ERP migration

Migrate from Infor LN to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Infor LN and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.

Infor LN logo

Infor LN

Source

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Destination

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central logo

Compatibility

92%

11 of 12

objects map 1:1 between Infor LN and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

8-12 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Infor LN to Microsoft Dynamics 365 is a structural ERP migration that requires careful sequencing of the dependency chain, text-table reconstruction, and multicompany settlement reconciliation. Infor LN stores long-form text in a separate LN Tools table and assigns numeric IDs to transactional tables, so we execute a two-pass extract to join text back before writing to Dynamics. Multicompany invoicing in LN generates internal financial settlements that can orphan during migration if invoice headers are extracted without linked counterpart journal entries. We resolve BOM structures with phantom assemblies, option classes, and engineering change order overlays against the correct revision level, and we export price matrix priority definitions alongside actual price records so the target system reconstructs the same resolution chain. Workflows, automations, and ION gateway configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's admin to rebuild in Dynamics.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Infor LN logo

Infor LN

What's pushing teams away

  • Licensing cost and minimum user requirements (20 users) make it economically impractical for smaller manufacturers or organizations with seasonal headcount.
  • Steep learning curve and specialized consultant dependency for day-to-day administration create ongoing operational overhead after go-live.
  • Vendor audit requests and contract enforcement practices cause friction and distrust, with some organizations reporting extended pressure campaigns for access and documentation.
  • Modern, lighter-weight ERPs like NetSuite or Acumatica offer faster time-to-value for manufacturers without the depth of discrete engineering complexity that LN addresses.
  • Support quality is perceived as inconsistent across implementation partners, leading to variable post-go-live experiences.

Choosing

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central logo

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

What's pulling them in

  • Deep integration with Microsoft 365, Power BI, and Power Platform means organizations already on the Microsoft stack get identity, reporting, and workflow continuity out of the box.
  • Unified financials, sales, service, and operations replace multiple disconnected systems — users report that data entered once flows through purchase orders, invoicing, and approvals without manual re-entry.
  • Copilot AI features (predictive analytics, embedded business intelligence) are included in both Essentials and Premium tiers, addressing demand for AI without separate module purchases.
  • Named-user licensing with no concurrent model appeals to organizations that want predictable per-seat costs even if some users access the system infrequently.
  • Strong partner ecosystem with certified NAV-to-Business Central migration specialists gives mid-market companies confidence the cutover from legacy Navision can be executed reliably.

Object mapping

How Infor LN objects map to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Each row shows how a Infor LN object lands in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Infor LN

Business Partners (Customers and Suppliers)

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Account and Contact

1:1
Fully supported

Infor LN maintains Business Partners as a single entity type with a Role field distinguishing customers from suppliers. Address, contact, financial limits, and payment terms are stored as related child records. We map the LN Business Partner to Dynamics 365 Account (with Account Type set to Customer or Vendor) and the primary contact to Contact. Financial limit data and credit terms migrate to the Account's CreditLimit and PaymentTerms fields. Multicompany BP assignments require cross-referencing the BP's Financial Company membership before writing the Account record in the correct legal entity context.

Infor LN

Financial Companies

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Legal Entity and Chart of Accounts

1:1
Fully supported

LN Financial Companies map directly to Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations Legal Entities or Business Central Companies. Each LN Financial Company maintains its own chart of accounts, fiscal calendar, and tax configuration. We extract all financial company definitions before any transactional data and create corresponding legal entity records in Dynamics. The fiscal year configuration and accounting currency migrate to ensure that period-close reporting is consistent post-migration.

Infor LN

Items (Products and Materials)

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Released Product or Item

1:1
Fully supported

LN Items carry rich attribute data including BOM structures, costing information, and unit-of-measure definitions. The Item is the anchor object for pricing matrices, purchase orders, and sales orders. We preserve the item's unit-of-measure conversions, costing version, and planning parameters during migration. Item variants in LN (size, color, configuration dimensions) map to Dynamics 365 product dimension groups.

Infor LN

Bills of Materials

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

BOM and Formula

1:1
Fully supported

LN BOMs support multiple levels of nesting, phantom assemblies, option classes, and lead-time offsets. Engineering Change Orders attach to BOMs as revision-controlled overlays. We preserve the BOM by mapping the parent item to a BOM Master, each nested component to BOM Lines, and the ECO revision level to a BOM Version with the effective from and to dates. Phantom BOMs in LN map to Phantom BOM type in Dynamics. Option classes with conditional components map to BOM Lines with alternative group configuration.

