Project Management migration

Migrate from Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Asana

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) and Asana. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Asana.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) logo

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Source

Asana

Destination

Asana logo

Compatibility

69%

9 of 13

objects map 1:1 between Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) and Asana.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

4-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Kantata Professional Services Cloud to Asana is a directional shift from a full PSA suite to a general-purpose project management platform. Kantata tracks work hierarchically within Workspaces, assigns resources with billing rates and scenario-modeled profitability, and ties time entries to financial estimates. Asana organizes work into Projects and Tasks with dependencies and subtasks but lacks native billing, resource allocation by role and rate, or financial forecasting. We extract Workspaces as Projects, Tasks as Tasks with subtasks preserved, Time Entries as task notes or custom fields, and Users as workspace members. We do not migrate Estimates, Scenarios, Billing records, Resource Assignments, or Custom Fields that require Asana Enterprise for mapping; we deliver a written inventory of these gaps with the field names and record counts so the customer's admin can decide whether to rebuild in Asana, purchase a third-party add-on, or accept the loss. Workflows, automations, and billing rules are not migrated as code.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) logo

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

What's pushing teams away

  • Task management is widely described as inflexible—advanced project tracking features require manual updates and struggle to accommodate complex multi-phase or milestone-heavy engagements.
  • The learning curve is steep for non-technical project managers, particularly around configuring custom fields, setting up billing rules, and understanding the distinction between OX and SX workspaces.
  • Pricing is opaque and scales significantly with seat count and feature tier, making it difficult to predict costs for growing teams or firms with seasonal staff fluctuations.
  • Users report that resource scheduling interfaces feel dated compared to modern alternatives, with slow screen transitions and unintuitive drag-and-drop allocation interactions.
  • The 2022 Mavenlink–Kimble merger created a bifurcated product line with divergent terminology and data models, confusing customers who expected a unified platform post-merger.

Choosing

Asana logo

Asana

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations with distributed teams cite Asana's multiple project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) as the primary reason for adoption, allowing each team member to work in their preferred interface without changing the underlying data.
  • The platform's 100+ native integrations with tools like Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, and Microsoft Teams reduce context-switching and keep work synchronized across the stack.
  • Small teams and non-profits value the free plan's generous limits: unlimited projects and tasks for up to 15 team members with basic views, enabling teams to validate fit before committing to a paid tier.
  • Marketing and creative teams specifically praise Asana's visual project organization, reporting dashboards, and timeline views for managing cross-functional campaign workflows.
  • Project managers report that Asana's dependency management and workload views help surface bottlenecks before they derail deadlines.

Object mapping

How Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) objects map to Asana

Each row shows how a Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) object lands in Asana, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Workspace

maps to

Asana

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Workspaces map to Asana Projects. We extract the full workspace record including status, dates, budget fields, and the activity feed as a text digest. Workspace-level custom field values (subject_type = Workspace) migrate to Asana project-level custom fields if the destination Asana tier supports them. Budget amounts, billing rates, and financial metadata from Kantata have no native Asana field; we flag these for the customer's admin to assign to custom fields or document in the project description as a manual reference.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Task / Story

maps to

Asana

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Tasks (OX) and Stories (OX) map to Asana Tasks. The parent-child hierarchy, start and due dates, status, and notes migrate directly. Custom field values scoped to subject_type Story migrate to Asana task-level custom fields. The Kantata WBS number stored in the New Task Tracker may be missing for deeply nested subtask levels due to a documented 2022 Kantata display bug; we flag affected records in the migration report and note that the WBS path is not available to reconstruct.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Subtask

maps to

Asana

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Subtasks attach to parent Tasks and inherit some parent-level fields. The Kantata New Task Tracker has a documented 2022 bug where WBS numbers fail to display for deeply nested subtask levels. We preserve the subtask hierarchy as nested Asana Subtasks, but WBS path information is not available for records affected by this bug. We flag any subtask chain exceeding three levels for manual verification post-import.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

User

maps to

Asana

Member

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Users (internal staff and contractors) map to Asana workspace Members. We match by email address and map role assignments to Asana team membership. Inactive or archived Kantata users do not transfer; we flag them separately for the admin to decide whether to provision as inactive Asana members.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Resource Assignment

maps to

Asana

Task Assignee (with notes)

