Project Management migration

Migrate from Project.co to Jira

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between Project.co and Jira. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Jira.

Project.co logo

Project.co

Source

Jira

Destination

Jira logo

Compatibility

70%

7 of 10

objects map 1:1 between Project.co and Jira.

Complexity

BStandard

Timeline

3-5 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from Project.co to Jira is a structural migration from a client-facing service workspace to a developer-focused issue tracker. Project.co organizes work around flat client-visible projects with tasks, discussions, and time tracking; Jira uses a nested hierarchy of Projects, Issues, Epics, Stories, Tasks, and Subtasks with configurable workflows and issue types. Project.co has no documented public API, so we choreograph sequential in-app CSV exports for projects, tasks, discussions, notes, and time entries, download files individually, then map everything into Jira via CSV import or REST API. We flag the absence of hourly rates in Project.co time entries (no rate data exists to migrate), reconstruct Jira project keys and issue type schemes during scoping, and map Project.co per-project roles to Jira project permissions. Workflows, automation rules, and reporting configurations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory for the customer's admin to rebuild in Jira.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

Project.co logo

Project.co

What's pushing teams away

  • Integration ecosystem is narrow — no native two-way sync with CRMs, accounting software, or popular dev tools, forcing teams to maintain workarounds or duplicate data entry.
  • Reporting and analytics are basic at every tier. Teams needing dashboards, custom reports, or resource utilization views find Project.co insufficient for data-driven decisions.
  • Scalability becomes a constraint for growing agencies. As the number of concurrent projects and users increases, the flat project structure without nesting or programme-level grouping creates organizational friction.
  • Advanced project management features common in competitors — Gantt charts, resource management, automation rules, and dependency tracking — are absent or limited, pushing complex teams toward more capable tools.

Choosing

Jira logo

Jira

What's pulling them in

  • Industry-standard tool with deep Git integration and sprint reporting that engineering teams already know, reducing onboarding friction for new hires.
  • Highly customizable workflows and status schemes let business teams model complex approval chains without writing code.
  • Strong ecosystem of Atlassian Marketplace apps means specialized capabilities like time tracking or portfolio management are one install away.
  • Free tier with up to 10 users and unlimited issues gives small teams a no-cost entry point to validate the platform before committing budget.
  • Visibility features — boards, backlog grooming, sprint reports, and dashboards — give leadership a shared view of what is planned, in progress, blocked, and done.

Object mapping

How Project.co objects map to Jira

Each row shows how a Project.co object lands in Jira, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

Project.co

Project

maps to

Jira

Project

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co projects map to Jira Projects. We extract project name, description, status, created date, and custom field values via CSV export, then create the Jira Project with an auto-generated project key during scoping. Jira project keys must be uppercase alphanumeric (3-10 characters) and are unique per Jira instance; we resolve any naming conflicts by appending a numeric suffix. Project.co's client-visible flag maps to Jira project's Public/Private visibility setting.

Project.co

Task

maps to

Jira

Issue (Story/Task/Bug)

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co tasks map to Jira Issues. We map task title to Issue Summary, task description to Issue Description, task status to Jira Issue status (To Do/In Progress/Done or custom workflow statuses), task assignee to Jira Assignee (resolved by email), due date to Due Date, and priority to Jira Priority. Project.co does not have issue types; we configure a default issue type (Story) during Jira project setup, or create separate issue type schemes for Story/Task/Bug if the customer specifies a multi-type configuration.

Project.co

Task (subtask-level)

maps to

Jira

Subtask

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co subtasks are not a distinct object type; they are tasks with a parent task association. We detect parent-child task relationships from Project.co's task list, then create Jira Subtasks linked to their parent Story or Task via the Parent Link field. If Jira's Subtasks feature is not enabled on the destination project, we create flat tasks with a parent reference in a custom field.

Project.co

Discussion

maps to

Jira

Issue Comment

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co discussions are per-project threaded message feeds. We flatten each thread as a chronological list of comments with author, timestamp, and body text, then attach each comment to the corresponding Jira Issue as an Issue Comment in thread order. File attachments referenced in discussions migrate as Jira attachments to the parent issue. Mentions and @-references in discussion text are preserved as plain text because Jira mentions require user context at render time.

