Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between raidlog.com and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
raidlog.com
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
10 of 12
objects map 1:1 between raidlog.com and Asana.
Complexity
CModerate
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Migrating from raidlog.com to Asana means leaving a tool purpose-built for the RAID log methodology and entering a general-purpose project management platform. raidlog.com treats Risks, Actions, Issues, Decisions, and Dependencies as first-class record types with dedicated fields for probability, impact, severity, owner, and due date. Asana has no native RAID concept; we reconstruct each log type as a tagged Asana project with custom fields matching the original schema, and we preserve risk scores by mapping the probability times impact calculation into a computed numeric field. Dependencies between records do not have a native Asana equivalent, so we flag each inter-record dependency as a linked-task reference. Lessons Learned and Change Log entries migrate as tagged task notes since neither has a dedicated API endpoint in raidlog.com or a native Asana object. We do not migrate any automations or reporting configurations; these require manual rebuild in Asana by the customer's project management team.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a raidlog.com object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
raidlog.com
Projects
Asana
Projects
1:1raidlog.com Projects are the top-level container for all RAID records. We map each Project to an Asana Project, preserving project name, description, start date, target date, and owner assignment. If the source has multiple Private Workspaces, we map each into an Asana Team so that access controls are preserved at the team level. The project hierarchy (projects nested under portfolios or groups) reconstructs as Asana Portfolios and Teams.
raidlog.com
Risks
Asana
Project (tagged Risk)
1:1Each raidlog.com Risk record maps to an Asana task within a dedicated Risk project. We preserve ID, title, description, probability, impact, status, owner, and due date as custom fields on the task. The calculated risk score (probability multiplied by impact) migrates as a numeric custom field value since Asana does not support native formula fields on tasks. The owner assignment resolves via email lookup to an Asana user.
raidlog.com
Action Items
Asana
Project (tagged Action)
1:1Each raidlog.com Action Item maps to an Asana task within an Actions project. We preserve assignee, due date, priority, status, and the linked risk or issue reference as a text field noting the original RAIDLOG linkage. Status values (Not Started, In Progress, Complete) map to Asana task completion state. If the source Action Item references a parent Risk or Issue, we create a linked-task reference in Asana by storing the original RAIDLOG record ID in a custom field.
raidlog.com
Issues
Asana
Project (tagged Issue)
1:1Each raidlog.com Issue record maps to an Asana task within an Issues project. We preserve description, severity, status, owner, and resolution date as custom fields. Severity levels map to a custom picklist with values matching the source (Low, Medium, High, Critical). Resolution date migrates as a custom date field since Asana task completion does not capture a separate resolution timestamp.
raidlog.com
Decisions
Asana
Project (tagged Decision)
1:1Each raidlog.com Decision record maps to an Asana task within a Decisions project. We preserve owner, date made, date due, status, and rationale as custom fields. The rationale field (often a longer text description) migrates to the task description field in Asana. Linked project reference from RAIDLOG preserves as a custom field storing the source project name and record ID.
raidlog.com
Dependencies
Asana
Linked-task reference (custom field)
lossyRAIDLOG Dependencies log inter-item relationships (e.g., Risk A blocks Action B). Asana has no native dependency object. We reconstruct each dependency as a linked-task reference stored in a custom text field on the dependent record, noting the type, title, and record ID of the blocking item. The customer's PMO team manually recreates these as Asana task dependencies if Asana's dependency feature is enabled on their plan.
raidlog.com
Lessons Learned
Asana
Project (tagged Lesson)
1:1Lessons Learned is a supplementary log type in RAIDLOG but has no dedicated API endpoint. We extract Lessons Learned from the All RAID endpoint and tag each entry with a Lesson tag. In Asana, we create a dedicated Lessons Learned project and add entries as tasks with the original source project name and context stored as custom fields. The AI Risk Predictor and Lessons Learned engine data from RAIDLOG Core does not migrate as structured data; narrative entries carry over as task descriptions.
raidlog.com
Change Log
Asana
Project (tagged Change)
1:1Change Log entries capture project change requests with requester, date, status, and description. No dedicated Change Log API exists in RAIDLOG; we reconstruct entries from the All RAID endpoint. Each entry maps to an Asana task in a Change Log project with requester as assignee, date as start date, status as custom field, and description as task notes.
raidlog.com
Tags
Asana
Tags
lossyRAIDLOG tags apply to any RAID record. We extract the full tag taxonomy via the Tags API and apply explicit value mapping during Asana import. Tag naming conventions differ between platforms; we flag any naming conflicts and suffix duplicate names with an underscore. Tags used for RAID classification (Risk, Action, Issue, Decision) map to project-level tagging rather than task tags to match the migration architecture.
