Project Management migration

Migrate from AGILITY to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between AGILITY and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

AGILITY logo

AGILITY

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

71%

10 of 14

objects map 1:1 between AGILITY and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-6 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Migrating from digital.ai AGILITY to Trello is a structural reduction, not a lateral move. AGILITY is an enterprise ALM platform with a layered object hierarchy — Projects contain Iterations, which contain Stories, Defects, and Tasks, each with rich custom field schemas and cross-object relationship fields. Trello operates as a flat Kanban board system: Boards hold Lists that hold Cards. There is no native iteration object, no sprint backlog, no test case management, no standalone issue tracker, and no support for custom field schemas beyond five types (text, number, checkbox, date, dropdown) with 25-character names on the free and Standard tiers. We resolve the structural gap by mapping Agility Projects to Trello Boards, splitting Agility Stories and Defects into Cards, converting task hierarchies into card checklists, preserving iteration cadence as board labels, and noting every Agility object (Test Sets, Test Cases, Issues, Environments, Requests) that has no Trello equivalent. We do not migrate automations, workflow rules, or test management artifacts; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to recreate post-migration.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

AGILITY logo

AGILITY

What's pushing teams away

  • Public pricing is not disclosed by digital.ai, requiring sales-led engagement even for small evaluations — competitors like Jira and Azure DevOps publish per-seat rates.
  • UI is widely perceived as dated relative to Jira, Linear, and Azure DevOps, particularly for individual contributors who interact with work items daily.
  • Edition gating means API and Data Mart access are restricted to higher tiers, blocking smaller orgs from automation and reporting.
  • Custom-field System-Name vs. display-label divergence creates silent data mismatches that bite teams during reporting and integration builds.
  • Smaller and less active community than Atlassian's ecosystem, so add-ons, third-party integrations, and shared expertise are harder to source.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How AGILITY objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a AGILITY object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

AGILITY

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Agility Projects map 1:1 to Trello Boards. Each Agility Project becomes a separate Trello Board with the Project name as the board title and the Project description migrated to the board description field. If the customer uses multiple Agility Teams within a Project, we create separate Lists within the board rather than separate Boards, unless each Team has a distinct board cadence that requires separation. Workspace membership in Trello maps to the Agility Project Owner and Team assignments.

AGILITY

Iteration/Sprint

maps to

Trello

Board Labels

lossy
Fully supported

Agility Iterations have no direct Trello equivalent. We reconstruct the iteration cadence by creating Trello Board Labels in the format 'Sprint N — Start Date to End Date' using Trello's label naming convention. Sprint status (Active/Closed/Planning) is appended to the label name. Teams that require full sprint planning features (backlog views, burndown, velocity tracking) are directed to the Planyway or Scrum for Trello Power-Up as a post-migration configuration step; we document the label scheme and recommend which Power-Up suits the team's cadence.

AGILITY

Story

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Agility Stories migrate to Trello Cards placed in the List representing the corresponding Story status (Backlog, In Progress, Done). Story points map to a Number-type Custom Field 'Story Points' on the board (Premium tier) or to a checklist item 'Story Points: N' inserted at the top of the card. The Story description migrates as the card description with rich text preserved where Trello supports it. Story priority maps to Trello Labels ('Priority: High', 'Priority: Medium', 'Priority: Low') using the Agility priority field values.

AGILITY

Defect

maps to

Trello

Card (with label)

1:1
Fully supported

Agility Defects migrate to Trello Cards with a 'Defect' label applied to distinguish them from Stories. The severity field (Critical, Major, Minor, Trivial) maps to an additional severity label or to a Dropdown-type Custom Field 'Severity' on Premium boards. Defect status maps to the appropriate List. The detected-in-iteration information is preserved as a label or card comment noting the originating sprint. Defects without a parent Story are created as standalone Cards; Defects linked to a parent Story are placed in the same List and optionally cross-referenced via a card link.

AGILITY

Task

maps to

Trello

Checklist item on Card

1:many
Fully supported

Agility Tasks are child work items of Stories or Defects. In Trello, child Tasks migrate as Checklist items on the parent Card rather than as separate Cards. This preserves the parent-child relationship within the single-Card paradigm Trello uses. Each Checklist item captures the Task title, assignee (as '@mention' in the checklist item text), estimated hours (appended to the item name), and status (completed checkbox for tasks with status 'Done', unchecked for all others). Tasks that exceed the natural checklist scope of a single card (complex tasks with their own comments, attachments, or sub-subtasks) are flagged for the customer to convert to linked Cards rather than checklists.

