Project Management migration

Migrate from ]project-open[ to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between ]project-open[ and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

]project-open[ logo

]project-open[

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

67%

8 of 12

objects map 1:1 between ]project-open[ and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-3 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from ]project-open[ to Trello is a structural compression, not a straightforward record copy. ]project-open[ stores every entity — projects, tasks, companies, tickets, costs, timesheets — in a normalized PostgreSQL schema with acs_objects inheritance and acs_rels traversal, while Trello organizes work as Boards containing Lists of Cards. We extract directly from the PostgreSQL backend (no public API exists), reconstruct the project-task hierarchy, and compress ERP-level data into the flat card structure that Trello supports. Financial records, custom fields, and company-contact relationships require explicit mapping decisions before any data moves. We do not migrate ]project-open[ workflows, ticketing automations, or financial reporting configurations; these receive a written inventory for your team to rebuild using Trello's Butler or a third-party automation tool. Historical timesheet data migrates as card-custom-fields if your Trello plan supports them, otherwise as a structured CSV export for offline reference.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

]project-open[ logo

]project-open[

What's pushing teams away

  • The user interface is dated and the learning curve is steep, requiring significant training investment before teams can operate productively — a common reason teams migrate to more modern SaaS alternatives.
  • Self-hosting and maintaining ]project-open[ demands dedicated technical resources for server management, upgrades, and troubleshooting, which becomes a burden for organizations without an in-house DevOps capability.
  • Performance degrades with large data volumes and complex module configurations, pushing organizations with growing datasets toward platforms that handle scale more gracefully without intensive tuning.
  • Enterprise support and commercial extension costs become expensive at scale, eroding the cost advantage that initially attracted teams to the open-source Community Edition.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How ]project-open[ objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a ]project-open[ object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

]project-open[

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

]project-open[ Projects map to Trello Boards. The project_id becomes the board identifier, and the project_name becomes the board title. Project status (potential, active, closed) requires a mapping decision: we recommend using board visibility (public, private, workspace) or a dedicated status label column rather than separate boards per status, since Trello has no native project status lifecycle. We preserve the project description as the board description. If the customer maintains a parent-child project hierarchy in ]project-open[, we document the structure as a board-naming convention for the Trello admin to implement post-migration.

]project-open[

Task / Sub-task

maps to

Trello

Card with Checklists

1:many
Fully supported

]project-open[ Tasks and sub-tasks map to Trello Cards. Parent tasks become cards at the top-level List, and child tasks become Checklist items on the parent card. This is the standard Trello pattern for hierarchical task decomposition. Task status_id (not started, in progress, completed) maps to a combination of card due dates, labels, or List placement depending on the customer's workflow preference. We preserve task description as the card description, priority flags as colored labels, and assignees as card Members.

]project-open[

Company

maps to

Trello

Card Custom Field or External Reference

lossy
Fully supported

Trello has no native Company or Account object. We provide two options during scoping. Option one: migrate company names as a Card Custom Field (Company Name, text type) attached to every relevant card if the Trello plan supports Custom Fields. Option two: deliver a structured CSV export of all im_companies records (company_name, company_status_id, company_type) as a reference document for the customer to maintain in a separate system. We recommend the CSV approach if the source has more than 200 companies because Trello's Custom Fields apply per-card and do not support lookup relationships.

]project-open[

Ticket (im_tickets)

maps to

Trello

Card with Label

1:1
Fully supported

]project-open[ Tickets migrate to Trello Cards with a Ticket-type label applied for visual filtering. The ticket_status_id maps to a label color (for example, Open = blue, In Progress = yellow, Resolved = green, Closed = gray). Ticket description, assignee, and conversation threads migrate as card description, member assignment, and card comments respectively. Conversation threads from the im_tickets and im_ticket_message tables are flattened into chronological comments on the card.

