ERP migration

Migrate from EQUAL to Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Field-level mapping, validation, and rollback between EQUAL and Infor CloudSuite Corporate. We move data and schema; workflows are rebuilt natively in Infor CloudSuite Corporate.

EQUAL logo

EQUAL

Source

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Destination

Infor CloudSuite Corporate logo

Compatibility

40%

4 of 10

objects map 1:1 between EQUAL and Infor CloudSuite Corporate.

Complexity

CModerate

Timeline

8-12 weeks

Rollback included Accuracy guarantee Field-level validation

Overview

What this migration involves

Moving from EQUAL to Infor CloudSuite is a cross-category migration from a spreadsheet-native financial operations platform into a full multi-tenant cloud ERP suite. EQUAL organizes around Accounts, Cards, and Transactions with multi-currency ledger support and merchant-level metadata. Infor CloudSuite uses Customer and Vendor master records, AP/AR subledgers, and a General Ledger structured around cost centers, GL accounts, and fiscal periods. The central challenge is translating EQUAL's flat transaction ledger into Infor's hierarchical financial schema where AP and AR records must reference Customer and Vendor masters, and GL journal entries must carry the correct fiscal period and currency codes from the original ledger. We handle the account-to-master mapping, the multi-currency exchange-rate context, the card-asset classification, and the import sequence that satisfies Infor's prerequisite data dependencies. Workflows, automations, and any EQUAL-specific integrations do not migrate; we deliver a written inventory of these for the customer's Infor administrator to rebuild in Infor OS.

Field-level fidelity

Every standard and custom field arrives verified.

Schema-aware mapping

AI proposes the map; you confirm before any record moves.

Relationships preserved

Parent–child, lookups, and ownership stay linked.

Full activity history

Calls, emails, meetings — with original timestamps.

Attachments & notes

Documents, uploads, and inline notes move with the record.

Why teams make this switch

Two sides of the same decision

Leaving

EQUAL logo

EQUAL

What's pushing teams away

  • No free trial is offered, which makes self-serve evaluation impossible — buyers must commit to a paid engagement before testing core functionality.
  • Limited independent review footprint on Capterra and other public sites makes it difficult to validate the vendor's claims against real customer experience.
  • $3,000 one-time fee is a Basic-plan entry point; higher tiers and customizations are not publicly priced, complicating budgeting.
  • No public API documentation or developer portal was located in research, leaving integration and migration paths reliant on vendor-mediated support.
  • Regional vendor presence (Abu Dhabi / India focus) limits support coverage and ecosystem depth versus global ERPs like NetSuite, SAP Business One, or Odoo.

Choosing

Infor CloudSuite Corporate logo

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

What's pulling them in

  • Infor CloudSuite is industry-specific out of the box — manufacturing, distribution, healthcare, and food & beverage editions ship with preconfigured workflows that reduce the need for extensive customization and accelerate time to value for operations-heavy organizations.
  • The platform's deep integration with Excel for financial reporting is frequently cited as a key productivity feature, allowing finance teams to pull data directly and make changes without leaving familiar tooling.
  • AWS-hosted multi-tenant deployment eliminates data center management for IT teams, and Infor OS provides a unified integration layer (ION) that connects the CloudSuite to third-party applications without point-to-point middleware.
  • Organizations with multi-site or multi-country operations choose Infor for its multicurrency, multilanguage, and local regulatory compliance capabilities across 175+ countries, which simplifies consolidation for global CFOs.
  • The two-tier ERP strategy positioning lets corporate headquarters run CloudSuite while subsidiaries run lighter instances, which appeals to complex organizational structures that want standardization without full replacement.

Object mapping

How EQUAL objects map to Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Each row shows how a EQUAL object lands in Infor CloudSuite Corporate, including any object-level transformations, lookup resolution, or schema-design dependencies.

Typical mapping — final map is confirmed during the sample migration step.