AGILITY

Custom Fields

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields (Premium) or Labels

lossy
Mapping required

Agility custom fields on Stories, Defects, and Tasks require type-aware mapping to Trello. Text fields migrate to Trello Text-type Custom Fields (Premium). Number fields migrate to Number-type Custom Fields. Date fields migrate to Date-type Custom Fields. Dropdown-type fields migrate to Dropdown-type Custom Fields. Checkbox fields migrate to Checkbox-type Custom Fields. Multi-select fields (not natively supported by Trello Custom Fields) are converted to a comma-separated text field or to multiple Checkbox fields per option. Standard-tier Trello limits boards to one Custom Field; Premium is required for full custom field migration. We flag Standard-tier boards during scoping and recommend upgrading before migration if custom field data is material.

AGILITY

Issue

maps to

Trello

Card (with label)

1:1
Fully supported

Agility Issues tracked in Fact.Issue are standalone work items with their own schema. They migrate to Trello Cards with an 'Issue' label applied. The Issue priority and status fields map to card Labels and Lists respectively. Issues do not have a native Trello equivalent object — the Card-with-label pattern is the closest structural mapping. We flag this as a schema reduction and note it in the written inventory for the customer's admin to communicate to stakeholders who rely on Issue reporting.

AGILITY

Test Set

maps to

Trello

Card (with checklist)

1:1
Fully supported

Agility Test Sets aggregate Test Cases and have a schema that varies by AGILITY edition. Trello has no native test management object. We migrate Test Sets as Cards with a checklist named 'Test Cases' containing one checklist item per Test Case (title and expected result). Test Set status is stored as a label. Test Sets with step-level attachments cannot preserve those attachments in Trello's flat card model; attachments are added as card-level file attachments and noted in the migration log. This mapping is documented as a known data reduction from AGILITY's test management to Trello's card-based workaround.

AGILITY

Test Case

maps to

Trello

Checklist item

1:many
Fully supported

Agility Test Cases carry steps, expected results, and custom fields. They migrate as Checklist items under the parent Test Set Card (see above). The step sequence number, description, and expected result are concatenated into the checklist item text. Custom fields on Test Cases (if available in the source edition) are stored as card comments on the parent Card. Trello does not support test case traceability, execution history, or pass/fail status natively; this is a known limitation documented in the migration scope.

AGILITY

Comment

maps to

Trello

Card Comments

1:1
Fully supported

Agility work item comments migrate to Trello Card comments. The comment author display name and timestamp are preserved in the Trello comment header. Comment body migrates as plain text. Rich text formatting in Agility comments is simplified to plain text with markdown-style emphasis where Trello supports it. If the original comment contains @mentions, we replace them with plain text since Trello comment mentions require the mentioned user to be a board member at migration time.

AGILITY

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Agility attachment binaries are stored in a separate OID registry from the work item JSON payload. We run a two-pass migration: first, we export attachment binaries and upload them to Trello Cards via the Trello API attachment endpoint, capturing the destination-generated attachment URLs. Second, we re-associate the attachment URLs with the corresponding Card IDs using a cross-reference table built during discovery. Trello's attachment limits apply: 10MB per file on Free, 250MB on Standard and above. Files exceeding these limits are flagged for the customer to store externally (Google Drive, SharePoint) and link from the Card.

AGILITY

Member/User

maps to

Trello

Workspace Member

1:1
Fully supported

Agility user records (display name, email, role, team membership) map to Trello Workspace members. We extract distinct owner and assignee references from all work items and match them by email to Trello Workspace members. Any Agility user without a matching Trello Workspace member is held in a reconciliation queue for the customer's admin to provision before Card import begins, because Trello @mentions and Card assignments require an existing Workspace member. Active Directory-sourced users in Agility are flagged if the destination Trello Workspace uses a different identity provider.

AGILITY

Environment

maps to

Trello

Label (stub)

1:1
Fully supported

Agility Environments are simple name/description records referenced by Test Sets and Defects. Trello has no native environment object. We create Trello Labels in the format 'Env: [environment_name]' on relevant boards and apply them to the Cards that reference the environment. This is a stub mapping — environments without Cards referencing them are noted in the migration log but not otherwise represented in Trello.