Infor LN

Warehouses and Sites

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Warehouse and Site

1:1
Fully supported

Sites in LN represent physical or logical locations with their own inventory policies, location definitions, and receiving rules. Multisite Control data governs cross-site stock transfers. We map each LN Site to a Dynamics 365 Site and Warehouse, preserving location structures, picking route definitions, and inventory posting profiles. The cross-site transfer orders require warehouse assignment resolution before inventory balances migrate.

Infor LN

Purchase Orders and Purchase Contracts

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Purchase Order and Purchase Agreement

1:1
Fully supported

LN separates purchase order headers from lines and schedule dates. Purchase contracts (blanket orders) link to release schedules that decrement funded quantities. We map PO headers and lines with schedule information, preserving delivery dates, purchasing taxes, and the supplier reference number. Purchase agreements migrate as Purchase Contracts with line items and release schedule limits mapped to the contract's remaining quantity.

Infor LN

Sales Orders and Sales Contracts

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Sales Order and Sales Agreement

1:1
Fully supported

Sales order pricing in LN can resolve through price books and matrix definitions. Multicompany sales invoicing can combine lines from Sales, Project, and Service logistic packages onto a single invoice. We map the sales order header, lines, and delivery schedules, preserving pricing terms and the original customer order reference. Sales agreements migrate with remaining quantities and committed amounts.

Infor LN

Projects

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Project

1:1
Fully supported

LN Projects support ETO and MTO lifecycles with phase structures, work breakdown hierarchies, and billing milestones. We map project phases and linked revenue recognition schedules to Dynamics 365 Project Management entities. Work breakdown structure lines migrate as project tasks with effort estimates, and billing milestones map to project contract lines and invoicing schedules.

Infor LN

Price Matrices and Item Surcharges

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Price List and Trade Agreements

1:1
Fully supported

LN resolves item prices through matrix priority search rules where multiple price books and matrix definitions compete and the highest priority wins. We export the full Matrix Definition (tdpcg0610m000) metadata alongside each price record to allow Dynamics 365 to reconstruct the same priority chain through trade agreement groups, price lists, and quantity break definitions. Item surcharges migrate as cost adders in the price calculation version. Without the matrix priority metadata, Dynamics would resolve prices differently than LN did.

Infor LN

Service Contracts and Field Service Records

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Agreement and Field Service entities

1:1
Fully supported

Service contracts in LN track entitlement, coverage periods, and SLA terms. Field service records include technician assignments and parts consumed. We map entitlement and coverage data to Dynamics 365 Field Service Agreement entities, and the service history to the service journal. Note that A&D-grade depot-level MRO tracking in LN may require supplemental configuration in Dynamics Field Service beyond the base agreement migration.

Infor LN

Multicompany Settlement Records

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Intercompany Journal and Ledger Setup

1:1
Mapping required

LN's multicompany invoicing generates internal financial settlements between entities using self-billing. These settlement records create intercompany journal entries that must be reconciled across all financial companies. We stage all intercompany settlement records and their counterpart journal entries in a reconciliation table, then write matching intercompany journal entries in Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations. Any settlement that lacks a matched debit or credit in the export scope is flagged for the customer's finance team before write-back.

Infor LN

Custom Fields

maps to

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Custom Fields and Extensions

lossy
Mapping required

LN custom fields are defined in the Extensions package with a Domain property specifying the data type. Two custom fields with the same logical name can have incompatible domains depending on how they were created. We read the Domain definition before mapping custom field columns to the Dynamics 365 schema, rejecting any column where the domain type cannot be coerced to the target field type. Custom field values are stored in dedicated extension tables that join to the base object tables by numeric ID.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Infor LN logo

Infor LN gotchas

High

ION API REST handler timeout is 25 seconds

High

Text data stored in separate LN Tools table requires join reconstruction

High

Multicompany invoicing creates intercompany settlements that can orphan during migration

Medium

Custom fields require Domain property validation before schema mapping

Medium

Price matrix priority rules must be exported as metadata, not just price data

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central logo

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central gotchas

High

Named-user licensing has no concurrent-use relief

High

API rate limits throttle large-volume migrations

Medium

Historical posted transactions require selective migration scoping

Medium

NAV-to-Business Central cloud migration requires partner coordination

Low

Custom fields and AL extensions require separate migration handling

Pair-specific challenges

  • LN text table join reconstruction is required or records show numeric IDs

    LN stores long-form text content in dedicated LN Tools tables and assigns numeric text IDs to each text field in transactional 'pd' tables. Direct table extraction produces numeric IDs rather than readable text unless we explicitly join to the text tables during extraction. We execute a two-pass extract: first pulling the text table contents keyed by ID, then the transactional tables, joining them in our staging layer before writing to Dynamics 365. Without this step, customer names, item descriptions, order terms, and project notes in Dynamics 365 show the numeric text ID values from LN rather than the actual content.