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Resource Assignments link a User to a Task with hours allocated, role, and billing rate. Asana has no native role or rate field on task assignment. We map the Assignee to the Asana Task and preserve hours allocated and role as task notes or custom fields. Billing rates do not transfer. We flag this as a manual rebuild item for the customer's admin if they need role-based or rate-based allocation tracking in Asana.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Time Entry

maps to

Asana

Task Notes or Time Tracking Field

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Time Entries record billable or non-billable hours against a task with date, user, and notes. We migrate the hours, date, and notes text to Asana task notes. If Asana Time Tracking is enabled per task, we populate the tracked time field. Billing rates from Kantata do not transfer to Asana because Asana has no billing rate field. Billable flag is preserved as a custom field if available.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Estimate / Scenario

maps to

Asana

Project Notes or Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

Kantata Estimates model supply-and-demand scenarios using role-based resource composition and margin projections. Asana has no scenario or estimate object. We extract the most recent active estimate as a structured text digest in the project notes, with key figures (total estimated hours, total estimated cost, margin) preserved as project custom fields if the Asana tier supports them. Historical scenario versions are not migrated. We document the count of estimate and scenario records in the migration report with a recommendation to use Asana Goals or a third-party budgeting tool for future estimation.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Custom Field

maps to

Asana

Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Custom Fields are scoped by subject_type (Workspace, Story, Estimate, User, WorkspaceGroup, Resource). Custom Fields and Custom Field Values are separate API objects with independent rate limits, which we manage during extraction via subject_type-scoped pagination. We map Number, Picklist, Text, Currency, and Date field types to Asana equivalents. Choice, list-based, and formula-based Kantata custom fields may require transformation or manual recreation in Asana depending on complexity.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Billing / Invoice

maps to

Asana

Project Notes (digest only)

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Billing allows multiple invoices per workspace, with line items tied to billing rates, expense codes, and milestone triggers. Asana has no billing, invoice, or accounts receivable module. We extract the last three invoices per workspace as a structured text digest in the project notes (invoice number, date, amount, status). The full invoice history does not migrate. We flag this gap in the migration report and recommend that finance teams retain Kantata access for historical billing records or export them to a financial system before cutover.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

WorkspaceGroup

maps to

Asana

Portfolio

lossy
Fully supported

Kantata WorkspaceGroups organize workspaces into folders or portfolios and carry their own custom fields. Group-level custom field values require a separate API call scoped to WorkspaceGroup. We map WorkspaceGroups to Asana Portfolios at the destination tier that supports them. WorkspaceGroup custom fields migrate to portfolio-level custom fields where supported. The group hierarchy is preserved as a nested portfolio structure.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

External Reference

maps to

Asana

Not migrated

lossy
Fully supported

Kantata External References link workspace records to objects in external systems—primarily Salesforce for Kantata SX (Kimble) customers. Asana has no native external reference concept. We flag all external reference records in the migration report with the original system name and target object ID so the customer's admin can decide whether to recreate the integration via Asana's native Salesforce integration or a third-party connector.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Attachment

maps to

Asana

Attachment or Link

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata file attachments live in the collaboration workspace and activity feed. Attachment URLs are accessible via the API with storage quotas set per workspace tier. We migrate attachments as links to the source file URL. Full file migration depends on the customer's file storage policy and whether they want to host files in Asana, Google Drive, SharePoint, or another destination. We flag any attachment that exceeds Asana's 100 MB file size limit for manual handling.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Kantata SX Opportunity / Milestone

maps to

Asana

Project or Task

lossy
Fully supported

Kantata SX (the former Kimble Application) uses Opportunity, Milestone, and Practices instead of the OX object names. We detect SX workspaces during discovery by querying the workspace type, then route extraction through the SX field map. Opportunity maps to an Asana Project or a top-level Task depending on the customer's preference. Milestone maps to a Task with the milestone subtask feature in Asana. Practices map to Asana Teams.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) logo