Project.co

File

maps to

Jira

Issue Attachment

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co files are stored in project-level folders. We download file binary content and re-upload to Jira as Issue Attachments on the corresponding issue using Jira's REST API. File metadata (uploader name, upload date) is preserved in a custom field if the customer requests an audit trail beyond Jira's native attachment history. We flag the total attachment volume during scoping because individual file downloads extend the export timeline significantly.

Project.co

Note

maps to

Jira

Issue Description or Jira Document (Confluence)

lossy
Fully supported

Project.co Notes are standalone rich-text documents attached to projects. We map each note's title and content to a Jira Issue's Description field if the note is short and issue-specific. For project-level documentation that does not attach to a single issue, we create Jira Document records (if Jira's native document feature is enabled) or flag the note for manual Confluence page creation post-migration. Formatting is simplified to Jira's Atlassian Document Format (ADF) because Project.co's rich-text schema may not map 1:1.

Project.co

Time Entry

maps to

Jira

Issue Worklog

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co time entries (task-level with duration, date, and billable flag) map to Jira Issue Worklogs. We preserve duration and date on every worklog entry. Project.co does not store hourly rates, so Jira worklogs inherit no billing rate; we flag this in the scoping report and advise the customer to configure billing rates in Jira if billable time tracking is required. The billable/non-billable flag from Project.co maps to a custom worklog field (billable__c) rather than a native Jira field because Jira does not have a built-in billable flag.

Project.co

Custom Field (Project-level)

maps to

Jira

Project Property or Custom Field

lossy
Fully supported

Project.co custom fields on projects map to Jira Project Properties (for project-level metadata) or Jira custom fields on the issue schema (for per-issue metadata). We extract custom field definitions (name, type, options) and their values per record. Custom field types including text, number, date, dropdown, and checkbox are mapped to equivalent Jira custom field types. Jira's custom field context (which project or issue type the field applies to) is configured during Jira project setup.

Project.co

Custom Field (Task-level)

maps to

Jira

Custom Field (Issue-level)

lossy
Fully supported

Project.co custom fields on tasks map to Jira custom fields on Issues. We extract task-level custom field values per task and import them as Jira custom field values on the corresponding issue. If a Project.co custom field uses a picklist with options, we create a Jira custom field of type Single Select or Multi Select and populate the options. Jira requires custom fields to be created and configured (with field context) before data import; we deploy field configuration via Jira REST API or CSV import configuration file.

Project.co

Client (external user)

maps to

Jira

Jira User Account

1:1
Fully supported

Project.co clients access projects via a client portal link without consuming a paid seat. We extract client email addresses and names and map them to Jira user accounts. Jira's permission model uses project roles (Viewers, Users, Administrators) rather than Project.co's per-project role assignments. We create Jira user accounts for clients and add them to the appropriate project role, but Jira guest access (external users without a full license) requires Jira Cloud with at least a Standard plan. We flag this during scoping because Enterprise-tier Jira Data Center may require different user provisioning.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

Project.co logo

Project.co gotchas

High

No documented public API constrains migration approach

High

Per-tier team member seat cap is a hard ceiling

Medium

Time tracking lacks hourly rate data

Medium

Custom domain and branding settings are not exportable

Jira logo

Jira gotchas

High

Unsupported workflow validators silently skipped during migration

High

Custom fields converted to flat text labels when migrating to non-Jira platforms

Medium

Historical status-change timestamps lost when exporting without a Marketplace plugin

Medium

Attachment import failures from oversized files and JQL reference corruption

Medium

Points-based API rate limits enforced on Jira Cloud apps from March 2026

Pair-specific challenges

  • No Project.co API means UI-based extraction with file-per-file download

    Project.co does not publish a public REST API for programmatic data extraction. All export must be performed through the in-app UI, typically via CSV downloads for list views and individual file downloads for attachments. We choreograph sequential UI exports for Projects, Tasks, Discussions, Notes, and Time Entries, and download file attachments one by one. We flag the total attachment volume during scoping because large file counts (over 500) extend the export timeline significantly. Jira's CSV importer then receives the extracted data, but the source-side extraction is the bottleneck that determines the migration schedule.

