, and mapping errors surface here. We do not proceed to production migration until the sandbox migration is signed off by the customer's admin.

  4. User and department reconciliation

    We extract every distinct Rival user referenced on employee profiles and match by email against Bullhorn's User table. Any Rival user without a Bullhorn User goes to a reconciliation queue. We also reconcile Rival departments against Bullhorn Departments, flagging any org units in Rival that have no Bullhorn equivalent and recommending a target structure. Bullhorn's Department entity does not support hierarchical nesting by default; if the customer's Rival org chart is multi-level, we document the hierarchy for manual reconstruction post-migration.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in strict record-dependency order: Departments (no dependencies), Users (manual provisioning validated), ClientCorporations, Candidates (with rival_employee_id__c and custom field mappings resolved), JobOrders, ClientContacts, Custom Object rows for compensation history (with effective_date sequencing preserved), PTO snapshots, and benefits enrollment data. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We use Bullhorn REST API with batch chunking and exponential backoff to handle the 1,500 requests per minute rate limit.

  6. Document re-upload handoff and onboarding inventory delivery

    We deliver a document mapping file pairing each Rival document filename with its associated Candidate record (by rival_employee_id__c) and the Bullhorn Candidate's new Bullhorn ID. The customer's admin re-uploads documents manually via Bullhorn's document module. We also deliver the Onboarding Workflow Inventory: a written document listing every active Rival onboarding task sequence, its tasks, stagger logic, conditional rules, and recommended Bullhorn Automation (Herefish) equivalent. We do not rebuild these in Bullhorn; that work is handled by the customer's Bullhorn admin or implementation partner as a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Rival logo

Rival

Source

Strengths

  • Unified rebrand of SilkRoad Technology's talent suite — Recruit, Onboard, Perform under one Rival umbrella.
  • Rich embedded analytics across recruiting, onboarding, and retention workflows.
  • Rival Recruit cites access to 700M+ passive candidate profiles plus AI-powered functionality.
  • Rival Onboard automates provisioning, forms, tasks, and content delivery across HR, Finance, IT, and Security systems.
  • Long list of native integrations: Workday HCM, JobVite, iCIMS Talent Cloud, ADP, Oracle, Jira, SAP.

Weaknesses

  • Vendor confirms no public API per G2/SoftwareWorld listings — customer integrations rely on the prebuilt connector catalog.
  • Pricing is sales-led with no public rate card.
  • Smaller customer profile post-rebrand than mainstream enterprise HCMs (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors).
  • Reviewer feedback notes complexity managing the breadth of integrations across HR/IT/Finance/Security.
  • Multi-module pricing can drive total cost above lighter talent suites for mid-market buyers.
Bullhorn ATS & CRM logo

Bullhorn ATS & CRM

Destination

Strengths

  • Unified ATS and CRM on one platform purpose-built for staffing agencies, eliminating separate tools for candidates and clients.
  • Automated resume parsing extracts structured candidate data—contact details, work history, skills—into searchable profiles instantly.
  • Native placement and split-billing model handles contract staffing workflows including start/end dates and overtime rules.
  • Bullhorn Recruitment Cloud Marketplace offers 100+ pre-validated third-party integrations spanning the full recruiting lifecycle.
  • 24/7 global support coverage from 350+ support staff with dedicated account management included at all tiers.

Weaknesses

  • Widely regarded as old and bloated with an unintuitive interface and steep learning curve for new recruiters.
  • Slow page loads and performance lag cited in over 200 verified G2 reviews during high-volume recruiting periods.
  • Pricing is opaque—custom-negotiated per organization with significant upfront implementation fees that vary by deal.
  • ATS Growth edition excludes API access entirely, preventing automated data export without upgrading first.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard HRMS migration. 2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Rival and Bullhorn ATS & CRM.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 7 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    7-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Rival: N/A — no public API.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Rival doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Rival to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Rival to Bullhorn ATS & CRM data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Rival to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Rival to Bullhorn ATS & CRM migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for accounts under 1,000 employees with no custom objects and a clean Rival export. Migrations with Rival custom fields requiring schema discovery, effective-dated compensation histories spanning multiple years, multi-subsidiary org structures, or large document inventories move to ten to sixteen weeks because of the platform-assisted export coordination, Custom Object provisioning through Bullhorn Support (5-10 business days), and per-migration field-mapping table construction.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Rival.
Land in Bullhorn ATS & CRM, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day