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) gotchas

High

Dual-product data model: Kantata OX vs. SX schema divergence

Medium

Custom Field Values have independent API rate limits

Medium

Subtask WBS numbering breaks with deep nesting in the New Task Tracker

Medium

Billing invoice history requires financial object co-migration

Low

Customer Portal migration caused case status renaming in SX support system

Asana logo

Asana gotchas

High

Automation rules have no export representation

High

API rate limits cap bulk migration throughput

Medium

Portfolios are view-only objects that do not hold data

Medium

Custom field enum options cannot be updated via API

Low

Subtasks do not appear in project views by default

Pair-specific challenges

  • PSA financial data has no Asana home

    Kantata's financial objects—billing rates, expense codes, milestone invoices, and margin projections—are tightly coupled to the workspace and resource assignment records. Asana has no billing, accounts receivable, expense coding, or financial forecasting module. Estimates and scenarios (which model supply-and-demand with role-based profitability) also have no Asana equivalent. We migrate time entries and workspace budget figures as task notes or custom fields, but the full financial model does not transfer. We flag the record counts in the migration report and recommend that the customer's finance team retains Kantata read access for historical billing records or exports them to a financial system before cutover.

  • Kantata OX vs SX schema divergence requires upfront product-line detection

    Kantata runs two distinct product lines with different object names and API shapes. OX uses Workspace, Story, and Resource; SX uses Opportunity, Milestone, and Practices. Migrating from Kantata to Asana requires identifying which product line each workspace belongs to before extraction begins. We perform product-line detection during discovery, then route each workspace through the correct field map. Organizations using both OX and SX workspaces will see two separate migration branches with different object mappings to the same Asana Projects and Tasks.

  • Custom Field Values have independent API rate limits that throttle heavy exports

    Kantata's Custom Fields and Custom Field Values are separate API objects, each with their own rate limits documented in the Kantata Knowledge Base. Workspaces with heavy custom field use across multiple subject types (Workspace, Story, Estimate, User) can cause 429 errors during export if we do not batch reads by subject_type and pace requests. We apply subject_type-scoped pagination and queue-based rate management to avoid throttling. Customers with more than 50 custom fields per workspace should expect a longer extraction phase.

  • Asana has no resource allocation, role, or capacity modeling

    Kantata's Resource Assignment object links a user to a task with hours allocated, role, and billing rate. Asana's task-level assignee is the only allocation concept—Asana has no role, rate, effective date, or capacity modeling for assignments. We map the Assignee and hours allocated, but the role and billing rate do not transfer. Customers who rely on Kantata's Team Builder for staffing trade-off analysis need to recreate this capability manually in Asana or via a third-party resource management tool. We document the count of resource assignment records in the migration report.

  • Kantata subtask WBS numbering may be absent for deeply nested hierarchies

    A known Kantata bug introduced in the 2022 New Task Tracker release causes WBS numbers to fail to display when subtasks are nested at multiple levels. This is a display issue within Kantata itself, not a data quality problem we can fix during export. We preserve the subtask hierarchy in Asana, but WBS path information is not available for records affected by this bug. We flag deeply nested subtask chains (more than three levels) for manual verification post-import and document the affected Kantata workspace records in the migration report.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Asana data migration

  1. Discovery and product-line detection

    We audit the source Kantata account across product line (OX vs SX), workspace count, task and subtask volumes, custom field definitions and their subject_type scoping, time entry volume, resource assignment records, estimate and scenario counts, and any WorkspaceGroup hierarchy. We run a product-line detection query against every workspace to route extraction through the correct field map. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object and per product line, a custom field inventory with Asana type mapping recommendations, and a preliminary Asana tier recommendation based on custom field and portfolio requirements.

  2. Schema design and financial gap documentation

    We design the Asana destination structure: Projects from Workspaces, Tasks from Tasks and Stories, Subtasks preserved in hierarchy, and Members from Users. We map Kantata custom fields to Asana custom fields by type (Number, Picklist, Text, Currency, Date). We pre-create all custom fields in Asana before any data import. For the financial gap (billing, invoices, estimates, resource assignments), we document the record counts and field names in a written Financial Gap Report, recommend whether to recreate in Asana custom fields or a third-party tool, and confirm the customer's decision before finalizing the mapping spec.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into an Asana test workspace or project area using a representative sample of workspaces (typically 10-15% of total volume). The customer's project management lead reconciles task counts, subtask hierarchy depth, time entry counts, custom field values, and assignee accuracy against the Kantata source. Any mapping corrections happen in this phase. We specifically verify that subtask WBS numbering is absent where expected per the Kantata bug, and that financial digest notes are readable. Sign-off on the sandbox migration unlocks the production migration phase.