  • Jira CSV import requires issue type and workflow pre-configuration

    Jira's CSV importer requires the destination project, issue type scheme, workflow, and custom fields to exist before data import begins. Project.co has no issue type concept, so the migration team must design the Jira issue type scheme (Story, Task, Bug, Subtask) and configure the workflow statuses that CSV column values will map to. We handle this during scoping: we create the Jira project, configure the issue type scheme, define the workflow, and create custom fields before any CSV import runs. Skipping this step results in rejected rows with 'invalid issue type' or 'invalid status' errors.

  • Time entries lack hourly rates that billing workflows may require

    Project.co records time entries with duration, date, billable flag, and task association, but does not store an hourly rate per user or per project. Jira Worklogs record time spent without a native billing rate field. When migrating to Jira with billable time requirements, the hourly rate must be configured at the destination separately or entered manually per worklog. We preserve the duration, date, and billable flag from every Project.co time entry, but the rate gap is surfaced in the scoping report and is not silently dropped. Jira billing reports and Invoice generation require the Tempo app or an AppExchange billing tool if billable time tracking is a core requirement.

  • Jira issue key uniqueness and naming conflicts require resolution

    Jira issue keys (e.g., PROJ-123) are immutable once assigned and must be unique per Jira instance. If a customer already has a Jira instance with projects using the same key prefix as the migrating Project.co project names, we must resolve the conflict during scoping. Common approaches include prepending a prefix (ACME-PROJ-123), appending a numeric suffix, or using a completely different project key. We flag this during discovery and configure the Jira project with the resolved key before CSV import begins. Jira's CSV import tool can remap CSV columns to existing Jira fields but cannot rename a project key post-creation without a full Jira database operation.

  • Jira workflows and automation rules do not migrate from Project.co

    Project.co task statuses (To Do, In Progress, Done) map to Jira workflow statuses, but Project.co does not have a configurable workflow engine. Jira workflows (statuses, transitions, validators, post-functions) must be configured in the destination and are not migrated. We configure a default workflow (To Do > In Progress > Done) during project setup, but any custom transition logic, conditional fields, or automation rules require rebuild post-migration. We deliver a written workflow configuration checklist based on the customer's Project.co status model. Jira automation rules (available on all Jira plans) are also not migrated; we document the existing status model and trigger conditions for the customer's admin to rebuild in Jira Automation.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful Project.co to Jira data migration

  1. Discovery and Project.co UI export choreography

    We audit the source Project.co workspace via in-app CSV exports: Projects list, Tasks list (including subtask parent associations), Discussions (flattened to CSV per thread), Notes list, Time Entries list, and Files inventory (folder path and file names). We identify the total attachment count and flag any projects with over 50 files because large file volumes extend the export timeline. We confirm the Jira destination (Cloud or Data Center, edition, and plan tier) and verify that the Jira user performing the import has admin or project admin permissions. The discovery output is a written migration scope with record counts, file inventory, and Jira project configuration requirements.

  2. Jira project and schema configuration

    We create the Jira project with a unique project key, configure the issue type scheme (Story, Task, Bug, Subtask), and define the workflow statuses that correspond to Project.co's task status model. We create any custom fields required by Project.co's custom field schema and set field context so that custom fields appear on the correct issue types. If the customer uses Jira Data Center, we configure the project via Jira REST API or Jira CLI. If the customer uses Jira Cloud, we configure via the Jira project settings UI or REST API. Schema configuration is validated against a test import before production data loads begin.

  3. File download and attachment staging

    We download all Project.co file attachments from project-level folders, preserving the original folder path and filename. Files are staged locally or in a cloud storage bucket for re-upload to Jira. If the attachment count exceeds 500, we schedule staged batch downloads to avoid UI export timeouts. We document the total file size and count in the scoping report because Jira Cloud has attachment size limits (10MB per file on Standard, 250MB on Premium/Enterprise) that may require compression or alternative handling for large binaries.

  4. CSV transformation and issue import

    We transform the Project.co exported CSVs into Jira CSV import format, mapping Project.co columns (task title, description, status, assignee, due date, priority, custom field values) to Jira CSV fields. We create the Jira CSV import configuration file (CSV mapping to Jira fields and issue type). We run a test import into a Jira sandbox or the production project with a subset of records (typically 50-100 rows) to validate field mapping, status mapping, and issue type assignment. Test import results are reconciled against the source CSV before production import begins.

