Project Management migration

Migrate from awork to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between awork and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

awork logo

awork

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between awork and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from awork to Trello is a structural simplification. awork structures work as Projects with tasks, subtasks, time entries, and per-workspace custom fields. Trello uses Boards containing Lists of Cards, with optional Custom Fields and Checklists. The primary migration challenge is that awork's built-in time tracking has no native Trello equivalent; we preserve time entry data as custom number fields or structured attachments. Projects map 1:1 to Boards, tasks map to Cards, and subtasks map to Checklists. Custom fields require pre-configuration in Trello before migration. We do not migrate awork Workflows or Project Templates as these have no Butler-equivalent structure and must be rebuilt manually in Trello. Archived tasks in awork require explicit inclusion during export because they are not pulled by default.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

awork logo

awork

What's pushing teams away

  • Time tracking cannot be logged directly against a Client record, only against Projects and Tasks, forcing teams that bill by client to create wrapper projects or lose billing granularity.
  • Small, ad-hoc tasks require a full Project to be created before they can be tracked, pushing teams toward either over-engineering their project structure or skipping time logging entirely.
  • Sortable priority tags are absent from the task interface, leaving teams without a native way to sequence or filter work by urgency across the project board.
  • A November 2025 review noted that despite being described as the best on the market, the platform fell short on core feature expectations and felt limiting for growing teams.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How awork objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a awork object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

awork

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

awork Projects map 1:1 to Trello Boards. Project name becomes Board name, project description becomes Board description, and project start/end dates are noted in the Board description or as a custom date field on each Card. If the source awork workspace contains multiple projects targeting the same Trello Workspace, we create a Board per project and optionally group boards by client using Trello's Board organization features.

awork

Client

maps to

Trello

Board Label or Team Workspace

lossy
Fully supported

awork Clients are independent objects with no direct Trello equivalent. Trello does not have a native Client or Account object separate from Projects. We map Clients to Trello Board Labels (colored tags applied to Cards) so that cards can be filtered by client across boards. Alternatively, for accounts using Trello Enterprise with multiple Workspaces, Clients can map to separate Workspaces. The customer selects the strategy during scoping.

awork

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

awork Tasks map 1:1 to Trello Cards. Task name becomes Card title, task description (rich text) becomes Card description, due date maps to the Card due date field, and assignee maps to Card member. Task priority maps to a Trello Label (e.g., High/Medium/Low labels pre-configured on the destination Board). The awork task status value maps to the Card's List position (which List it belongs to) rather than a custom field if the awork status vocabulary is small enough to map to existing Lists.

awork

Subtask

maps to

Trello

Checklist

1:1
Fully supported

awork Subtasks map to Trello Checklists on the corresponding Card. Each subtask name becomes a checklist item. Checklist item completion status (checked/unchecked) migrates from awork. Trello supports multiple checklists per card, which covers awork's subtask nesting at one level of depth. If awork subtasks have their own subtasks beyond one level, we flatten to checklist items with a naming convention (e.g., '- Sub-subtask text') to preserve the hierarchy within a single checklist.

awork

User (Team Member)

maps to

Trello

Member

1:1
Fully supported

awork workspace users map to Trello Members by email address match. We extract the full user list during scoping and match against the destination Trello workspace members. If a Trello account lacks an invited user, we flag the discrepancy in the scoping report for the customer admin to provision before migration so that Card assignments resolve correctly on import.

awork

Project Status

maps to

Trello

List

lossy
Fully supported

awork per-workspace status values require value mapping to Trello Lists. We collect every unique status name, color, and order from the source workspace during discovery, then map them to existing Trello List names or create new Lists on each Board. Status ordering is preserved by setting the List sequence. If awork uses many statuses that exceed a reasonable number of Lists per Board, we map the most-used statuses to Lists and store remaining status values in a Card custom field.

awork

Time Entry

maps to

Trello

Custom Field (Number) or Card Attachment

lossy
Fully supported

awork time entries have no native Trello equivalent. We offer two strategies: (1) Custom number field on each Card holding the total logged time in hours, populated from the sum of time entries for that task; (2) Structured attachment (CSV or text file) on each Card listing individual time entries with date, user, duration, and billable flag. Strategy selection happens during scoping based on whether the team uses Trello Premium (required for Custom Fields) and whether they need granular time entry detail or just a summary.

