Project Management migration

Migrate from KANNA to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between KANNA and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

KANNA logo

KANNA

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between KANNA and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from KANNA to Trello is a structural simplification. KANNA organizes work hierarchically with Projects, Sub-projects, and Tasks inside a construction-focused interface with Gantt charts and photo reporting. Trello uses a flat Board-List-Card model without native Gantt support. We map KANNA Projects to Trello Boards, Sub-projects to Lists (or separate Boards for large phased scopes), and Tasks to Cards with assignees and due dates preserved. KANNA has no documented public API, so we rely on KANNA's native Data Import/Export feature, which covers Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports but does not explicitly list comment threads or chat as a named export category. We extract these where accessible and flag gaps before migration begins. Trello's own import tools do not include archived Cards; we instruct customers to unarchive all relevant Cards before the source export. Workflows, automations, approval flows, and bulletin board features from KANNA do not migrate to Trello; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild using Butler or Trello Automation.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

KANNA logo

KANNA

What's pushing teams away

  • The minimum 5-seat billing requirement forces small solo operators or two-person teams into paying for unused licenses.
  • Teams that outgrow construction-only workflows report that KANNA lacks the broader PM capabilities (resource management, advanced reporting) needed for scaling.
  • Migrating away is difficult because KANNA's native export covers Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports but not the full historical comment or chat thread history in a portable format.
  • Enterprise pricing is inquiry-only with no published limits, creating uncertainty for growing teams evaluating total cost of ownership.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How KANNA objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a KANNA object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

KANNA

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA Projects map to Trello Boards. The Project name becomes the Board name, the Project status (active, on-hold, completed) maps to Board visibility and state, and the Project date range maps to optional Board start and deadline fields via a custom Power-Up or Trello Workspace table if the customer is on Premium. We preserve the original KANNA Project ID in a card label for audit traceability.

KANNA

Sub-project

maps to

Trello

List or Board

1:many
Fully supported

KANNA Sub-projects allow phased or multi-site work within a Project. Where a Sub-project contains fewer than 10 Tasks, we map it to a Trello List inside the parent Board. Where a Sub-project contains more than 10 Tasks or represents a distinct team scope, we promote it to a separate Trello Board with a naming convention referencing the parent Project. The customer chooses the split strategy during scoping based on their preferred visibility model.

KANNA

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA Tasks map to Trello Cards. The Task name becomes the Card title, the due date maps to the Card due date, and the Task status (To Do, In Progress, Done) maps to the Card's position in the relevant List. Task assignees map to Card members by email resolution. Sub-task support in KANNA is not a separate object but a property; we represent sub-tasks as Checklist items on the parent Card in Trello.

KANNA

Custom Input Fields (Project Templates)

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields

lossy
Mapping required

KANNA custom input fields are configured per Project template via Settings > Customize Settings and are bound to the template, not the record. We capture both the field definition (field name, type) and the value stored on each Task. Trello Custom Fields (available on Standard and above) are flat key-value pairs per Card. We map KANNA field types (text, number, date, dropdown) to the equivalent Trello Custom Field type and add them to the Board before migration begins. Any KANNA fields without a Trello equivalent are appended to the Card description as a formatted block.

KANNA

Photo Report / Photo

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA Photo Reports are a first-class export category in KANNA's Data Import/Export feature. We extract photos and their captions and attach them to the corresponding Card in Trello. The photo caption migrates as Card attachment description or as a Card comment referencing the photo. Large batches of photos (over 100 per Card) may require chunking to avoid Trello attachment limits; we flag this during scoping and handle it as part of the migration run.

KANNA

Document

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Documents associated with KANNA Projects and Tasks migrate as Card attachments in Trello. The document file and its association are preserved. Document content itself is not extracted or transformed; the file is reattached in its original format. We validate attachment sizes against Trello's 10MB per file limit on Free and Standard plans and flag any files exceeding the limit before migration.

KANNA

Comments / Chat / Reporting Threads

maps to

Trello

Card Comments

1:1
Mapping required

KANNA's in-platform chat and reporting threads on Projects and Tasks are treated as Card comments. We preserve the author name, timestamp, and text content. KANNA's Data Import/Export does not explicitly list chat threads as a named export category, so we extract them from the UI or export format where accessible and flag any gaps explicitly. We advise customers to manually archive any critical thread history not captured in the export before migration begins.

