ERP migration

Migrate from Edicom EDI to Epicor Prophet 21

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Edicom EDI and Epicor Prophet 21. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Epicor Prophet 21.

Edicom EDI logo

Edicom EDI

Source

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Compatibility

50%

7 of 14

objects map 1:1 between Edicom EDI and Epicor Prophet 21.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

8-10 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Edicom EDI to Epicor ERP consolidates a two-vendor EDI-plus-ERP stack into a single platform with native EDI embedded directly in Epicor Kinetic and Prophet 21. Edicom EDI operates as a managed B2B integration layer supporting X12, EDIFACT, UBL, and ODETTE standards across 80+ countries; Epicor EDI uses AtlasExchange for managed services and native integration points for in-house ERP customers. We migrate Transaction Sets and Trading Partner records, rebuild Connection Protocol credentials (AS2, SFTP, VAN, OFTP2) in Epicor, and resolve ERP integration mapping between Edicom's document-transform logic and Epicor's order-to-cash and procure-to-pay flows. Country-specific e-invoicing mandates (Brazil NF-e, France Chorus Pro, Saudi ZATCA Phase 2) do not transfer between platforms and are itemized for re-implementation. Trading Partner re-onboarding with compliance testing is coordinated by tier (top-volume partners first) and runs in parallel before full cutover.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Edicom EDI logo

Edicom EDI

What's pushing teams away

  • No published pricing forces prospective customers into sales conversations before they can budget, and many mid-market buyers drop Edicom EDI in favor of transparent-cost alternatives.
  • Implementation timelines of 4–8 weeks with ERP integration and 6+ months for greenfield ERP plus EDI mean slow time-to-value compared to faster-configuring managed EDI providers.
  • Onboarding each new trading partner individually adds 1–2 weeks per partner, creating a cumulative drag for companies expanding into new retail or logistics networks.
  • Vendor lock-in risk grows as in-house IT teams build custom integrations on top of Edicom's platform, making future migrations complex and expensive to untangle.
  • Smaller suppliers with few trading partners and low transaction volumes often find Edicom EDI's enterprise pricing and complexity disproportionate to their needs.

Choosing

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-specific design for wholesale distributors, not a general-purpose ERP repurposed for distribution — distributors choose P21 because it matches their replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Strong inventory control with automated replenishment, lot and serial tracking, and multi-warehouse management appeals to distributors with complex stock requirements and tight margin pressure.
  • Responsive customer support cited across G2 and Gartner reviews, with Epicor's 90% retention rate reflecting long-term customer satisfaction in a market where switching costs are high.
  • Cloud deployment on Microsoft Azure provides the flexibility to scale user counts and warehouse locations without on-premise infrastructure investment.
  • The Software Development Kit lets distributors personalize P21 to their specific business processes without modifying the application source code, preserving upgrade paths.

Object mapping

How Edicom EDI objects map to Epicor Prophet 21

Each row shows how a Edicom EDI object lands in Epicor Prophet 21, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Edicom EDI

Transaction Sets

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

EDI Document Records (Epicor EDI)

1:1
Fully supported

Edicom EDI Transaction Sets (X12 850 purchase orders, 810 invoices, 856 ASN, 855 order acknowledgments, 997 functional acknowledgments; EDIFACT ORDERS, INVOIC, DESADV) map to Epicor EDI document records within the Epicor EDI module. We extract transaction history as structured export (XML/CSV) from Edicom, then load into Epicor Kinetic or Prophet 21 order, invoice, and ASN tables using Epicor's data import tools or REST API, preserving document numbers, dates, line items, and amounts. VAN interchange control numbers and functional acknowledgment status (997/Contrl) are stored as reference fields in Epicor EDI.

