Project Management migration

Migrate from Taskworld to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Taskworld and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Taskworld logo

Taskworld

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

85%

11 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Taskworld and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Taskworld to Asana is a structural migration that requires resolving a fundamental data model difference: Taskworld scopes custom fields to individual Projects, while Asana supports workspace-level custom fields accessible across all projects. We extract every Taskworld custom field definition per project, consolidate duplicates into global Asana custom fields, and apply those definitions at the destination so data is not scattered across manually-recreated project-level fields. Checklist hierarchies in Taskworld map to nested subtask levels in Asana. Dependency links (blocks/blocked-by) migrate as Asana dependency records. Automations, Forms, and custom workflows do not migrate as code; we deliver a written inventory for admin rebuild. The GraphQL-only source API means extraction pacing is adaptive with retry logic rather than rate-limit predictable, which extends scoping timelines compared to REST-based sources.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Taskworld logo

Taskworld

What's pushing teams away

  • Performance degrades during large projects with many tasks and team members, causing slow loading of views and delayed updates that disrupt daily workflows.
  • The mobile application is significantly less responsive than the web interface, frustrating team members who need to update or review work on the go.
  • As teams scale beyond 30 users, organizations find the feature set insufficient compared to enterprise alternatives and migrate to platforms with stronger automation and reporting depth.
  • Confusion over plan tier capabilities and what features unlock at Business versus Enterprise creates friction, especially around custom fields, automations, and guest limits.
  • Limited API documentation and GraphQL-only access makes programmatic data extraction and integration difficult, pushing technical teams toward more API-friendly alternatives.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Taskworld objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Taskworld object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Taskworld

Workspace

maps to

Asana

Workspace (Organization)

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld workspaces map directly to Asana organizations (the top-level container). We extract workspace-level member lists, guest collaborator limits, and organization metadata. Taskworld's Business plan allows 30 guests; Enterprise allows unlimited. Asana Starter also limits guests but Enterprise removes this cap. We flag any guest count that exceeds the destination plan ceiling and provide a reconciliation list for the admin to convert guests to full members or provision additional licenses.

Taskworld

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld Projects map to Asana Projects with direct transfer of project name, description, start date, and status (active/archived). The destination project type (Team or Portfolio) is selected during scoping based on the organization's structure. Taskworld's project-level display setting for completed task visibility is preserved as a project metadata flag; Asana does not enforce this behavior natively so the setting is documented for the admin to apply in project settings post-migration.

Taskworld

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld tasks map to Asana tasks with all core properties: title, description (rich text preserved), assignees (mapped by email to Asana User), followers, due dates, priority level, and start dates. Completed status migrates to Asana completion. Task IDs change during migration; we track the original Taskworld ID in a custom field tw_original_id__c for audit and reconciliation.

Taskworld

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask (nested task)

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld subtasks map to Asana subtasks (first-class tasks nested under parent tasks). Taskworld supports one level of subtask nesting; Asana supports up to five levels. We preserve the Taskworld subtask hierarchy and pad any missing intermediate levels if the source had a flat subtask structure. Each subtask inherits the parent's assignee and due date unless individually overridden in the source.

Taskworld

Checklist

maps to

Asana

Checklist (task sub-object)

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld checklist items migrate to Asana Checklist items on the parent task. Completion status is preserved. Taskworld displays a percent-complete calculation based on checklist items; Asana does not auto-calculate this from checklists alone (it calculates from subtasks), so the percent-complete value is stored in a custom field tw_percent_complete__c on the task for reporting.

Taskworld

Custom Field (project-scoped)

maps to

Asana

Custom Field (workspace-level)

many:1
Fully supported

This is the most complex mapping in this migration. Taskworld custom fields are scoped per-project; the same field (e.g., Customer Name) may exist independently in multiple projects with the same name but different definitions. We extract every custom field definition across all projects, deduplicate by field name and type, consolidate into a single workspace-level custom field in Asana, and apply it to all projects that had a matching field. Field types (text, number, date, dropdown) map directly to Asana custom field types. Multi-select dropdowns in Taskworld map to Asana enumerator (multi-select) fields. Any fields that cannot be consolidated (e.g., two Taskworld fields with the same name but different picklist values in different projects) are flagged for manual resolution.

Taskworld

Task Dependency

maps to

Asana

Task Dependency

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld blocks/blocked-by dependency links map to Asana dependency records. We translate the directional link into the appropriate Asana dependency type (Finish-to-Start by default). Note: Asana's dependency date-propagation behavior can produce red arrows if predecessor dates are not adjusted to account for duration, a known Asana quirk documented in the Asana community forum. We apply dependency records but cannot adjust date propagation automatically; this is a manual post-migration review item for the project manager.

