Project Management

Migrate your KANNA data

Construction-focused project management platform with integrated task boards, Gantt charts, and photo-reporting workflows. Targets small to mid-size field teams with a per-seat pricing model.

Encrypted end-to-end with one-click rollback
Talk to a real migration engineer in minutes
KANNA logo

In its favor

Why people choose KANNA

The signal that keeps KANNA on the shortlist. Sourced from G2, Capterra, and customer scoping calls.

Users consistently highlight KANNA's ease of use for team collaboration and task management without a steep learning curve.

The platform combines project management, task assignment, and document/photo reporting in a single tool, reducing the need for multiple systems on field projects.

Per-user pricing with a modest minimum (5 seats) makes it accessible for small to mid-size construction or field teams.

The Gantt Chart and calendar views provide multiple perspectives on project timelines, helping site managers stay on top of phased work.

Custom input fields on project templates allow teams to capture property-specific or client-specific data without relying on spreadsheets.

The minimum 5-seat billing requirement forces small solo operators or two-person teams into paying for unused licenses.

Teams that outgrow construction-only workflows report that KANNA lacks the broader PM capabilities (resource management, advanced reporting) needed for scaling.

Migrating away is difficult because KANNA's native export covers Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports but not the full historical comment or chat thread history in a portable format.

Enterprise pricing is inquiry-only with no published limits, creating uncertainty for growing teams evaluating total cost of ownership.

Reasons to switch

Why people leave KANNA

The recurring reasons buyers give for replacing KANNA. Presented as facts, not knocks.

Platform scorecard

Strengths, weaknesses, and where KANNA fits

Grades across six dimensions, plus a SWOT-style view of where the platform shines and where it falls short.

SWOT — strengths, weaknesses, and use-case fit

Strengths

Integrated PM with task boards, Gantt charts, and calendar views in a single interface.Photo report creation and document attachment directly on Projects and Tasks.Approval flow and bulletin board features for formal field sign-offs.Data Import/Export supporting Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports as named export categories.Customizable project templates with configurable input fields via Settings.

Weaknesses

Minimum 5-seat license regardless of actual team size, raising costs for small operators.No public API documentation found in the research; migration tooling relies on manual export/import rather than scripted API extraction.Enterprise tier is opaque — no published pricing, feature limits, or SLA terms.Chat and reporting threads may not be fully captured in the standard data export, risking loss of historical project context.

Where it works

Small to mid-size construction teams with 5 to 30 field workers who need centralized task tracking, Gantt visualization, and photo-based progress reporting in a single platform.Multi-site or phased construction projects where sub-project grouping and calendar views help site managers coordinate timelines across properties or locations.Field teams requiring document and photo attachments directly on tasks, enabling progress documentation without switching between separate tools.Construction or installation companies using custom project templates to capture property-specific or client-specific data fields without relying on spreadsheets.Teams needing formal approval workflows and bulletin board features for field sign-offs on completed work stages.

Where it struggles

Solo operators or two-person teams forced into a 5-seat minimum license, paying for unused seats.Organizations requiring API-based integrations or automated data pipelines, as KANNA has no documented public API.Growing teams that need resource management, capacity planning, or advanced analytics beyond task tracking.Projects requiring full historical chat or reporting thread exports for compliance or audit purposes.Teams evaluating total cost of ownership without published enterprise pricing or SLA terms.

Pricing tiers

KANNA pricing overview

KANNA uses a per-seat model with a mandatory 5-seat minimum on Light, Pro, and Pro Plus plans, billed annually at a 20% discount or monthly at a higher rate. The Enterprise tier is quote-only and not available in Japan or Thailand.

Light

Tier 1 of 4

$15/user/month (annual); $75/month total (5-seat minimum)

What's included

5 user minimum across all plansProject Management with centralized status trackingTask assignment with due datesCalendar and board viewsData Import/Export (Projects, Customers, Properties, Reports)

Need help selecting your Project Management?

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Pricing is informational. FlitStack AI does not bill on KANNA's schedule — see our quote-based pricing →

What gets migrated

KANNA object support

Object-by-object support for KANNA migrations. Per-pair details surface during scoping.

Projects

Fully supported

Projects are the top-level container in KANNA. They carry a name, status, date range, and belong to a client or property. We export Projects 1:1 and map them to the destination project's equivalent container.

Tasks

Fully supported

Tasks sit inside Projects and Sub-projects, support due dates, assignees, and status fields. We migrate tasks with their parent-child hierarchy intact and preserve the original assignee mapping.

Sub-projects

Mapping required

Sub-projects allow work to be broken into phases or sites within a parent Project. Where the destination does not support a Sub-project object, we flatten the structure and mark the parent relationship as a custom property on each Task.

Custom Input Fields (Project Templates)

Mapping required

KANNA allows customization of input fields via Settings > Customize Settings for Project templates. These fields are template-bound, not global. We capture the field definitions and their values, then map them to destination custom fields by name.

Photo Reports / Photos

Mapping required

Photo reports are a first-class export in KANNA's data export feature. We extract the photos and their captions and attach them to the corresponding Task or Project in the destination system.

Documents

Mapping required

Documents are associated with Projects and Tasks. We preserve the file and its association during migration; document content itself is not extracted or transformed.

Comments / Chat / Reporting Threads

Mapping required

KANNA provides in-platform chat and reporting threads on Projects and Tasks. We treat these as comment threads, preserving the author, timestamp, and text content.

Clients / Properties

Mapping required

The Data Import/Export feature separately handles customer information and property information. These are distinct data types in KANNA's model. We map them to the destination's equivalent contact or property object.

Gantt Chart Data

Mapping required

KANNA displays work as a Gantt Chart. The chart data is derived from task start dates, end dates, and dependencies. We export the underlying task dates and reconstruct the Gantt structure in the destination PM tool.

Pipeline Stages / Statuses

Mapping required

Project and Task statuses in KANNA are configurable per workspace. We capture the full status taxonomy and map each to the nearest equivalent status in the destination system.

Users / Assignees

Mapping required

User accounts and task assignments are exported separately. We map each KANNA user to a destination user by email address, and flag any assignee with no corresponding destination account.

Gotchas

What to watch for in KANNA migrations

Issues we've hit on past KANNA migrations, tagged by severity. FlitStack AI handles every one — surfacing them up front because buyer engineering teams want to know.

High

Minimum seat billing regardless of usage

High

Chat threads and reporting comments may not export cleanly

Medium

Custom input fields are template-bound, not global

Medium

Enterprise plan not available in Japan and Thailand

Medium

No documented public API for automated migration

How a KANNA migration works

Four steps, KANNA-specific

Connect

Not publicly documented into KANNA. Scopes limited to read-only on the data we move.

Map

We translate KANNA-specific structures (custom fields, objects, value lists) to the destination's model.

Sample

Test with a 50–200 record subset to validate KANNA quirks before production.

Migrate

Full migration with KANNA rate-limit handling. Rollback available throughout.

FAQ

KANNA migration FAQ

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during KANNA migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your KANNA migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most KANNA migrations under 1M records finish in 48–72 hours end-to-end. Larger orgs with custom objects or buyer-side security review typically take 5–7 days.

Ready when you are

Migrate KANNA.
Without the rebuild.

Free scoping call with a migration engineer. Tell us about your KANNA setup and destination — written quote back within a business day.

Free scoping call Quote in 1 business day 1,784 platforms supported