EQUAL

Account

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Customer and Vendor

1:many
Fully supported

EQUAL Accounts represent both inbound and outbound monetary flows within a single record. We split each EQUAL Account into an Infor Customer master (for inbound/receivable flows) and/or a Vendor master (for outbound/payable flows) based on the transaction history attached to the Account. If an Account has only expense Transactions, it maps to Vendor. If it has only inbound Transactions, it maps to Customer. Accounts with both require both records. The original EQUAL Account ID is preserved in a custom reference field for audit and reconciliation.

EQUAL

Card

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Item (ItemMaster) or Asset

lossy
Fully supported

EQUAL virtual and physical Card records carry metadata such as card type, spending limits, and linked department codes. We map Cards to Infor ItemMaster records (if treated as a spend instrument) or Infor Asset records (if treated as a physical or virtual payment device requiring tracking). The mapping decision is made during scoping based on whether the customer uses Infor's inventory module for card tracking or maintains card spend visibility through the GL. Card assignment metadata migrates as custom fields on the chosen Infor object.

EQUAL

Transaction

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

AP Invoice / AR Invoice / GL Journal Entry

1:many
Fully supported

EQUAL Transactions carry direction (credit/debit), currency, merchant name, and expense category. We split Transactions into Infor AP Invoice records (outbound/payable), AR Invoice records (inbound/receivable), or GL Journal Entry lines depending on the Account type and transaction direction. Each transaction's original timestamp becomes the Infor document date and GL posting date. The merchant metadata and expense category tags are preserved as line-level custom fields or mapped to Infor cost center codes during schema design.

EQUAL

Currency Balance

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

GL Account (Multi-Currency Configuration)

lossy
Fully supported

EQUAL tracks multi-currency ledger balances per Account with per-transaction exchange rates. We configure Infor's multi-currency GL settings during schema design, mapping each EQUAL currency code to an Infor currency identifier. Historical exchange rates used in EQUAL Transactions are stored as Infor GL exchange rate records at the per-period level so that the trial balance reconciles at historical rates. Currency Balance aggregates are validated against the Infor GL trial balance after import.

EQUAL

Expense Category

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Cost Center / GL Account Code

lossy
Fully supported

EQUAL expense categories (tags applied at the Transaction level) do not have a 1:1 equivalent in Infor CloudSuite's financial schema. We map each EQUAL expense category to an Infor Cost Center code or a GL Account code during schema design, depending on whether the customer wants cost-center-level or account-level visibility in Infor reporting. Custom fields on the GL Journal Entry line carry the original EQUAL category name as a reference field.

EQUAL

Merchant Metadata

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Vendor Reference or Custom Field

1:1
Fully supported

EQUAL Transactions carry merchant name, merchant category code, and location metadata that Infor does not store natively on AP/AR records. We map merchant name to the Infor Vendor reference on AP records where the merchant functions as a Vendor, or store it as a custom text field on the AP Invoice or GL Journal Entry line. Merchant category code is preserved as a custom field for reconciliation against card spend reports.

EQUAL

GL Entries

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

GL Journal Entry

1:1
Fully supported

EQUAL's live ledger entries map directly to Infor GL Journal Entry records. We preserve the original EQUAL transaction ID, date, currency, amount, and description as Infor journal line fields, with the GL account mapped through the expense category configuration. Journal entries are posted in Infor's configured fiscal period sequence, and the trial balance is validated after each batch.

EQUAL

Custom Fields (Account/Card/Transaction)

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Custom Fields (Customer/Vendor/AP/AR/GL)

lossy
Fully supported

EQUAL supports custom fields on Account, Card, and Transaction records. We pre-create the destination custom fields in Infor CloudSuite during schema design, matching EQUAL field types to Infor field types (text, number, date, picklist). Custom fields with lookup relationships in EQUAL are resolved to the corresponding Infor master record ID before import. Any custom fields without a clear Infor equivalent are flagged for customer decision during scoping.