  • Multicompany settlements require intercompany journal reconciliation or unbalanced ledgers

    LN's multicompany invoicing automatically generates internal financial settlements between financial companies when goods and invoices cross entity boundaries. If we extract invoice headers without also extracting the linked settlement records and their counterpart journal entries, the target Dynamics 365 organization will have unbalanced intercompany positions that only surface during period-close or audit. We sequence the export to capture all Financial Company and Business Partner data before any invoice or settlement records, and we reconcile every intercompany settlement against matched debit and credit lines before write-back.

  • BOM revision overlays from ECOs require effective-date scoping or wrong revision lands

    Infor LN Engineering Change Orders attach to Bills of Material as revision-controlled overlays with effective-from and effective-to dates. A single LN item can have multiple active BOM revisions active simultaneously across different date ranges or work orders. Dynamics 365 BOM Versions carry effective dates but do not natively support simultaneous overlapping active revisions on a single item. We resolve each BOM revision to the correct effective-date range during migration, flagging any component that requires a date-specific BOM version in Dynamics and requiring the customer's engineering team to confirm the active revision at the target go-live date.

  • ION API 25-second timeout forces chunked exports on large record sets

    LN ION API REST handlers enforce a hard 25-second timeout on individual request/response cycles. When migrating large transactional record sets, we chunk exports into page sizes that return within this window and implement retry logic with backoff for queued response handlers that have a 10-minute window. Without chunking, the migration job stalls and the ION Gateway marks the service as unavailable. This affects Purchase Orders, Sales Orders, and project transaction history sets that exceed 5,000 records per API call.

  • Dynamics 365 legal entity setup must precede all transactional imports

    Dynamics 365 Finance and Operations requires that a legal entity be fully configured with its address, operating unit type, and posting profile before any transactional records are created under that entity. LN organizations with multiple financial companies frequently attempt to import transactional data before the corresponding legal entities are provisioned in Dynamics, which causes the import to fail with entity-not-found errors. We stage all legal entity creation and validation as a prerequisite gate before the first transactional phase begins.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Infor LN to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central data migration

  1. Discovery and migration path selection

    We audit the source Infor LN environment across financial company count, item volume, BOM complexity, active price matrix definitions, project count, service contract volume, and historical transactional record counts. We pair this with a Dynamics 365 edition decision: Business Central ($70-$185/user/month) for single-company or light multi-company manufacturers without complex intercompany settlement chains; Finance and Operations for multinational, multi-entity organizations with advanced manufacturing, supply chain, and financial consolidation requirements. The discovery output is a written migration scope document and a Dynamics 365 edition recommendation with the object inventory ranked by priority.

  2. Dependency chain sequencing and text table extraction

    We design the export sequence following the LN dependency chain: Financial Companies and Business Partners before Warehouses and Sites, then Items and Bills of Material before any transactional data. We execute the two-pass text table extraction for all objects with text fields, joining numeric text IDs to their source content in our staging layer before any transformation. We export the full price matrix priority definitions (tdpcg0610m000 metadata) alongside price records so the Dynamics 365 trade agreement structure can replicate the same resolution chain. For multicompany environments, we stage intercompany settlement records in a reconciliation table and flag any settlement lacking matched debit and credit lines before write-back.

  3. Schema design and legal entity configuration

    We design the destination schema in Dynamics 365. This includes provisioning legal entities (mapped from LN Financial Companies), configuring the chart of accounts and fiscal calendars, setting up warehouse and site structures, designing product dimension groups mapped from LN item variants, and creating BOM versions with effective date ranges matched to LN revision overlays. Price list structures and trade agreement groups are configured to reflect the LN price matrix priority chain. Schema is deployed into a Sandbox or Development environment first for validation before any production write-back.

