Project Management migration
Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Conceptboard and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.
Conceptboard
Source
Jira
Destination
Compatibility
8 of 10
objects map 1:1 between Conceptboard and Jira.
Complexity
CModerate
Timeline
6-8 weeks
Overview
Moving from Conceptboard to Jira is a lossy structural conversion: Conceptboard stores visual collaboration as spatial canvas objects, while Jira stores structured work as typed issues with fields, assignees, and workflow transitions. Conceptboard has no public REST or GraphQL API, so all source data must be extracted through PDF and PNG board exports performed via the UI in guided sessions. We reconstruct boards in Jira as Projects (or Epics and Stories), extract text from PDFs to populate issue descriptions, map tasks to typed Jira Issues with assignees and due dates, and reattach exported files to their corresponding issues. Facilitator-mode settings, voting results, and structured meeting outlines have no Jira equivalent and are documented for manual rebuild. Board history and approval workflow state are not migratable as they are tier-gated audit artifacts rather than content data. Jira workflows, projects, boards, and dashboards similarly do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these configurations for the customer to rebuild in Jira.
Every standard and custom field arrives verified.
AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.
Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.
Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.
Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.
Why teams make this switch
Leaving
What's pushing teams away
Choosing
What's pulling them in
Object mapping
Each row shows how a Conceptboard object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.
Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.
Conceptboard
Project
Jira
Project
1:1Conceptboard Projects (containers for Boards) map 1:1 to Jira Projects. We create the Jira project during schema setup, selecting the appropriate project template (Scrum, Kanban, or Bug Tracking) based on the customer's delivery model. The Project name, description, and creation date migrate. Archived Conceptboard projects are noted separately and optionally imported as inactive Jira projects if the customer wants to preserve the historical workspace structure.
Conceptboard
Board
Jira
Epic or Project
1:1Individual Conceptboard Boards map to Jira Epics within the destination project, or to standalone Jira Projects if the board represents an independent delivery track. Board metadata (name, description, creation date, tags) migrates as Epic or Project fields. The spatial layout of sticky notes, shapes, and connectors is not representable as structured Jira issue data; we document the visual organisation as a written board map for the customer's admin to implement as Epic-Story-Task hierarchies in Jira.
Conceptboard
Section
Jira
Sprint or Labels
1:manyConceptboard Sections subdivide a board spatially and, as of January 2026, can contain items as child objects. Sections map to Jira Sprints if the customer uses Scrum mode and wants time-boxed delivery, or to Jira Labels (applied to issues) if the customer prefers Kanban with label-based grouping. We determine the mapping strategy during scoping and configure the Sprint or Label structure in Jira before migration. Section ordering is preserved as Sprint sequence or label application order.
Conceptboard
Task
Jira
Issue (Story, Task, Bug)
1:1Conceptboard Tasks (cards on a board with assignee, due date, status, and description) map directly to Jira Issues. Task name becomes the Issue Summary; task description text extracts from the board PDF and populates the Issue Description field; task assignee maps to Jira Assignee (resolved by email match to Jira User); task due date maps to Due Date; task status maps to the appropriate Jira status value within the configured workflow. Custom fields on Conceptboard tasks migrate to Jira custom fields of matching type if the Jira project schema includes them.
Conceptboard
Attachment
Jira
File Attachment
1:1Files uploaded to a Conceptboard Board via the Attachments dialog are downloaded individually and re-attached to the equivalent Jira Issue during migration. Filenames and original upload dates are preserved. We use Jira's REST API to POST each file to the corresponding issue's attachments endpoint. Attachments with null filenames in Conceptboard are flagged during discovery and resolved before migration begins, per Jira's Cloud Migration Assistant guidance on null-filename handling.
Conceptboard
Comment
Jira
Issue Comment
1:1Conceptboard comments on board elements are captured from the board-level PDF export and, where a comment is attributable to a specific task or section, migrate as Jira Issue Comments. Comment text is preserved; commenter identity maps to the Jira User by email match. Spatial comments (pinned to canvas coordinates rather than objects) are collected as a board-level comment thread on the corresponding Epic or Project in Jira, with their original position noted in the comment body.
Conceptboard
User (Licensed)
Jira
User
1:1Conceptboard licensed users (per-seat accounts) map to Jira Users by email address match. The Jira user must exist and be active before record import begins; we run owner reconciliation during the approach phase and flag any Conceptboard user without a Jira match for the customer's Jira admin to provision. Guest accounts (free, unregistered collaborators) are noted as non-billable contributors and do not receive Jira seats unless the customer requests it.
Conceptboard
Template
Jira
Project Template or Issue Type Scheme
lossyConceptboard personal and team-shared templates migrate as Jira Project Templates if the customer wants to reuse board structures in future Jira projects, or as archived reference boards noted in the migration inventory document. Team templates on Conceptboard Advanced+ migrate as documented template patterns for the customer's admin to implement as Jira project templates or Automation rules post-migration.
Conceptboard
Board Tag
Jira
Label
1:1Conceptboard Board Tags (introduced December 2025) used to categorise boards migrate as Jira Labels on the corresponding Jira Project or Epic. Labels are available on all Jira Software Cloud tiers and provide a lightweight classification mechanism that requires no schema configuration. Tag application is preserved at the board level; if tags were applied at the item level within a board, they are applied to the corresponding Jira Issue.
