Project Management migration

Migrate from CONTACT Project Office to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between CONTACT Project Office and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

75%

9 of 12

objects map 1:1 between CONTACT Project Office and Asana.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

4-8 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from CONTACT Project Office to Asana is primarily a data discovery and normalization exercise rather than a straightforward record copy. CONTACT Project Office lacks extensive public API documentation, meaning we begin every engagement with a structured discovery call to inventory the actual source schema from whatever export artifacts the customer can produce. We normalize manually extracted projects, tasks, and subtasks into FlitStack AI's staging format, then map those into Asana's workspace structure. Subtasks in CONTACT are treated as nested children; we preserve the relationship by creating Asana subtasks under their parent tasks and flagging any deeply nested chains that exceed Asana's practical subtask depth for admin cleanup. Custom fields migrate as Asana custom fields, with their type (text, enum, number, date) inferred from the source data. Attachments re-upload to Asana's native file storage. We do not migrate Workflows, Automations, or Reports as code; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana's workflow builder. Timeline ranges from four to eight weeks for straightforward single-project-structure migrations to ten to sixteen weeks for large portfolios with complex custom fields and attachment volumes.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

What's pushing teams away

  • Very thin public review presence — neither G2 nor Capterra currently shows established user ratings for CONTACT Project Office, so prospective buyers struggle to find peer validation outside of CONTACT's own case studies.
  • Tightly tied to the broader CONTACT Elements stack — customers who never adopted CIM Database PLM derive less differentiated value from Project Office vs. mainstream PM tools and tend to drift toward Jira, MS Project, or Smartsheet.
  • Limited third-party integration ecosystem — outside the CONTACT Elements modules and MS Office/CAD viewers, customers report fewer pre-built connectors than ServiceNow SPM, Planview, or Wrike provide.
  • Sparse public documentation outside the customer portal — without a vendor relationship, evaluators have difficulty finding API references, data-model documentation, or pricing transparency in open channels.
  • Concentrated in German-speaking and European industrial sectors — North American and APAC customers may face support, language, and consultant availability gaps compared with global PPM vendors.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How CONTACT Project Office objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a CONTACT Project Office object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

CONTACT Project Office

Project

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Projects map directly to Asana Projects within the target Workspace. We extract project metadata (name, description, status, start date, due date) and create the corresponding Asana Project via the POST /projects endpoint. If the source uses a hierarchical folder or program structure above the project level, we map the top-level program to an Asana Portfolio and the child projects under it. Project color and icon settings in CONTACT have no direct Asana equivalent and are noted for admin configuration post-migration.

CONTACT Project Office

Task

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Tasks map to Asana Tasks linked to the parent Project via the projects array. Standard task fields (name, description, start date, due date, priority, status) map to Asana's name, notes, start_on, due_on, and custom fields for priority. Assignee resolves via the User mapping by email lookup and sets the Asana assignee field. Tasks without a valid assignee are created as unassigned and flagged in the reconciliation report.

CONTACT Project Office

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Subtasks map to Asana Subtasks by creating the task under its parent via the parent gid field. Asana supports one level of subtasking; if the source has sub-subtasks or deeper nesting, we flatten them to the first-level subtask level and flag the remainder in the reconciliation report for manual rebuild as separate tasks. The subtask's assignee, dates, and notes migrate identically to a standard task.

CONTACT Project Office

User

maps to

Asana

User

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Users and Assignees map to Asana Workspace Members by email match. We extract all distinct user emails from the source data (task assignees, project leads, comment authors) and match them against the destination Asana Workspace membership. Any email without a matching Asana User goes to the provisioning queue for the customer's admin to invite before record migration proceeds. User display name and role/title migrate as custom fields if the source includes this data.

CONTACT Project Office

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Custom Fields require manual extraction and type inference from the source data because there is no documented API field model. We inspect the extracted values to classify each field as text, number, enum (single-select), multi-enum (multi-select), date, or Boolean. We pre-create the corresponding Asana Custom Field definition in the target Workspace via POST /custom_fields, then associate it with the target Project via a Custom Field Setting. Enum and multi-enum options migrate with their labels intact.

CONTACT Project Office

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office file attachments are extracted from whatever export format the customer can produce (exported zip, linked file URLs, or file references in the data dump). We re-upload each file to Asana via the POST /tasks/{task_gid}/attachments endpoint using the multipart/form-data upload method. File name, size, and resource subtype (document, image, spreadsheet) are preserved. If the source stores only URLs rather than file content, we create an Asana attachment with the original URL as a link attachment.

CONTACT Project Office

Comment

maps to

Asana

Story

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Comments map to Asana Stories on the parent task. The comment body migrates as the story's text field; the author timestamp and author name migrate from the source comment metadata. Asana Stories are immutable once created, so we create them read-only on the target task. Rich text formatting (bold, italic, hyperlinks) in source comments attempts to map to Asana's supported HTML subset; unsupported formatting is stripped and noted in the reconciliation report.

