Project Management migration

Migrate from KANNA to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between KANNA and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

KANNA logo

KANNA

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

60%

6 of 10

objects map 1:1 between KANNA and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from KANNA to Jira is a structural migration that crosses domains: KANNA organizes field work around Projects containing Tasks and Sub-projects with photo reports and approval flows; Jira uses Projects containing Issues organized by issue type (Story, Task, Bug, Epic) with Sprints and boards. We map KANNA Projects to Jira Projects, KANNA Tasks to Jira Issues (Story or Task), and KANNA Sub-projects to Jira Epics or flat-issue groupings depending on the destination project configuration. Custom input fields configured per template in KANNA Settings become Jira custom fields that must be created in the destination Jira site before any data inserts. KANNA's photo reports, document attachments, and comment threads migrate as Jira attachments and comments respectively. Approval flows, bulletin boards, and Gantt-derived timeline data are advisory-only: we deliver a written inventory of these configurations for the customer's Jira admin to rebuild post-migration. KANNA has no documented public API, so we rely on KANNA's native Data Import/Export feature for initial extraction and use Jira's REST API with batch chunking and rate-limit handling for the destination write.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

KANNA logo

KANNA

What's pushing teams away

  • The minimum 5-seat billing requirement forces small solo operators or two-person teams into paying for unused licenses.
  • Teams that outgrow construction-only workflows report that KANNA lacks the broader PM capabilities (resource management, advanced reporting) needed for scaling.
  • Migrating away is difficult because KANNA's native export covers Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports but not the full historical comment or chat thread history in a portable format.
  • Enterprise pricing is inquiry-only with no published limits, creating uncertainty for growing teams evaluating total cost of ownership.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How KANNA objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a KANNA object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

KANNA

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA Projects map directly to Jira Projects as the top-level container. Each KANNA Project becomes a Jira Project with the same name, description, and date range (stored as custom fields if Jira project dates are not enabled). The Jira project must be created before any Issues migrate so that the project key is available for issue-key generation. We use the Jira REST API to provision projects before bulk issue creation begins.

KANNA

Sub-project

maps to

Jira

Epic

lossy
Fully supported

KANNA Sub-projects are a first-class container for phased or multi-site work. Jira has no Sub-project object; the nearest equivalent is the Epic issue type, which groups related Stories and Tasks under a single parent. We evaluate each KANNA Sub-project during scoping: if it contains more than 10 Tasks, we create it as a Jira Epic; if it contains fewer Tasks, we flatten the Sub-project level and link the Tasks directly to the parent Project. The customer chooses the grouping strategy during scoping based on their Jira board configuration.

KANNA

Task

maps to

Jira

Story or Task (Issue)

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA Tasks map to Jira Issues. The choice of Story versus Task in Jira depends on the customer's use case: Tasks represent discrete work items (analogous to KANNA Tasks with assignees and due dates), while Stories represent user-facing deliverables with acceptance criteria. We use Task as the default KANNA Task mapping and apply Story mapping where KANNA Tasks carry a deliverable description. Status (Open, In Progress, Done) maps to Jira status values; due dates map to Jira Due Date; assignees map by email resolution to Jira User accounts.

KANNA

Client / Property

maps to

Jira

Component

lossy
Fully supported

KANNA's Data Import/Export separately handles customer information and property information. Jira uses Components as a label-level grouping within a project (not a global object like Account). We map KANNA Properties to Jira Components on the migrated Project. KANNA Clients without a Jira-native equivalent are stored as a custom field (client_name__c) on each Issue for filtering and reporting.

KANNA

Custom Input Fields (Project Templates)

maps to

Jira

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

KANNA custom fields are defined per project template via Settings > Customize Settings and store property-specific or client-specific data. Jira supports custom fields globally from the Jira Administration > Issues > Custom Fields screen. We capture both the KANNA field definition (name, type) and the values stored on each record during extraction, then pre-create equivalent Jira custom fields (Text Field, Date Field, Number Field, Select) before any issue migration begins. Field types are mapped by KANNA input type: text inputs to Jira Text Field, date inputs to Jira Date Field, dropdown selects to Jira Select.

KANNA

Photo Report

maps to

Jira

Issue Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA Photo Reports are a first-class export category in KANNA's Data Import/Export. We extract photos and their captions and attach them to the corresponding Jira Issue. Each photo becomes a Jira attachment on the migrated issue with the KANNA caption stored in the attachment description field. Photo metadata (capture date, location if present) migrates as custom issue fields if the customer requests it during scoping.

