Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Breeze and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.
Breeze
Source
Jira
Destination
Compatibility
8 of 11
objects map 1:1 between Breeze and Jira.
Complexity
CModerate
Timeline
3-5 weeks
Overview
Moving from Breeze to Jira is a structural migration that requires careful task hierarchy mapping and custom field reconciliation. Breeze uses a flat Project-Task-Subtask model with per-project custom field schemas; Jira uses Projects containing Issues with Epic-Story-Task-Bug-Subtask hierarchy and project-level field configuration. We inspect each Breeze project's field schema at export time, detect type collisions (the same field name existing as text in one project and dropdown in another), and resolve them before writing to Jira's project-level custom field definitions. Subtasks migrate as Jira Subtasks when the destination project allows one level of nesting; deeper hierarchies flatten to linked Stories with a parent reference. Breeze Tags map to Jira Labels by default; if the customer uses Tags as categorisation across teams rather than labels on individual tasks, we recommend Components as the destination. We flag Comments as unrecoverable via Breeze's public API and advise manual export before migration begins. We do not migrate Breeze automations, notification rules, or Gantt chart configurations as code.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Breeze object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Breeze
Project
Jira
Project
1:1Breeze Projects map directly to Jira Software Projects. Each Breeze Project name becomes the Jira Project name. We preserve the project description, start date, and target end date as Jira Project properties. If the customer has multiple Breeze workspaces, we map each to a Jira Project by default and note whether consolidation into a single Jira Project with Epic groupings is preferable during scoping.
Breeze
Task
Jira
Issue (Story or Task)
1:1Breeze Tasks map to Jira Issues. The mapping to Story or Task issue type depends on the customer's intent: Tasks that represent deliverables or backlog items map to Jira Story; Tasks that represent discrete actions map to Jira Task. We use the Breeze task priority (High, Normal, Low) to set Jira Priority (High, Medium, Low, or Lowest). The Breeze due date maps to Jira Due Date field. Assignee resolves by email match against Jira User records.
Breeze
Subtask
Jira
Subtask Issue
1:1Breeze Subtasks map to Jira Subtask issues, which sit one level below a parent Jira Story or Task. Breeze supports exactly one level of subtasking, matching Jira's Subtask pattern. If the destination Jira project has Subtasks disabled, we map Subtasks to linked Jira Tasks with a custom parent-reference field and flag the change for admin review. Parent-child ordering is preserved by setting the Jira subtask ordering at import time.
Breeze
Custom Field
Jira
Custom Field
lossyBreeze per-project custom fields require pre-migration schema reconciliation. We detect field name collisions across Breeze projects (same field name existing as text in one project and dropdown in another) during export scoping and build an explicit type map per project. These maps drive Jira Custom Field creation in each destination project before data import begins. Type conversions (Breeze text to Jira text field, Breeze dropdown to Jira single-select) are applied during the transform phase.
Breeze
Tag
Jira
Label or Component
lossyBreeze Tags are flat label-style identifiers attached to Tasks with no hierarchical structure. By default we map Tags to Jira Labels (Issue > Labels field), which are flat and per-issue. If the customer uses Tags as team-level or project-level categorisation rather than per-task labels, we recommend Jira Components as the destination and configure Components per Project during migration scoping. The customer chooses the strategy during discovery.
Breeze
Time Entry
Jira
Worklog
1:1Breeze Time Entries (billable hours, duration, date, user) map to Jira Worklog entries on the migrated Issue. Jira Software Standard and Premium tiers include time tracking natively; Free tier requires a time-tracking app from the Marketplace. Worklog author resolves by matching the Breeze time entry user email to a Jira User. If the customer used Breeze time entries for billing rather than estimation, we flag Worklog visibility settings so that billable hours are visible to the correct Jira project roles.
Breeze
Attachment URL
Jira
Attachment metadata
1:1Breeze attachments are stored in Breeze's file system and referenced by URL in the API. We export the attachment URL, filename, size, and upload date. The actual files must be downloaded from Breeze separately via the file export process. For Jira, we write the attachment metadata record pointing to the URL as an external link if the file has not been re-hosted. If the customer migrates files to a cloud storage location before migration, we update the Jira attachment reference to point to the new location.
Breeze
User / Assignee
Jira
User
1:1Breeze Users are referenced on Tasks and Time Entries by email, name, and role. We extract the full user roster from Breeze and match each assignee by email against Jira User records in the destination instance. Any Breeze user without a matching Jira User goes to a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision. If Jira user provisioning uses SSO (Atlassian Access or an external IdP), we flag that the admin must pre-create or sync users before assignee resolution can complete.
