Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between CONTACT Project Office and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.
CONTACT Project Office
Source
Asana
Destination
Compatibility
9 of 12
objects map 1:1 between CONTACT Project Office and Asana.
Complexity
CModerate
Timeline
4-8 weeks
Overview
Migrating from CONTACT Project Office to Asana is primarily a data discovery and normalization exercise rather than a straightforward record copy. CONTACT Project Office lacks extensive public API documentation, meaning we begin every engagement with a structured discovery call to inventory the actual source schema from whatever export artifacts the customer can produce. We normalize manually extracted projects, tasks, and subtasks into FlitStack AI's staging format, then map those into Asana's workspace structure. Subtasks in CONTACT are treated as nested children; we preserve the relationship by creating Asana subtasks under their parent tasks and flagging any deeply nested chains that exceed Asana's practical subtask depth for admin cleanup. Custom fields migrate as Asana custom fields, with their type (text, enum, number, date) inferred from the source data. Attachments re-upload to Asana's native file storage. We do not migrate Workflows, Automations, or Reports as code; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Asana's workflow builder. Timeline ranges from four to eight weeks for straightforward single-project-structure migrations to ten to sixteen weeks for large portfolios with complex custom fields and attachment volumes.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a CONTACT Project Office object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
CONTACT Project Office
Project
Asana
Project
1:1CONTACT Project Office Projects map directly to Asana Projects within the target Workspace. We extract project metadata (name, description, status, start date, due date) and create the corresponding Asana Project via the POST /projects endpoint. If the source uses a hierarchical folder or program structure above the project level, we map the top-level program to an Asana Portfolio and the child projects under it. Project color and icon settings in CONTACT have no direct Asana equivalent and are noted for admin configuration post-migration.
CONTACT Project Office
Task
Asana
Task
1:1CONTACT Project Office Tasks map to Asana Tasks linked to the parent Project via the projects array. Standard task fields (name, description, start date, due date, priority, status) map to Asana's name, notes, start_on, due_on, and custom fields for priority. Assignee resolves via the User mapping by email lookup and sets the Asana assignee field. Tasks without a valid assignee are created as unassigned and flagged in the reconciliation report.
CONTACT Project Office
Subtask
Asana
Subtask
1:1CONTACT Project Office Subtasks map to Asana Subtasks by creating the task under its parent via the parent gid field. Asana supports one level of subtasking; if the source has sub-subtasks or deeper nesting, we flatten them to the first-level subtask level and flag the remainder in the reconciliation report for manual rebuild as separate tasks. The subtask's assignee, dates, and notes migrate identically to a standard task.
CONTACT Project Office
User
Asana
User
1:1CONTACT Project Office Users and Assignees map to Asana Workspace Members by email match. We extract all distinct user emails from the source data (task assignees, project leads, comment authors) and match them against the destination Asana Workspace membership. Any email without a matching Asana User goes to the provisioning queue for the customer's admin to invite before record migration proceeds. User display name and role/title migrate as custom fields if the source includes this data.
CONTACT Project Office
Custom Field
Asana
Custom Field
lossyCONTACT Project Office Custom Fields require manual extraction and type inference from the source data because there is no documented API field model. We inspect the extracted values to classify each field as text, number, enum (single-select), multi-enum (multi-select), date, or Boolean. We pre-create the corresponding Asana Custom Field definition in the target Workspace via POST /custom_fields, then associate it with the target Project via a Custom Field Setting. Enum and multi-enum options migrate with their labels intact.
CONTACT Project Office
Attachment
Asana
Attachment
1:1CONTACT Project Office file attachments are extracted from whatever export format the customer can produce (exported zip, linked file URLs, or file references in the data dump). We re-upload each file to Asana via the POST /tasks/{task_gid}/attachments endpoint using the multipart/form-data upload method. File name, size, and resource subtype (document, image, spreadsheet) are preserved. If the source stores only URLs rather than file content, we create an Asana attachment with the original URL as a link attachment.
CONTACT Project Office
Comment
Asana
Story
1:1CONTACT Project Office Comments map to Asana Stories on the parent task. The comment body migrates as the story's text field; the author timestamp and author name migrate from the source comment metadata. Asana Stories are immutable once created, so we create them read-only on the target task. Rich text formatting (bold, italic, hyperlinks) in source comments attempts to map to Asana's supported HTML subset; unsupported formatting is stripped and noted in the reconciliation report.
CONTACT Project Office
Section
Asana
Section
1:1If the CONTACT Project Office export includes task groupings or sections, these map to Asana Sections within the parent Project. We create sections via POST /projects/{project_gid}/sections and then move tasks into their respective sections via the move task endpoint. Section ordering is preserved by setting the section's created_at timestamp from the source sequence.
CONTACT Project Office
Milestone
Asana
Task (marked as milestone)
lossyCONTACT Project Office Milestones map to Asana Tasks with the custom field or marker set to indicate milestone status. Asana's native milestone feature is project-scoped; we create a task in the project, set its due date to the milestone date, and configure a custom field dropdown with a 'Milestone' option if the customer's Asana plan supports custom fields. If no custom fields are available on the plan, we use a 'milestone_name' prefix in the task name for identification.