CONTACT Project Office

Section

maps to

Asana

Section

1:1
Fully supported

If the CONTACT Project Office export includes task groupings or sections, these map to Asana Sections within the parent Project. We create sections via POST /projects/{project_gid}/sections and then move tasks into their respective sections via the move task endpoint. Section ordering is preserved by setting the section's created_at timestamp from the source sequence.

CONTACT Project Office

Milestone

maps to

Asana

Task (marked as milestone)

lossy
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Milestones map to Asana Tasks with the custom field or marker set to indicate milestone status. Asana's native milestone feature is project-scoped; we create a task in the project, set its due date to the milestone date, and configure a custom field dropdown with a 'Milestone' option if the customer's Asana plan supports custom fields. If no custom fields are available on the plan, we use a 'milestone_name' prefix in the task name for identification.

CONTACT Project Office

Project Lead

maps to

Asana

Project Member (Editor role)

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Project Leads map to Asana Project Members with Editor-level permissions. We extract project-lead assignments from the source data and add the corresponding user as a project member via POST /projects/{project_gid}/addMembers. If the source distinguishes between lead and member roles, leads receive Editor access and general members receive Commenter or Viewer access based on the source role.

CONTACT Project Office

Tag

maps to

Asana

Tag

1:1
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office Tags or labels migrate to Asana Tags on the parent task. We create tags via POST /tags and associate them with tasks via POST /tasks/{task_gid}/addTag. Tag colors from the source map to Asana tag color names where possible; unmapped colors default to 'none'. Tags used for categorization in the source are preserved as-is on the task.

CONTACT Project Office

Dependency

maps to

Asana

Task dependency or custom field

lossy
Fully supported

CONTACT Project Office task dependencies (finish-to-start, start-to-start) do not have a direct Asana API equivalent without third-party tools. We capture the dependency relationship as a custom text field on the dependent task (e.g., 'Depends on: [Task Name]') and flag the dependency for the customer's admin to rebuild using Asana's native dependency feature (available on Advanced and Enterprise plans) or a compatible integration post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office gotchas

High

Public documentation is limited; API surface is gated to customers

Medium

Project structure is template-driven and may include CIM Database links

Medium

Hybrid agile + classical tasks coexist in the same project

Low

Ratings and peer feedback are sparse — discovery has to be customer-led

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • Source data requires manual extraction with no documented API

    CONTACT Project Office lacks extensive public API documentation, meaning there is no guaranteed programmatic export path for all data types. We begin every engagement with a structured discovery call to inventory what export artifacts the customer can produce from their current instance. Depending on the deployment type, this may include manually downloaded CSV exports, database queries against a self-hosted instance, or file-system exports of attachments. Any gaps in the export (missing comment history, incomplete custom field data, unlinked attachments) are flagged in the discovery report. Migrations where the customer cannot produce a full export may require partial manual re-entry, which is outside the standard migration scope and scoped as custom work.

  • Subtask nesting depth requires flattening

    CONTACT Project Office supports multi-level nested subtasks (sub-subtasks, sub-sub-subtasks). Asana's subtask model supports only one level of nesting below the parent task. Subtasks created under a subtask in CONTACT cannot be directly represented in Asana's data model. We flatten all sub-subtask levels to first-level Asana subtasks under the original parent and flag each flattened record in the reconciliation report. The customer's admin rebuilds the logical hierarchy in Asana as separate tasks with dependency markers or as a separate project structure. Migrations with deep nesting chains (four or more levels) have a higher reconciliation report volume.

  • Custom field type inference from source data

    Without a documented CONTACT Project Office field schema API, custom field types must be inferred from the extracted values. We inspect the data to classify each custom field as text, number, date, Boolean, or enum (single-select). Edge cases include fields with mixed-type values (some numeric, some text), date fields in non-standard formats, and enum fields with values containing special characters. We resolve these ambiguities during the discovery phase with the customer's input and document the inferred type in the mapping specification before creating Asana custom fields.

  • Asana API cost-based rate limits on large project fetches

    Asana's paid API enforces cost-based rate limits in addition to the standard 1500 calls per minute ceiling. Expensive requests that traverse large task graphs (projects with over 1,000 tasks, tasks with extensive custom_fields arrays, comments, and attachments) accrue higher cost units. We monitor the Retry-After header on 429 responses, implement exponential backoff, and chunk large project fetches into smaller batches. Migrations with projects containing thousands of tasks per project may experience slower throughput and longer migration windows, which we account for in the timeline estimate.

