Project Management migration

Migrate from Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Microsoft Project

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) and Microsoft Project. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Project.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) logo

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Source

Microsoft Project

Destination

Microsoft Project logo

Compatibility

70%

7 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) and Microsoft Project.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

2-4 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from Kantata Professional Services Cloud to Microsoft Project is a scope reduction, not a lateral move. Kantata's integrated PSA model combines project planning, resource optimization, financial forecasting, and billing in one platform; Microsoft Project provides core scheduling and resource management without a billing module, role-based scenario modeling, or AI-powered resource matching. We extract Workspaces, Tasks, Subtasks, Resource Assignments, and Time Entries through the Kantata REST API with subject_type-scoped rate-limit management, then map them into Microsoft Project MPP or Project Online format. We flag the billing, estimates, and milestone-triggered invoice records that cannot migrate because Microsoft Project does not expose those as importable objects, and we deliver a written inventory of Kantata automations and custom billing rules for the customer's admin to handle manually post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) logo

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

What's pushing teams away

  • Task management is widely described as inflexible—advanced project tracking features require manual updates and struggle to accommodate complex multi-phase or milestone-heavy engagements.
  • The learning curve is steep for non-technical project managers, particularly around configuring custom fields, setting up billing rules, and understanding the distinction between OX and SX workspaces.
  • Pricing is opaque and scales significantly with seat count and feature tier, making it difficult to predict costs for growing teams or firms with seasonal staff fluctuations.
  • Users report that resource scheduling interfaces feel dated compared to modern alternatives, with slow screen transitions and unintuitive drag-and-drop allocation interactions.
  • The 2022 Mavenlink–Kimble merger created a bifurcated product line with divergent terminology and data models, confusing customers who expected a unified platform post-merger.

Choosing

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

What's pulling them in

  • Organizations already running Microsoft 365 and Azure AD adopt Microsoft PPM because it slots into existing identity, Teams, and SharePoint infrastructure without requiring a separate identity provider or SSO vendor.
  • Enterprise PMOs choose it for critical-path scheduling, baseline comparison, cross-project dependencies, and resource utilization reporting that standalone PM tools cannot replicate at this depth.
  • Project Online's integration with Power BI gives portfolio-level dashboards and cost-rollup reporting that satisfies executive governance requirements without third-party BI tooling.
  • Government, financial services, and healthcare organizations select it because FedRAMP, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 compliance certifications meet enterprise procurement requirements out of the box.
  • Large IT departments default to it as the market-leader in project portfolio management software, often driven by corporate licensing agreements that bundle it with other Microsoft 365 seats.

Object mapping

How Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) objects map to Microsoft Project

Each row shows how a Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) object lands in Microsoft Project, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Workspace

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Workspaces (OX) and their equivalent Project containers in SX map to Microsoft Project as the top-level project record. We extract Workspace name, status, start/end dates, description, and archived flag. Workspace-level custom field values migrate as Microsoft Project custom fields (if Project Plan 3 or 5) or are documented as a manual field map for the customer's admin to enter post-migration. Microsoft Project does not support multi-workspace portfolio views natively; we deliver a SharePoint or Project Online site map documenting how each migrated project should be organized.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Task / Story

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Tasks (OX) and Stories share the same underlying object and map directly to Microsoft Project tasks. We preserve parent-child nesting, WBS numbering (noting that Kantata's New Task Tracker WBS display can misfire at deep nesting levels per 2022 release notes), start and finish dates, percent complete, and task-level notes. We flag any task without a valid start or finish date as a scheduling gap requiring manual entry in Microsoft Project.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Subtask

maps to

Microsoft Project

Subtask (outline indent)

1:1
Fully supported

Subtasks attach to parent tasks in Kantata and inherit some parent-level fields. We preserve the hierarchy as outline indent levels in Microsoft Project. Where Kantata's WBS numbering misfires at deep nesting (documented as a known bug in the New Task Tracker), we regenerate the WBS path during transform and flag affected records in the migration report. Subtask-level custom field values migrate alongside their parent task record.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