KANNA

Client / Property

maps to

Trello

Board Label or Member Invite

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA separates customer information and property information as distinct data types. We map KANNA Clients to Trello Board Members (invited by email) and KANNA Properties to Trello Labels with a naming convention referencing the Property name. This preserves the client-property association while adapting it to Trello's flat member and label model.

KANNA

Pipeline Stages / Statuses

maps to

Trello

List

lossy
Mapping required

KANNA's configurable project and task statuses are captured during export. We map each KANNA status to a Trello List name using the nearest semantic equivalent (e.g., Not Started to To Do, In Progress to Doing, Completed to Done). Where KANNA has more status values than Trello Lists can cleanly represent, we consolidate closely related statuses and note the consolidation in the mapping document.

KANNA

User / Assignee

maps to

Trello

Member

1:1
Fully supported

KANNA user accounts and task assignees are resolved by email address against Trello Workspace members. We extract every distinct assignee across all migrating Tasks and match against the destination Trello Workspace. Any assignee without a corresponding Trello account is flagged in the reconciliation report for the customer's admin to provision before record migration begins.

KANNA

Gantt Chart Data

maps to

Trello

Card Dates and Checklist Dependencies

1:1
Mapping required

KANNA's Gantt Chart is derived from task start dates, end dates, and dependency relationships. Trello has no native Gantt view on Free or Standard plans; the Timeline Power-Up (Premium and Enterprise) provides a timeline view sorted by card dates. We export the underlying task start and end dates and populate Card start and due dates accordingly. Dependency links (if configured in KANNA) are preserved as Checklist items or as Card links referencing the dependent Card, since Trello does not have a native dependency field.

KANNA

Approval Flow / Bulletin Board

maps to

Trello

Manual Handoff (flagged)

lossy
Fully supported

KANNA's approval flow and bulletin board features are construction-specific workflow tools with no equivalent in Trello's core feature set. We do not migrate these as functional automations. We document each approval workflow and bulletin board post as a written item in the migration inventory, noting its current state and recommending a Trello approach (Card status changes, Butler rules, or a third-party Power-Up) for the customer's admin to implement post-migration.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

KANNA logo

KANNA gotchas

High

Minimum seat billing regardless of usage

High

Chat threads and reporting comments may not export cleanly

Medium

Custom input fields are template-bound, not global

Medium

Enterprise plan not available in Japan and Thailand

Medium

No documented public API for automated migration

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • No documented public API for KANNA export

    KANNA has no publicly documented REST API with published endpoints, authentication schemes, or rate limits found in the research. All data extraction relies on KANNA's native Data Import/Export feature, which covers Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports as named export categories. Chat threads, reporting comments, and template-bound custom field definitions are not listed as explicit export categories. We extract these where accessible and flag gaps before migration begins. Customers with complex custom field configurations on KANNA templates should allocate additional scoping time for field mapping discovery.

  • Trello exports exclude archived Cards

    Trello's native export functionality, including JSON export from the board menu and CSV export on Premium Workspaces, does not include archived Cards by default. If KANNA Tasks were ever archived in Trello during a prior use of the platform, those Cards will not appear in the export and will not be available for import to the destination. We instruct customers to unarchive all relevant Cards in Trello before the source export begins. This is a manual step that the customer must complete; we provide a numbered checklist during the pre-migration preparation phase.

  • Large attachment batches can stall during import

    Trello card import processes can stall or crash when processing large batches of attachments, particularly when downloading and re-uploading files. Community reports from Vikunja's Trello migration (which uses the same Trello API) document memory exhaustion when downloading card attachments en masse. We chunk large photo report batches and process attachments in sequence rather than parallel to avoid API rate limit responses. Any Cards with over 50 attachments are flagged for manual review or staged migration to prevent stall conditions.

  • Trello has no native Gantt view on Free or Standard plans

    KANNA's Gantt Chart view is a core feature at the Light plan tier. Trello provides no native Gantt visualization on Free ($0) or Standard ($5/user/mo) plans. The Timeline Power-Up (Premium, $10/user/mo) provides a timeline view but does not support dependency arrows or critical path analysis. We migrate task start and end dates as Card due dates. For customers who rely on Gantt views for project planning, we document this gap and recommend evaluating the Timeline Power-Up or a third-party visualization tool post-migration.