Taskworld

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment (ContentDocument)

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld file attachments migrate to Asana as ContentDocument records attached via ContentDocumentLink to the parent task. The Asana API ignores attachments exceeding 100MB; we skip files above this threshold and provide a manifest of oversized files for manual re-upload to Asana's storage. Taskworld's Business plan caps storage at 1TB; if the workspace approaches this limit, we flag file counts and total storage size during scoping. Files are re-uploaded to Asana's storage during migration.

Taskworld

Comment

maps to

Asana

Comment (Story)

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld project chat and task-level comments migrate as Asana Stories on the task. Author attribution is preserved where the author maps to an existing Asana User; comments from unmapped users are attributed to the migration service account. Thread structure is flattened to a chronological list; Asana Stories do not support threaded replies natively. Chat history (project-level chat, not task-level comments) migrates as tasks with a specific tag if the customer requests it; otherwise it is documented as out-of-scope.

Taskworld

Tag/Label

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld tags and labels migrate to Asana Tags (a workspace-level tagging object). Tag strings are preserved exactly. Asana tags are not tied to specific tasks automatically; they are applied as tags on tasks during migration. Tag hierarchy (if present in Taskworld) is flattened to a single-level tag set.

Taskworld

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Time Tracking (Advanced) or Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld time tracking entries (where available via API on Business and Enterprise plans) migrate to Asana Time Tracking entries if the destination organization is on Asana Advanced or Enterprise tier. If the destination is Starter, time entries are stored in a custom numeric field tw_time_hours__c on the task. Time entry notes and user attribution are preserved as story comments in Asana.

Taskworld

User and Guest Collaborator

maps to

Asana

User (Member or Guest)

1:1
Fully supported

Taskworld workspace members (billed per-seat) map to Asana full members. Guest collaborators (up to 30 on Business) map to Asana guests if the destination plan supports guest licensing; otherwise they are flagged for conversion to full members. We resolve users by email match. Any Taskworld user without a matching Asana user goes to a reconciliation queue for the admin to provision.

Taskworld

Automation Rule

maps to

Asana

Rule (Rules Engine)

lossy
Fully supported

Taskworld automations (Business and Enterprise plan only) trigger actions based on task events (status change, due date, assignment). We do not migrate automations as code because Taskworld and Asana automation models are structurally different. We deliver a written inventory of every Taskworld automation with its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Asana Rule equivalent. The customer's admin rebuilds them in Asana Rules Engine (Advanced tier) or Workflow Builder (Enterprise tier) post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Taskworld logo

Taskworld gotchas

High

GraphQL API is the sole programmatic extraction method

Medium

Custom fields scoped per-project not globally

Low

Completed task visibility state transfers as a setting

Medium

Storage limits by plan tier affect file migration completeness

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Custom fields are project-scoped in Taskworld, workspace-scoped in Asana

    Taskworld defines custom fields at the project level via the Customize panel. Migrating to Asana requires either re-creating each project-level field in each destination project individually, or consolidating duplicate definitions into a single workspace-level custom field that applies across all projects. We perform the consolidation during migration: we extract all field definitions, deduplicate by name and type, create a global Asana custom field, and apply it to every project that had the field. However, if two Taskworld projects had the same field name but different picklist values, these cannot be auto-merged and are flagged for manual resolution. The admin must review these conflicts and decide whether to standardize on one picklist set or create separate project-level fields in Asana.

  • GraphQL-only extraction with undocumented rate limits

    Taskworld exposes only a GraphQL API for data access. There is no REST endpoint and no public documentation of rate limits. We implement adaptive throttling with exponential backoff and cursor-based pagination. For workspaces with thousands of records, extraction may require multiple sessions spread across several days. We flag this during scoping so timeline expectations account for pacing. Unlike REST-based sources where extraction pacing is predictable, GraphQL pagination depth and query complexity can cause session timeouts on large workspaces.

  • Asana API ignores attachments over 100MB

    The Asana API silently ignores file attachments exceeding 100MB. Taskworld Business plan allows 1TB of storage, and teams in manufacturing, retail, and operations commonly attach large evidence photos, compliance documents, and design assets. We scan file sizes during scoping, skip files above 100MB, and provide a manifest of skipped files with original URLs so the admin can manually re-upload them to Asana's storage post-migration. Large file handling is the most common source of incomplete migration reports if not scoped upfront.

  • Automations and Forms do not migrate as code

    Taskworld Automations (Business and Enterprise plans) and Forms are feature-gated automation and intake tools. We do not migrate them as code because the trigger logic, conditions, and actions do not map directly to Asana's Rules Engine or Forms. We deliver a written inventory of every active Automation and Form with its configuration details, trigger events, and a recommended Asana replacement. The customer's admin rebuilds these in Asana Rules Engine (Advanced tier) or Asana Forms. This is the most common post-migration admin task that surprises teams who expected a full automation transfer.