raidlog.com
Users and Owners
Asana
Users
1:1Users are referenced by ID across Risks, Actions, Issues, and Decisions as the assigned Owner. We map RAIDLOG user IDs to Asana users by email address match. Any Owner without a matching Asana user account goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import resumes. Private Workspace membership maps to Asana Team membership based on the workspace-level access configuration.
raidlog.com
Stakeholder List
Asana
Team Members
1:1The Contact and Stakeholder List is a supplementary RAIDLOG component. We export it as a distinct record set and map it to Asana team membership with stakeholder role noted in the user profile or a custom field. External stakeholders who do not need Asana access are flagged separately for the customer to manage outside the platform.
raidlog.com
Attachments
Asana
ContentDocument (flagged)
1:1RAIDLOG's grid UI supports linking to external files but exposes no native file attachment API. We export the file reference URL and flag the record as requiring manual re-link in Asana. Any documents stored externally and linked in RAIDLOG migrate as a text URL field on the corresponding Asana task, and the customer's team manually attaches or links the actual files in Asana post-migration.
| raidlog.com | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projects | Projects1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Risks | Project (tagged Risk)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Action Items | Project (tagged Action)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Issues | Project (tagged Issue)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Decisions | Project (tagged Decision)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Dependencies | Linked-task reference (custom field)lossy | Mapping required | |
| Lessons Learned | Project (tagged Lesson)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Change Log | Project (tagged Change)1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Tags | Tagslossy | Mapping required | |
| Users and Owners | Users1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Stakeholder List | Team Members1:1 | Mapping required | |
| Attachments | ContentDocument (flagged)1:1 | Not supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
raidlog.com gotchas
Free tier 5-RAID-log ceiling is a hard import block
Enterprise Private Workspaces create isolated migration targets
No bulk export API forces chunked pagination
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Scoping and plan audit
We audit the source RAIDLOG account across plan tier (Free/Core/Enterprise), total record counts per RAID type, active Tags, active Users and Owners, and any Private Workspace structures. We document the current project hierarchy, the risk score calculation method in use, and any custom field implementations. For Enterprise accounts, we map each Private Workspace to an Asana Team. The scoping output is a written migration plan with record counts, object mapping table, and a flag for any data that cannot be extracted via API (requiring manual export).
Asana architecture design
We design the Asana destination structure: one Team per RAIDLOG workspace or project group, one Project per RAID log type (Risks, Actions, Issues, Decisions), and a Lessons Learned and Change Log project for supplementary records. We create custom fields in the Asana custom field library (shared across projects) for probability, impact, risk score, severity, and status so they can be applied consistently across projects. We configure Asana Teams, membership, and privacy settings to match the source workspace isolation. If the customer uses Asana Enterprise, we enable the dependency feature for future use and document the rebuild steps.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into an Asana workspace using production-like data volume. The customer's project management lead reconciles record counts per RAID type, spot-checks 20-30 random records against the RAIDLOG source, and validates that risk scores, owner assignments, and date fields are accurate. We verify that Lessons Learned entries map to the correct source project context and that Change Log entries carry the requester and date correctly. The customer signs off on the sandbox before production migration begins. Any mapping corrections and custom field adjustments happen here.
Owner and user reconciliation
We extract every distinct RAIDLOG Owner referenced on Risks, Actions, Issues, and Decisions and match by email address against the Asana destination workspace. Owners without a matching Asana user account go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Asana admin provisions any missing users (active or inactive depending on whether the original RAIDLOG user is still active). Migration cannot proceed past this step because task assignee fields require a valid Asana user reference. Private Workspace membership maps to Asana Team membership based on the source workspace-level access configuration.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Asana Teams and Projects (created with custom fields first), then Risks, Actions, Issues, Decisions (in parallel with owner resolution validated), then Dependencies (linked-task references resolved after all parent records exist), then Lessons Learned and Change Log entries (extracted from All RAID endpoint), then Tags (applied as final step). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. File reference URLs from RAIDLOG migrate as text fields and are flagged for manual re-link post-migration.
Cutover, validation, and handoff
We freeze RAIDLOG write access during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Asana as the system of record for project governance. We deliver a RAID-to-Asana architecture document that the customer's PMO team uses to recreate the structure for new projects. We do not rebuild any Asana Rules, templates, or reporting configurations inside the migration scope; those are separate scope items for the customer's admin team. We support a three-day hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues raised during initial Asana adoption.
Platform deep dives
raidlog.com
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Overall complexity
Moderate migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across raidlog.com and Asana.
Object compatibility
1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
raidlog.com: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
raidlog.com doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during raidlog.com to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your raidlog.com to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave raidlog.com
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.