]project-open[

Timesheet Entry (im_costs with cost_type_id = timesheet)

maps to

Trello

Card Custom Field or CSV Export

lossy
Fully supported

Timesheet data in ]project-open[ has no direct Trello equivalent. If the customer's Trello plan is Standard or above (Custom Fields enabled), we create a numeric Custom Field (Hours Logged) per card and map timesheet entries from tasks that have time tracking. We sum hours per task and write the total to the card. For detailed timesheet history (user-level, date-level, billing type), we deliver a CSV export of im_costs timesheet entries mapped by project and user for offline financial reporting.

]project-open[

Cost / Invoice (im_costs)

maps to

Trello

CSV Export

1:1
Fully supported

Invoice and financial cost records in ]project-open[ do not have a migration path into Trello because Trello has no financial object model. We extract im_costs records with cost_type_id indicating invoice or billable cost, preserve the full financial metadata (amount, currency, cost_status_id, project reference, company reference), and deliver as a structured CSV export. We map project_id and company_id to their migrated Trello Board and Company Custom Field values respectively so the financial export references the correct destination records.

]project-open[

User

maps to

Trello

Member

1:1
Fully supported

]project-open[ User accounts map to Trello Members by email match. We extract user_id, name, and email from the acs_users table and resolve against Trello workspace members. The challenge is that Trello membership is workspace-level and invitation-based, whereas ]project-open[ user records include permission hierarchies and group memberships. We map users by email, flag any user without a Trello account for the customer to provision before migration, and note that ]project-open[ role hierarchies do not transfer to Trello (which uses workspace Admin, Member, and Observer roles).

]project-open[

Custom Fields (dynamic attributes)

maps to

Trello

Card Custom Fields

lossy
Fully supported

]project-open[ allows unrestricted dynamic custom attributes per Business Object. We perform field-level discovery during scoping, extract the full set of attribute names and data types per object type, and map each to a Trello Custom Field of the closest matching type (text, number, date, dropdown, checkbox). Custom Field availability is plan-dependent: Standard plan and above only. We map text fields as text, numeric fields as number, date fields as date, and enumerated fields as dropdown with their option values preserved. Max 50 Custom Fields per board and max 50 options per dropdown field in Trello apply; we flag any attribute that exceeds these limits and propose a consolidation approach.

]project-open[

Document / Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Documents in ]project-open[ are stored as separate objects with acs_objects references. Binary files may be in the filesystem or the database depending on configuration. We identify file storage locations during discovery, extract file references, and create Card Attachments in Trello. Trello enforces a 10MB per-file limit; any attachment exceeding this threshold is flagged and the customer decides whether to compress, split, or host externally with a link card comment substituting for the attachment.

]project-open[

Label / Category

maps to

Trello

Label

1:1
Fully supported

]project-open[ Categories stored in the hierarchical category system (used for ticket types, project sectors, and object classification) map to Trello Labels. We extract category_id and category labels, filter to the relevant classification sets the customer wants to preserve in Trello, and create Label records per Board. Category hierarchy (parent-child) does not transfer since Trello Labels are flat; we preserve the full category label string as the label name and document the hierarchy as a label-naming convention (for example, Project Type: Software, Project Type: Infrastructure) for the customer to implement post-migration.

]project-open[

Office / Location

maps to

Trello

External Reference

1:1
Fully supported

Office objects in ]project-open[ store physical location data linked to companies and projects via acs_rels. Trello has no location or office concept. We extract office records (name, address) and preserve the relationship metadata (which companies and projects reference which offices) as a structured reference document. For organizations that need location context in Trello, we recommend a Card Custom Field (Location) to capture this at the project or card level.