  • Custom input fields are template-bound in KANNA

    KANNA custom fields are configured per project template via Settings > Customize Settings, not as global properties on records. When exporting, the field definition is tied to the template and the value is tied to the individual record. We capture both. In Trello, Custom Fields are flat and per-card (on Standard and above). Fields that rely on template inheritance in KANNA may need to be recreated per Board in Trello, and complex conditional visibility rules on KANNA templates do not have a direct Trello equivalent. We map each field individually and document any that require manual Board-level reconfiguration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful KANNA to Trello data migration

  1. Scoping and export validation

    We audit the KANNA account across all active Projects, Sub-projects, Tasks, and configured project templates. We identify the Custom Input Fields defined per template, the photo report count and file size distribution, and any configured approval flows or bulletin board posts. We validate that the customer has access to KANNA's Data Import/Export feature (available on Light and above) and confirm the Trello Workspace and target Boards exist or will be created. We also confirm the customer's Trello plan tier since Custom Fields and Workspace-level exports require Standard or higher.

  2. Source data extraction and field mapping

    We extract data from KANNA using the native Data Import/Export feature. For each Project, Sub-project, and Task, we capture the record ID, name, status, date fields, assignee, and any custom field values. Photo reports and documents are extracted as separate file batches linked by record ID. Comment and chat threads are captured where accessible from the export format or UI. We build a field mapping spreadsheet that pairs each KANNA field to its Trello equivalent (Card title, due date, member, Custom Field) and flag any KANNA fields with no Trello destination for manual handling.

  3. Target schema setup in Trello

    We create the target Boards in Trello, one per KANNA Project. For each Board, we configure the Lists to match the KANNA pipeline stages or Task statuses. We add Custom Fields to each Board corresponding to the KANNA custom input fields, matching field types (text, number, date, dropdown). For KANNA Properties, we create Labels on each Board. For KANNA Clients, we prepare Board member invitations by email. We deploy this schema into the production Trello Workspace before any data migration begins.

  4. Test migration and reconciliation

    We run a test migration using a subset of the KANNA data (typically the three most active Projects) into a staging set of Trello Boards. We validate Card counts, Custom Field population, attachment uploads, and comment preservation. The customer's project lead reviews the test output and confirms the mapping is correct before we proceed to full production migration. Any field mapping corrections, List name adjustments, or Custom Field type changes happen at this stage.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record order: Board and List creation first, then Card creation with Custom Field values, then member invitations and Label assignment, then attachment uploads in chunked batches, then comment migration. We use Trello's REST API for all writes, respecting rate limits and handling attachment upload retries. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. We freeze KANNA writes during the final migration window and run a delta pass for any records modified during the migration window.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We perform a final reconciliation comparing migrated Card counts, attachment counts, and Custom Field coverage against the source KANNA data. We deliver the migration inventory document, which includes the full object mapping, any unmapped KANNA fields with recommendations, and a written inventory of approval flows, bulletin board posts, and automation patterns that require rebuild in Trello. We support a three-day hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Workflow rebuilds, Butler rules, and Power-Up configuration are outside the standard migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

KANNA logo

KANNA

Source

Strengths

  • Integrated PM with task boards, Gantt charts, and calendar views in a single interface.
  • Photo report creation and document attachment directly on Projects and Tasks.
  • Approval flow and bulletin board features for formal field sign-offs.
  • Data Import/Export supporting Projects, Customers, Properties, and Reports as named export categories.
  • Customizable project templates with configurable input fields via Settings.

Weaknesses

  • Minimum 5-seat license regardless of actual team size, raising costs for small operators.
  • No public API documentation found in the research; migration tooling relies on manual export/import rather than scripted API extraction.
  • Enterprise tier is opaque — no published pricing, feature limits, or SLA terms.
  • Chat and reporting threads may not be fully captured in the standard data export, risking loss of historical project context.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across KANNA and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    KANNA: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    KANNA doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your KANNA to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about KANNA to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during KANNA to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your KANNA to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and three weeks for accounts under 20 Projects and 500 Tasks with a straightforward status taxonomy. Migrations with large photo report libraries (over 1,000 attachments), complex template-bound custom field hierarchies, or Sub-project structures that require board-split decisions move to four to six weeks because of export scoping, custom field remapping, and the manual unarchiving step on Trello before migration begins.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from KANNA.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day