Project Management migration

Migrate from Breeze to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Breeze and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

Breeze logo

Breeze

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

73%

8 of 11

objects map 1:1 between Breeze and Jira.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Breeze to Jira is a structural migration that requires careful task hierarchy mapping and custom field reconciliation. Breeze uses a flat Project-Task-Subtask model with per-project custom field schemas; Jira uses Projects containing Issues with Epic-Story-Task-Bug-Subtask hierarchy and project-level field configuration. We inspect each Breeze project's field schema at export time, detect type collisions (the same field name existing as text in one project and dropdown in another), and resolve them before writing to Jira's project-level custom field definitions. Subtasks migrate as Jira Subtasks when the destination project allows one level of nesting; deeper hierarchies flatten to linked Stories with a parent reference. Breeze Tags map to Jira Labels by default; if the customer uses Tags as categorisation across teams rather than labels on individual tasks, we recommend Components as the destination. We flag Comments as unrecoverable via Breeze's public API and advise manual export before migration begins. We do not migrate Breeze automations, notification rules, or Gantt chart configurations as code.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Breeze logo

Breeze

What's pushing teams away

  • Setup takes longer than expected—some users report it takes several days to fully configure workflows and migrate existing data before the team can work productively.
  • The lack of a permanent free plan frustrates users evaluating Breeze against Trello, which offers unlimited free boards and power-ups.
  • Redirect management for web-based access requires contacting support rather than giving admins direct control, creating friction for IT-managed environments.
  • No plugin or marketplace ecosystem means teams cannot extend functionality, unlike Trello which has a rich power-up ecosystem via Atlassian.
  • Occasional app instability causes task ordering to shuffle or tasks to disappear temporarily, eroding trust in data reliability.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How Breeze objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a Breeze object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Breeze

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Projects map directly to Jira Software Projects. Each Breeze Project name becomes the Jira Project name. We preserve the project description, start date, and target end date as Jira Project properties. If the customer has multiple Breeze workspaces, we map each to a Jira Project by default and note whether consolidation into a single Jira Project with Epic groupings is preferable during scoping.

Breeze

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue (Story or Task)

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Tasks map to Jira Issues. The mapping to Story or Task issue type depends on the customer's intent: Tasks that represent deliverables or backlog items map to Jira Story; Tasks that represent discrete actions map to Jira Task. We use the Breeze task priority (High, Normal, Low) to set Jira Priority (High, Medium, Low, or Lowest). The Breeze due date maps to Jira Due Date field. Assignee resolves by email match against Jira User records.

Breeze

Subtask

maps to

Jira

Subtask Issue

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Subtasks map to Jira Subtask issues, which sit one level below a parent Jira Story or Task. Breeze supports exactly one level of subtasking, matching Jira's Subtask pattern. If the destination Jira project has Subtasks disabled, we map Subtasks to linked Jira Tasks with a custom parent-reference field and flag the change for admin review. Parent-child ordering is preserved by setting the Jira subtask ordering at import time.

Breeze

Custom Field

maps to

Jira

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Breeze per-project custom fields require pre-migration schema reconciliation. We detect field name collisions across Breeze projects (same field name existing as text in one project and dropdown in another) during export scoping and build an explicit type map per project. These maps drive Jira Custom Field creation in each destination project before data import begins. Type conversions (Breeze text to Jira text field, Breeze dropdown to Jira single-select) are applied during the transform phase.

Breeze

Tag

maps to

Jira

Label or Component

lossy
Fully supported

Breeze Tags are flat label-style identifiers attached to Tasks with no hierarchical structure. By default we map Tags to Jira Labels (Issue > Labels field), which are flat and per-issue. If the customer uses Tags as team-level or project-level categorisation rather than per-task labels, we recommend Jira Components as the destination and configure Components per Project during migration scoping. The customer chooses the strategy during discovery.

Breeze

Time Entry

maps to

Jira

Worklog

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Time Entries (billable hours, duration, date, user) map to Jira Worklog entries on the migrated Issue. Jira Software Standard and Premium tiers include time tracking natively; Free tier requires a time-tracking app from the Marketplace. Worklog author resolves by matching the Breeze time entry user email to a Jira User. If the customer used Breeze time entries for billing rather than estimation, we flag Worklog visibility settings so that billable hours are visible to the correct Jira project roles.

