Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between awork and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.
awork
Source
Trello
Destination
Compatibility
9 of 12
objects map 1:1 between awork and Trello.
Complexity
BStandard
Timeline
2-3 weeks
Overview
Moving from awork to Trello is a structural simplification. awork structures work as Projects with tasks, subtasks, time entries, and per-workspace custom fields. Trello uses Boards containing Lists of Cards, with optional Custom Fields and Checklists. The primary migration challenge is that awork's built-in time tracking has no native Trello equivalent; we preserve time entry data as custom number fields or structured attachments. Projects map 1:1 to Boards, tasks map to Cards, and subtasks map to Checklists. Custom fields require pre-configuration in Trello before migration. We do not migrate awork Workflows or Project Templates as these have no Butler-equivalent structure and must be rebuilt manually in Trello. Archived tasks in awork require explicit inclusion during export because they are not pulled by default.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a awork object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
awork
Project
Trello
Board
1:1awork Projects map 1:1 to Trello Boards. Project name becomes Board name, project description becomes Board description, and project start/end dates are noted in the Board description or as a custom date field on each Card. If the source awork workspace contains multiple projects targeting the same Trello Workspace, we create a Board per project and optionally group boards by client using Trello's Board organization features.
awork
Client
Trello
Board Label or Team Workspace
lossyawork Clients are independent objects with no direct Trello equivalent. Trello does not have a native Client or Account object separate from Projects. We map Clients to Trello Board Labels (colored tags applied to Cards) so that cards can be filtered by client across boards. Alternatively, for accounts using Trello Enterprise with multiple Workspaces, Clients can map to separate Workspaces. The customer selects the strategy during scoping.
awork
Task
Trello
Card
1:1awork Tasks map 1:1 to Trello Cards. Task name becomes Card title, task description (rich text) becomes Card description, due date maps to the Card due date field, and assignee maps to Card member. Task priority maps to a Trello Label (e.g., High/Medium/Low labels pre-configured on the destination Board). The awork task status value maps to the Card's List position (which List it belongs to) rather than a custom field if the awork status vocabulary is small enough to map to existing Lists.
awork
Subtask
Trello
Checklist
1:1awork Subtasks map to Trello Checklists on the corresponding Card. Each subtask name becomes a checklist item. Checklist item completion status (checked/unchecked) migrates from awork. Trello supports multiple checklists per card, which covers awork's subtask nesting at one level of depth. If awork subtasks have their own subtasks beyond one level, we flatten to checklist items with a naming convention (e.g., '- Sub-subtask text') to preserve the hierarchy within a single checklist.
awork
User (Team Member)
Trello
Member
1:1awork workspace users map to Trello Members by email address match. We extract the full user list during scoping and match against the destination Trello workspace members. If a Trello account lacks an invited user, we flag the discrepancy in the scoping report for the customer admin to provision before migration so that Card assignments resolve correctly on import.
awork
Project Status
Trello
List
lossyawork per-workspace status values require value mapping to Trello Lists. We collect every unique status name, color, and order from the source workspace during discovery, then map them to existing Trello List names or create new Lists on each Board. Status ordering is preserved by setting the List sequence. If awork uses many statuses that exceed a reasonable number of Lists per Board, we map the most-used statuses to Lists and store remaining status values in a Card custom field.
awork
Time Entry
Trello
Custom Field (Number) or Card Attachment
lossyawork time entries have no native Trello equivalent. We offer two strategies: (1) Custom number field on each Card holding the total logged time in hours, populated from the sum of time entries for that task; (2) Structured attachment (CSV or text file) on each Card listing individual time entries with date, user, duration, and billable flag. Strategy selection happens during scoping based on whether the team uses Trello Premium (required for Custom Fields) and whether they need granular time entry detail or just a summary.
awork
Custom Field
Trello
Custom Field
1:1awork workspace-level custom fields activated per project must be pre-configured in Trello before migration because Trello Custom Fields are defined per Board. During scoping, we list every activated custom field per project, check whether the corresponding Board has an equivalent Custom Field defined, and flag gaps. Supported Trello Custom Field types (Number, Date, Dropdown, Checkbox, Text) map from awork field types. Fields not supported by Trello (e.g., complex calculated fields) are documented as unmapped with a workaround recommendation.
awork
Project Template
Trello
Board Template (manual)
1:1awork Project Templates define reusable structures including default tasks, statuses, and custom field configurations. Trello does not have a native template-with-tasks feature (Trello's template feature duplicates cards, not full project structures). We document the template structure (tasks, subtasks, default field values, and status configuration) in a written template inventory that the customer's admin uses to recreate Board templates in Trello. Template mapping is not a data migration; it is a manual rebuild scope documented during migration.
