Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between CAMMS and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
CAMMS
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
6 of 12
objects map 1:1 between CAMMS and Asana.
Complexity
CModerate
Timeline
4-6 weeks
Overview
Moving from CAMMS to Asana is a structural migration that must account for CAMMS's absence of a public REST API, its enterprise governance model (Risks, Issues, Budgets, Meetings as distinct objects), and the fact that CAMMS custom fields lack a stable export schema. We begin every engagement with an export-method assessment — if the source is cloud-hosted without API access we coordinate a structured data export from CAMMS support before we begin field mapping and import sequencing. In Asana, we configure Teams, Projects, and Sections to mirror the original project hierarchy, then import Risks and Issues as custom-tagged Tasks with status, probability, and owner preserved in Asana custom fields. Budget lines are documented as a separate structured carry-over because Asana has no native budget-tracking object. We do not migrate Workflows, approval chains, or CAMMS governance stage gates; we deliver a written inventory of every active workflow for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana Rules. Attachments are extracted from CAMMS's document management layer, staged with their folder hierarchy, and re-linked to the matching Asana Tasks after import.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a CAMMS object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
CAMMS
Project
Asana
Project
1:1CAMMS Projects (top-level containers with sub-projects) map to Asana Projects. We preserve project name, description, start and end dates, status, owner, and cost centre. Sub-projects from CAMMS create child Asana Projects within a parent Project or, where the team prefers flat structure, become Sections within the parent Project. The mapping decision is made during scoping based on how the customer uses CAMMS project hierarchies. Cost centre is carried as a custom project field in Asana.
CAMMS
Task
Asana
Task
1:1CAMMS Tasks map directly to Asana Tasks. We preserve task name, description (rich text), start and end dates, status, assignee, effort estimate (hours), and parent-child hierarchy (subtasks). Task-level attachments are held in the attachment pipeline. Assignee resolution uses email match against the Asana Workspace members list; any assignee without a matching Asana user is flagged in the reconciliation report for admin provisioning before production import.
CAMMS
Risk
Asana
Task (tagged)
1:1CAMMS Risks contain likelihood, impact, owner, mitigation plan, and a risk score. Asana has no native Risk object, so we migrate Risks as Tasks with a custom field Risk_Status (enum: Open, Mitigated, Closed) and a custom field Probability (enum: Low, Medium, High) matching CAMMS likelihood. The mitigation plan migrates as task description. Risk register rows with multiple linked Issues carry a cross-reference note in the task description. Risk owner is resolved by email against Asana Workspace members.
CAMMS
Issue
Asana
Task (tagged)
1:1CAMMS Issues are related but distinct from Risks and contain status workflow, priority, owner, and linked project context. We migrate Issues as Tasks with a custom field Issue_Status (enum: Open, In Progress, Resolved, Closed) and a custom field Priority (enum: Low, Medium, High, Critical) matching CAMMS priority values. Issue-to-risk associations from CAMMS are preserved as a text cross-reference note in the Asana task description because Asana does not support native cross-object linking without an integration.
CAMMS
Budget
Asana
Custom Section / Structured carry-over document
lossyCAMMS Budget entries track planned cost, actuals, cost codes, and variance per project or work package. Asana has no native budget-tracking object. We export the full budget register as a structured CSV with columns for project, cost code, period, planned amount, actual amount, and variance. During import, we create a dedicated Asana Project named '[Project Name] Budget Register' with one Task per budget line and carry the cost data as custom fields (Cost Code, Period, Planned, Actual, Variance). The customer uses these Tasks as a living budget register within Asana. Budget totals per project are computed and stored as custom fields on the parent Project.
CAMMS
Meeting
Asana
Task (tagged)
1:manyCAMMS Meeting records contain agenda items, attendees, and minutes. We split this into an Asana Task (for the meeting itself, with agenda as description and a meeting date custom field) and a Notes document (attached to the Task). Attendee names are stored in a multi-user custom field. Meeting attachments (documents, PDFs) are extracted separately and linked to the Task via Asana's attachment API.
CAMMS
Document
Asana
Asana attachment
1:1Documents attached to CAMMS Projects, Tasks, Risks, Issues, and Meetings are stored in CAMMS's document management layer. We run a parallel attachment export pipeline that downloads files in their original format, recreates the original folder hierarchy in our staging environment, and re-links each file to its matching Asana Task using Asana's attachment API endpoint. File naming preserves the original CAMMS document ID prefix so that provenance is traceable. Large portfolios with hundreds of attachments require additional storage provisioning and transfer time; we scope this separately during discovery.
CAMMS
User
Asana
User
1:1CAMMS User accounts map to Asana Workspace members. We extract the full user roster including role, department, and active/inactive status. Role-based access assignments from CAMMS map to Asana Team membership and project-level access; Asana does not have a direct role-permission model so the customer's admin sets permissions in Asana based on the provided role inventory. Inactive CAMMS users are imported as inactive Asana members to preserve assignment history on historical records.
CAMMS
Custom Field
Asana
Custom Field (Asana workspace or project level)
lossyCAMMS custom fields are not governed by a stable export schema and cannot be retrieved via any programmatic interface. We do not auto-migrate custom fields from CAMMS. Instead, we ask customers to provide a written inventory of all active custom fields, their data types, and current values before scoping begins. We then map each one individually against Asana's custom field types (text, number, enum, multi-enum, date, user). Fields with no Asana equivalent are flagged as manual carry-over items and documented in the handoff report for the customer's admin to handle post-migration.