Breeze

Attachment URL

maps to

Jira

Attachment metadata

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze attachments are stored in Breeze's file system and referenced by URL in the API. We export the attachment URL, filename, size, and upload date. The actual files must be downloaded from Breeze separately via the file export process. For Jira, we write the attachment metadata record pointing to the URL as an external link if the file has not been re-hosted. If the customer migrates files to a cloud storage location before migration, we update the Jira attachment reference to point to the new location.

Breeze

User / Assignee

maps to

Jira

User

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze Users are referenced on Tasks and Time Entries by email, name, and role. We extract the full user roster from Breeze and match each assignee by email against Jira User records in the destination instance. Any Breeze user without a matching Jira User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. If Jira user provisioning uses SSO (Atlassian Access or an external IdP), we flag that the admin must pre-create or sync users before assignee resolution can complete.

Breeze

Status

maps to

Jira

Status (via Workflow)

lossy
Fully supported

Breeze task statuses (To Do, In Progress, Done, Archived) per project map to Jira Status values within a Jira Workflow. We extract the per-project status schema from Breeze during scoping and create a Jira Workflow with corresponding statuses for each destination project. Breeze status ordering maps to Jira status category (To Do, In Progress, Done). If the customer has custom Breeze statuses beyond the default set, we document them during scoping and the customer's Jira admin confirms the target workflow configuration before migration.

Breeze

Priority

maps to

Jira

Priority

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze task priority (High, Normal, Low) maps directly to Jira Priority values. We use the Breeze priority value to set the corresponding Jira Priority on each Issue. If the customer has custom priority levels in Breeze, we map them to the nearest Jira standard priority during scoping and flag the mapping for review.

Breeze

Comment

maps to

Jira

Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Breeze does not expose task-level comments via its public REST API. We cannot programmatically export comment history. If comments are important to the customer, we advise manual export via Breeze's in-app CSV export or screenshot workflow before migration. We flag this gap during scoping and note that any comment context will need to be reattached manually in Jira after migration, or preserved in a shared document linked from the Jira Issue description.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Breeze logo

Breeze gotchas

High

Comments are not exported via Breeze API

Medium

Attachment files require separate file-system export

Medium

Custom field schemas differ per project

Low

No permanent free tier limits evaluation

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • Comments are not accessible via Breeze API

    Breeze's public REST API does not expose task-level comments. We cannot programmatically export discussion history attached to Tasks or Subtasks. Customers who rely on comments for project context, stakeholder decisions, or bug triage notes must manually export them via Breeze's in-app CSV export or screenshot workflow before migration. We flag this gap during scoping and advise budgeting time for manual comment recovery. Jira comments can be manually recreated or linked from a Confluence page after migration.

  • Per-project custom field schemas require explicit reconciliation

    Breeze allows each project to define its own custom field set without a global schema. The same field name can be a text field in one project and a dropdown in another. Jira requires consistent field types per project-level custom field definition. We detect all field name collisions across Breeze projects during export scoping, build an explicit type map for each project, and create Jira custom fields with the resolved type before data import. If type conflicts cannot be resolved cleanly (for example, one project uses a date and another uses free text for what both call 'Sprint'), we escalate to the customer's admin for a business decision on the target schema.

  • Subtask nesting is flat in Breeze but hierarchical in Jira

    Breeze supports exactly one level of subtasks under a Task. Jira supports Subtasks as a distinct issue type with one level of nesting, but also supports Stories with child Stories (if the Jira project enables subtask hierarchy). We map Breeze Subtasks to Jira Subtask issues 1:1. If the customer has used Breeze Subtasks to simulate a deeper hierarchy, those deeper items flatten to linked Issues with a custom parent-reference field and are flagged for the admin to restructure in Jira after migration.

  • Attachment files require separate file-system export

    The Breeze API returns attachment URLs rather than streaming binary file content. We export the attachment URL, filename, size, and upload date but the actual files must be downloaded from Breeze's storage separately via a file export session. If a customer has hundreds of attachments, we coordinate a parallel file-system export session to complete before the Jira import so that Jira attachments can be linked to the correct issue records at migration time. Jira's attachment size limit is 75 MB per file in Cloud and 256 MB per file in Data Center.