awork
Tag
Trello
Label
1:1awork Tags are key-value labels applied to tasks. We map tag names 1:1 to Trello Labels on the destination Board. Label colors are assigned based on Trello's default palette. If awork uses many tags relative to the number of available label colors (Trello limits Labels to a small set of predefined colors per Board), we normalize tag groups and document any overflow in the mapping notes for admin review.
awork
Archived Task
Trello
Archived Card
1:1Archived tasks in awork require explicit export during scoping because awork does not include archived records in standard Excel exports. We query the source for archived tasks and recreate them in Trello as archived Cards (Trello Cards can be archived after import). This step is opt-in and adds time to scoping because the customer's admin must confirm which archived projects or tasks are in scope. Archived cards not included in the export must be manually restored in awork before export or reconstructed manually in Trello post-migration.
awork
Workflow
Trello
Butler Rules (manual rebuild)
1:1awork Workflows (property-triggered automation rules) have no Trello equivalent as migrated code. We do not migrate Workflows as automation code. We deliver a written inventory of every active awork Workflow including its trigger, conditions, actions, and a recommended Butler rule equivalent with natural-language steps the customer can configure. The customer's admin rebuilds Butler rules post-migration. This inventory is included in the standard migration deliverables.
| awork | Trello | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Board1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Client | Board Label or Team Workspacelossy | Fully supported | |
| Task | Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Subtask | Checklist1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User (Team Member) | Member1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project Status | Listlossy | Fully supported | |
| Time Entry | Custom Field (Number) or Card Attachmentlossy | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Project Template | Board Template (manual)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Archived Task | Archived Card1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Workflow | Butler Rules (manual rebuild)1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
awork gotchas
Custom fields must be activated per project
Project statuses are per-workspace, not global
Timeline export is an image, not structured data
Trello gotchas
Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint
Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData
API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration
Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership
Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and export preparation
We audit the source awork workspace for project count, task volume, subtask nesting depth, custom field definitions and their per-project activation status, time entry volume, tag inventory, and workflow count. We confirm the source account's Trello tier (Free, Standard, Premium, Enterprise) because free accounts require the Export for Trello Chrome Extension. We verify that archived tasks and projects are in scope and identify any that require manual pre-restoration before export. The discovery output is a written scope document with record counts, custom field gap analysis, and a timeline estimate.
Value mapping and Board schema pre-configuration
We collect every unique awork status value, custom field definition, tag, and user from the source and map them to Trello equivalents. Status values map to Board Lists; custom fields are created on each destination Board via the Trello API (Number, Date, Dropdown, Checkbox, Text). Time entry migration strategy is confirmed with the customer: Trello Premium custom field or structured attachment. Label colors are assigned for tag mapping. The customer's admin approves the mapping document before any data extraction begins.
Data extraction from awork
We export from awork using the list view and board view to capture task fields, subtasks, assignments, due dates, descriptions, and custom field values. Time entries are exported as a separate Excel file with task association, user, duration, and billable flag. We extract user records by email for Trello member matching. If the source account is free-tier Trello (in the reverse direction), we install the Export for Trello Chrome Extension. Archived records are extracted separately if in scope. All exports are validated for row count and field completeness before transformation.
Transformation and Board creation
We transform awork data into Trello API payload format. Projects become Boards created via the Trello API. Tasks become Cards with Card name, description, due date, and member assignments resolved by email match. Subtasks become Checklist items. Custom field values write to Board-level Custom Fields via the Custom Fields Power-Up API. Time entries write as number fields (Premium) or attachments (Standard/Free). Status values place Cards in the appropriate List. Tags become Labels with assigned colors. Any unmapped fields are logged with a reason and included in the scoping report for customer review.
Sandbox validation and reconciliation
We run the migration into a test Trello Workspace first using representative data volume. The customer reconciles record counts (Boards, Cards, Checklists, Labels, Custom Field values) against the source awork data and spot-checks 25-50 random Cards for field accuracy. Any mapping corrections are made to the transform logic before the production migration begins. This step prevents data errors from reaching the live destination and allows the customer to validate the result without committing to the production workspace.
Production migration and workflow handoff
We run the production migration into the live Trello Workspace with a read-only freeze on the source awork account during the cutover window. Any records modified during migration are captured in a delta run. We deliver the Workflow inventory document describing every awork Workflow with its trigger, conditions, and recommended Butler rule equivalent. We do not rebuild Workflows as Butler rules; that is a manual post-migration task documented for the customer's admin. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation of any records that arrive incorrectly.
Platform deep dives
awork
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Trello
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Standard migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across awork and Trello.
Object compatibility
3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
awork: Rate-limited per client; 429 Too Many Requests response includes RateLimit-Reset header indicating seconds until reset.
Data volume sensitivity
awork exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during awork to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your awork to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave awork
Other ways to arrive at Trello
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.