Breeze
Status
Jira
Status (via Workflow)
lossyBreeze task statuses (To Do, In Progress, Done, Archived) per project map to Jira Status values within a Jira Workflow. We extract the per-project status schema from Breeze during scoping and create a Jira Workflow with corresponding statuses for each destination project. Breeze status ordering maps to Jira status category (To Do, In Progress, Done). If the customer has custom Breeze statuses beyond the default set, we document them during scoping and the customer's Jira admin confirms the target workflow configuration before migration.
Breeze
Priority
Jira
Priority
1:1Breeze task priority (High, Normal, Low) maps directly to Jira Priority values. We use the Breeze priority value to set the corresponding Jira Priority on each Issue. If the customer has custom priority levels in Breeze, we map them to the nearest Jira standard priority during scoping and flag the mapping for review.
Breeze
Comment
Jira
Comment
1:1Breeze does not expose task-level comments via its public REST API. We cannot programmatically export comment history. If comments are important to the customer, we advise manual export via Breeze's in-app CSV export or screenshot workflow before migration. We flag this gap during scoping and note that any comment context will need to be reattached manually in Jira after migration, or preserved in a shared document linked from the Jira Issue description.
| Breeze | Jira | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Issue (Story or Task)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Subtask | Subtask Issue1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Label or Componentlossy | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Worklog1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment URL | Attachment metadata1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User / Assignee | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Status | Status (via Workflow)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Priority | Priority1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Comment1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Breeze gotchas
Comments are not exported via Breeze API
Attachment files require separate file-system export
Custom field schemas differ per project
No permanent free tier limits evaluation
Jira gotchas
Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration
Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms
Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin
Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption
Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and scoping
We audit the source Breeze account across projects, tasks, subtasks, custom fields (with per-project schema detection), tags, time entries, attachments, and user roster. We map each Breeze project's field schema to identify name collisions with type conflicts. We assess Jira destination readiness: Jira project count, issue type scheme configuration, workflow availability, and whether the destination instance is Cloud or Data Center. The discovery output is a written migration scope document, a custom field collision report, and a Jira project layout recommendation.
Custom field reconciliation and Jira schema preparation
We resolve all Breeze per-project custom field type collisions before creating any Jira schema. Each unique field name across all Breeze projects receives a resolved Jira field type (text, number, date, single-select, multi-select). We then create Jira Custom Fields in each destination project via the Jira REST API or project configuration. We configure Jira Workflows for each project using the Breeze status schema as the starting point and deliver a written workflow inventory for the admin to finalise. If Tags require mapping to Jira Components, we create Component records per project during this phase.
User reconciliation and Jira provisioning
We extract every distinct Breeze User referenced on Tasks, Subtasks, and Time Entries and match by email against the Jira destination instance's User table. Any Breeze user without a matching Jira User goes to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Jira admin provisions missing users (or configures Atlassian Access SSO for automated provisioning) before the record import phase begins. Migration cannot proceed past this step because Jira Issue assignment requires a valid Jira User.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a Jira Sandbox (or a dedicated test project in the production instance) using representative data volume. The customer's project manager or Jira admin spot-checks 25-50 randomly sampled issues against the Breeze source, verifies that subtask hierarchy is correct, custom field values are populated, and time entries are attached to the correct issues. Any mapping corrections are applied to the transform logic before production migration begins.
Production migration in dependency order
We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects first (with configured workflows and custom fields), then Issues (Stories, Tasks) with assignee and priority resolved, then Subtasks linked to parent Issues, then Worklogs attached to the correct issues, then Labels (or Components) applied per issue, then Attachment metadata written. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Breeze writes are frozen during the migration window; any changes made during migration are captured in a delta migration run before cutover.
Cutover, validation, and automation handoff
We enable Jira as the system of record, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and deliver a written workflow and automation inventory document derived from the Breeze project status schemas. The customer's Jira admin rebuilds automations and configures boards post-migration. We support a five-business-day hypercare window where we resolve any data reconciliation issues raised by the team. We do not rebuild Breeze automations or notification rules as Jira automation configurations inside the migration scope.
Platform deep dives
Breeze
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Jira
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Overall complexity
Moderate migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Breeze and Jira.
Object compatibility
1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Breeze: Not publicly documented by Breeze.
Data volume sensitivity
Breeze doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Breeze to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Breeze to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Breeze
Other ways to arrive at Jira
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.