  • Jira workflow and board configuration does not migrate

    Jira projects require an active Workflow and Board configuration that is not part of the issue data migration. The customer's Jira admin must configure the workflow statuses, transitions, and any automation rules (triggers, conditions, post-functions) for each project after migration. We deliver a written workflow inventory derived from the Breeze project's status schema to guide the admin's configuration. Jira Software Premium includes a workflow automation engine; Standard and Free tier require Atlassian Automation for Jira or a Marketplace app for complex automation.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Breeze to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and scoping

    We audit the source Breeze account across projects, tasks, subtasks, custom fields (with per-project schema detection), tags, time entries, attachments, and user roster. We map each Breeze project's field schema to identify name collisions with type conflicts. We assess Jira destination readiness: Jira project count, issue type scheme configuration, workflow availability, and whether the destination instance is Cloud or Data Center. The discovery output is a written migration scope document, a custom field collision report, and a Jira project layout recommendation.

  2. Custom field reconciliation and Jira schema preparation

    We resolve all Breeze per-project custom field type collisions before creating any Jira schema. Each unique field name across all Breeze projects receives a resolved Jira field type (text, number, date, single-select, multi-select). We then create Jira Custom Fields in each destination project via the Jira REST API or project configuration. We configure Jira Workflows for each project using the Breeze status schema as the starting point and deliver a written workflow inventory for the admin to finalise. If Tags require mapping to Jira Components, we create Component records per project during this phase.

  3. User reconciliation and Jira provisioning

    We extract every distinct Breeze User referenced on Tasks, Subtasks, and Time Entries and match by email against the Jira destination instance's User table. Any Breeze user without a matching Jira User goes to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Jira admin provisions missing users (or configures Atlassian Access SSO for automated provisioning) before the record import phase begins. Migration cannot proceed past this step because Jira Issue assignment requires a valid Jira User.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox (or a dedicated test project in the production instance) using representative data volume. The customer's project manager or Jira admin spot-checks 25-50 randomly sampled issues against the Breeze source, verifies that subtask hierarchy is correct, custom field values are populated, and time entries are attached to the correct issues. Any mapping corrections are applied to the transform logic before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects first (with configured workflows and custom fields), then Issues (Stories, Tasks) with assignee and priority resolved, then Subtasks linked to parent Issues, then Worklogs attached to the correct issues, then Labels (or Components) applied per issue, then Attachment metadata written. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Breeze writes are frozen during the migration window; any changes made during migration are captured in a delta migration run before cutover.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We enable Jira as the system of record, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and deliver a written workflow and automation inventory document derived from the Breeze project status schemas. The customer's Jira admin rebuilds automations and configures boards post-migration. We support a five-business-day hypercare window where we resolve any data reconciliation issues raised by the team. We do not rebuild Breeze automations or notification rules as Jira automation configurations inside the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Breeze logo

Breeze

Source

Strengths

  • Per-user flat pricing at $9/month provides transparent cost predictability for small teams.
  • Built-in Kanban boards, Gantt charts, and time tracking in a single tool without requiring third-party integrations.
  • Strong customer support with quick response times and guided migration assistance.
  • Cross-platform availability via web, iOS, and Android with real-time sync across devices.
  • Integrations with Slack, Google Drive, Dropbox, Toggl, Harvest, Zapier, QuickBooks, and GitHub cover common agency stacks.

Weaknesses

  • No plugin or marketplace ecosystem limits extensibility beyond built-in integrations.
  • Comments are not accessible via the public API, blocking programmatic export of discussion history.
  • Custom field schemas vary per project, requiring per-project field mapping during migration.
  • No permanent free tier—only a 14-day trial with no credit card required.
  • Attachment files must be downloaded separately from the Breeze file system; the API provides URLs only, not binary data.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Breeze and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    C

    1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Breeze: Not publicly documented by Breeze.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Breeze doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Breeze to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Breeze to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Breeze to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Breeze to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts with up to 10,000 tasks, no per-project custom field type collisions, and a single Jira project per Breeze project. Migrations with multiple Breeze projects requiring Jira project setup, custom field type conflict resolution across projects, or deep subtask hierarchies needing flatten logic move to six to ten weeks because of schema reconciliation time and Jira project configuration scope. Jira workflow and board configuration by the admin runs in parallel after the data migration phase completes.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Breeze.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day