Edicom EDI

Trading Partners

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Trading Partner Configuration (Epicor EDI)

1:1
Fully supported

Each Trading Partner record in Edicom EDI defines document types exchanged, communication protocol, and partner-specific validation rules. We export partner records as structured configuration files, then map each to Epicor EDI's Trading Partner module by partner ID, document types, and protocol. Connection credentials (AS2 URL, SFTP keys, VAN mailbox) are re-established in Epicor EDI or AtlasExchange; partner-specific validation rules are cataloged for rebuild in Epicor's mapping tool. Automotive partners using OFTP2 are configured in Epicor's automotive EDI module with virtual filepaths and certificate exchange completed under Epicor's automotive protocol requirements.

Edicom EDI

Connection Protocols

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Connection Configuration (Epicor EDI)

lossy
Fully supported

Edicom EDI supports AS2, SFTP/FTPS, VAN mailbox, OFTP for automotive, and HTTPS web services. We extract protocol endpoint definitions, credential configurations, and certificate details from Edicom, then re-establish each in Epicor EDI or AtlasExchange by protocol type. AS2 and SFTP credentials (user, password, certificate, URL) transfer as configuration values and are entered manually into Epicor EDI connection settings. VAN mailbox routing tables from Edicom's network are replaced by Epicor EDI's VAN or re-routed via AtlasExchange managed VAN. OFTP2 for automotive requires virtual filepath and certificate setup in Epicor automotive module, which is rebuilt from Edicom's OFTP2 configuration during the mapping phase.

Edicom EDI

EDI Mappings

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

EDI Map Rebuild (Epicor Kinetic / AtlasExchange)

lossy
Mapping required

Custom field-level EDI maps in Edicom EDI define how ERP data fields translate into EDI segment positions (e.g., ERP customer part number to X12 N1 segment). Edicom stores maps in a proprietary format; Epicor Kinetic uses its own mapping tool or AtlasExchange map management. We perform a manual field-level inventory of every custom in-house mapping during scoping, output a written map inventory document, and the customer's EDI team rebuilds each map in Epicor Kinetic's mapping interface or AtlasExchange based on our field inventory. Non-standard maps without a clear Epicor equivalent are flagged as requiring re-engineering before cutover.

Edicom EDI

ERP Integration Configurations

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor Kinetic REST API / Prophet 21 API Integration

1:1
Mapping required

Edicom EDI connects to ERP systems (SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, NetSuite) via pre-built or custom connectors with field selection, transformation rules, and triggering conditions. We extract ERP integration logic from Edicom configuration exports, then re-implement equivalent integration in Epicor Kinetic using REST API endpoints or in Prophet 21 using its API integration framework. Inbound EDI-to-ERP flows (EDI 850 to Epicor Kinetic Sales Order) and outbound ERP-to-EDI flows (Epicor Kinetic Invoice to EDI 810) are rebuilt as Epicor integration configurations. Epicor's iParts and REST adapter framework replaces the connector logic that was previously managed in Edicom EDI.

Edicom EDI

VAN Mailbox Records

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

AtlasExchange VAN or Epicor EDI Direct Connection

1:1
Fully supported

Edicom EDI operates as a Value-Added Network with mailbox addresses per organization and per Trading Partner. VAN routing tables, interchange acknowledgments (997/Contrl), and transmission logs are exported as structured data. We re-establish VAN connectivity in Epicor EDI via AtlasExchange (Epicor's managed VAN) or by configuring direct AS2/SFTP connections for each Trading Partner. Mailbox address assignments and routing configurations are mapped to Epicor's VAN management or AtlasExchange partner routing tables.

Edicom EDI

Document Standards

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor EDI Standard Configuration (X12, EDIFACT, UBL, ODETTE)

1:1
Fully supported

Edicom EDI natively handles X12 (US retail), UN/EDIFACT (Europe, global logistics), UBL (cross-industry XML), and ODETTE (automotive). Epicor EDI via AtlasExchange supports all four standards families. We export document type configurations from Edicom by standard and version, then re-create the equivalent configuration in Epicor EDI for each Trading Partner's required standard. Test credentials, acknowledgment requirements, and partner-specific protocol settings are re-established per partner in Epicor EDI.