Conceptboard
Board History, Approval Workflows, Audit Logs
Jira
Not Migratable
1:1Board history (Advanced+), approval workflows (Corporate and Government tier), and audit logs (Corporate and Government tier) are tier-gated governance artifacts. Board history is an audit trail with no Jira equivalent; approval workflow state is a process variable that does not map to any Jira object; audit logs are administrative records outside user content. We document whether these features were in active use during scoping and flag their absence in the destination so the customer's admin can plan manual rebuilds or compensating controls in Jira.
| Conceptboard | Jira | Compatibility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project | Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board | Epic or Project1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Section | Sprint or Labels1:many | Fully supported | |
| Task | Issue (Story, Task, Bug)1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Attachment | File Attachment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Comment | Issue Comment1:1 | Fully supported | |
| User (Licensed) | User1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Template | Project Template or Issue Type Schemelossy | Fully supported | |
| Board Tag | Label1:1 | Fully supported | |
| Board History, Approval Workflows, Audit Logs | Not Migratable1:1 | Fully supported |
Gotchas + challenges
Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.
Conceptboard gotchas
No public API means migration relies entirely on PDF/PNG export
One-way import to Miro is PDF-only and non-editable
Starter plan limits active projects to 5, blocking full workspace migration
Board history and approval workflows are tier-gated and not migratable
Jira gotchas
Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration
Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms
Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin
Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption
Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026
Pair-specific challenges
Migration approach
Discovery and board inventory
We run a scoping session with the customer to enumerate all Conceptboard Projects, Boards, Sections, Tasks, and Attachments across the workspace. We identify the user's seat count (licensed vs. guest), the Conceptboard tier in use (Starter, Advanced, or Corporate & Government), and whether Board History, Approval Workflows, or Audit Logs were active. We assess attachment volume (file count and total size) and determine whether any boards used facilitator-mode features. The discovery output is a written scope document with board-by-board inventory, an estimated issue count, and a decision on how Sections map to Jira Sprints or Labels.
Jira project schema design
We configure the destination Jira project before any data moves. This includes selecting the project template (Scrum with Sprints, Kanban, or Bug Tracking), configuring the issue type scheme (Epic, Story, Task, Bug), designing any custom fields needed to capture Conceptboard task metadata, and designing the workflow with statuses that map to Conceptboard task states. If Sections are mapped to Sprints, we pre-create the sprints in Jira with approximate dates based on section creation timestamps. If Sections are mapped to Labels, we pre-create the label vocabulary. We also configure the issue security level scheme if Conceptboard's board-level visibility settings need to be preserved.
Guided board export sessions
Because Conceptboard has no API, we run guided export sessions with the customer's Conceptboard admin. We export each Board as PDF and, where individual Sections need isolated migration, as per-section PDF or PNG. Attachments are downloaded from each board's Attachments dialog. We extract text from the exported PDFs using document parsing to capture task names, descriptions, assignees, due dates, and comments. We process exports in batches of 5-10 boards per session to manage the manual overhead. Each batch produces a structured data extract that we use for Jira issue creation.
Data transformation and Jira issue creation
We transform the extracted Conceptboard data into Jira issue payloads. Task names become Issue Summary fields; task descriptions populate the Issue Description (parsed from PDF text); task assignees resolve to Jira User accounts by email match; task due dates map to Due Date fields; and task status maps to Jira workflow status values. Sections that are mapped to Sprints have their contained issues assigned to the corresponding Sprint during creation. We use Jira's Bulk API with batch sizes of 50 issues per request, implementing exponential backoff on rate limit responses (Jira Cloud enforces 0-1 requests per second on the REST API for most operations). Attachments are uploaded via the Jira attachments endpoint after issue creation, with parent-issue ID resolution.
Reconciliation and validation
We run a post-migration reconciliation comparing Conceptboard source counts (boards, tasks, attachments, comments) against Jira destination counts (issues created, attachments attached, comments posted). We spot-check 25-50 randomly sampled issues for data accuracy: correct assignee, correct due date, correct description content, and correct attachment linkage. Any discrepancies are corrected in Jira before sign-off. We also verify that user assignments for all licensed Conceptboard users were resolved to Jira Users, and that any boards with no migratable task data are documented in the unmapped-content inventory.
Handoff and migration inventory delivery
We deliver the migration inventory document to the customer's Jira admin. This document includes the full list of Conceptboard boards with their Jira equivalent (Project, Epic, or Issue), a note on visual organisation that could not be captured (for manual issue hierarchy implementation), facilitator-mode feature usage requiring manual rebuild, Board History and Approval Workflow flags for governance review, Jira Workflow and Board configuration items requiring admin rebuild, and a list of any Conceptboard content (attachments with null filenames, comments on boards with no attributable task) that could not be migrated. We do not rebuild Jira workflows, projects, boards, or dashboards as part of the migration scope; these are delivered as written configuration specifications for the customer's admin to implement.
Platform deep dives
Conceptboard
Source
Strengths
Weaknesses
Jira
Destination
Strengths
Weaknesses
Complexity grading
Moderate Project Management migration. 5 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Overall complexity
Moderate migration
Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Conceptboard and Jira.
Object compatibility
5 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.
Field mapping clarity
Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.
Timeline complexity
8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.
API constraints
Conceptboard: Not publicly documented.
Data volume sensitivity
Conceptboard doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.
Estimator
Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.
Step 1
Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.
Category
FAQ
Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Conceptboard to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.
Walk through your Conceptboard to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.
Book a free 30 minute consultationAdjacent paths
Other ways to leave Conceptboard
Other ways to arrive at Jira
Same-Project Management migrations
Ready when you are
Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.