CAMMS
Workflow / Approval Chain
Asana
Asana Rules (not migrated as code)
lossyCAMMS approval chains and stage-gate workflows cannot migrate to Asana because they represent fundamentally different governance models. CAMMS workflows are governance structures tied to project type; Asana Rules are task-level automations (when task status changes, send notification). We deliver a written inventory of every active CAMMS workflow specifying the project type, stage gates, approval chain members, and escalation path. The customer's admin uses this inventory to rebuild equivalent Asana Rules or to adopt an Asana Enterprise approval solution. This is explicitly out of scope as a coded migration deliverable.
CAMMS
Portfolio-level dashboard
Asana
Portfolio
lossyCAMMS executive dashboards consolidate project status, budget variance, and risk exposure across the portfolio. Asana Portfolios aggregate project status and custom field values. We map the CAMMS dashboard metrics to a set of Asana custom project fields (status RAG, budget variance, risk count, issue count) and configure a Portfolio to pull these fields. The customer rebuilds any complex chart or graph as an Asana Dashboard widget manually; we document the data source for each dashboard metric.
CAMMS
Resource Allocation / Utilisation
Asana
Workload view (Asana Business/Enterprise)
lossyCAMMS workforce modules store resource allocations and utilisation data per user and project. Asana Business and Enterprise tiers provide a Workload view that displays task assignments by team member. We export the CAMMS utilisation data as a CSV and import it into Asana as custom fields on Tasks (allocated hours, utilisation percentage). The customer uses the Workload view to visualise capacity; the historical utilisation data is preserved as a reference document for the admin to cross-check against Asana assignments.
| CAMMS | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Risk | Task (tagged)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Issue | Task (tagged)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Budget | Custom Section / Structured carry-over documentlossy | Fully supported | |
| Meeting | Task (tagged)1:many | Fully supported | |
| Document | Asana attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Field (Asana workspace or project level)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Workflow / Approval Chain | Asana Rules (not migrated as code)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Portfolio-level dashboard | Portfoliolossy | Fully supported | |
| Resource Allocation / Utilisation | Workload view (Asana Business/Enterprise)lossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
CAMMS gotchas
No public API forces manual or database-level export
Custom fields lack a stable schema for export
On-premise deployments require IT coordination for database access
Attachment export requires separate file-handling pipeline
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Export method assessment and data extraction
We assess whether the CAMMS deployment is cloud-hosted or on-premise and whether CAMMS support can provide a structured data export. For cloud-hosted instances we raise a support ticket or engage the CAMMS account executive to request an export. For on-premise instances we coordinate with the customer's IT team for database-level access. We extract data in dependency order: Projects and Budgets first (these are top-level), then sub-projects and Tasks, then Risks and Issues, then Meetings and Documents. Each module export is validated against a record-count reconciliation before transformation begins. If a structured export is not available we use a guided per-module UI export with CSV downloads, extending the discovery phase by two to four weeks.
Schema bridging design for governance objects
We design the Asana schema to carry CAMMS governance data. This includes provisioning Asana custom fields on Projects (for project-level cost centre and status RAG), Tasks (for risk and issue status, priority, probability, and budget fields), and Workspace-level custom fields where governance data spans multiple projects. We create an Asana Team for each CAMMS business unit or department. The customer approves the custom field design before we deploy it to a staging Workspace. We do not create Salesforce-style custom objects for CAMMS risks and issues unless the customer has Asana Enterprise with custom objects enabled; the default approach uses tagged Tasks with custom fields.
Custom field inventory and mapping
We ask the customer to provide a written inventory of all active CAMMS custom fields before we finalise the mapping. For each custom field we record: the source object (Project, Task, Risk, Issue), the field name in CAMMS, the data type (text, number, date, picklist, multi-picklist), and current value distribution. We map each to an Asana custom field of the closest type. Fields with no Asana equivalent are flagged as manual carry-over items and documented in the handoff report. The inventory step adds one to two weeks to discovery but prevents mapping gaps that would surface only during production import.
Sandbox migration and reconciliation
We run a full migration into a staging Asana Workspace (which we recommend creating alongside the production Workspace) using the full record volume from CAMMS. The customer's project management lead reconciles record counts per module, spot-checks 25-50 records against the CAMMS source, and validates that risk and issue custom fields display correctly in Asana Portfolios and Dashboards. Any custom field corrections, mapping errors, or hierarchy issues are resolved in the staging Workspace before production migration begins. Owner reconciliation also runs at this stage: we match CAMMS owners by email against the production Asana Workspace members list and flag any unmapped owners for admin provisioning.
Attachment export pipeline
We run the document export in parallel with record import preparation. The pipeline downloads files from CAMMS's document management layer, preserves original filenames and folder hierarchies, and stages them in our secure storage environment. After the production record import is complete we re-link each file to its parent Asana Task using the Asana attachment API. The file re-link step runs as a separate phase after record import so that Tasks appear without broken attachment references during the cutover window. We validate that every CAMMS document has a corresponding Asana attachment before declaring the attachment pipeline complete.
Production migration and cutover
We run the production migration in dependency order: Workspace and Teams first, then Projects (with custom fields deployed via metadata API), then Tasks and sub-tasks, then Risk and Issue Tasks, then Meeting Tasks, then Budget Register Tasks, then Attachments. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. We freeze CAMMS writes during the cutover window and run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window. After cutover we deliver the workflow inventory document, the custom field carry-over list, and a post-migration data quality report. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues raised by the customer's project team.
Platform deep dives
CAMMS
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Moderate Project Management migration. 1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Overall complexity
Moderate migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across CAMMS and Asana.
Object compatibility
1 of 8 objects need a manual workaround.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
CAMMS: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
CAMMS doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during CAMMS to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your CAMMS to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave CAMMS
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.