awork

Custom Field

maps to

Trello

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

awork workspace-level custom fields activated per project must be pre-configured in Trello before migration because Trello Custom Fields are defined per Board. During scoping, we list every activated custom field per project, check whether the corresponding Board has an equivalent Custom Field defined, and flag gaps. Supported Trello Custom Field types (Number, Date, Dropdown, Checkbox, Text) map from awork field types. Fields not supported by Trello (e.g., complex calculated fields) are documented as unmapped with a workaround recommendation.

awork

Project Template

maps to

Trello

Board Template (manual)

1:1
Fully supported

awork Project Templates define reusable structures including default tasks, statuses, and custom field configurations. Trello does not have a native template-with-tasks feature (Trello's template feature duplicates cards, not full project structures). We document the template structure (tasks, subtasks, default field values, and status configuration) in a written template inventory that the customer's admin uses to recreate Board templates in Trello. Template mapping is not a data migration; it is a manual rebuild scope documented during migration.

awork

Tag

maps to

Trello

Label

1:1
Fully supported

awork Tags are key-value labels applied to tasks. We map tag names 1:1 to Trello Labels on the destination Board. Label colors are assigned based on Trello's default palette. If awork uses many tags relative to the number of available label colors (Trello limits Labels to a small set of predefined colors per Board), we normalize tag groups and document any overflow in the mapping notes for admin review.

awork

Archived Task

maps to

Trello

Archived Card

1:1
Fully supported

Archived tasks in awork require explicit export during scoping because awork does not include archived records in standard Excel exports. We query the source for archived tasks and recreate them in Trello as archived Cards (Trello Cards can be archived after import). This step is opt-in and adds time to scoping because the customer's admin must confirm which archived projects or tasks are in scope. Archived cards not included in the export must be manually restored in awork before export or reconstructed manually in Trello post-migration.

awork

Workflow

maps to

Trello

Butler Rules (manual rebuild)

1:1
Fully supported

awork Workflows (property-triggered automation rules) have no Trello equivalent as migrated code. We do not migrate Workflows as automation code. We deliver a written inventory of every active awork Workflow including its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Butler rule equivalent with natural-language steps the customer can configure. The customer's admin rebuilds Butler rules post-migration. This inventory is included in the standard migration deliverables.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

awork logo

awork gotchas

Medium

Custom fields must be activated per project

Medium

Project statuses are per-workspace, not global

Low

Timeline export is an image, not structured data

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Trello export requires Business Class or a Chrome Extension

    Trello's native export feature is gated behind Business Class (paid tier) or requires the third-party Export for Trello Chrome Extension for free accounts. Free Trello accounts cannot export board data programmatically without this extension, and even with the extension, archived cards require manual restoration before export. We check the source account's tier during scoping. If the source is a free Trello account migrating to Trello, we require the extension to be installed before export begins. If migrating archived cards, we flag this explicitly and estimate the additional manual work required to restore them in awork before export.

  • Custom fields must be pre-configured per Board before migration

    Trello Custom Fields are defined at the Board level, not globally across the workspace. Each destination Board must have the relevant Custom Fields created before Cards are imported or the values will not write. We check during scoping whether the destination Boards have the equivalent Custom Fields defined for every awork custom field activated on the source Project. We pre-configure the Board Custom Fields via the Trello API before migration begins. If a custom field type from awork is not supported in Trello (Trello supports Number, Date, Dropdown, Checkbox, and Text only), we flag it and use a Text field as a fallback.

  • No native time tracking in Trello requires workaround strategy

    awork stores billable time entries with start/end timestamps, user attribution, and billable flags. Trello has no native time tracking field, object, or integration. We resolve this by migrating time entry summaries into Trello Custom Fields (Number type for hours) on Cards or as structured CSV attachments listing individual entries. The strategy requires Trello Premium for Custom Fields. We confirm the chosen strategy (custom field vs attachment) during scoping and document the tradeoffs: custom fields enable filtering and reporting via Power-Ups but require Premium; attachments preserve full granularity but cannot be used for native Trello reporting.

  • Per-workspace statuses require explicit value mapping

    awork statuses are defined per workspace with custom names, colors, and ordering. Trello Lists serve as status containers but the values are list names rather than formal status objects. We collect every unique status value from the source workspace during discovery and build a value map to existing Trello Lists or create new Lists on each Board. If awork uses more than 10 status values for a single project, we discuss whether to map to multiple Lists or consolidate into a Custom Field to avoid an unwieldy number of Lists on a single Board.