AGILITY

Request

maps to

Trello

Card (with label)

1:1
Fully supported

Agility Requests tracked in Fact.Request represent incoming work or stakeholder asks with their own custom field set. They migrate to Trello Cards with a 'Request' label. Request custom fields are mapped using the same custom field strategy as Stories and Defects (Premium Custom Fields or Labels). Requests without a parent relationship to a Story or Defect are created as standalone Cards in the board's 'Backlog' or 'Incoming' List.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

AGILITY logo

AGILITY gotchas

High

Edition-gated API access blocks migration extraction

High

Custom field System Name vs. display label mismatch

Medium

Rate limits are undocumented for direct consumption

Medium

Test Set and Test Case schemas vary by Agility edition

Medium

Attachment OID registry requires a separate migration pass

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • AGILITY API access is Enterprise-tier gated

    The Agility REST API and Data Mart are restricted to Enterprise-tier licenses. Starter and Pro tier customers cannot programmatically export data via API, forcing reliance on manual CSV exports or the built-in UI. We identify the customer's current AGILITY edition during scoping. If API access is unavailable we pivot to a file-based migration path using Agility's native export functionality, though this limits which asset types and custom fields are extractable. The file-based path adds two to three weeks to the timeline because CSV exports must be run per asset type, per Project, and reconciled manually against the data model.

  • Trello has no native sprint or iteration object

    Agility's Sprint and Iteration objects have no structural equivalent in Trello. Sprint start/end dates, velocity, and backlog management must be reconstructed through board Labels, Power-Ups (Planyway, Scrum for Trello), or manual admin processes. We document the iteration cadence during discovery, create Labels in the format 'Sprint N — YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD', and flag which sprint artifacts (backlog, velocity, burndown) cannot be preserved natively. Teams that rely on sprint reporting in AGILITY should plan to configure a Power-Up post-migration or accept a reduced sprint tracking capability.

  • Trello Standard tier limits custom fields to one per board

    Trello's Standard tier ($5/user/month) restricts boards to one Custom Field. Premium ($10/user/month) unlocks unlimited Custom Fields with a 25-character name limit. AGILITY's custom field schemas commonly include 10-20+ fields per asset type across Stories, Defects, Tasks, and Test Cases. During scoping we audit the full custom field inventory and either recommend upgrading to Trello Premium or establish a priority-ordered subset of fields to migrate on Standard. Fields that cannot be migrated due to tier constraints are listed in the written inventory for manual recreation or for use as Labels.

  • Custom field Data Mart column names differ from display labels in AGILITY

    AGILITY's Data Mart generates column names for custom fields from the field's System Name (the internal identifier), not the user-facing display label. A field named 'Customer Priority' in the AGILITY UI may expose a Data Mart column of 'Custom_CustomerPriority' or similar. We extract both the System Name and display label during discovery and generate a dual-key mapping table. If this step is skipped, destination field matching silently fails and data lands in the wrong columns or is dropped. This gotcha applies regardless of destination platform because it affects the AGILITY export side of any migration.

  • Test Sets and Test Cases have no native Trello representation

    AGILITY's Test Sets and Test Cases carry step sequences, expected results, and edition-gated custom fields that Trello cannot natively represent. We map Test Sets to Cards with step sequences as checklist items and Test Cases to individual checklist items, but Trello cannot track test execution history, pass/fail status, or traceability chains. Attachment binaries on individual test steps are attached to the parent Card, which may exceed Trello's attachment limits on Free and Standard tiers. We flag all test artifacts in the migration scope and deliver a written test management rebuild inventory recommending dedicated test management tools (Jira Software with Zephyr, TestRail, or qTest) if test case management is a compliance or process requirement.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful AGILITY to Trello data migration

  1. Edition audit and extraction path selection

    We audit the source AGILITY organization for edition tier (Starter/Pro/Enterprise), active Projects, Iterations, work item counts (Stories, Defects, Tasks, Test Sets, Test Cases, Issues, Requests), custom field inventory with System Names, attachment volume and file size distribution, and user/team roster. If Enterprise-tier API access is confirmed, we configure API extraction with rate-limit pacing. If Starter or Pro, we design a file-based extraction plan using AGILITY's CSV export UI for each asset type, reconciling field names against the Data Mart System Name catalog. The output is a written discovery report with record counts, custom field mapping table, and extraction path decision.

  2. Trello destination tier evaluation and schema pre-creation

    We assess the target Trello Workspace for tier (Free/Standard/Premium/Enterprise), existing boards, Workspace member roster, and Power-Up inventory. If the customer is on Trello Standard and has more than one custom field to migrate, we recommend upgrading to Premium before migration begins. We pre-create Custom Fields on each target board using the AGILITY custom field inventory, mapping AGILITY data types (text, number, date, checkbox, dropdown) to Trello Custom Field types. We create Labels for priority, defect/issue/request flags, iteration cadence, and environment stubs. Workspace members are provisioned by matching AGILITY owner and assignee emails to Trello Workspace members, with a reconciliation queue for unmatched users.

