Project Management migration

Migrate from Matilda Workspace to Trello

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Matilda Workspace and Trello. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Trello.

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

Source

Trello

Destination

Trello logo

Compatibility

50%

6 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Matilda Workspace and Trello.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Matilda Workspace to Trello is a structural migration from a multi-module workspace to a Kanban-first board system. Matilda organizes work across interconnected Projects, Tasks, Docs, and Chat threads within permission-scoped Teamspaces; Trello collapses this into Workspaces containing Boards, Lists, and Cards with no native Docs module or integrated Chat. We resolve the structural gap by mapping Projects to Boards, Tasks to Cards, subtasks to Trello Checklists, and Chat thread messages to Card comments. Docs content exports as a linked markdown package or card description depending on length. We flag the Custom Fields limitation (Standard plan required) and the AI Copilot scheduling data (preserved as custom fields, not automated in Trello) upfront during scoping. Butler automations, Power-Up configurations, and workspace-level permissions do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of every Butler rule and Power-Up requiring rebuild by the customer's admin.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

What's pushing teams away

  • Users report missing features compared to mature tools like Jira, particularly around advanced reporting, custom workflows, and enterprise-scale integrations.
  • The platform's recent launch (2024) raises concerns about long-term reliability, customer support responsiveness, and whether the product roadmap will be sustained.
  • Some users express frustration that promised features like Tables and Customers CRM are still marked as "coming soon" after initial launch timelines passed.

Choosing

Trello logo

Trello

What's pulling them in

  • Free plan supports unlimited users and 10 boards, giving small teams full access to core Kanban functionality before any paid commitment is required.
  • The drag-and-drop board/card/Label interface requires no training, which reduces adoption friction and onboarding time across distributed teams.
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket provides native cross-tool workflows for teams already using Atlassian tools.
  • Butler automation on paid tiers enables rule-based triggers without third-party integrations, covering basic workflow automation needs.
  • Simple visual task management with due dates, checklists, and member assignments keeps individual contributors and small teams organized without complexity.

Object mapping

How Matilda Workspace objects map to Trello

Each row shows how a Matilda Workspace object lands in Trello, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Matilda Workspace

Teamspace

maps to

Trello

Workspace

1:1
Mapping required

Matilda Teamspaces are the top-level permission boundary containing Projects, Tasks, Docs, and Chat. We map each Teamspace to a Trello Workspace using the Workspace name from Matilda. Permission inheritance (who can see which Teamspace) does not map directly because Trello Workspace permissions are Workspace-level (admin, member, observer) and not inherited from child objects. We document the original permission matrix in a permission-map deliverable for the customer's admin to re-apply at the Workspace level. If the customer uses Enterprise features in Matilda, those map to Trello Enterprise Workspace with domain-claimed member restrictions.

Matilda Workspace

Project

maps to

Trello

Board

1:1
Fully supported

Each Matilda Project maps to a Trello Board. Project name, description, start date, end date, and status (active, archived) migrate as Board name, Board description, and a custom Board field for target dates. The Project's status (active vs archived) maps to Board archival state in Trello. Project-level custom properties (Matilda custom fields defined at the Project level) migrate to Board-level Custom Fields if the destination is on Standard plan or above; Free-tier destinations flag these as unmapped and surface them in the pre-flight report for plan upgrade consideration.

Matilda Workspace

Task

maps to

Trello

Card

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Tasks map to Trello Cards. The Task name becomes the Card title, description migrates as Card description (markdown-formatted), due date maps to the Card due date field, assignee maps to Card member, and status (To Do, In Progress, Done) maps to the Card's position within the appropriate List. We resolve the Matilda status to the nearest Trello List during scoping. Task custom properties (custom fields on individual Tasks) migrate to Trello Custom Fields on the Card if the Standard plan is active; otherwise they are flagged as deferred.

Matilda Workspace

Subtask

maps to

Trello

Checklist item

1:many
Fully supported

Matilda supports multi-level subtask nesting. Trello Checklists are a single level of Checklist items per Card. We flatten Matilda's subtask hierarchy into a flat Checklist on each Card, preserving parent-child relationships by prefixing child items with a dash (e.g., '- [ ] Subtask text') or nesting them as a text hierarchy within a single Checklist. The original subtask depth is recorded in a custom field subtask_depth__c so the customer can optionally restructure in a project management tool better suited to hierarchy. Checklists in Trello are available on Free tier with a limit of 100 items per card on Free, unlimited on Standard and above.