]project-open[

Configuration Item

maps to

Trello

Card with Label

1:1
Fully supported

Configuration items tracking IT assets and dependencies in ]project-open[ do not have a native Trello equivalent. We map configuration items to Cards on a dedicated IT Assets Board with a CI-type label applied, preserve the CI attributes as card description text and Custom Fields, and document the dependency relationships (stored in acs_rels) as a CSV export for the customer to reference when rebuilding dependency tracking in their new IT management system.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

]project-open[ logo

]project-open[ gotchas

High

No public API forces direct PostgreSQL database access

Medium

Boolean fields use 't'/'f' char values not native booleans

Medium

Complex acs_objects inheritance and acs_rels traversal

Medium

Custom fields require pre-migration field discovery and mapping

Low

Date and datetime storage formats vary across modules

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • No public API forces direct PostgreSQL access

    ]project-open[ exposes no documented public REST or SOAP API. Every migration must connect directly to the underlying PostgreSQL database. We require read-only database credentials and network access to the database server during the discovery and extraction phases. This means migrations cannot be performed API-only and depend on infrastructure access the customer must provision. We establish a secure, scoped database connection during discovery and execute all data extraction through SQL queries against the well-documented OpenACS schema. The customer must ensure their firewall and database permissions allow this access for the duration of the migration window.

  • Trello API rate limits constrain write throughput

    Trello's REST API enforces rate limits that vary by endpoint and plan tier. The standard limit for most operations is approximately 100-200 requests per minute per token, with burst allowances. For migrations with more than 10,000 cards, we implement exponential backoff, request batching (up to 10 cards per batch where supported), and chunking to stay within Trello's per-minute and per-second limits. Attachments upload separately from card creation and are subject to their own rate limit queue. We log all API responses including 429 Too Many Requests and automatically retry with backoff; customers do not need to provision additional API tokens.

  • Trello Custom Fields are plan-gated

    Trello Custom Fields are available only on Standard ($5/user/month), Premium ($10/user/month), and Enterprise ($17.50/user/month) plans. The Free plan does not support Custom Fields. If the customer's Trello workspace is on the Free plan, we cannot migrate dynamic attributes and custom fields from ]project-open[ as native Trello Custom Fields. We flag this gap during scoping and recommend either upgrading the Trello plan before migration or accepting a CSV export of custom attribute data as the alternative. We do not recommend downgrading to Free post-migration if custom fields are part of the core workflow.

  • Financial records (invoices, costs) have no Trello equivalent

    ]project-open[ stores financial records — invoices, costs, and timesheet entries — in im_costs with a rich schema including variable_cost_p, cost_status_id, and cost_type_id. Trello has no invoice, cost, or timesheet object. We do not create a financial data structure inside Trello; instead, we extract the full im_costs dataset and deliver it as a structured CSV export with column headers matching the source schema. This export is intended for import into a dedicated accounting or financial tool post-migration. The customer must decide which financial system receives this export and plan for that integration separately.

  • Workflows and automations do not migrate

    ]project-open[ stores ticketing workflows, project status transitions, and notification rules as OpenACS application logic and Tcl procedures. Trello automations (Butler rules) are a separate rule-based system with different trigger types, conditions, and actions. We do not migrate workflows as executable code. We deliver a written inventory of every active ]project-open[ workflow and automation rule describing its trigger (for example, ticket status change on a specific ticket_type_id), conditions, and actions. The customer's team rebuilds these in Trello Butler or a third-party automation tool (such as Make or Zapier) post-migration. Automations that depend on financial thresholds or ERP data crossing boundaries cannot be rebuilt in Trello at all and are marked as requiring a process redesign.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful ]project-open[ to Trello data migration

  1. Infrastructure access and database extraction

    We establish a read-only PostgreSQL connection to the ]project-open[ database and run a full schema discovery pass. This identifies which modules are active (project management, CRM, financials, ticketing), the full set of custom attribute definitions per object type, the acs_rels table entries defining project-task hierarchies and company-contact relationships, and any filesystem versus database file storage configuration. We extract all data in CSV format during this phase. The customer provisions database credentials and network access; we handle the connection securely with no write operations during extraction.