  4. Owner reconciliation and user provisioning

    We extract every distinct Kantata User referenced on Tasks, Subtasks, Time Entries, and Resource Assignments and match by email against the destination Asana workspace members. Users without a matching Asana member go to a reconciliation queue. The customer's Asana admin provisions any missing members (active or inactive depending on the original Kantata user's status). Migration cannot proceed past this step because assignee references are required on task records.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Users and Members (validated), WorkspaceGroups as Portfolios, Workspaces as Projects, Tasks with custom fields (parent tasks first, then subtasks), Time Entries as task notes or time tracking fields, Resource Assignment data as task notes, and Financial digest notes last. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. Custom field values are extracted per subject_type with rate-limit pacing and loaded per object type. Attachments are migrated as links, with files exceeding 100 MB flagged for manual handling.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff documentation

    We freeze Kantata writes during cutover and run a final delta migration for any records modified during the migration window. We validate assignee accuracy, subtask hierarchy, and custom field completeness against the Kantata source. We deliver the Migration Report including the Financial Gap Report, the External Reference inventory, the WBS numbering gap report, and the Workflow and Automation inventory for the customer's admin to review. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. We do not rebuild Kantata workflows, billing rules, or resource allocation rules as Asana automations; that work is a separate engagement.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) logo

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Source

Strengths

  • Integrated PSA covering scoping, resourcing, billing, and business intelligence across the entire project lifecycle.
  • Role-based scenario modeling for resource composition and margin forecasting before project kickoff.
  • Dual product lines serve both Salesforce-centric and open-API infrastructure preferences.
  • Team Builder feature surfaces resource trade-offs and staffing alternatives across the portfolio.
  • Strong G2 market presence with over 1,500 verified reviews and consistent category leadership awards.

Weaknesses

  • Task management rigidity and limited advanced project tracking features relative to modern PM tools.
  • Steep onboarding and configuration complexity for non-technical administrators and project managers.
  • Opaque pricing model with enterprise-only sales preventing small teams from self-serve evaluation.
  • Split between Kantata OX and SX creates confusion and technical divergence rather than a unified product experience.
  • Resource scheduling UI lags behind competitors in responsiveness and ease of use according to user reviews.
Asana logo

Asana

Destination

Strengths

  • Unlimited projects and tasks on the free plan for teams up to 15 members.
  • 100+ native integrations including Salesforce, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams.
  • Four distinct project views (List, Board, Calendar, Timeline) in a single interface.
  • Dependency management with start/end dates and predecessor links for critical path tracking.
  • Portfolio dashboards for executives to track cross-project status and workload.

Weaknesses

  • Per-seat pricing scales expensively: Advanced tier costs nearly double Starter for a 50-seat team.
  • API does not expose all UI-accessible data; some fields require screen-scraping for full fidelity.
  • Automation rule limits on lower tiers are restrictive, causing power users to upgrade or leave.
  • No native document/wiki capability forces teams to use external tools for knowledge management.
  • Rate limits (150 req/min on free, 1,500 req/min on paid) constrain bulk migration throughput.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) and Asana.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble): Documented in Kantata Knowledge Base; separate limits apply to Custom Field Values endpoint versus standard object endpoints.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Asana migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Asana data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Asana migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Asana migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between four and six weeks for accounts under 200 workspaces and 5,000 tasks with straightforward custom field use. Migrations with deep subtask hierarchies, heavy custom field use across multiple Kantata subject types, large time entry histories (over 200,000 entries), WorkspaceGroup hierarchies requiring portfolio reconstruction, or both OX and SX workspaces move to ten to fourteen weeks because of product-line detection complexity, rate-limit pacing during extraction, and the sandbox reconciliation phase.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble).
Land in Asana, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day