Matilda Workspace

Docs

maps to

Trello

Card description or linked document package

lossy
Mapping required

Matilda Docs are rich-text documents embedded within Projects. Short Docs (under 4,000 characters) migrate as Card descriptions in Trello with markdown formatting preserving headings, lists, and links. Longer Docs are exported as individual markdown files organized in a folder structure mirroring the original Matilda Project hierarchy, and the Card description contains a relative path link to the exported file. For teams using Google Docs or Notion alongside Matilda Docs, we can generate placeholder Cards with a card description linking to the original Matilda Doc export URL until the content is manually re-hosted in the destination Docs tool (Notion, Confluence, Google Docs).

Matilda Workspace

Chat Thread

maps to

Trello

Card comment

lossy
Fully supported

Matilda Chat threads are per-project messaging with author, timestamp, and message body. Trello has no native Chat module; collaboration happens in Card comments and Board-level activity logs. We transform each Chat message into a Trello Card comment with the author name as comment author, original timestamp preserved, and message body in markdown. Thread context (which thread the message belonged to) is preserved in the comment body header. For high-volume Chat migrations (over 10,000 messages), we batch comments to avoid Trello's comment rate limits (documented at 100 comments per minute per token on Standard plan). Chat threads that reference specific Tasks are linked to the corresponding Card comment thread; standalone Chat threads without a Task reference are attached to the Project's primary Board as a dedicated Card comment thread.

Matilda Workspace

Label

maps to

Trello

Label

1:1
Fully supported

If the customer's Matilda workspace uses a Labels system on Tasks, we map Labels to Trello Labels using the same color and name. Label-to-Task assignment migrates as Card-Label association. Trello Labels are available on Free tier and support arbitrary color and name pairs, which is compatible with Matilda's label model. We inventory the full label set during discovery to avoid naming conflicts within each Trello Board.

Matilda Workspace

User Assignment

maps to

Trello

Card member

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Task assignee and Project membership data map to Trello Card members. We resolve users by email address across both platforms. Trello exposes only usernames via API for user mapping (not email), per Atlassian documentation on the Power-Up migration flows. We use the email-based lookup from Matilda to resolve the correct Trello member, and flag any Matilda user whose email does not match a Trello account in the destination Workspace as an unmapped user in the reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing Trello accounts before record migration resumes.

Matilda Workspace

Attachment

maps to

Trello

Card attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Matilda Task and Docs attachments migrate as Card attachments in Trello. We export attachment metadata (filename, URL, size, upload date) and re-link files to the Card if the destination Trello plan supports attachment storage (Free tier includes 10MB per attachment, 250MB total per Board; Standard and above increase these limits). For attachments exceeding Trello's size limits, we generate a download package and include the URL reference in the Card description. If the customer uses a cloud storage integration (Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive Power-Ups), we re-link attachments to the corresponding cloud file URL.

Matilda Workspace

Project custom fields

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields Power-Up

lossy
Fully supported

Matilda custom fields defined at the Project level map to Board-level Custom Fields in Trello if the destination Workspace is on Standard plan or above. The Custom Fields Power-Up (a Trello Inc. power-up, not third-party) supports text, number, date, checkbox, and dropdown field types. We inventory all Matilda custom field types during discovery, map them to the nearest Trello Custom Field type, and flag any Matilda field type without a Trello equivalent (e.g., Matilda-specific field types or multi-reference fields) as deferred with a recommendation for a third-party Power-Up or a Trello Standard plan upgrade. Custom Fields are not available on Trello Free tier, which is surfaced during scoping if the customer's Matilda workspace uses extensive custom fields.

Matilda Workspace

Task custom fields

maps to

Trello

Custom Fields on Card

lossy
Fully supported

Matilda custom fields defined at the Task level map to Card-level Custom Fields in Trello (same Custom Fields Power-Up noted above). The field name, type, and default value migrate. If the destination Trello Workspace is on the Free plan, custom fields are not available; we surface this gap in the pre-flight report and recommend upgrading to Standard before migration. The customer can choose to merge task-level custom fields into the Card description as structured text if a plan upgrade is not feasible, though this loses filterability.

Matilda Workspace

AI Copilot generated dates

maps to

Trello

Custom Field (scheduling dates)

lossy
Fully supported

Matilda's AI Copilot auto-schedules tasks and generates task sequencing based on dependency analysis. This AI-generated schedule does not translate to equivalent automation in Trello. We preserve the auto-scheduled due dates and task sequencing order as Trello Custom Fields (date type) and as a Card ordering note so the customer can re-enter them manually or run Trello's Butler automation to approximate the schedule. The original AI-generated dates are preserved in custom fields ai_original_due_date__c and ai_schedule_order__c on each Card for reference. The customer should plan a post-migration review of AI-scheduled dates to validate that Trello's manual scheduling aligns with project expectations.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace gotchas