Edicom EDI

Country Compliance Rules

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor Compliance Management (non-portable)

lossy
Mapping required

Edicom EDI encodes country-specific e-invoicing validation rules and government portal submission flows for jurisdictions including Brazil NF-e, France Chorus Pro, Italy SDI, and Saudi ZATCA Phase 2. These rules cannot be exported and loaded into Epicor; each destination jurisdiction requires re-implementation in Epicor Compliance Management or country-specific integration. We catalog every active country mandate during discovery, document the current Edicom configuration (validation rules, digital signature requirements, portal endpoints), and itemize re-implementation effort separately so customers do not assume regulatory compliance transfers automatically with the data.

Edicom EDI

e-Invoicing Mandates

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor Compliance Management / Re-implementation Required

lossy
Mapping required

When Edicom EDI handles mandatory e-invoicing (rather than pure EDI), the platform enforces country-specific schema, digital signatures, and government portal submissions that are jurisdiction-bound. We flag every active e-invoicing mandate in the discovery phase, document the Edicom configuration (submission endpoint, authentication, schema version, digital certificate), and deliver a written re-implementation plan for Epicor's compliance module. The customer's fiscal or IT team coordinates with each tax authority's portal for re-registration, as digital certificates and portal credentials cannot be transferred between EDI platforms.

Edicom EDI

Automotive-Specific Protocols

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor Automotive EDI Module (OFTP2 / VDA)

1:1
Mapping required

Edicom EDI's automotive module uses OFTP2 (Odette File Transfer Protocol) and VDA standards for manufacturer-supplier exchanges. OFTP2 connection setup—certificates, endpoints, virtual filepaths—is required in Epicor's automotive EDI module. We extract OFTP2 configuration from Edicom (partner endpoints, virtual mailbox, certificate thumbprints, conversation IDs), then rebuild the equivalent configuration in Epicor Automotive EDI. VDA message type support (VDA 4906, VDA 4913) is configured per Trading Partner in Epicor's automotive module. Customer-supplier OFTP2 test exchanges with each automotive partner are coordinated as part of the trading partner re-onboarding phase.

Edicom EDI

Web Service Endpoints (REST/SOAP)

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor REST API / Epicor iParts Adapter

1:1
Mapping required

Edicom EDI exposes some document exchange via REST or SOAP web services for ERP systems that cannot use traditional EDI protocols. Endpoint definitions, payload schemas, and authentication configuration from Edicom are exported as configuration data. We re-implement the equivalent integration in Epicor Kinetic using the Epicor REST API (Ice.Core.Session login, Erp.BO.SalesOrder, Erp.BO.Invoice) or Epicor iParts adapter framework. API authentication (API key, OAuth, basic auth) is re-configured in Epicor; endpoint URLs and payload field mappings are documented in the integration inventory for the customer's Epicor administrator.

Edicom EDI

Maritime and Port Documents

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor EDI (IFTDPC, COPISNL) or Middleware

lossy
Mapping required

Edicom EDI supports IFTDPC, COPISNL, and similar maritime transport messages for customs, port authority, and shipping company communications. These are vertical-specific document types with limited target-platform support. We catalog every active maritime message type during discovery, then assess whether Epicor EDI's AtlasExchange VAN handles the relevant port community system integration or whether a middleware layer is required to maintain maritime document exchange. If Epicor EDI does not natively support a specific maritime standard, we document the gap and recommend a middleware approach (iPaaS or direct API integration with the port community system) as a separate implementation workstream.

Edicom EDI

Custom EDI Transformations

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor Kinetic Mapping Tool / AtlasExchange (rebuild)

lossy
Fully supported

In-house-developed custom transformations, partner-specific validations, and ERP integration hooks built on Edicom EDI often encode years of accumulated business logic with no external reference. We perform a manual field-level inventory of all custom transformations during scoping, document each map's input fields, output positions, validation rules, and business logic, then deliver a written map inventory for the customer's EDI team to rebuild in Epicor Kinetic's mapping tool or AtlasExchange. Maps without a clear Epicor equivalent are flagged as requiring re-engineering before cutover, and the re-engineering effort is itemized as a separate workstream in the migration scope.