  5. Production import with user reconciliation

    We run the production Jira CSV import with all validated mapping. Jira CSV import runs in the foreground with a progress indicator for smaller datasets (under 10,000 issues); larger imports use Jira's bulk import with background processing. During import, we resolve Project.co user email addresses to Jira user accounts and flag any unmapped users (no Jira account exists) for the customer's admin to provision. After issue import completes, we upload file attachments to the corresponding Jira issues via Jira REST API, maintaining the original folder structure in the attachment comment or description field.

  6. Cutover, validation, and handoff

    We freeze Project.co write access during cutover, run a final delta export of any records created or modified during the migration window, and apply the delta to Jira. We deliver a reconciliation report comparing source record counts against Jira issue counts and spot-checking 25-50 random issues against the Project.co source data. We deliver the automation rebuild checklist for Jira workflows and automation rules, and the post-migration handoff checklist covering custom domain reconfiguration (if Confluence is also used), Jira dashboard setup, and user permission audit. We do not rebuild Project.co automations or reporting configurations in Jira as part of the migration scope.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

Project.co logo

Project.co

Source

Strengths

  • Per-seat pricing with unlimited client and freelancer access keeps external collaboration affordable across all tiers.
  • Time tracking, recurring tasks, and custom fields are included on every plan without feature gating.
  • Per-project role-based permissions provide fine-grained control over what clients, freelancers, and team members can see and do.
  • Unlimited projects, tasks, discussions, file folders, and notes on all plans remove arbitrary caps that frustrate growing teams.
  • 14-day free trial with full feature access and no credit card required lowers the barrier to evaluation.

Weaknesses

  • No documented public API — all data export relies on the in-app interface, making programmatic or bulk migration contingent on UI-based extraction.
  • Basic reporting and analytics across all tiers leaves data-driven teams without built-in dashboards or exportable performance metrics.
  • Limited third-party integrations. Native integrations are listed as 'coming soon' on the roadmap, creating uncertainty about the platform's expansion roadmap.
  • Per-tier user seat caps (3 / 10 / 30 / 100 team members) mean growing teams must upgrade or leave when they exceed the limit, rather than paying overages.
Jira logo

Jira

Destination

Strengths

  • Deeply customizable workflows and status schemes with no hard limits on workflow complexity or number of custom statuses.
  • Strong agile ceremony support: sprint planning, backlog grooming, velocity tracking, and burndown charts for Scrum teams.
  • Industry-standard developer tool with native Git integration linking commits, pull requests, and deployments to issues.
  • Large Atlassian Marketplace with thousands of plugins extending time tracking, portfolio management, and reporting capabilities.
  • Free tier available for up to 10 users with unlimited issues, enabling evaluation before committing to a paid plan.

Weaknesses

  • Excessive configurability creates a steep learning curve; cross-team consistency is hard to maintain without strict governance.
  • Performance degrades with large backlogs, complex custom fields, and heavily nested issue hierarchies.
  • Reporting requires additional configuration or paid plugins; out-of-the-box analytics are limited for business users.
  • Jira lacks native sprint management, requiring Jira Software for true agile team features.
  • Teams outside engineering resist adoption due to UI complexity, leaving the all-in-one promise unfulfilled for cross-functional organizations.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Standard Project Management migration. 3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

B

Overall complexity

Standard migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across Project.co and Jira.

  • Object compatibility

    B

    3 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    Project.co: Not applicable..

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    Project.co doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your Project.co to Jira migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Project.co to Jira data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during Project.co to Jira migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your Project.co to Jira migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between three and five weeks for accounts with fewer than 5,000 tasks, under 10 projects, and fewer than 500 file attachments. Migrations with high file attachment counts (over 500 files requiring individual download), complex custom field schemas, or Jira Data Center destinations move to six to ten weeks because the Project.co UI export must be choreographed manually and Jira Data Center imports use the REST API rather than the Cloud CSV importer. Jira Cloud has a faster import path for bulk issue creation, which shortens the timeline compared to Data Center.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from Project.co.
Land in Jira, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day