  • Task dependency date propagation produces red arrows post-migration

    Asana's dependency model propagates dates based on predecessor task duration. When Taskworld dependency links are imported as Asana dependencies, the date propagation behavior can produce red arrows (indicating scheduling conflicts) on tasks where the predecessor duration in Asana differs from the assumed duration in Taskworld. This is a known Asana quirk documented in the Asana community forum. We preserve all dependency links accurately but cannot automatically resolve date conflicts caused by duration differences. The project manager reviews and corrects date conflicts as a post-migration step. We provide a dependency conflict report listing all affected tasks.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Taskworld to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the Taskworld workspace via GraphQL API extraction, capturing all projects, tasks, subtasks, checklist items, custom field definitions (including per-project field names and types), attachments with file sizes, task dependencies, comments, tags, time entries, user lists, and guest collaborator counts. We identify custom fields that exist across multiple projects with the same name and type (candidates for consolidation) versus those with conflicting definitions. We flag oversized files (>100MB), attachments exceeding 1TB total, and any guest counts exceeding destination plan limits. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with record counts, a custom field consolidation plan, and an Asana edition recommendation (Starter at $10.99/seat for basic migrations; Advanced at $24.99/seat for time tracking, portfolio management, and workload view; Enterprise at $49.99/seat for Workflow Builder and custom branding).

  2. Schema design and custom field consolidation

    We design the destination Asana schema before any data moves. This includes creating workspace-level custom fields for each consolidated field group (e.g., a single 'Customer Name' text field applied to all projects that had a Customer Name field in Taskworld). For fields with conflicting picklist values across Taskworld projects, we flag the conflict and propose a resolution strategy (standardize on the most common value set, or create separate Asana fields per project). We create any required Asana sections, portfolio structure, and team organization. This step runs in an Asana Sandbox or a parallel organization so the admin can review the schema before production migration begins.

  3. User reconciliation and project structure setup

    We extract every Taskworld user and guest collaborator and match by email against the destination Asana organization's user list. Users without a match go to a reconciliation queue for the admin to provision. We create the project hierarchy in Asana matching the Taskworld workspace structure, with sections and status columns configured to reflect Taskworld project stages. Each project receives its assigned custom field definitions. This step must complete before any task import because subtask parent resolution requires the parent task to exist.

  4. Project and task migration in dependency order

    We migrate in this order: Projects (with custom field definitions applied), Tasks (with assignees resolved, custom field values populated, and checklist items attached), Subtasks (nested under parent tasks), Dependencies (applied after all tasks exist so all referenced task IDs are valid), Attachments (via Asana API; skipping files over 100MB and listing them in the skip manifest), Comments and Stories (flattened from Taskworld threads), Tags (applied to tasks after migration), and Time Entries (to native time tracking if Advanced tier; to custom fields if Starter). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  5. Delta migration and cutover

    We freeze writes in Taskworld during the cutover window, extract any records modified since the initial migration, apply them to Asana, and run a final reconciliation comparing total task counts, attachment counts, and custom field value coverage between source and destination. We deliver the automation and form inventory document to the customer's admin team. We do not rebuild automations or forms as part of the migration scope. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve any data discrepancy issues raised by the project team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Taskworld logo

Taskworld

Source

Strengths

  • Built-in audit and inspection features with checklist-driven compliance scoring and photo evidence capture for regulated industries.
  • Evidence-based management reporting generates activity trails, ownership logs, and performance metrics for team evaluations.
  • Flexible deployment options include cloud, dedicated cloud (DC), and on-premise for enterprises with strict data residency requirements.
  • Unified collaboration combines task management, project chat, file sharing, and workload tracking in one interface without tool switching.
  • Trello import wizard provides a built-in migration path for teams switching from Trello with JSON-based data transfer.

Weaknesses

  • GraphQL-only API with limited public documentation makes programmatic data extraction and integration challenging for technical teams.
  • Mobile application significantly underperforms the web interface, causing friction for field workers and remote team members.
  • Custom fields are scoped per-project rather than globally, requiring repetitive field definition across projects.
  • Performance degrades on workspaces with large numbers of tasks and active collaborators, slowing view loading.
  • Storage capped at 1TB on Business plan with unlimited storage only on Enterprise, creating a migration trigger for data-heavy teams.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Taskworld and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Taskworld: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Taskworld doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Taskworld to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Taskworld to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Taskworld to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Taskworld to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations under 5,000 tasks, 50 projects, and 500 custom field definitions typically land in three to five weeks and $4,500-$7,500. Migrations with high custom field volume (1,000+ definitions across projects requiring consolidation design work), large attachment libraries, complex checklist hierarchies, or multiple workspaces extend to seven to twelve weeks and $10,000-$16,000. The GraphQL-only extraction from Taskworld means pacing is adaptive and can extend the extraction phase compared to REST-based sources.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Taskworld.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day