User

maps to

Microsoft Project

Resource (Enterprise Resource Pool)

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata internal users map to Microsoft Project resources. We extract user name, email, and role assignment. Contractors and external talent from Kantata's Talent Network migrate as resources with their role designation preserved. Resource types (material vs. work) map from Kantata's resource type field. Microsoft Project requires a Project Online or Project Server resource pool for cross-project resource management; we document the resource pool structure in the migration output.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Resource Assignment

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Assignment

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Resource Assignments link a User to a Task within a Workspace and carry allocated hours, role, and billing rate. We map these to Microsoft Project task assignments with hours preserved where Project allows. Note that Microsoft Project does not store billing rate or cost-per-role at the assignment level unless the resource has a cost rate table configured; we document which assignments had non-default billing rates in Kantata for manual entry into Project's resource sheet cost tables.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Time Entry

maps to

Microsoft Project

Task Actual Work

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata time entries record billable or non-billable hours against a task or project. We extract time entry date, hours, user, and billable flag and write actual work hours to the corresponding Microsoft Project task assignment. Non-billable hours write to a separate custom field (ms_project_nonbillable_hours__c) rather than actual work to prevent distorting project cost calculations. Microsoft Project's timesheet model is simpler than Kantata's; we document any time entry without a matching task or user as a reconciliation gap.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

WorkspaceGroup (Group)

maps to

Microsoft Project

Project Site or SharePoint Folder

1:1
Fully supported

Kantata Groups organize workspaces into portfolios and carry their own custom fields. We map Groups to SharePoint document libraries or Project Online sites for folder-based organization in Microsoft 365. Group-level custom field values require a separate API call scoped to WorkspaceGroup and migrate as metadata on the corresponding SharePoint folder if available in the destination plan tier.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

External Reference

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not applicable

lossy
Fully supported

Kantata SX workspaces carry Salesforce external references linking project records to CRM Opportunities and Accounts. These references are not importable into Microsoft Project and do not have an equivalent construct. We document every external reference found during extraction so the customer's admin can re-establish the Salesforce link through a different integration mechanism (Power Automate flow, third-party connector) post-migration.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Estimate / Scenario

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not applicable

lossy
Fully supported

Kantata Estimates and Scenarios model supply-and-demand compositions with role-based resource forecasting and margin projections. Microsoft Project does not have an equivalent scenario modeling feature. We export all active and historical scenarios as a written reference document with role counts, hours, and margin projections so the customer's admin can use them as manual input for future project planning in Microsoft Project.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Billing / Invoice

maps to

Microsoft Project

Not applicable

lossy
Fully supported

Kantata's billing module stores invoices, milestone triggers, expense codes, and billing rates tied to workspaces and resource assignments. Microsoft Project has no billing or accounts-receivable module. We extract invoice headers, line items, and payment status as a written reference document for manual entry into the customer's accounting system (QuickBooks, NetSuite, Sage) or for reconciliation purposes. We preserve the invoice-to-project linkage as a custom field (kantata_invoice_ref__c) on the migrated project record.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) logo

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) gotchas

High

Dual-product data model: Kantata OX vs. SX schema divergence

Medium

Custom Field Values have independent API rate limits

Medium

Subtask WBS numbering breaks with deep nesting in the New Task Tracker

Medium

Billing invoice history requires financial object co-migration

Low

Customer Portal migration caused case status renaming in SX support system

Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project gotchas

High

Project for the web is being retired and merged into Microsoft Planner

Medium

Planner-tier portfolio features are incomplete despite Plan 5 labeling

Medium

Web app constraint controls are weaker than the Windows desktop client

High

Project requires a separate license not bundled with standard Microsoft 365

Medium

Project Online API is edition-gated and inconsistently documented

Pair-specific challenges

  • Kantata OX and SX use divergent object schemas requiring schema-mapping upfront

    Kantata runs two product lines with different object names: OX uses Workspace, Story, and Resource; SX uses Opportunity, Milestone, and Practices. We identify which product line each workspace belongs to during discovery, then route extraction through the correct field map before writing to Microsoft Project. Mixing these schemas causes mismatched task types, missing resource assignments, and broken parent-child relationships in the destination. We apply a schema-mapping layer before any extraction begins.