EQUAL

Attachment / Document

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

ContentDocument / Document Management

1:1
Fully supported

EQUAL supports document attachments on Transactions. We migrate attachments as Infor ContentDocument records linked via ContentDocumentLink to the corresponding AP Invoice, AR Invoice, or GL Journal Entry. Document filenames and any EQUAL-specific metadata are preserved in the Infor ContentVersion record. We migrate attachments after the parent financial records are created so that the parent record IDs are available for linking.

EQUAL

User / Owner

maps to

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Infor OS User

1:1
Fully supported

EQUAL user accounts referenced on Transactions (as approver, creator, or owner) map to Infor OS User records. We match by email address. Users without a matching Infor OS account go to a reconciliation queue for the customer's administrator to provision before production migration begins. User role and permission mapping from EQUAL to Infor OS security roles is out of migration scope and handled by the customer's Infor administrator.

Gotchas + challenges

What specifically takes care here

Platform-specific issues from each side, plus the pair-specific challenges that don't show up on either platform's page on its own.

EQUAL logo

EQUAL gotchas

High

No documented public API for self-service extraction

Medium

Regional tax and compliance baked into modules

Medium

One-time licensing model complicates cutover budgeting

Low

Limited independent review data complicates customer-side validation

Infor CloudSuite Corporate logo

Infor CloudSuite Corporate gotchas

High

Infor OS tier-based usage limits gate API and BaaS capabilities

Medium

Custom Fields use inconsistent naming across Infor editions

Medium

SQL migration utility requires source database access

Medium

Multi-site and multi-currency data require separate period closure sequencing

Low

REST API payload and timeout limits restrict bulk migration throughput

Pair-specific challenges

  • EQUAL transaction ledger requires GL prerequisite sequencing in Infor

    Infor CloudSuite enforces a dependency order for financial data: GL accounts and cost centers must exist before AP and AR records can reference them, and AP/AR records must be posted before they can be fully reconciled in the trial balance. EQUAL's flat transaction ledger has no inherent sequencing. We reconstruct the prerequisite order by first loading all EQUAL expense categories as Infor GL account codes and cost centers, then posting GL journal entries in fiscal-period order, then creating AP and AR records with GL account references. Skipping this sequencing results in validation failures and rejected records at import time.

  • Multi-currency historical rates require explicit migration or recomputation

    EQUAL stores a per-transaction exchange rate for multi-currency ledgers. Infor CloudSuite stores exchange rates at a point in time and applies them at posting. Migrating a multi-currency EQUAL ledger requires deciding whether to use the original EQUAL transaction-level rate (preserving accuracy but requiring per-line import of the rate) or recomputing at the Infor period rate (simpler but changing the historical value). We default to preserving the original EQUAL rate as a custom field on each GL line and configuring Infor to use that rate, with the customer's finance lead confirming the approach during scoping.

  • Infor CloudSuite does not allow direct database access in multi-tenant cloud

    Infor CloudSuite is a multi-tenant cloud ERP deployed on AWS with no direct SQL database access for customers or migration vendors. EQUAL's SQL-queryable database structure is a significant architectural difference. We use Infor's documented migration utilities, Infor OS APIs, and ION for data import. Any EQUAL-specific custom tables, stored procedures, or SQL-based automations do not have a direct Infor equivalent and must be reimplemented as Infor OS Mongoose extensions or rebuilt as integrations. Infor's migration utility requires the source database to use SQL Server 2008 or later and communicate with the Infor target database; we verify connectivity and driver availability during the planning phase.

  • Card metadata and virtual payment records lack a native Infor equivalent

    EQUAL's virtual and physical Card records carry card type, spending limit, linked department, and status metadata that Infor CloudSuite does not store natively outside of its WMS or Asset Management modules. Depending on which Infor modules the customer activates, Card records may require mapping to a custom Infor object, an Item record, or an Asset record. We design this mapping during schema scoping, but the customer's Infor administrator should validate whether the chosen representation supports their card spend reporting workflow in Infor OS.

