Project Management migration

Migrate from awork to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between awork and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

awork logo

awork

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between awork and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from awork to Asana restructures how work is organized. awork uses a workspace-per-client model with Projects as the primary billing container and time entries linked directly to Tasks. Asana uses Teams to group Projects and does not include native time tracking, so historical billable data must be preserved through custom fields or Notes rather than a direct field map. We audit every awork project's custom field activation status during scoping because fields defined at the workspace level must be explicitly turned on per project before they appear at the task level. We collect the full workspace status vocabulary during discovery and apply a value map to Asana's project status options during the load step. Automations, templates, and Lexoffice integration configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of each for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules or a third-party time-tracking tool.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

awork logo

awork

What's pushing teams away

  • Time tracking cannot be logged directly against a Client record, only against Projects and Tasks, forcing teams that bill by client to create wrapper projects or lose billing granularity.
  • Small, ad-hoc tasks require a full Project to be created before they can be tracked, pushing teams toward either over-engineering their project structure or skipping time logging entirely.
  • Sortable priority tags are absent from the task interface, leaving teams without a native way to sequence or filter work by urgency across the project board.
  • A November 2025 review noted that despite being described as the best on the market, the platform fell short on core feature expectations and felt limiting for growing teams.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How awork objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a awork object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

awork

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

awork Projects map 1:1 to Asana Projects. The awork project name, description, start date, and end date migrate directly. awork's project status (per-workspace custom vocabulary) requires a value map because Asana uses global On Track, At Risk, and Off Track statuses rather than custom names. We collect the full workspace status schema during discovery and apply the mapping during the load step. If the destination Asana org uses Teams, we group migrated projects under the appropriate Team based on the awork workspace or client association.

awork

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

awork Tasks map directly to Asana Tasks. Assignee, due date, description (rich text), and task status migrate as native Asana fields. The awork project assignment maps to the Asana project membership. Tasks that belong to no project in awork (standalone tasks) require a decision during scoping: either create a catch-all Asana project for them or exclude them from the migration scope.

awork

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

awork workspace Users map to Asana Users. We match by email address during migration. Any awork User with no matching Asana User is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before record import begins. User display name, email, and role migrate as profile fields.

awork

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

awork Custom Fields require per-project activation before they appear at the task level. We audit every custom field's project-level activation status during scoping and flag any gap where a field exists at the workspace level but is not active in a given project. For migrated projects, we replicate the same field configuration as active custom fields in Asana, using text, number, date, or multi-select picklist types matched to the awork field type. Fields inactive in awork for a given project are not created in Asana for consistency.

awork

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

awork Tags are key-value labels applied to Tasks. They map directly to Asana Tags. Tag names migrate as-is. If Asana enforces any tag naming restrictions, we normalize during the transform step before loading.

awork

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Custom Field or Note (on Task)

1:1
Fully supported

awork Time Entries carry billable/non-billable flags, user attribution, start/end timestamps, and task association. Asana does not have a native time tracking object. We preserve time entry data by creating custom fields on Asana Tasks: total_hours (number), billable (checkbox), and tracked_date (date). For detailed time logs, we attach a structured Note to the task with the time entry table. The customer's admin can connect a third-party time-tracking integration (Harvest, Toggl, Timely) post-migration to replace this for ongoing tracking.

awork

Project Template

maps to

Asana

Project Template (Business tier) or Project Duplication (lower tiers)

lossy
Fully supported

awork Project Templates define reusable task structures, default statuses, and custom field configurations. Asana supports Project Templates natively only on Business tier ($24.99/seat/mo). For Premium or Personal tiers, we document the template structure as a written deliverable and recommend manual project duplication or Asana's duplicate-project workflow as the replacement. We migrate the template definition as a JSON manifest and a descriptive record for the customer's admin to use as a rebuild reference.

awork

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

awork Subtasks are structured child objects of Tasks. They map directly to Asana Subtasks. The parent-child relationship is preserved. If subtask ordering is critical, we include a sort_order field in the migration payload so the destination maintains the original sequence.

awork

Project Status (per-workspace vocabulary)

maps to

Asana

Project Status (global options)

lossy
Fully supported

awork allows each workspace to define a custom set of project statuses with distinct names, colors, and ordering. These have no global equivalent in Asana, which uses three fixed status options. We collect the full status vocabulary during discovery, build a value map to the nearest Asana global status (On Track, At Risk, Off Track), and apply the mapping during load. The original awork status name is preserved in a custom field original_awork_status__c on the project for audit and reporting.

awork

Client

maps to

Asana

Team or Project Name Prefix

lossy
Fully supported

awork has a distinct Client object above Project in the hierarchy. Asana does not have a native Client object. For teams that rely on client billing or client-level reporting in awork, we recommend creating an Asana Team per Client and grouping Projects under that Team. The customer decides during scoping whether to create Teams per client or to use a project name prefix convention.

awork

Engagement: Note

maps to

Asana

Note (on Task or Project)

1:1
Fully supported

awork Notes attached to Tasks or Projects migrate to Asana Notes. Rich text content, attachment references, and user attribution (author) migrate. If awork notes include file attachments, those become Asana attachment links pointing to the original URL.

awork

Engagement: Task (internal checklist)

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

awork internal task-type engagements map to Asana Tasks within the same project. Status, assignee, due date, and description migrate directly.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

awork logo

awork gotchas

Medium

Custom fields must be activated per project

Medium

Project statuses are per-workspace, not global

Low

Timeline export is an image, not structured data

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • awork project statuses have no direct Asana equivalent

    awork allows each workspace to define a completely custom set of project statuses with unique names, colors, and ordering. Asana uses three fixed global statuses (On Track, At Risk, Off Track) with no per-project customization. We collect every distinct status value from every source workspace during discovery, build a value map to the nearest Asana global status, and apply it during the load step. We preserve the original awork status name in a custom field original_awork_status__c so the customer's admin can report on the original classification post-migration.