  • Billing, estimates, and scenario data have no Microsoft Project equivalent

    Kantata's billing module, milestone invoices, expense codes, and role-based estimate scenarios do not map to any Microsoft Project object. We do not write this data into Project. We extract invoice and estimate records as a written reference document with Kantata-to-project linkage preserved in a custom field, and the customer's admin enters the financial data into their accounting system manually post-migration. Estimates used for staffing should be recreated in Project as baseline tasks with manual cost entries.

  • Custom Field Values have independent API rate limits in Kantata

    Kantata exposes Custom Fields and Custom Field Values as separate API objects, each with their own rate limit documentation. Heavy use of custom fields on Tasks, Projects, or Estimates causes export throttling if we do not batch reads by subject_type and pace requests per the published limits. We apply subject_type-scoped pagination and queue-based rate management to avoid 429 errors during extraction. Microsoft Project custom fields (Plan 3 and 5 only) are limited in data type; we validate type compatibility before writing.

  • Deeply nested subtask WBS numbering fails in Kantata's New Task Tracker

    A documented 2022 Kantata bug causes WBS numbers to misfire when multiple subtask levels are nested in the New Task Tracker. During migration, deeply nested subtask hierarchies may arrive without correct WBS path information. We flag this for manual verification post-import, regenerate the WBS path during our transform step where possible, and document all affected records in the migration report with their original Kantata WBS values for the customer's PMO to reconcile.

  • Resource billing rates do not transfer into Microsoft Project's cost model

    Kantata stores billing rates at the resource assignment level with effective dates. Microsoft Project stores cost rates at the resource sheet level using cost rate tables. Rates in Kantata that deviate from the resource default rate require manual entry into Project's resource cost tables post-migration. We flag every assignment with a non-default billing rate in Kantata with the rate value, effective date, and assignment ID so the customer's admin can update the resource sheet before the project baseline is finalized.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Microsoft Project data migration

  1. Discovery and product line identification

    We audit the source Kantata environment to identify which product line each workspace belongs to (OX vs SX). We extract workspace count, task hierarchy depth, subtask nesting levels, resource assignment volume, time entry count, custom field usage by subject_type, and any external reference records. We also identify billing and estimate records that cannot migrate and document them for the written reference deliverable. This step produces a written migration scope with record counts per object and a migration roadmap.

  2. Schema mapping and destination preparation

    We design the Microsoft Project target structure: MPP files for desktop users or Project Online site structure for cloud deployments. We map Kantata Workspaces to individual Project files or Project Online projects, preserve task nesting as outline levels, and map resource assignments to Project resources. We validate custom field type compatibility (Kantata picklist to Project drop-down, Kantata currency to Project number or currency if supported in the plan tier). We flag any Kantata custom field with a data type that cannot map to Microsoft Project.

  3. Extraction with rate-limit management

    We extract Kantata data in dependency order: Users first (for resource resolution), then Workspaces, Tasks, Subtasks, Resource Assignments, and Time Entries. We apply subject_type-scoped pagination on custom field values to avoid 429 rate-limit errors. We extract billing and estimate records in parallel as a separate extract for the written reference document. We preserve the OX vs SX schema routing throughout extraction and flag any workspace that cannot be fully resolved.

  4. Transform, WBS regeneration, and billing flag

    We transform Kantata records into Microsoft Project format: task dates, durations, and dependencies map to Project fields; parent-child relationships map to outline indent; resource assignments map to the resource pool with a lookup by email. We regenerate WBS numbering for any subtask chain flagged as affected by the 2022 New Task Tracker bug. We flag assignments with non-default Kantata billing rates for manual entry into Project's resource cost tables. We attach the invoice and estimate reference document to the appropriate project record where Project Online allows attachments.