KANNA

Document

maps to

Jira

Issue Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Documents attached to KANNA Projects or Tasks migrate as Jira Issue attachments. We preserve the original filename and attachment association. Document content is not extracted or transformed; the file is attached as a binary to the Jira Issue. If a document is attached to a Project in KANNA but Jira has no project-level attachment, we attach it to the first issue in the project as a reference.

KANNA

Comment / Chat Thread

maps to

Jira

Issue Comment

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA's in-platform chat and reporting threads on Projects and Tasks map to Jira Issue Comments. We preserve the author (by email resolution to Jira User), timestamp (set as Jira comment creation date), and text content. KANNA chat threads that span multiple Tasks are split into per-issue comments; threads with no Task association are attached to the parent Project as a Project-level comment in Jira if the destination project has a project description or documentation page. We flag any thread history that cannot be cleanly attributed to a specific Jira Issue for manual handoff.

KANNA

User / Assignee

maps to

Jira

Jira User

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA user accounts and task assignees are exported separately. We resolve each KANNA user by email address to a Jira User account in the destination site. Any KANNA assignee with no matching Jira User account goes to a reconciliation queue before migration begins; the customer's Jira admin provisions the missing accounts. Inactive Jira users are supported: we set AssigneeId to the inactive user's account if the customer requires historical accuracy, or we reassign to an active user if the project is actively worked post-migration.

KANNA

Pipeline Stage / Status

maps to

Jira

Issue Status

lossy
Fully supported

KANNA Project and Task statuses are configurable per workspace. We capture the full status taxonomy from KANNA during extraction and map each to a Jira Status value in the destination project's workflow. The Jira workflow must be configured before migration so that status transitions are valid. We use Jira status categories (To Do, In Progress, Done) to group KANNA statuses into the nearest Jira equivalent.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

KANNA logo

KANNA gotchas

High

Minimum seat billing regardless of usage

High

Chat threads and reporting comments may not export cleanly

Medium

Custom input fields are template-bound, not global

Medium

Enterprise plan not available in Japan and Thailand

Medium

No documented public API for automated migration

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • KANNA has no public API — extraction relies on native export

    KANNA does not publish a REST API with documented endpoints, authentication schemes, or rate limits. We therefore extract data using KANNA's native Data Import/Export feature, which covers Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports as named export categories. Chat threads, reporting comments, and approval workflow states may not be fully captured in that export. We flag any data type not covered by KANNA's export as a manual archive step before migration begins. This extraction method adds a manual step that a documented API-based migration would not require.

  • Jira lacks a native approval gate for project tasks

    KANNA includes built-in approval flow and bulletin board features for formal field sign-offs. Jira Software does not have a native approval gate for task completion; formal approvals require either Jira Service Management (with its request-type and approval workflow features) or a third-party Marketplace app such as XaitPorter or Tempo Approvals. We do not migrate approval flows as code. We document every KANNA approval workflow as a written record with its trigger, approver, and status so the customer's Jira admin can configure an equivalent in Jira Service Management or a compatible app.

  • Sub-project hierarchy requires design decision upfront

    KANNA's Sub-project object has no direct Jira equivalent. During scoping, we evaluate each Sub-project and recommend whether to map it to a Jira Epic (for large phased groupings), a Jira Component (for groupings under 10 issues), or a label-based grouping. This decision affects the board configuration and backlog view in Jira. If the customer chooses Epic mapping, we pre-create the Epics before migrating child Tasks; if they choose flat mapping, we migrate Tasks directly to the parent Project. The choice must be made before migration begins because it affects the Jira schema we configure in the destination site.

  • Custom fields must be created in Jira before data inserts

    KANNA custom input fields are template-bound, meaning the field definition lives on the project template and values live on individual records. Jira custom fields must be pre-created in Jira Administration before any Issues are inserted, because Jira requires a field ID at insert time. We run the Jira custom field creation step before any issue migration begins. If a KANNA custom field has a type (text, date, number) that Jira does not natively support, we select the nearest Jira equivalent and document the conversion so the customer understands any data formatting changes.

  • Photo report and attachment file size is governed by Jira limits

    Jira Cloud imposes attachment file size limits per the destination site's storage tier (250GB on Standard, 500GB+ on Premium and Enterprise). KANNA photo reports and documents migrate as Jira attachments. We chunk large attachment batches and verify the destination site's available storage before migration. Attachments exceeding Jira's per-file limit (the default maximum is 10MB for attachments via REST API, though Jira administrators can increase this up to 64MB) are flagged and escalated to the customer for an admin-side configuration decision before the migration batch runs.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful KANNA to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and KANNA export audit

    We audit the source KANNA workspace across all active Projects, Sub-projects, Tasks, custom input fields defined in Settings > Customize Settings, photo report volumes, document attachment counts, and user accounts. We use KANNA's native Data Import/Export feature to extract Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports. We manually flag any chat thread or approval workflow data not covered by the export as a manual archive step. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts per object type, a list of custom fields with their KANNA input types, and the recommended Jira project type (Jira Software for software teams, Jira for general project teams) and issue type scheme.