  3. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into a shadow Trello Workspace or into a set of test Boards with '_MIGRATION_TEST' suffixes using production-equivalent data volume. The customer reviews record counts (Cards per board, checklists per card, attachments per card), spot-checks 25-50 random Cards against the AGILITY source records for field accuracy, validates that parent-child task relationships are represented correctly as checklists, and confirms that iteration Labels are named and applied correctly. Any mapping corrections (wrong field, wrong label, missing checklist item) are documented and applied before the production migration begins. This step cannot be skipped because Trello's bulk editing capabilities are limited compared to its API for post-import corrections.

  4. Attachment export and re-association pass

    We extract attachment binaries from AGILITY's OID registry alongside the work item JSON export. Files exceeding Trello's size limits (10MB Free, 250MB Standard+) are flagged and stored to a customer-provided external location (S3, Google Drive, SharePoint) with links embedded in the Card description. For files within Trello's limits, we upload via the Trello API attachment endpoint, capturing the returned attachment ID and URL. We then re-associate each attachment with its parent Card using a cross-reference table keyed on the AGILITY OID. This two-pass approach prevents orphaned attachments and ensures Card descriptions contain a complete attachment manifest.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Workspace member provisioning (manual, validated), Board creation (one per AGILITY Project), Labels pre-creation (iteration, priority, severity, type), Cards (Stories, Defects, Issues, Requests in a single pass per board), Checklist items (Tasks attached to parent Cards), Custom Field values applied via Trello API, Card Comments (authored after Card creation to preserve timeline), and Attachments (second-pass re-association). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report showing Cards imported, Cards skipped (with reason), Custom Fields populated, Comments migrated, and Attachments re-associated. Delta records modified in AGILITY during the migration window are captured in a final reconciliation pass before cutover.

  6. Cutover, validation, and rebuild inventory handoff

    We freeze writes in AGILITY during the cutover window, run a final delta migration of any records modified since the last extraction checkpoint, then mark Trello as the system of record. We deliver the complete migration log, a written inventory of what was migrated and what was not (Test Sets, Issues, sprint artifacts, environment stubs, custom fields on Standard-tier boards), and a recommended approach for rebuilding test management, sprint reporting, and workflow automations in Trello or an adjacent tool. We support a one-week hypercare window to resolve data quality issues raised by the customer's team. We do not rebuild automations, Power-Up configurations, or sprint management setups inside the migration scope; these are documented for the customer's admin to configure post-migration.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

AGILITY logo

AGILITY

Source

Strengths

  • JSON-based export/import mapping files allow declarative, auditable migration configurations that can be version-controlled
  • Custom fields are available on a wide range of asset types and exposed through both the REST API and Data Mart reporting layer
  • Multi-edition architecture means Teams, Sprints, and Iterations are first-class citizens with stable OIDs and relationship fields
  • Rate limiting is documented as a system-wide protection, reducing the risk of accidental API-induced outages during migration
  • Export and import operations can be run incrementally, supporting phased cutover rather than a single big-bang switchover

Weaknesses

  • Specific API rate limit values are not publicly documented, requiring empirical testing to calibrate migration throughput
  • Custom field Data Mart column names derive from System Names, not display labels — silent mismatches occur if this naming layer is not handled explicitly
  • Edition gating on API access means Starter and Pro tier orgs have limited or no programmatic data extraction capability
  • No public deprecation timeline or changelog for the API means schema changes between Agility versions are not proactively communicated
  • Attachments and binary assets are managed through a separate OID registry from the JSON mapping data, adding a second migration pass
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across AGILITY and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    AGILITY: Rate limiting is documented but specific quota values are not publicly disclosed; limits vary by Agility edition and org tier.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    AGILITY doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your AGILITY to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about AGILITY to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during AGILITY to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your AGILITY to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Migrations land between three and six weeks for organizations under 3,000 work items with Enterprise-tier AGILITY API access, clean custom field schemas (under 10 fields per asset type), and no test management artifacts. Migrations with Starter or Pro AGILITY (requiring file-based extraction), rich custom field schemas (20+ fields), large attachment volumes (1,000+ files), or multiple Projects requiring separate board hierarchies move to eight to fourteen weeks because of the extraction, transformation, and manual inventory work. Test Set and Test Case migration adds scope because they require a manual rebuild inventory rather than a direct object mapping.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from AGILITY.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day