Edicom EDI

Trading Partner Compliance Testing History

maps to

Epicor Prophet 21

Epicor EDI / AtlasExchange (reset)

lossy
Fully supported

Edicom EDI stores compliance testing status, test document exchange logs, and partner acknowledgment records per Trading Partner. This history does not transfer to Epicor EDI; each Trading Partner's compliance test status resets at cutover. We export the current compliance testing history as a reference document, then coordinate re-testing with each partner after Epicor EDI is configured. Top-volume partners run parallel testing before full cutover; lower-volume partners are migrated in a second wave with extended parallel-run windows.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Edicom EDI logo

Edicom EDI gotchas

High

No publicly documented public API endpoint reference

High

E-invoicing compliance rules are country-bound and non-portable

Medium

In-house EDI developments create undocumented mapping dependencies

Medium

Trading partner re-onboarding is per-partner and time-consuming

Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21 gotchas

High

Third-party bolt-on integrations complicate migration scope

High

Dirty data without standardized processes compounds migration risk

Medium

SDK customizations and BPMs may not survive platform upgrades

Medium

Report-based export only for non-technical users

Low

Per-user pricing model requires accurate user count before migration planning

Pair-specific challenges

  • No public API reference for Edicom EDI extraction

    Edicom EDI does not publish a developer-facing REST or SOAP API reference in its public documentation. Migration extraction relies on exportable transaction archives, partner configuration files, and EDI mapping documents obtained through the customer portal or direct Edicom support engagement. We request structured data exports (XML/CSV) before planning field-level mapping and flag any configuration retrievable only through Edicom professional services as a potential scope delay. This extraction limitation is specific to Edicom EDI and applies regardless of the destination platform.

  • E-invoicing compliance rules are country-bound and non-portable

    Edicom EDI encodes country-specific e-invoicing validation rules, digital signature requirements, and government portal submission flows for Brazil NF-e, France Chorus Pro, Italy SDI, Saudi ZATCA Phase 2, and other jurisdictions. These rules cannot be exported and loaded into Epicor Compliance Management; each destination jurisdiction requires separate re-implementation with new portal registration and digital certificate issuance. We catalog every active country mandate during discovery, document the Edicom compliance configuration, and itemize the re-implementation effort separately so customers understand that regulatory compliance does not transfer automatically with transaction data.

  • In-house EDI customizations require manual field-level inventory

    Companies with in-house developments on Edicom EDI have often added custom transformations, partner-specific validations, and ERP integration hooks not fully documented in Edicom standard tooling. These customizations may represent years of accumulated business logic with no external reference. We perform a manual inventory of all non-standard mappings during the scoping phase and flag any map without a clear Epicor equivalent as requiring re-engineering before cutover. The rebuild effort is itemized separately because Epicor's mapping tool or AtlasExchange requires the customer's EDI team to re-implement each map based on our written inventory.

  • Trading partner re-onboarding requires per-partner compliance testing

    Migrating EDI to Epicor ERP requires re-establishing communication with every Trading Partner, re-running compliance testing, re-submitting test documents, and waiting for partner-side acknowledgment. For companies with dozens or hundreds of active partners, this creates a parallel-run period that extends migration timelines. We coordinate phased cutover by partner tier (top-volume partners first), negotiate test windows with each partner before migrating the full transaction stream, and document the current Edicom compliance testing status as a reference for the re-testing phase in Epicor EDI.