  5. Import and reconciliation

    We write to Microsoft Project format (MPP via COM interop for desktop, or Project Online API for cloud). For cloud deployments, we use the Project Online REST API with batch operations and throttling. We reconcile record counts: tasks written vs tasks extracted, assignments written vs assignments extracted, time entries written vs time entries extracted. Any gap greater than 1% triggers a re-run of the affected phase. We do not overwrite existing Project plans without explicit customer authorization.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation handoff

    We freeze Kantata writes during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Microsoft Project as the system of record. We deliver the written billing and estimate reference document, the WBS reconciliation report for affected subtask chains, and the non-default billing rate flag list. We do not migrate Kantata automations, billing rules, or custom workflow configurations; these are documented as a separate rebuild task for the customer's admin.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) logo

Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble)

Source

Strengths

  • Integrated PSA covering scoping, resourcing, billing, and business intelligence across the entire project lifecycle.
  • Role-based scenario modeling for resource composition and margin forecasting before project kickoff.
  • Dual product lines serve both Salesforce-centric and open-API infrastructure preferences.
  • Team Builder feature surfaces resource trade-offs and staffing alternatives across the portfolio.
  • Strong G2 market presence with over 1,500 verified reviews and consistent category leadership awards.

Weaknesses

  • Task management rigidity and limited advanced project tracking features relative to modern PM tools.
  • Steep onboarding and configuration complexity for non-technical administrators and project managers.
  • Opaque pricing model with enterprise-only sales preventing small teams from self-serve evaluation.
  • Split between Kantata OX and SX creates confusion and technical divergence rather than a unified product experience.
  • Resource scheduling UI lags behind competitors in responsiveness and ease of use according to user reviews.
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

Destination

Strengths

  • Deep critical-path scheduling with baseline comparison and cross-project dependency tracking unmatched by lighter PM tools.
  • Native Azure AD authentication, Teams integration, and Power BI reporting sit on infrastructure enterprises already license and manage.
  • Enterprise governance controls including demand intake workflows, resource request approval, and portfolio-level capacity analysis.
  • Supports both Waterfall and Agile methodologies within the same project, accommodating hybrid delivery teams.
  • Scalable from Project Plan 1 for small teams to Project Server on-premises for regulated industries with strict data-sovereignty requirements.

Weaknesses

  • Ease-of-use scores trail the category average by a wide margin; onboarding friction frustrates new users consistently across G2 and Capterra reviews.
  • Pricing ranks 42nd of 49 tools in its category — the total cost of ownership including IT administration and training is rarely recovered for small or mid-market teams.
  • No built-in client portal, external stakeholder sharing, or proofing workflow, limiting use cases to internal PMO environments only.
  • The web interface (Project for the web / Planner Premium) has materially weaker constraint controls and resource auto-leveling than the Windows desktop client.
  • Project for the web is being consolidated into Microsoft Planner, creating uncertainty about which product tier will host project portfolio data long-term.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) and Microsoft Project.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble): Documented in Kantata Knowledge Base; separate limits apply to Custom Field Values endpoint versus standard object endpoints.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Microsoft Project migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Microsoft Project data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Microsoft Project migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble) to Microsoft Project migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between two and four weeks for organizations with up to 50 active projects, clean task hierarchies, and under 20,000 time entries. Migrations with complex subtask nesting, hundreds of workspaces, or large time entry histories (over 50,000 records) requiring parent-record resolution move to four to eight weeks. The extraction and transform phases are typically shorter than the reconciliation and validation phases because Kantata's dual-product schema requires careful routing before writing.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Kantata Professional Services Cloud (formerly Mavenlink + Kimble).
Land in Microsoft Project, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day