  2. Jira destination schema setup

    We configure the Jira destination site before any data migration begins. This includes creating the Jira Project (with the appropriate project type and key), configuring the Issue Type Scheme to include Story, Task, and optionally Bug, configuring the Status workflow to map KANNA status values to Jira status values, pre-creating all Jira custom fields to match KANNA custom input fields (with type mapping: text inputs to Text Field, date inputs to Date Field, dropdowns to Select), and setting up Components for KANNA Properties. If Sub-project to Epic mapping was chosen during scoping, we pre-create the Epics in Jira so that child Issues can reference them during insert. Schema is configured via Jira REST API or manually in the Jira Administration UI, then validated before migration begins.

  3. KANNA data extraction and transform

    We extract data from KANNA using the native export plus manual screen-scraped extracts for chat threads and approval workflow records not covered by the export. We transform the extracted data into the Jira-compatible import format: Projects become Jira Projects, Sub-projects become Epics or are flattened depending on the scoping decision, Tasks become Jira Issues with Story or Task as the issue type, assignees are resolved by email match to Jira User accounts, due dates are preserved, status values are mapped via the status mapping table, and custom field values are mapped to the pre-created Jira custom fields. Attachments (photos and documents) are staged in a cloud storage bucket for batch Jira attachment after issue creation.

  4. Test migration to Jira sandbox

    We run a full test migration into a Jira Sandbox or a temporary Jira Cloud site using production-like data volume. The customer's project manager or Jira admin spot-checks 25-50 random issues for field accuracy (custom field values, assignee, due date, status), verifies photo and document attachment presence, reviews the comment thread migration on a sample of issues, and confirms the Sub-project-to-Epic mapping if applicable. We resolve any mapping errors, field type mismatches, or status mapping gaps in the test phase before touching production data. Test migration sign-off is required before production migration begins.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Jira Projects (created first to establish project keys), Epics (if applicable), Jira Issues (Tasks and Stories with assignee, due date, custom field values, and parent Epic reference resolved), Comments (linked to the migrated Issues by issue key), and Attachments (photos and documents staged and batch-attached to the correct Issues). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Jira API rate limits are managed with exponential backoff and batch chunking (default batch size 50 issues per request). KANNA write access is suspended during the production migration window to prevent delta writes during cutover.

  6. Cutover, validation, and workflow handoff

    We freeze KANNA writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then confirm Jira as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of KANNA approval flows, bulletin board configurations, and any Gantt chart dependencies that require manual rebuild in Jira Service Management or a compatible app. We support a three-day hypercare window where we resolve any data quality issues reported by the customer's team. We do not rebuild KANNA approval workflows as Jira automations inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal Jira admin task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

KANNA logo

KANNA

Source

Strengths

  • Integrated PM with task boards, Gantt charts, and calendar views in a single interface.
  • Photo report creation and document attachment directly on Projects and Tasks.
  • Approval flow and bulletin board features for formal field sign-offs.
  • Data Import/Export supporting Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports as named export categories.
  • Customizable project templates with configurable input fields via Settings.

Weaknesses

  • Minimum 5-seat license regardless of actual team size, raising costs for small operators.
  • No public API documentation found in the research; migration tooling relies on manual export/import rather than scripted API extraction.
  • Enterprise tier is opaque — no published pricing, feature limits, or SLA terms.
  • Chat and reporting threads may not be fully captured in the standard data export, risking loss of historical project context.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across KANNA and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    KANNA: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    KANNA doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your KANNA to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about KANNA to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during KANNA to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your KANNA to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts with under 5,000 Tasks, under 500 photo and document attachments, and fewer than 10 Sub-projects requiring Epic conversion. Migrations with large photo report libraries (over 1,000 files), extensive custom input field sets across multiple KANNA project templates, multiple Sub-projects requiring hierarchical redesign, or multiple KANNA workspaces move to six to ten weeks because of schema design time, file ingestion, and Jira custom field creation. Jira project type and issue type scheme configuration is completed before data migration begins and is included in the timeline.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from KANNA.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day