  • Epicor EDI map structures differ from Edicom mapping format

    Edicom EDI and Epicor EDI use different internal formats for field-level mapping configurations. There is no automated conversion between them. Custom maps from Edicom must be manually rebuilt in Epicor Kinetic's mapping tool or AtlasExchange. We export the complete map inventory from Edicom (input fields, output positions, validation logic, partner-specific rules) as a written document, and the customer's EDI team rebuilds each map in Epicor. We do not rebuild EDI maps as part of standard migration scope; the map inventory document enables the customer's team to complete the rebuild accurately and efficiently.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Edicom EDI to Epicor Prophet 21 data migration

  1. Discovery and scope definition

    We audit Edicom EDI across transaction history volume and date range, active Trading Partner count and document types exchanged, EDI standards in use (X12, EDIFACT, UBL, ODETTE), ERP integration points (SAP, Oracle, Dynamics, NetSuite or other), country-specific e-invoicing mandates active in the Edicom platform, and any in-house custom EDI developments. We document every non-standard map, custom transformation, and ERP integration hook. This audit produces the migration scope document, a non-portable mandate itemization, and a custom map inventory requiring rebuild in Epicor Kinetic or AtlasExchange. We also confirm the Epicor edition (Kinetic Cloud, Prophet 21, or BisTrack) and the EDI layer choice (Epicor EDI native, AtlasExchange managed, or hybrid) during this phase.

  2. EDI map inventory and Epicor EDI configuration planning

    We inventory every non-standard EDI map from Edicom EDI at the field level, documenting input fields, EDI segment positions, transformation logic, and partner-specific rules. Each map is assessed for Epicor EDI or AtlasExchange equivalence. Maps with a native Epicor equivalent are marked for configuration migration; maps without a clear Epicor equivalent are flagged for rebuild and included in the written map inventory document delivered to the customer's EDI team. ERP integration configurations (field selection, transformation rules, triggering conditions) are documented for rebuild as Epicor Kinetic REST API integrations or Prophet 21 API integrations. Country compliance rules and e-invoicing mandates are cataloged for re-implementation planning.

  3. Transaction history extraction and Epicor staging migration

    We extract transaction history from Edicom EDI as structured export (XML/CSV) covering all active transaction types and the agreed historical date range. Each transaction record is validated for completeness (document number, date, Trading Partner ID, line items, amounts, status) before transformation. We map Edicom transaction fields to Epicor Kinetic or Prophet 21 order, invoice, and ASN record structures using the Epicor REST API or data import tools. VAN interchange control numbers, acknowledgment status, and functional acknowledgment records are preserved as reference fields. A reconciliation report comparing source record counts and totals against Epicor staged record counts is produced before final load.

  4. ERP integration re-implementation and connectivity validation

    We re-implement ERP integration logic from Edicom EDI as Epicor Kinetic REST API configurations or Prophet 21 API integration points. Inbound EDI-to-ERP flows (EDI 850 purchase orders from Trading Partners into Epicor Kinetic Sales Order records) and outbound ERP-to-EDI flows (Epicor Kinetic invoices into EDI 810 format for Trading Partner transmission) are configured in Epicor's integration framework. We validate that Epicor API credentials, endpoint URLs, and field mappings produce correct ERP records before connecting live Trading Partner traffic. Any custom ERP connector logic from Edicom is documented for rebuild in Epicor iParts or REST adapter.

  5. Sandbox validation and Trading Partner compliance testing coordination

    We run a full migration into Epicor Kinetic or Prophet 21 sandbox environment using production-like data volume. We validate record counts, data integrity, and mapping accuracy against the Edicom source. The customer's EDI team spot-checks 25-50 transaction records for field-level accuracy. Any mapping corrections are documented and applied before production migration. Simultaneously, we begin coordinating compliance testing with Trading Partners in Epicor EDI, establishing AS2, SFTP, VAN, or OFTP2 connections per partner and initiating test document exchange. Top-volume partners complete compliance testing first; lower-volume partners follow in subsequent waves.