  • Workflows, automations, and EQUAL API integrations do not migrate

    EQUAL's automated approval workflows, recurring transaction rules, and API-based integrations to banking or expense tools have no direct equivalent in Infor CloudSuite's ION and Ming.le workflow engine. We do not migrate these as code. We deliver a written inventory of every active EQUAL workflow, automation trigger, and external integration with its EQUAL configuration and recommended Infor OS equivalent. The customer's Infor administrator or an Infor implementation partner rebuilds these post-migration. Any EQUAL API endpoints used by third-party tools must be replaced with Infor ION connectors or Infor OS API calls, which may require a separate integration scope.

Migration approach

Six steps for a successful EQUAL to Infor CloudSuite Corporate data migration

  1. Discovery and financial scope assessment

    We audit the EQUAL source database across Accounts, Cards, Transactions, currency codes, custom fields, and attachment volume. We extract record counts, date ranges, currency pairs, and the distribution of transaction directions (inbound vs outbound) to determine how many Customer and Vendor masters the migration will produce. We pair this with an Infor CloudSuite module inventory to confirm which Infor modules are active (Financials, AP, AR, Asset Management) and which will be activated post-implementation, as this determines what data must migrate versus what can be built fresh in Infor. The discovery output is a written migration scope, a preliminary EQUAL-to-Infor object mapping, and a decision gate for multi-currency rate handling.

  2. Schema design and GL account configuration

    We design the Infor CloudSuite financial schema before any data import. This includes creating the Infor GL account structure from EQUAL expense categories, configuring multi-currency settings and exchange rate tables, defining Customer and Vendor master templates from EQUAL Account records, and establishing AP and AR posting groups. We configure the EQUAL-to-Infor GL account mapping and the multi-currency rate strategy (original EQUAL rate vs Infor period rate) in a schema design document reviewed by the customer's finance lead. Schema elements are validated in Infor's sandbox or development environment before production.

  3. GL prerequisite migration and trial balance foundation

    We load the GL foundation data first: GL account codes from EQUAL expense categories, cost centers, fiscal period structure, and currency codes. If EQUAL contains historical exchange rate records, these are loaded into Infor's exchange rate tables. We run a preliminary GL import and validate the trial balance report before proceeding to AP and AR. This step is critical because all subsequent financial records (AP, AR, journal entries) reference GL accounts; a missing or mis-mapped account at this stage causes rejection of dependent records later.

  4. Customer and Vendor master migration

    We migrate EQUAL Account records to Infor Customer and Vendor masters in the split determined during discovery. For accounts with both inbound and outbound history, we create both a Customer and a Vendor record and link them via a cross-reference to the original EQUAL Account ID. Card metadata is mapped to the chosen Infor object (ItemMaster or Asset) as configured in schema design. Custom fields on Account records are pre-created in Infor and populated during this phase.

  5. Transaction migration: AP, AR, and GL journal entries

    We migrate EQUAL Transactions in fiscal-period order, splitting each into the appropriate Infor financial record type (AP Invoice, AR Invoice, or GL Journal Entry line). We batch transactions by month to manage import volume and stay within Infor API rate limits. Each batch is validated against the Infor trial balance before the next batch begins. Expense category tags and merchant metadata are carried as custom fields on each line. After all transaction batches are loaded, we run a full trial balance reconciliation comparing EQUAL totals to Infor totals by currency and by GL account.

  6. Cutover, validation, and automation rebuild handoff

    We freeze new EQUAL entries during a defined cutover window, run a final delta migration of any transactions created since the bulk import, and then enable Infor CloudSuite as the system of record. We deliver the automation and integration inventory document to the customer's Infor administrator. We support a one-week hypercare window where we resolve any reconciliation discrepancies raised by the finance team. We do not rebuild EQUAL workflows as Infor OS workflows inside the migration scope; that is a separate engagement or an internal Infor administrator task.

Platform deep dives

Context on both ends of the pair

EQUAL logo

EQUAL

Source

Strengths

  • Single integrated suite spanning finance, property, inventory, HR, BI, and project modules.
  • Web, Android, and iOS deployment for multi-device access.
  • One-time licensing model for buyers preferring capex over subscription.
  • 24/7 multi-channel support plus training resources.
  • Targets freelancers through enterprises with a single platform.