High

Tables and Customers modules are not yet generally available

Medium

Early-stage platform with limited public API documentation

Medium

Auto-schedule and AI Copilot generate derived data that may not export cleanly

Trello logo

Trello gotchas

High

Billing model uses maximum seat quantity at term midpoint

Medium

Custom Field data historically stored in pluginData

Medium

API rate limits are token-gated and can block bulk migration

Medium

Guest-to-paid seat conversion triggers on multi-board membership

Low

Automation command runs are capped per plan and overage triggers upgrade pressure

Pair-specific challenges

  • Custom Fields require Trello Standard plan or higher

    Trello Custom Fields are a Power-Up available from the Standard plan ($5/user/month) onward. Matilda Workspace custom fields (on both Projects and Tasks) have no equivalent on Trello Free. If the customer's Matilda workspace uses custom fields on Tasks or Projects, we flag this in pre-flight and recommend upgrading the destination Trello Workspace to Standard before migration begins. Migrations scoped without accounting for this limitation result in custom field data being dropped or rendered as plain text in Card descriptions, losing filterability. We include a plan-upgrade recommendation with the scoping document and adjust the migration timeline if the upgrade requires procurement cycles.

  • Matilda Chat threads have no native Trello equivalent

    Matilda's integrated Chat module with per-project threads, author attribution, and timestamps has no direct Trello replacement. Trello card comments are the closest structural analog, but they are scoped to individual Cards rather than being a project-level conversation stream. We transform Chat messages into Card comments with thread metadata preserved in the comment header, but this loses the chronological chat-room context and makes it difficult to follow multi-thread conversations that span multiple Cards. For teams with high Chat volume, we recommend a parallel Slack or Teams migration for Chat content and use Card comments only for task-specific discussions that should travel with the Card. This dual-destination approach is scoped separately.

  • Butler automations and Power-Up configurations do not migrate

    Matilda's Automate module with triggers, conditions, and multi-step actions across all workspace apps is not equivalent to Trello's Butler or any single Power-Up configuration. Butler handles board-level rule-based automation (when Card moves to Done, notify Slack channel), scheduled commands (every Monday, send a report), and button commands (move all cards with Label X to List Y). We do not migrate Butler rules as code. We deliver a written Butler inventory documenting every Matilda Automate rule with its trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Butler equivalent for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration. Power-Up configurations (third-party Power-Up settings) similarly do not migrate.

  • Docs content transformation is lossy without a destination Docs tool

    Matilda Docs with rich formatting, embedded media, and cross-references require transformation for Trello, which has no native Docs module. Short Docs convert to Card descriptions (markdown), which truncates at the Card description field limit and strips some embedded content. Longer Docs export as markdown files in a folder structure, which requires a separate destination repository (Notion, Confluence, Google Drive) for the team to access after migration. We do not migrate Docs to Confluence or Notion as part of the standard scope; we deliver the markdown package and a document-link mapping Card for each Doc-to-Board reference. If the customer relies heavily on Docs as a primary knowledge artifact, we recommend a parallel Docs migration to a dedicated knowledge management tool scoped separately.

  • Subtask hierarchy flattens to a single Checklist level

    Matilda Tasks support multi-level subtask nesting (subtasks of subtasks). Trello Checklists are a single level per Card. We flatten multi-level subtask hierarchies into a flat Checklist, preserving parent-child relationships via text prefixes. The original hierarchy depth is recorded in a custom field subtask_depth__c for the customer to reference. Teams that rely on deep task hierarchies (more than two levels of subtasks) may find the flattened representation less usable in Trello and should consider whether the task structure itself needs redesign during migration. This is documented in the pre-flight report and flagged for the customer's project manager to review before migration.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Matilda Workspace to Trello data migration

  1. Discovery and plan assessment

    We audit the source Matilda workspace across object volume (Teamspaces, Projects, Tasks, subtasks, Docs, Chat threads, attachments, custom fields, and labels), the current Matilda plan tier, and any active Automate rules. We pair this with a Trello plan assessment: Free covers basic migrations with no custom fields; Standard ($5/user) is required if the customer's Matilda workspace uses any custom fields; Premium ($10/user) adds Advanced checklists and the Calendar Power-Up for timeline visualization. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a Trello plan recommendation, and a list of any Matilda features with no Trello equivalent (Tables, Customers CRM, Chat, Docs) surfaced as deferred objects.

  2. Object inventory and mapping design

    We inventory every Matilda object type and design the Trello destination structure: which Matilda Project becomes which Trello Board, which Task status maps to which Trello List, which Chat thread maps to which Card comment thread, and which Docs map to Card descriptions versus exported markdown files. We design the custom field mapping for each Matilda custom property, identifying any field types that require a Trello Standard plan. We resolve the Teamspace-to-Workspace mapping and document permission boundary changes. The mapping design is delivered as a written object-mapping table before any data extraction begins.