  6. Production migration, Trading Partner cutover, and handoff

    We run the production migration in dependency order, then freeze Edicom EDI writes during cutover and migrate any records modified during the migration window. Trading Partner cutover proceeds by tier: top-volume partners migrate first with parallel-run validation (Edicom and Epicor EDI both active, outputs compared per partner), followed by full cutover once trading partners confirm accurate receipt and acknowledgment. We deliver the written map inventory and integration rule document to the customer's EDI team for rebuild in Epicor Kinetic or AtlasExchange. We support a one-week hypercare window for reconciliation issues. Post-migration admin, Workflow rebuild, and EDI map rebuild in Epicor are outside standard migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Edicom EDI logo

Edicom EDI

Source

Strengths

  • Global EDI platform with documented coverage of EDIFACT, ANSI X12, GS1 catalogues, SSCC/GS1-128 labels, and core retail documents (ORDERS, ORDRSP, DESADV/ASN, INVOIC).
  • Multi-protocol connectivity: AS2/AS4, SFTP, VAN, REST/GraphQL APIs, and B2B portals with monitoring and automatic retries.
  • EDICOMiPaaS adds modern iPaaS capabilities — orchestration, hybrid EDI+API flows, real-time visibility across purchasing/operations/finance.
  • Enterprise security posture: encryption, audit trails, SSO, OAuth2/OIDC, RBAC, and a published 99.9% SLA.
  • Global compliance coverage — handles country-specific e-invoicing and tax requirements (e.g., SAT in Mexico, NF-e in Brazil, Peppol in Europe) under one platform.

Weaknesses

  • No publicly published pricing — every contract requires a sales-driven discovery and negotiation cycle.
  • Implementation complexity and timeline make it poorly suited for small businesses or low-volume EDI users.
  • Limited public API documentation makes programmatic data extraction harder to scope before engagement.
  • In-house custom integrations create technical debt that makes switching EDI providers costly and time-consuming.
  • As a European-headquartered provider, US-focused companies may prefer EDI platforms with deeper North American retail network penetration.
Epicor Prophet 21 logo

Epicor Prophet 21

Destination

Strengths

  • Purpose-built for wholesale distribution with industry-specific replenishment, kitting, and counter-sale workflows out of the box.
  • Multi-warehouse management with bin locations, cross-docking, and real-time inventory visibility across all warehouse locations.
  • Automated replenishment engine with demand-based and min-max planning reduces stockouts and overstock carrying costs.
  • AI-infused reporting via Epicor Prism provides Gen AI-driven insights into ERP data without requiring a BI team.
  • Strong customer retention at 90% and a 50-year track record in the distribution vertical provides long-term vendor stability.

Weaknesses

  • High total cost of ownership — per-user pricing of $150-200/month plus $10K-$500K implementation creates significant budget commitment for small and mid-market distributors.
  • Customization via SDK requires technical expertise and introduces upgrade risk when custom code conflicts with new P21 releases.
  • Report generation performance is a known pain point — multiple users report system freezes during large or complex report exports.
  • Third-party bolt-on reliance for functionality that competitors include natively increases integration complexity and total solution cost.
  • Limited public API documentation — developers building custom integrations report difficulty finding P21 API authentication methods and endpoint specifications.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard ERP migration. 2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Edicom EDI and Epicor Prophet 21.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    2 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Edicom EDI: Not publicly documented — typical SaaS limits assumed and confirmed during scoping.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    A

    Edicom EDI exposes a bulk API — large-volume migrations stream efficiently.

Estimator

Estimate your Edicom EDI to Epicor Prophet 21 migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Edicom EDI to Epicor Prophet 21 data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Edicom EDI to Epicor Prophet 21 migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Edicom EDI to Epicor Prophet 21 migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Straightforward migrations with 50-200 Trading Partners, a single EDI standard (X12 or EDIFACT), and no multi-jurisdiction e-invoicing mandates land between 8 and 10 weeks. Complex migrations with hundreds of Trading Partners, automotive OFTP2 protocol requirements, multi-standard environments (X12 plus EDIFACT plus UBL), or multiple active country e-invoicing mandates (Brazil, France, Saudi Arabia) extend to 14-18 weeks because of the trading partner re-onboarding scope, VAN re-establishment per partner, and country-mandate re-implementation planning. Epicor Kinetic or Prophet 21 cloud provisioning timelines run in parallel and are managed as a separate Epicor deployment workstream.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Edicom EDI.
Land in Epicor Prophet 21, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day