  4. Sandbox migration and reconciliation

    We run a full migration into the Dynamics 365 Sandbox environment using production-like data volume. The customer's finance and operations leads reconcile record counts (Business Partners in, Accounts in, Items in, BOMs in, Purchase Orders in, Sales Orders in), spot-check 25-50 records against the LN source for field accuracy, and validate that multicompany settlement totals balance across all financial entities. Any mapping corrections, BOM revision decisions, or settlement reconciliation actions happen in the Sandbox phase, not in production.

  5. Production migration in dependency order

    We run production migration in record-dependency order: Financial Companies (legal entities), Warehouses and Sites, Business Partners, Items, BOMs with revisions, price matrices with priority definitions, Purchase Orders, Sales Orders, Project data, Service Contracts, and multicompany settlement records. Each phase emits a row-count reconciliation report before the next phase begins. For large transactional sets, we use Dynamics 365 Data Management Framework with OData batch endpoints and chunked loads to stay within API rate limits.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze LN writes during cutover, run a final delta migration of any records modified during the migration window, then enable Dynamics 365 as the system of record. We deliver a written inventory of LN ION workflows, automated processes, and any custom gateway configurations that require rebuild in Dynamics 365. We do not rebuild these as code. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve reconciliation issues raised by the customer's operations and finance teams. Workflow rebuilds and automation rebuilds are outside standard migration scope and are handled as a separate engagement with the customer's Dynamics 365 partner or internal admin team.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Infor LN logo

Infor LN

Source

Strengths

  • Handles multi-level BOMs, phantom assemblies, and engineering change orders without requiring application-layer workarounds.
  • Multicompany architecture natively supports organizations with multiple financial entities and intercompany trading.
  • MRO and field service modules provide depot-level and shop-floor tracking capabilities purpose-built for A&D environments.
  • Cloud deployment on AWS delivers elastic scaling and automated availability-zone failover at a lower TCO than statically-sized on-premises.
  • Comprehensive discrete manufacturing coverage across ETO, MTO, and standard BOM-driven production modes.

Weaknesses

  • Minimum 20-user licensing requirement and $200/user/month floor exclude smaller manufacturers from cost-effective adoption.
  • Specialized consultant dependency for administration creates ongoing operational overhead beyond typical ERP platforms.
  • Steep learning curve and dated UI conventions compared to modern SaaS ERP alternatives.
  • Unicode and VRC-based update management requires careful planning and downtime windows for on-premises deployments.
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central logo

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Destination

Strengths

  • Tight integration with Microsoft 365 (Outlook, Teams, SharePoint) for users already in the Microsoft ecosystem.
  • Includes Copilot AI, predictive analytics, and embedded Power BI dashboards at no additional cost in both license tiers.
  • Supports multiple companies within a single tenant for holding-company or multi-entity organizational structures.
  • Open REST API v2.0 with OAuth 2.0 authentication and data entity abstraction layer for developer-friendly integrations.
  • Strong partner ecosystem specializing in NAV-to-Business Central migrations provides implementation confidence for legacy upgrades.

Weaknesses

  • Named-user licensing model means every active user account requires a paid license — no concurrent access model to reduce costs for occasional users.
  • SaaS-only deployment means no on-premises option; organizations requiring full data residency control may not have viable alternatives within Microsoft's stack.
  • Manufacturing module (Production Orders, routing, work centers) is only available on Premium tier, pushing cost-sensitive manufacturers to higher-priced plans.
  • Customization and extension development requires AL language knowledge and developer licenses, limiting what power users can do without a partner engagement.
  • Global pricing increases effective October 2024 and again October 2025 after five years of stable pricing, creating budget uncertainty for existing customers.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. All 8 core objects map 1:1 between Infor LN and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Infor LN and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.

  • Object compatibility

    A

    All 8 core objects map 1:1 between Infor LN and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Infor LN: PRD tenant: max 250 concurrent REST executions; other tenant suffixes: max 125. REST handler timeout: 25 seconds..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Infor LN doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Infor LN to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Infor LN to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Infor LN to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Infor LN to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between eight and twelve weeks for organizations with a single financial company, under 50,000 items, and clean BOM structures without complex ECO overlays. Migrations with multiple financial companies, large BOM hierarchies (over 10,000 BOM revisions), extensive price matrix definitions, or historical transactional data exceeding 500,000 records move to sixteen to twenty-eight weeks because of the dependency sequencing, text-table reconstruction, multicompany settlement reconciliation, and BOM revision resolution work.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Infor LN.
Land in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day