  3. Schema pre-creation in Trello

    We pre-create the Trello destination structure: Workspaces, Boards, Lists, Labels, and (if on Standard plan) Custom Fields matching each Matilda custom field name and type. We configure the Custom Fields Power-Up on each destination Board before record migration. For any Matilda custom field type with no Trello equivalent, we define the fallback treatment (card description text, label, or deferred). Board visibility settings (public, workspace, private) are set per Board based on the original Matilda Teamspace permission model. We run this in a Trello Workspace with test data first to validate the structure before production migration.

  4. User reconciliation and account provisioning

    We extract every distinct Matilda user referenced on Tasks, Projects, Chat threads, and Docs (as author or collaborator). We match by email address against the Trello destination Workspace members. Any Matilda user without a matching Trello account is added to a reconciliation queue. The customer's admin provisions any missing Trello accounts before migration resumes. This step cannot be skipped because Card members and Board access require an existing Trello user. Trello API limitations mean we work with email-based lookup from Matilda rather than Trello's username-only API response.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Workspaces and Boards (created first), Lists (per Board), Labels (per Board), Cards (Tasks from Matilda mapped to Cards), Checklist items (flattened subtasks), Card attachments, Custom Fields data (if Standard plan), Card comments (transformed Chat messages), and Docs (as Card descriptions or exported markdown). Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report. Chat thread transformation applies author, timestamp, and message body from each Matilda Chat message into a Trello Card comment, with thread context preserved. Custom field data populates after the Custom Fields Power-Up is confirmed active on each Board. AI Copilot scheduling dates populate into custom date fields (ai_original_due_date__c, ai_schedule_order__c) for manual re-entry or Butler automation post-migration.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze Matilda workspace writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Trello as the system of record for the migrated scope. We deliver the Butler inventory document listing every Matilda Automate rule with its trigger, conditions, actions, and recommended Trello Butler equivalent for the customer's admin to rebuild post-migration. We do not rebuild Matilda Automate rules as Butler rules as part of the standard migration scope; that work is handled by the customer's admin or a Trello automation consultant. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation issues with record counts, mapping gaps, or attachment failures.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Matilda Workspace logo

Matilda Workspace

Source

Strengths

  • Combines Docs, Projects, Tasks, Chat, and Customers in a single interconnected workspace
  • AI Copilot auto-generates task hierarchies, project outlines, and subtasks from minimal input
  • Auto-schedule engine handles task sequencing and dependency resolution automatically
  • Free tier with unlimited users reduces barrier to entry for small teams
  • Context Engine maintains permission-aware relationships between all workspace objects

Weaknesses

  • Platform launched in 2024 with a small team—long-term product stability is unproven
  • CRM (Customers) and database (Tables) modules are still marked as "coming soon"
  • Limited public API documentation makes programmatic export and migration more complex
  • Smaller user base means fewer community templates, integrations, and third-party resources than established PM tools
  • G2 reviews note missing enterprise features compared to Jira or monday.com for complex workflow requirements
Trello logo

Trello

Destination

Strengths

  • Generous free tier with unlimited users and 10 boards, the lowest barrier to entry among major project management tools.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop Kanban interface requires no training or onboarding documentation.
  • Deep Atlassian integration with Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket for teams already in the ecosystem.
  • Built-in Butler automation covers rule-based triggers without requiring third-party integrations.
  • REST API with comprehensive documentation enables programmatic access to all core objects.

Weaknesses

  • Reporting and analytics are absent, with no built-in velocity tracking, burndown charts, or historical performance metrics.
  • The flat board/list/card data model scales poorly for complex projects requiring hierarchical task structures.
  • Customization is limited compared to platforms like Asana, monday.com, or Jira that offer richer field types and workflow configuration.
  • Advanced views (Timeline, Dashboard) require Premium and are not available on Standard, inflating total cost for teams needing visibility features.
  • Guest user billing rules are confusing and prone to accidental seat overages when guests join multiple boards.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Matilda Workspace and Trello.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Matilda Workspace: Not publicly documented..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Matilda Workspace doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Matilda Workspace to Trello migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Matilda Workspace to Trello data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Matilda Workspace to Trello migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Matilda Workspace to Trello migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for workspaces under 5,000 Tasks, 500 Projects, and 10 Teamspaces with no complex Chat history. Migrations with large Chat histories (over 50,000 messages), deep subtask hierarchies, Docs content packages over 500 documents, or Matilda custom fields on every Task object move to eight to twelve weeks because of Chat-to-comment transformation time, subtask flattening, Docs export packaging, and reconciliation of AI-generated scheduling data into Trello custom fields.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Matilda Workspace.
Land in Trello, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day