CONTACT Project Office
Project Lead
Asana
Project Member (Editor role)
1:1CONTACT Project Office Project Leads map to Asana Project Members with Editor-level permissions. We extract project-lead assignments from the source data and add the corresponding user as a project member via POST /projects/{project_gid}/addMembers. If the source distinguishes between lead and member roles, leads receive Editor access and general members receive Commenter or Viewer access based on the source role.
CONTACT Project Office
Tag
Asana
Tag
1:1CONTACT Project Office Tags or labels migrate to Asana Tags on the parent task. We create tags via POST /tags and associate them with tasks via POST /tasks/{task_gid}/addTag. Tag colors from the source map to Asana tag color names where possible; unmapped colors default to 'none'. Tags used for categorization in the source are preserved as-is on the task.
CONTACT Project Office
Dependency
Asana
Task dependency or custom field
lossyCONTACT Project Office task dependencies (finish-to-start, start-to-start) do not have a direct Asana API equivalent without third-party tools. We capture the dependency relationship as a custom text field on the dependent task (e.g., 'Depends on: [Task Name]') and flag the dependency for the customer's admin to rebuild using Asana's native dependency feature (available on Advanced and Enterprise plans) or a compatible integration post-migration.
| CONTACT Project Office | Asana | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Task | Task1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Subtask | Subtask1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Custom Field | Custom Fieldlossy | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Story1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Section | Section1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Milestone | Task (marked as milestone)lossy | Fully supported | |
| Project Lead | Project Member (Editor role)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Tag | Tag1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Dependency | Task dependency or custom fieldlossy | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
CONTACT Project Office gotchas
Public documentation is limited; API surface is gated to customers
Project structure is template-driven and may include CIM Database links
Hybrid agile + classical tasks coexist in the same project
Ratings and peer feedback are sparse — discovery has to be customer-led
Asana gotchas
Automation rules have no export representation
API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput
Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data
Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API
Subtasks do not appear in project views by default
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and data extraction planning
We conduct a structured discovery session with the customer to inventory the CONTACT Project Office source data. This includes identifying the deployment type (cloud-hosted, self-hosted, hybrid), locating all exportable data artifacts (CSV exports, database access, file-system shares), and mapping the source data model to our FlitStack AI staging format. We document the project hierarchy, task counts, custom field definitions, attachment storage locations, and comment volume. Any data that cannot be extracted programmatically is flagged with a manual extraction path. The discovery output is a written migration scope document with estimated record counts per object type and a go/no-go decision point before migration design begins.
Destination schema setup in Asana
We configure the Asana destination workspace before any data loads. This includes creating the Workspace (if not already established), defining Teams for project access scoping, and creating the target Projects. For each project, we pre-create the Asana custom field definitions (inferred from source data during discovery) and associate them with the project via custom field settings. We configure project privacy settings, default view, and notification preferences per the customer's requirements. Section structures for each project are created in advance so that tasks can be placed directly into their sections during load rather than moved post-creation.
User provisioning and assignment mapping
We extract every distinct user email from the CONTACT Project Office source data (task assignees, project leads, comment authors, attachment uploaders). Each email is matched against the destination Asana Workspace membership. Users who do not yet exist in Asana are added to the provisioning queue for the customer's admin to invite or provision via SCIM if the Workspace uses Enterprise identity management. Migration cannot proceed past the task load phase until all assignees referenced in the source data have a valid Asana User gid, because the Asana Tasks API requires a valid assignee reference.
Record migration in dependency order
We load data into Asana in strict dependency order. Projects are created first via POST /projects. Tasks are loaded second via bulk task creation endpoints, with the project_gid set and the parent field used for any subtasks. Custom field values are set on each task via the custom_fields array in the task creation payload, with the enum_value gid resolved from the pre-created custom field definitions. Attachments are uploaded per task after the task record exists. Comments are created last as Stories on the task via POST /tasks/{task_gid}/stories. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report comparing source record counts to destination record counts before the next phase begins.
Subtask hierarchy resolution
During the task load phase, we process subtasks by setting the parent gid on each subtask record to reference the parent task's Asana gid. Any subtasks that exceed Asana's one-level nesting are flattened to the first level and flagged in the reconciliation report with the original nesting depth and parent chain noted. Dependencies captured as custom fields are written to the dependent task record. The reconciliation report for subtasks includes the full flattened list so the customer's admin can manually rebuild the logical hierarchy in Asana if needed.
Validation and cutover
We perform a validation pass comparing a random sample of 50-100 migrated records against the source data, checking task name, assignee, dates, custom field values, and attachment count. The customer's project manager reviews the sample and signs off. We run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then freeze the source CONTACT Project Office instance from new writes. We enable Asana as the system of record, deliver the automation inventory document, and provide a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflow rebuild planning begins as a parallel workstream under the customer's admin team.
Platform deep dives
CONTACT Project Office
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Asana
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Moderate Project Management migration. 7 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Moderate migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across CONTACT Project Office and Asana.
Object compatibility
7 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
CONTACT Project Office: Not publicly documented — confirmed with CONTACT support per tenant during scoping..
Data volume sensitivity
CONTACT Project Office doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during CONTACT Project Office to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your CONTACT Project Office to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave CONTACT Project Office
Other ways to arrive at Asana
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.