  • Workflows and automations do not migrate as code

    CONTACT Project Office automations, project rules, and notification triggers do not have a direct Asana equivalent that can be migrated programmatically. Asana's Rules feature (Advanced and Enterprise plans) and Forms are configurable by the customer's admin but require manual rebuild. We deliver a written inventory of every active CONTACT automation with its trigger, conditions, and actions documented for the admin to translate to Asana Rules. The absence of an automation migration path means teams should plan a workflow redesign as part of the migration project, not assume that existing automations will function in Asana.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful CONTACT Project Office to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and data extraction planning

    We conduct a structured discovery session with the customer to inventory the CONTACT Project Office source data. This includes identifying the deployment type (cloud-hosted, self-hosted, hybrid), locating all exportable data artifacts (CSV exports, database access, file-system shares), and mapping the source data model to our FlitStack AI staging format. We document the project hierarchy, task counts, custom field definitions, attachment storage locations, and comment volume. Any data that cannot be extracted programmatically is flagged with a manual extraction path. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with estimated record counts per object type and a go/no-go decision point before migration design begins.

  2. Destination schema setup in Asana

    We configure the Asana destination workspace before any data loads. This includes creating the Workspace (if not already established), defining Teams for project access scoping, and creating the target Projects. For each project, we pre-create the Asana custom field definitions (inferred from source data during discovery) and associate them with the project via custom field settings. We configure project privacy settings, default view, and notification preferences per the customer's requirements. Section structures for each project are created in advance so that tasks can be placed directly into their sections during load rather than moved post-creation.

  3. User provisioning and assignment mapping

    We extract every distinct user email from the CONTACT Project Office source data (task assignees, project leads, comment authors, attachment uploaders). Each email is matched against the destination Asana Workspace membership. Users who do not yet exist in Asana are added to the provisioning queue for the customer's admin to invite or provision via SCIM if the Workspace uses Enterprise identity management. Migration cannot proceed past the task load phase until all assignees referenced in the source data have a valid Asana User gid, because the Asana Tasks API requires a valid assignee reference.

  4. Record migration in dependency order

    We load data into Asana in strict dependency order. Projects are created first via POST /projects. Tasks are loaded second via bulk task creation endpoints, with the project_gid set and the parent field used for any subtasks. Custom field values are set on each task via the custom_fields array in the task creation payload, with the enum_value gid resolved from the pre-created custom field definitions. Attachments are uploaded per task after the task record exists. Comments are created last as Stories on the task via POST /tasks/{task_gid}/stories. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report comparing source record counts to destination record counts before the next phase begins.

  5. Subtask hierarchy resolution

    During the task load phase, we process subtasks by setting the parent gid on each subtask record to reference the parent task's Asana gid. Any subtasks that exceed Asana's one-level nesting are flattened to the first level and flagged in the reconciliation report with the original nesting depth and parent chain noted. Dependencies captured as custom fields are written to the dependent task record. The reconciliation report for subtasks includes the full flattened list so the customer's admin can manually rebuild the logical hierarchy in Asana if needed.

  6. Validation and cutover

    We perform a validation pass comparing a random sample of 50-100 migrated records against the source data, checking task name, assignee, dates, custom field values, and attachment count. The customer's project manager reviews the sample and signs off. We run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then freeze the source CONTACT Project Office instance from new writes. We enable Asana as the system of record, deliver the automation inventory document, and provide a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflow rebuild planning begins as a parallel workstream under the customer's admin team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

CONTACT Project Office logo

CONTACT Project Office

Source

Strengths

  • Hybrid planning combining Gantt/WBS with agile task boards inside a single project.
  • Native interoperability with CIM Database PLM for engineering-program data continuity.
  • ISO 26262 tool qualification supports safety-relevant automotive and industrial development.
  • Document management with version control and metadata is part of the same Elements stack.
  • Available as on-premise install or CONTACT Cloud SaaS in EU-hosted environments.

Weaknesses

  • Very limited public review and pricing data — Capterra lists 0 reviews and only a single €35/month figure with no tier breakdown.
  • Strength is conditional on adopting the broader CONTACT Elements stack; standalone value is harder to justify.
  • Smaller pre-built integration ecosystem than mainstream PPM tools.
  • Public API and data-model documentation is gated behind the customer portal.
  • Vendor and consultant footprint is concentrated in European industrial sectors.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate Project Management migration. 7 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across CONTACT Project Office and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    D

    7 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    CONTACT Project Office: Not publicly documented — confirmed with CONTACT support per tenant during scoping..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    CONTACT Project Office doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your CONTACT Project Office to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about CONTACT Project Office to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during CONTACT Project Office to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your CONTACT Project Office to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations with a clean source export (direct CSV or database access), under 50 projects and 10,000 tasks, and no deeply nested subtask chains typically complete in four to eight weeks. Migrations requiring extensive manual data extraction, handling attachments from file-system sources, resolving complex custom field types, or migrating 20+ projects with large attachment volumes move to ten to sixteen weeks. The discovery phase (step one) alone can take two to three weeks if the customer cannot produce a consolidated export on the first attempt.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from CONTACT Project Office.
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day