  • Time entries require a non-native custom field strategy

    awork's time tracking is a core data object with billable flags, start/end timestamps, and user attribution. Asana has no native time tracking. We migrate time entry data into Asana custom fields on Tasks (total_hours, billable, tracked_date). For teams that need detailed time logs, we attach a structured Note. If the customer requires ongoing native time tracking after migration, they must adopt a third-party integration (Harvest, Toggl, Timely) or Asana's own time tracking add-on if available at their tier. We document the integration options during scoping.

  • Custom fields must be checked for per-project activation gaps

    a work Custom Fields are created at the workspace level but must be explicitly activated per project before they appear at the task level. We audit every custom field's project-level activation status during scoping and flag any gap before we begin the export. Records in projects where a field is not activated will not carry that data into Asana unless we correct the activation in awork before export or create the field directly in Asana for that project post-migration.

  • No documented public API for awork export

    a work does not publish a confirmed public API with documented authentication, rate limits, or endpoint specifications. We use the most current export methods available at the time of scoping, which typically means CSV export from the list or board view. We cannot guarantee bulk API extraction rates or batch sizes without confirmed endpoint documentation, so conservative chunk sizing and retry logic apply to all export operations.

  • Asana attachments from Google Drive export as links only

    If awork stores files linked from Google Drive, those links migrate to Asana as attachment links rather than embedded files. Google Drive files attached in awork export as a URL reference. Any files stored natively within awork export as downloadable attachments in Asana. We confirm the attachment storage type during discovery and flag any content that will require re-authorization of third-party drive connections in Asana.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful awork to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and workspace audit

    We audit every awork workspace in scope, cataloging Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, Custom Fields (with per-project activation status), Tags, Time Entries, Users, Project Templates, and the full project status vocabulary. We extract the owner and assignee records, identify any inactive users with open task assignments, and flag any data gaps (fields not activated per project, time entries with missing task associations). The discovery output is a written migration scope with a complete object inventory and a custom field activation matrix.

  2. Schema design and status value mapping

    We design the Asana destination schema before any data moves. This includes creating Custom Fields in Asana matched to awork field types, mapping the awork per-workspace status vocabulary to Asana's global On Track, At Risk, and Off Track options (with original status preserved in original_awork_status__c), structuring Teams to mirror awork clients or workspaces, and deciding on the time entry preservation strategy (custom fields, Notes, or both). Schema is validated in the Asana destination org before production migration begins.

  3. User reconciliation and Asana provisioning

    We extract every distinct awork User referenced on Projects, Tasks, Subtasks, and Time Entries and match by email against the Asana destination org. Any awork User without a matching Asana User goes to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions missing Users in Asana before record migration begins. Migration cannot proceed past this step because OwnerId and assignee references must be satisfied on insert.

  4. Sandbox migration and record reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Asana test workspace using the actual data volume. The customer's project lead spot-checks 25-50 randomly selected tasks and projects against the awork source, validates custom field values, confirms time entry data is preserved, and reviews the status mapping output. Any mapping corrections are documented and applied before the production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users (validated and reconciled), Teams (if creating Team-per-Client structure), Projects (with original_awork_status__c set), Tasks (with Custom Fields and Tags), Subtasks (with parent references resolved), Time Entries (as custom fields or Notes on tasks), and Project Template manifests (as written documentation for Business tier template creation). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automations handoff

    We freeze writes in awork during cutover, run a delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then set Asana as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of all awork Workflow Automations and Project Templates requiring rebuild in Asana Rules or Business-tier templates, plus a time-tracking integration recommendation document. We do not rebuild awork automations as Asana Rules inside the migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's admin or a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

awork logo

awork

Source

Strengths

  • Built-in time tracking keeps billable data linked directly to tasks without a separate tool.
  • Clean, accessible interface reduces onboarding time for non-technical team members.
  • Workflow customization requires far less configuration overhead than comparable tools like Jira.
  • Automation capabilities and Lexoffice integration support end-to-end agency billing workflows.
  • GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance with European-hosted data addresses regulatory requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Time cannot be logged against a Client record directly, only against Projects or Tasks.
  • Small, ad-hoc work items still require a full project to be created before they can be tracked.
  • Native sortable priority tagging is absent from the task interface.
  • No publicly documented API with confirmed authentication or rate limit specifications.
  • The feature set is optimized for agencies and may be limiting for non-agency project teams.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across awork and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    awork: Rate-limited per client; 429 Too Many Requests response includes RateLimit-Reset header indicating seconds until reset.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    awork exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your awork to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about awork to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during awork to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your awork to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Small migrations under 500 tasks with no custom fields and no time entry preservation requirements complete in two to three weeks. Mid-size migrations with 500-5,000 tasks, multiple custom fields, and time tracking data land in three to five weeks. Enterprise migrations with over 5,000 tasks, Project Template translation, deeply nested subtasks, and multi-workspace consolidation move to five to eight weeks. The timeline is driven by record volume, custom field complexity, the number of distinct workspace status vocabularies to map, and how quickly the customer provisions missing Asana users.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from awork.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day