  • Archived cards do not export from Trello by default

    When exporting from awork to Trello, or when exporting from Trello to migrate to another tool, archived Cards in Trello are not included in the standard export. awork's archive feature similarly excludes archived records from standard Excel exports. We explicitly scope archived records during discovery. If the customer requires archived task history, the customer's admin must restore archived records in the source platform before export begins, which adds manual preparation time. We document this requirement in the scoping checklist.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful awork to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and export preparation

    We audit the source awork workspace for project count, task volume, subtask nesting depth, custom field definitions and their per-project activation status, time entry volume, tag inventory, and workflow count. We confirm the source account's Trello tier (Free, Standard, Premium, Enterprise) because free accounts require the Export for Trello Chrome Extension. We verify that archived tasks and projects are in scope and identify any that require manual pre-restoration before export. The discovery output is a written scope document with record counts, custom field gap analysis, and a timeline estimate.

  2. Value mapping and Board schema pre-configuration

    We collect every unique awork status value, custom field definition, tag, and user from the source and map them to Trello equivalents. Status values map to Board Lists; custom fields are created on each destination Board via the Trello API (Number, Date, Dropdown, Checkbox, Text). Time entry migration strategy is confirmed with the customer: Trello Premium custom field or structured attachment. Label colors are assigned for tag mapping. The customer's admin approves the mapping document before any data extraction begins.

  3. Data extraction from awork

    We export from awork using the list view and board view to capture task fields, subtasks, assignments, due dates, descriptions, and custom field values. Time entries are exported as a separate Excel file with task association, user, duration, and billable flag. We extract user records by email for Trello member matching. If the source account is free-tier Trello (in the reverse direction), we install the Export for Trello Chrome Extension. Archived records are extracted separately if in scope. All exports are validated for row count and field completeness before transformation.

  4. Transformation and Board creation

    We transform awork data into Trello API payload format. Projects become Boards created via the Trello API. Tasks become Cards with Card name, description, due date, and member assignments resolved by email match. Subtasks become Checklist items. Custom field values write to Board-level Custom Fields via the Custom Fields Power-Up API. Time entries write as number fields (Premium) or attachments (Standard/Free). Status values place Cards in the appropriate List. Tags become Labels with assigned colors. Any unmapped fields are logged with a reason and included in the scoping report for customer review.

  5. Sandbox validation and reconciliation

    We run the migration into a test Trello Workspace first using representative data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (Boards, Cards, Checklists, Labels, Custom Field values) against the source awork data and spot-checks 25-50 random Cards for field accuracy. Any mapping corrections are made to the transform logic before the production migration begins. This step prevents data errors from reaching the live destination and allows the customer to validate the result without committing to the production workspace.

  6. Production migration and workflow handoff

    We run the production migration into the live Trello Workspace with a read-only freeze on the source awork account during the cutover window. Any records modified during migration are captured in a delta run. We deliver the Workflow inventory document describing every awork Workflow with its trigger, conditions, and recommended Butler rule equivalent. We do not rebuild Workflows as Butler rules; that is a manual post-migration task documented for the customer's admin. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation of any records that arrive incorrectly.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

awork logo

awork

Source

Strengths

  • Built-in time tracking keeps billable data linked directly to tasks without a separate tool.
  • Clean, accessible interface reduces onboarding time for non-technical team members.
  • Workflow customization requires far less configuration overhead than comparable tools like Jira.
  • Automation capabilities and Lexoffice integration support end-to-end agency billing workflows.
  • GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance with European-hosted data addresses regulatory requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Time cannot be logged against a Client record directly, only against Projects or Tasks.
  • Small, ad-hoc work items still require a full project to be created before they can be tracked.
  • Native sortable priority tagging is absent from the task interface.
  • No publicly documented API with confirmed authentication or rate limit specifications.
  • The feature set is optimized for agencies and may be limiting for non-agency project teams.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across awork and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    awork: Rate-limited per client; 429 Too Many Requests response includes RateLimit-Reset header indicating seconds until reset.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    awork exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your awork to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about awork to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during awork to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your awork to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and three weeks for accounts under 50 projects and 5,000 tasks with no archived records in scope. Migrations with high-volume time entry histories (over 50,000 time records), multiple awork workspaces requiring separate Board sets, or archived task exports requiring manual pre-restoration move to three to five weeks. Trello Custom Field pre-configuration and value mapping add a few days to scoping but do not significantly extend the timeline if the mapping is confirmed early.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from awork.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day