  2. Trello workspace scoping and plan assessment

    We assess the destination Trello workspace for plan tier (Free/Standard/Premium/Enterprise) and determine whether Custom Fields are available. We map the source modules to a Trello board structure: we recommend one Board per ]project-open[ project, with Lists representing task status categories and Labels representing ticket types and category classifications. If the customer has more than 10 active projects and wants to use the Free plan, we flag the 10-board workspace limit and propose a board consolidation strategy before migration begins.

  3. Object mapping specification and customer decisions

    We produce a written mapping specification for every object type in scope. This document records the migration decision for each entity: Board from Project, Card from Task, Card with Label from Ticket, Member from User, and the disposition for financial records (CSV export), companies (Custom Field or reference document), and custom fields (Custom Field migration or CSV). The customer reviews and approves the mapping specification, including the checklist-from-subtask conversion approach and any label-naming conventions, before we begin any data transformation.

  4. Data transformation and schema preparation

    We transform extracted data into Trello API-compatible JSON payloads. Tasks become card creation requests with parent project resolved to board_id, subtasks become checklist items on the parent card, labels are created per Board before any cards are added, and members are resolved by email against the Trello workspace. Boolean fields from ]project-open[ ('t'/'f' char values) are converted to proper boolean types. Dates are normalized to ISO 8601 UTC. For any record exceeding Trello's attachment limit, we flag and hold for customer decision. We run a dry-run import against a test Board to validate mapping fidelity before committing to the full migration.

  5. Migration execution with API rate-limit handling

    We execute the migration using Trello's REST API with exponential backoff on 429 responses, batch chunking for multi-card operations, and attachment upload queuing separate from card creation. Migration proceeds in dependency order: Board creation first, then Label creation per Board, then Members, then Cards with Checklist items, then Comments, then Card Custom Fields. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report showing records attempted, records succeeded, and records held for retry or customer decision.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation inventory handoff

    We freeze ]project-open[ write access during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, and deliver the complete Trello workspace with all boards, lists, cards, labels, members, and comments. We deliver the Workflow and Automation Inventory document covering every active ]project-open[ workflow with its trigger, conditions, and recommended Trello Butler equivalent or process redesign note. We do not rebuild automations inside Trello; that work belongs to the customer's admin team or a Butler-specialist partner. We support a one-week post-migration window for reconciliation of any data quality issues raised during initial Trello usage.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

]project-open[ logo

]project-open[

Source

Strengths

  • Covers the full project lifecycle — planning, execution, financial controlling, and billing — in a single integrated platform.
  • Open-source Community Edition is free with no per-seat or per-feature licensing costs.
  • Modular architecture lets organizations activate only the functional areas they need, reducing complexity for simpler deployments.
  • ERP-level financial management including timesheet tracking, cost accounting, and invoice generation.
  • Strong documentation of the underlying data model allows technical teams to audit and understand data structure without vendor dependency.

Weaknesses

  • No public REST API — all migrations require direct database access to the PostgreSQL backend.
  • Interface is widely described as dated and difficult to navigate, increasing onboarding time significantly.
  • Self-hosting requires dedicated technical resources for installation, maintenance, and upgrades.
  • Performance degrades with large data volumes or heavily configured module setups.
  • Commercial Professional and Enterprise editions are required for advanced reporting and official support, adding cost that offsets the free Community Edition advantage.
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across ]project-open[ and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    ]project-open[: Not applicable — no public API.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    ]project-open[ doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your ]project-open[ to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about ]project-open[ to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during ]project-open[ to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your ]project-open[ to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations under 5,000 tasks with one active module (project management or ticketing) complete in two to three weeks. Complex migrations with multiple active modules (project management, CRM, financials, ticketing), large custom attribute sets, or more than 50,000 total records move to four to eight weeks because of the direct PostgreSQL extraction, acs_rels relationship traversal, and the board-structure design work required before data loads begin. The timeline also depends on Trello API rate-limit response patterns during the write phase.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from ]project-open[.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day