Weaknesses

  • No public API or developer portal documented in research.
  • No free trial; paid engagement required to evaluate.
  • Limited independent review footprint.
  • Public pricing covers only the Basic tier ($3,000 one-time) with higher tiers undisclosed.
  • Regional vendor presence concentrated in MEA and India versus global ERP competitors.
Infor CloudSuite Corporate logo

Infor CloudSuite Corporate

Destination

Strengths

  • Industry-specific preconfiguration across manufacturing, distribution, healthcare, and food & beverage reduces post-implementation customization effort.
  • Deep Excel integration for financial reporting allows finance teams to export, manipulate, and push data back without leaving a familiar environment.
  • Multi-tenant AWS deployment with Infor OS provides a unified integration layer that simplifies connecting to third-party applications and legacy systems.
  • Strong multicurrency, multilanguage, and regulatory localization capabilities support organizations operating across 175+ countries from a single platform.
  • Modular architecture allows organizations to deploy core financials, supply chain, or manufacturing modules independently and expand over time.

Weaknesses

  • Opaque pricing model with no public per-user rates and deployments commonly ranging from $500K to $5M creates significant budget uncertainty for prospective buyers.
  • Implementation complexity and timeline (commonly 2+ years for large deployments) leads to extended periods of reduced productivity and elevated project risk.
  • Steep learning curve with hidden options and a lack of public setup guidance makes self-service onboarding difficult compared to competitors with richer documentation communities.
  • Manufacturing module functionality is perceived by some users as outdated relative to modern ERP platforms, with reported bug issues that require workarounds.
  • Tight coupling between modules and environment-specific configurations makes migration to non-Infor systems labor-intensive, increasing switching costs.

Complexity grading

How hard is this migration?

Moderate ERP migration. 8 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

C

Overall complexity

Moderate migration

Derived from compatibility, mapping clarity, API constraints, and data volume across EQUAL and Infor CloudSuite Corporate.

  • Object compatibility

    D

    8 of 8 objects need a mapping; the rest are 1:1.

  • Field mapping clarity

    C

    Field mapping is derived from defaults — final spec confirmed during the sample migration.

  • Timeline complexity

    B

    8-object category — typical timelines run 2–7 days end-to-end.

  • API constraints

    B

    EQUAL: Not publicly documented.

  • Data volume sensitivity

    B

    EQUAL doesn't expose a bulk API — REST + parallelization used for high-volume runs.

Estimator

Estimate your EQUAL to Infor CloudSuite Corporate migration cost

Rule-based pricing — no per-record fees, no manual quotes. Migrations over 2M records are scoped individually.

Step 1

What are you migrating?

Pick a category, then your source and destination platforms.

Category

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about EQUAL to Infor CloudSuite Corporate data migrations

Answers to the questions buyers ask most during EQUAL to Infor CloudSuite Corporate migration scoping. Not seeing yours? Book a call.

Can't find your answer?

Walk through your EQUAL to Infor CloudSuite Corporate migration with a real engineer — 30 minutes, free, written quote within 24 hours.

Book a free 30 minute consultation

Most migrations land between 8 and 12 weeks for straightforward financial data: clean Accounts, under 10,000 Transactions, single currency, and no complex card metadata. Multi-currency migrations with 3+ currency pairs, historical exchange-rate reconciliation requirements, large transaction volumes (over 100,000 rows), or extensive EQUAL custom fields extend to 14-20 weeks because of GL prerequisite sequencing, exchange-rate decision-making, and Infor trial balance validation. Infor CloudSuite implementation itself (module activation, user provisioning, report design) typically runs 9-18 months and is separate from the data migration scope.

Adjacent paths

Related migrations to explore

Ready when you are

Move from EQUAL.
Land in Infor CloudSuite Corporate, intact.

Tell us record counts and timeline. We'll come back with a written quote inside 1 business day — no commitment, no sales pitch.

Accuracy guarantee Rollback included Quote in 1 business day